BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 20 comments on the Jan 8, 2009, Chicago Tribune story titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#138829 Jan 24, 2013
This a totally staged anti-CCP holder dog and pony show by ABC (who would have guessed). If they wanted to do a more "real world-situation" experiment the the plant would have been able to chose his own seat (the intruder knew that after he shot the instructor, he would target the man, in the middle on the front row) and the intruder would not be an experienced cop but another student who would not have been told their was a CCP holder in the class.
You Libtards never understand the difference between Objective and Subjective scientific testing. And like a bunch of bobble-head dolls, you agree with ABC.


Proof that Concealed Carry permit holders live in a dream world, Part One

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#138830 Jan 24, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, why was the last time the Catholic Church killed a gay guy?
Oh, you do know Thomas Paine was active in the French revolution and he saw no problem with cutting the heads of those evil rich people. Nice guy Thomas was. And a flaming hypocrite.
From Wiki: He wrote the Rights of Man (1791), in part a defense of the French Revolution against its critics.

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually that was a Red Herring as I knew you, or Jacques, would NEVER answer the FIRST sentence!
So Poopo, can you answer my first sentence?
Oh, this is for everyone else, Thomas Paine wrote Rights of Man in 1791 and the Reign of Terror, as Poppo says, did not start until the FOLLOWING year.
Yes, he was arrested by the French, imprisoned in Paris, then released in 1794.. No, the French did not execute him!
Now, how about attempting to answer my FIRST sentence!
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
Mainly because civilization for the most part has outgrown the bronze aged god creation myths but the killer text yet remains as the absolute word of god for the true believers.
In the Old Testament the Mosaic Law specifies no less than thirty-six capital offenses calling for execution by stoning, burning, decapitation, or strangulation. Included in the list are idolatry, magic, blasphemy, violation of the sabbath, murder, adultery, bestiality, incest and “pederasty”(sex between two males) Guess the good lord didn’t mind so much the woman to woman thang. LOL
Thank you for finally addressing my first point and not my red herring. Most Christians believe that the Bible was inspired by God whereas the Gospels are the actual words of God. This is the exact opposite of a significant majority of Muslims who think the Koran is the word of God.
I believe in, Rendering unto Caesar what is Caesar's and unto God what is God's. In other words, if there is an American law against, let's say pedophilia, than that law should be enforced by man. And God's laws, I will leave to God! And I hope he will show me mercy for my sins.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#138831 Jan 24, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, the point went right by you. Do you not criticize Republicans on regular basis? Yes, you do. Hypocrite. Why don't you ask poopsicle about avoiding taxes? HaHaHa! I noticed you had no response for, "what business is it of yours?". I'll remind you....NONE! You're a brokedown, pennyless, coward of a man! Now really, why don't you find another country to bash? You're coming off as very hate-filled. Typical for a dumbascrap atheist!
What, the Republicans are the very essence of the USA and to criticize that party is to criticize the USA? You are daf. And come to think of it, and apart from a few exact and true comments I made about that party and its 7 or 8 sad sack candidates, YOU tell me where I criticized even the Republican party.
Also, get it through your profanity-laden thick skull that it is my right and business to involve myself in USA discussion, or discussion of any country. I explained many a time why I have every right to be here. Go back, look for it. But what irks you the most is not my intrusion into YOUR so-called affairs, it's rather my backing of Obama. THAT is the crux of the matter. You are so in denial, you won't even say he was elected. You went so far as to call a 100% American, wojar, a Pollack (LRS tm reg'd), telling him to go back to Poland. THAT's the kind of ignorant slug you are, ignorant and unwashed.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#138832 Jan 24, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
No, that's not criticizing the losers. Merely cheering that the best candidate won. I asked you what business of yours is it where the golfers moved or what they do with money. Now, you're free to ask Rogue anything you like, don't look to me to answer for him. North Africa is probably going to see U.S. strikes soon, in case you didn't know.
Ha ha, you really hate it when I mention Obama's victory. You are such a loser, you cannot even digest his brilliant win.

If Rogue thinks Woods and Mickelson are okay to avoid paying higher taxes, why is it not ok to criticize their strategy? It's not my business to do anything about it, and even if I were American, it would make no difference, I can certainly comment on it all I want and it's extremely ignorant of you to tell me that I can't on a public open forum and loaded, to boot, with Canadian advertising.

Based on your logic (logic???) what business do YOU have to mention North Africa? And more importantly, how relevant is its bombing to Woods and Mickelson and CA taxes? You got lost again, eh boy?

