BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 240347 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

LRS

Shreveport, LA

#138707 Jan 23, 2013
Grand Birther wrote:
Civil War deniers are way below racists, birfoons, and truthers.
They are a category of loser heretofore unseen.
Rogue Moron is their leader.
No war is civil, brainchild.
Truman

Boise, ID

#138708 Jan 23, 2013
Grand Birther wrote:
Civil War deniers are way below racists, birfoons, and truthers.
They are a category of loser heretofore unseen.
Rogue Moron is their leader.
Right it CERTAINLY wasnt about keepping the economic exploitation and essential genocide of a race of Human Beings...in the Neo Facist Neo Con alternate dimension it was a gallant crusade for 'State Rights'.
A pathetic lie but as youve seen on this thread the bounds of reality are totaly arbritary for these fools as is the right to re-write history then relate to it as established fact.
These folks are missing some fundamental pieces.
They call them selves 'patriots' but there just the garde variety racists and mysoginists and belligerant slobs and selfish evil nihlists America has always had to endure and overcome to progress and thrive.
Truman

Boise, ID

#138709 Jan 23, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Look up the definition of "civil war". The War between then Roses was a civil war. The war between the Red and White Russians was a civil war too. In both of these wars, two sides were warring to control the SAME land.
In the War Between the States, The Confederate States were flight for their independence from the union and we would not let them.
the same during our Revolutionary War which also was not a civil war but a war of independence and should have been called that.
Civil War: A civil war is a war between organized groups within the same nation state or republic.
<quoted text>
Don't get it, do you? I will try an explain so pay attention, please. In a civil war, two groups of people are fighting over the same territory. During our War of Independence/Revolutionary War, two groups, the Patriots and the British WERE fighting over the same territory whereas, in our so call Civil War, we were not. The Confederates States of America wanted no part of the Northern States!!!
Now, our Civil War of 1775-1783 we call it a War of Independence because that is what we wanted from Britain. And we also call it the Revolutionary War as we revolted. But in basic terms, it was a civil war as both sides were fighting over control of the same territory.
Two Groups of people fighting over the same teritory is a 'civil war'?
That would make every war ever fought a civil war.
Its ONE group with factions within that group in conflict with one another.
I dont know why your trying to pull everyones chain with that definition I know you know better.
Jacques Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#138710 Jan 23, 2013
LRS wrote:
Just like we were warned. At least those of us who had our ears open!
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2013/01/23/does-...
Saw a picture of Clinton this morning and it almost scared me to death. She looks awful. Last broom ride, perhaps?
The woman is not well. Why is it, as a last resort, and out of ammunition, you birthers attack physical characteristics of people you don't like? "Last broom ride?" If that was not physically pejorative, can you explain that one? Yesterday, it was one of your ilk commenting on Mrs Obama's physical appearancce. Common utlra-right birther tea party tactic.
Jacques Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#138711 Jan 23, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
And you remain on the outside looking in! HaHaHa!
Yes, and tearing the pieces out of birther birfoons like you. I don't enjoy it as much as you believe, as there is no challenge, so easy and yet I feel so let-down having to read your lame ripostes, even going deep again and having Hillary Clinton on a broom.
Jacques Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#138712 Jan 23, 2013
LRS wrote:
Just like we were warned. At least those of us who had our ears open!
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2013/01/23/does-...
Saw a picture of Clinton this morning and it almost scared me to death. She looks awful. Last broom ride, perhaps?
And what BS this FoxNews.com garbage. And of course you believe it. No, rather, you WANT to believe it, it conforms to your hate for your president, your government and ,finally, your country.

You are so petty, so small, so revenge-driven, so envious, you're ready for your country to go belly-up just to get even with that BLACK man having the nerve to live in that WHITE House.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#138713 Jan 23, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
The woman is not well. Why is it, as a last resort, and out of ammunition, you birthers attack physical characteristics of people you don't like? "Last broom ride?" If that was not physically pejorative, can you explain that one? Yesterday, it was one of your ilk commenting on Mrs Obama's physical appearancce. Common utlra-right birther tea party tactic.
I said I saw a picture of her and she looked like crap, so what? She did.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#138714 Jan 23, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, and tearing the pieces out of birther birfoons like you. I don't enjoy it as much as you believe, as there is no challenge, so easy and yet I feel so let-down having to read your lame ripostes, even going deep again and having Hillary Clinton on a broom.
Sure you enjoy it! Otherwise, you wouldn't be here. You live for this kind of stuff. What challenge do you keep talking about? You know, you can skip my posts, right? Surely, you're mature enough to understand a little metaphor, no? You're a real goofball, man.

URGENT, URGENT: THEY WALK AMONG US!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#138715 Jan 23, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
The woman is not well. Why is it, as a last resort, and out of ammunition, you birthers attack physical characteristics of people you don't like? "Last broom ride?" If that was not physically pejorative, can you explain that one? Yesterday, it was one of your ilk commenting on Mrs Obama's physical appearancce. Common utlra-right birther tea party tactic.
And you are right, the woman is not well!
Proud RIGHT Winger