The bombng has alrerady started anyhow. Ever been to Mali? Ever been on the ground? Ever seen Mali? Ever spoken to a Malian. Know the history of Mali? Best you read up a bit before talking bombing

You haters have failed to mention that Mali has asked for international aid to repulse those fanatical Islamists, AlQaeda. You conveniently ignore tha fact that the Algerian army wiped out 30 of 35 AlQaeda hostage takers, executed, on the spot, those that weren't killed. Your ignorance knows no bounds.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#138833 Jan 24, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
I didn't tell you what photo I saw or where I saw, now did I? Nope. Why today she looked like she'd never been sick a day in her life! Four dead Americans and she asks, "what difference does it make what started it". Unacceptable. It matters because it's her dept. and people want to know just how inept her dept. was. They failed. Simple as that. Now, if you think a 70 year old Clinton with this garbage in her past (plus more) has got a chance in hell for 2016, then you need your head examined! What a joke your are j.o.!
Well, we'll just see, won't we? As to you, we are dealing with facts here, not 2016, rather 2012. Your boy, and remember ("can you hear us coming?")( who was coming again?) and your premature victory claims. How right were you? Tell me. Tell everyone.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#138834 Jan 24, 2013
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Howdy, birfoon.
Here's the latest update on being the losingest losers in the history of losing:
Constitution:198 :: Birthers:0
Please keep tolling your pretend clock for whatever reason you've dreamt up, and we'll keep on making fun of you.
Final Countdown.....tic toc, tic toc, tic toc!!
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#138835 Jan 24, 2013
Foxhole wrote:
you morons...Hillary just lied to you and when they got close she melted down right on cue:
Hillary is nuts...
EMOTIONAL ROLLERCOASTER...
Hillary Refers to 'ARGO' in Explaining Benghazi...
Shouts:'What Difference ... Does It Make?!'
Potent brew of righteous outrage...
Never saw requests for more security...
Blames Congress for lack of funding...
Rand Paul:'I would have relieved you of post'...
CONGRESSMAN:'Only Person In Jail Right Now Is Filmmaker...
shouting, yelling, talking about movies, referring to Argo as her defense....she is guilty as hell. So is obama.
...only an idiot would believe that bitch.
Foxhole? Ha ha.Probably never ever bdeen near one. As to birthers such as you, you have to revert to name-calling, it's all you have, "bitch" is something you know about and it does not signify that she is one of you.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#138836 Jan 24, 2013
Foxhole wrote:
...it matters because
1- their families need to know and deserve the truth
2- incomtence/lies and coverup is rampant in obama's admininistration, led by him in every way possible: from fake birth certificates (4 of them), to a forged Selective Service card that is a childish fake, to non-existent passports/college records/multiple fathers/ degrees/...you name it, obama is a complete fraud.
3- we assets on the ground calling for help and orders- and none came.
4- intel from our country and others had that thing nailed before it happened and as it happened and Clinton never even read it as she is REQUIRED to do, by her own admission today. And people died on her watch, due to her. obama ran to Hollywood for "The Five". More important to him than our ambassador getting slaughtered. Politics. Can't have a bothched up massacre on our hands, now can we.
"why does it matter"???? then she refers to the movie "Argo" as her defense???!! Sounds like she was the one would made up the movie story in the first place.
Any asshole in here that defends that lying slackard is a fool and is worse than she is.
More name-calling.

Name-calling = ignorance and frustration. Deal with it.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#138837 Jan 24, 2013
Foxhole wrote:
...topix mistakes are incredible today. Must be California or obama f-ing with it.
lol!
Right, blame your awkwardness on Obama, and why not? Next you'll blame him for the weather.

I blame myself for my typos and misspelling, not Obama or Romney.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#138838 Jan 24, 2013
George W Bush wrote:
Hey, does anyone remember all of the hearings and media coverage after my pathetic failure to secure all of these embassies?
Jan. 22, 2002 - American Consulate in Calcutta, India. Gunmen, 5 dead.
June 14, 2002 - American Consulate in Karachi, Pakistan. Car bomb, 12 dead.
Feb. 28, 2003 - American embassy in Islamabad, Pakistan. Gunmen, 2 dead.
June 30, 200 - American embassy in Tashkent, Uzbekistan. Suicide bomber, 2 dead.
Dec. 6, 2004 - American compound in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Gunmen, 9 dead.
March 2, 2006 - American consulate in Karachi, Pakistan. Car bomb, 2 dead.
Sept. 12, 2006 - American embassy in Damascus, Syria. Gunmen, 4 dead.
March 18, 2008 - American consulate in Istanbul, Turkey. Mortar attack, 2 dead.
Sept. 17, 2008 - American embassy in Sanaa, Yemen. Car bomb, 16 dead.
Remember that????????
Neither do I.
I lied, 54 died....
and without a single news story on any of them.
ACHIEVEMENT UNLOCKED 54G -
8 years of embassy attack cover-ups
Oh oh, duck, profanity and name-calling on the way. They hate facts.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#138839 Jan 24, 2013
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
Mainly because civilization for the most part has outgrown the bronze aged god creation myths but the killer text yet remains as the absolute word of god for the true believers.
In the Old Testament the Mosaic Law specifies no less than thirty-six capital offenses calling for execution by stoning, burning, decapitation, or strangulation. Included in the list are idolatry, magic, blasphemy, violation of the sabbath, murder, adultery, bestiality, incest and “pederasty”(sex between two males) Guess the good lord didn’t mind so much the woman to woman thang. LOL
So you're saying most people in the world no longer believe in their religion? That's a whole bunch of people who have recently lost their faith, no? Perhaps you should tell the Christians, Jews and Islamists of this late breaking news! You don't know what you're talking about. Big surprise!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#138840 Jan 24, 2013
What a brilliant move by the "Zero" to give Egypt a few of our F-16s! Nothing like helping out a friend in need, huh Zero? I'm sure your pals, the Muslim Brotherhood, are very grateful. Impeach this boneheaded fool.

“On Deck”

Since: Aug 08

French Polynesia

#138841 Jan 24, 2013
Jacques,
The one common thread in all those senseless attacks is Islam.
Islam is dragging the world down, I say.
It is Jihad. It is holy war sanctioned by the Koran.
Learn to Read

Chicago, IL

#138842 Jan 24, 2013
Only 1,457 days until Obama leaves office

Tic tic tic
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#138843 Jan 24, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Ha ha, you really hate it when I mention Obama's victory. You are such a loser, you cannot even digest his brilliant win.
If Rogue thinks Woods and Mickelson are okay to avoid paying higher taxes, why is it not ok to criticize their strategy? It's not my business to do anything about it, and even if I were American, it would make no difference, I can certainly comment on it all I want and it's extremely ignorant of you to tell me that I can't on a public open forum and loaded, to boot, with Canadian advertising.
Based on your logic (logic???) what business do YOU have to mention North Africa? And more importantly, how relevant is its bombing to Woods and Mickelson and CA taxes? You got lost again, eh boy?
The bombng has alrerady started anyhow. Ever been to Mali? Ever been on the ground? Ever seen Mali? Ever spoken to a Malian. Know the history of Mali? Best you read up a bit before talking bombing
You haters have failed to mention that Mali has asked for international aid to repulse those fanatical Islamists, AlQaeda. You conveniently ignore tha fact that the Algerian army wiped out 30 of 35 AlQaeda hostage takers, executed, on the spot, those that weren't killed. Your ignorance knows no bounds.
You're a fool. North Africa was in the news yesterday. And the only reason you've been mouthing off about the golfers is because they're rich! If they weren't you wouldn't mention them. And you accuse others of being hate-filled? What a joke. You're the most hateful person on this forum. I should study up on Mali? Why? If it's an AQ launching zone then I say wipe it out. Too bad for your brothers in arms! Tic Toc, Tic Toc, Tic Toc!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#138844 Jan 24, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
Only 1,457 days until Obama leaves office
Tic tic tic
That would be if he makes it that long! LMAO Tic Toc, Tic Toc, Tic Toc!
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#138845 Jan 24, 2013
Black Sexy Samba wrote:
<quoted text>
hey pops...you wanna ride on my butt?
Nothing more need be added
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#138846 Jan 24, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, why was the last time the Catholic Church killed a gay guy?
Oh, you do know Thomas Paine was active in the French revolution and he saw no problem with cutting the heads of those evil rich people. Nice guy Thomas was. And a flaming hypocrite.
From Wiki: He wrote the Rights of Man (1791), in part a defense of the French Revolution against its critics.
<quoted text>
Actually that was a Red Herring as I knew you, or Jacques, would NEVER answer the FIRST sentence!
So Poopo, can you answer my first sentence?
Oh, this is for everyone else, Thomas Paine wrote Rights of Man in 1791 and the Reign of Terror, as Poppo says, did not start until the FOLLOWING year.
Yes, he was arrested by the French, imprisoned in Paris, then released in 1794.. No, the French did not execute him!
Now, how about attempting to answer my FIRST sentence!
A red herring!!!! Do you not realise how everyone here, why, even your birther ilk, are laughing at you? You're a joke, and yes, funny, even. You proved you know zilch about Thomas Paine and the French AND Amereican revolution.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#138847 Jan 24, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, why was the last time the Catholic Church killed a gay guy?
Oh, you do know Thomas Paine was active in the French revolution and he saw no problem with cutting the heads of those evil rich YOUple. Nice guy Thomas was. And a flaming hypocrite.
From Wiki: He wrote the Rights of Man (1791), in part a defense of the French Revolution against its critics.
<quoted text>
Actually that was a Red Herring as I knew you, or Jacques, would NEVER answer the FIRST sentence!
So Poopo, can you answer my first sentence?
Oh, this is for everyone else, Thomas Paine wrote Rights of Man in 1791 and the Reign of Terror, as Poppo says, did not start until the FOLLOWING year.
Yes, he was arrested by the French, imprisoned in Paris, then released in 1794.. No, the French did not execute him!
Now, how about attempting to answer my FIRST sentence!
Why don't you try this on for size with reference to your first sentence, Rogue?

www.petertatchell.net/religion/vatican.htmw

which says :

When Will The Vatican Apologise To Gays?

It's time the Pope got down on his knees and apologised for the Catholic persecution of lesbians and gay men.

The Vatican last week offered a mealy-mouthed, half-baked apology to Jewish people for the role of "some" Catholics during the Nazi era. It pointedly refused to condemn the failure of leading clerics, including Pope Pius XII, to speak out against Nazism. Nor was there any acknowledgement that the Catholic Church backed the Jew-murdering regime in Croatia, or that after the war Church officials in Rome helped Nazi war criminals escape to South America. In short, the Vatican's so-called apology white-washed Catholic collusion with fascism.

If the Pope cannot give an unequivocal apology for Church anti-semitism, the likelihood of an apology for homophobia is less than zero. Unrepentant and heartless as ever, the Vatican shows not a shred of remorse for the Church's past and present persecution of lesbians and gay men.

In medieval times, "abominable sodomites" were burnt at the stake on the orders of Papal Inquisitors. As recently as the early nineteenth century, homosexuals were still being strung up on gallows all over Britain - with the blessing of the Catholic Church. This persecution isn't over yet. The Vatican is still crucifying queers.

The Catholic Catechism condemns homosexual acts as a "grave depravity", "intrinsically disordered" and "contrary to natural law".

In 1992, the Vatican officially rejected the concept of lesbian and gay "human rights", asserting that there is "no right" to homosexuality. It added that the civil liberties of homosexuals can be "legitimately limited". While condemning "unjust" discrimination, the Catholic leadership declared that some forms of anti-gay discrimination are "not unjust" and may even be "obligatory".

Denouncing homosexuality as an "aberrant deviation", four years ago the Pope condemned proposals by the European Parliament to remove discrimination as an "attack on the family". Simultaneously, the Catholic leader in England, Cardinal Basil Hume, refused to support an equal age of consent, later justifying his stance with the claim that the Church cannot endorse human rights for "acts which she teaches are morally wrong".

In 1996, the Vatican newspaper, L'Osservatore, explicitly urged Catholics to vote against political candidates who back equal rights for lesbians and gay men, describing homosexual equality as a "deviant trend".

When will we get an Papal apology for Catholic homophobia? Probably never. If the Vatican won't say sorry, perhaps Cardinal Hume will? Over to you Basil.

Metropolis, 26 March 1998.

© Copyright Peter Tatchell, 1998. All rights reserved.



LRS

Shreveport, LA

#138848 Jan 24, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
A red herring!!!! Do you not realise how everyone here, why, even your birther ilk, are laughing at you? You're a joke, and yes, funny, even. You proved you know zilch about Thomas Paine and the French AND Amereican revolution.
Personally, I laugh at you and the other skinflaps. Just sayin'

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min Realtime 1,220,249
anybody know Glen Musielak? Glentech? (Mar '13) 35 min Cracker Jack 87
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 44 min TRD 69,700
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 59 min Progressive Democrat 52,858
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 1 hr Michael Satterfield 99,362
Ask Amy 4-25-15 2 hr mrs gladys kravitz 3
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 6 hr Analog man 5,907
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]