Falls Church, VA

#138716 Jan 23, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
But, who will kill the vile homosexuals? Did God not give an order? If YOU don't do it, will you have disobeyed him? Oh, same applies to adulterers.
Don't forget, I did not add, did not comment. Just quoted the Old Testament word for word. Is that bad of me?
I am not the judge of people. I do not hate people because they are homo, nor will do I do anythigng to them if I see them together. I do not know who makes it to Heaven or not. All I do know is that God said hemosex is wrong and he is againist it. What God does with those lost souls is up to him, and him alone. My job as a Christian is to pray for people. God is a forgiving God, and if you go to him, and ask for forgiveness, know in your heart you done wrong,he will forgive you. You have to mean what you say tho. God knew you before you were born. he knows your heart. God knows if you are a good person or a bad one. You can lie to some people and get away with it, but you can not lie to God. God can see all and knows all.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#138717 Jan 23, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
And what BS this FoxNews.com garbage. And of course you believe it. No, rather, you WANT to believe it, it conforms to your hate for your president, your government and ,finally, your country.
You are so petty, so small, so revenge-driven, so envious, you're ready for your country to go belly-up just to get even with that BLACK man having the nerve to live in that WHITE House.
This has been in the works for some time now. Many sources have reported on it. Try and keep up or at least be honest. HaHaHa
Learn to Read

United States

#138718 Jan 23, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>This has been in the works for some time now. Many sources have reported on it. Try and keep up or at least be honest. HaHaHa
Yes this fable has been circulating for quite some time now.
Jacques Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#138719 Jan 23, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
I said I saw a picture of her and she looked like crap, so what? She did.
It's all you've got left. Hate. You'll stop (stoop) at nothing to denigrate people who have succeeded and envy.
Jacques Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#138720 Jan 23, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure you enjoy it! Otherwise, you wouldn't be here. You live for this kind of stuff. What challenge do you keep talking about? You know, you can skip my posts, right? Surely, you're mature enough to understand a little metaphor, no? You're a real goofball, man.
URGENT, URGENT: THEY WALK AMONG US!
You're right. I agree. I do enjoy embarrassing the weak and feeble-minded birthers. And as long as YOU're here, I guess I'll be sticking around for my daily doze of fun LRS/birther put-downs. But, as a favour, do try to make it a bit more challenging by rising above the Honey boo boo level, extreme fighting and WEE.
Jacques Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#138721 Jan 23, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
This has been in the works for some time now. Many sources have reported on it. Try and keep up or at least be honest. HaHaHa
Yes, this has been in the birther, right-wing nut works, fanned by adored FoxNews.com (how they ate crow Monday, ha ha), WND.com and Pravda.com . Thanks to your hate so skillfully manipulated by the likes of the aforementioned propaganda organs, you actually BELIEVE that the U.N, that organ which your ilk constantly accuse of doing nothing and having no influence, will dictate U.S. internal policy! WOW, you<re easy. Yes, you are so easy to manipulate. Just mention guns and liberals and you're off to the races.
Jacques Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#138722 Jan 23, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
This has been in the works for some time now. Many sources have reported on it. Try and keep up or at least be honest. HaHaHa
Do you actually label WND.com , foxnews.com and Pravda.com "many sources^"
Frank

Spokane, WA

#138723 Jan 23, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
The woman is not well. Why is it, as a last resort, and out of ammunition, you birthers attack physical characteristics of people you don't like? "Last broom ride?" If that was not physically pejorative, can you explain that one? Yesterday, it was one of your ilk commenting on Mrs Obama's physical appearancce. Common utlra-right birther tea party tactic.
I thought Hillary looked much better with the added weight. I thought that Mrs President looked hilarious with the all the makeup and the bobbed hair style.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#138724 Jan 23, 2013
Grand Birther wrote:
Civil War deniers are way below racists, birfoons, and truthers.
They are a category of loser heretofore unseen.
Rogue Moron is their leader.
Know, I believe we had our civil war with Brits from 1776 to 1783 and the War Between the States between 1861 and 1865. Unfortunately history books are written by .... Libtards.
Frank

Spokane, WA

#138726 Jan 23, 2013
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
It becomes racism when you perpetrate fraud to advance a pointless notion, especially when white women for the most part don’t face the same hardships as their black counterparts.
In the 38 reporting areas for which race was provided, classified according to the same categories used in previous years, approximately 53% of women who obtained legal induced abortions were white; 35%, black; and 8%, other; race was not known for 4% The abortion ratio for black women (472 per 1,000 live births) was 2.9 times the ratio for white women (161 per 1,000), and the ratio for women of the nonhomogeneous "other" race category (330 per 1,000) was 2.0 times the ratio for white women.
Rogue sees
472 and 1,000, and so it must mean 47.2%, which is "almost half"! Except... it's a RATIO, not a percentage. Those "1,000 live births" are just that; babies that are actually born, i.e., not aborted. If you want the percentage, its 472 /(472 + 1000)= 32%.(FYI, the percentage for whites is 13.9%.)
So if Rogue’s statement is not a fact then what is it?
Regardless of the circumstances involved in the pregnancy, the bottom line is that any child born is less likely to see prosperity due to radical Obama policies. Obama is ruining our country,there millions upon millions of more people unemployed now than in 2006 when Obama started pushing his agenda on a national level. What do we have to look forward to over the next four years?
Learn to Read

United States

#138727 Jan 23, 2013
Another epic Birfoon fail. Linda Jordan smacked down to the tune if nearly $13,000 for appealing her frivolous Social Security blather after being warned it was nonsense and frivolous.

Poor Birfoons - that combination if the Constitution, rule of law, and facts just keeps pummeling you

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 8 min UIDIOTRACEMAKEWOR... 1,522,440
Looking for information of a Marvin Leslie Addis 59 min Needing info 1
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 4 hr They cannot kill ... 10,585
Hello Chicago 11 hr JDogs The Name 1
News Ultra Foods in Crestwood offers array of prepar... (Jun '12) 12 hr Bryce 31
Scary Obituary 13 hr Diiiiiiiiiiiiiiii... 12
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 13 hr Rose of Tralee 105,132

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages