BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#138126 Jan 20, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Yes Jacques, his approval rating started as soon as he started to attack our Second Amendment!!! Now is approval rating is 3-points lower than Bush's was just prior to his second inauguration!!!
Backfire: Obama Approval Plummets During Gun Push
Posted on January 19, 2013 by Cowboy Byte
Just a week before the New Year, Obama enjoyed his highest approval ratings of 2012. According to Gallup, 58% of Americans approved of the job Obama was doing. Survey results released today by Gallup, though, show Obama’s approval rating has plummeted to just 49%.
Read more: http://cowboybyte.com/17822/backfire-obama-ap...
Who cares? He's a lame-duck president and besides, he has 4 years and 1 day to improve his ratings.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#138124 Jan 20, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Jacques will never admit he was wrong about the inauguration starting at 10:00 a.m.!
Re-read. I wrote the inauguration started at 10AM. I didn't write the swearing-in. As a matter of fact, it starts at 9AM. See CNN and no, not that socialist network, see Fox.com as its commentators swallow fistfuls of crow when chief justice Roberts intones "CONGRATULATIONS,MR PRESIDENT" as you dance in the streets in a fit of uncontrolabe joy, haha
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#138127 Jan 20, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Rogue, Rogue, why the numerous monikers? Do they come in themes, categories? One for mild language, one for semi-mild language, one for outrageous language, one that is pro-birther, one that is not birther, one that is racist, one that is NAACP-like?, one that is not barred, etc?
Funny, I thought the inauguration was tomorrow. But hey...
Incidentally, if you are following LRS's lead on this, he did correct me as I had written the inauguration starts at 10AM, knowing full well the swearing-in and those cherished word you so yearn to hear "Congratulations, MR PRESIDENT" will occur at noon +. Well, I was wrong, as tv coverage starts at 9AM, not 10AM
We'll see Obama and family, to start the day, dutifully attending church, and the rest of the preparations, including a visit to the White House by the new first lady, as is customary, Mrs Romney , to get a look at the place, be introduced to the household staff (hmmm, she'll murmur, did you see all the blackies in here?) and then...oh wait, her husband didn't win , did he? Who were these people we could "hear comming", what was all that dancing in the streets by this Jacksonville birther?. Oh oh, what? Obama was elected? OMG. I went to sleep like Van Winkle night of November 6,so sure after reading Tea party and birhter celebratory messages, that Romney was a ahoo-in. God bless America, they ain't so dumb after all.
For LRS : This is NOT a repetitious message and I shall not post it again.
You're right, it's not repetitive. Just BS. I didn't correct you on the time either.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#138128 Jan 20, 2013
Here is an example of Libtaridan Logic. When Obama became president four years ago the unemployment rate was ...... 7.8% and the current unemployment rate is also ..... 7.8%. To a Libtard, that means the same number of people are employed but that is not what the unemployed rate says. That rate is the percentage of people still looking for a job.
Now there is a better indicator and that is the Labor Participation Rate which was 65.7% four years ago but has dropped to 63.6% and that mean 6.5 Million MORE Americans are unemployed than when Obama entered the White House and that is BAD.
Yep, the real unemployment rate is not the U-3 Unemployed rate but the U-6 Unemployment Rate which is .... 14.4% or 23 MILLION AMERICAN OUT OF WORK!!! Shame on Obama!!!!
http://portalseven.com/employment/unemploymen...

“ad maiora nati sumus ”

Since: Sep 09

Justice Scalia is an Oxymoron

#138129 Jan 20, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
But you Democrats have re-enslaved the blacks. You put them in ghettos!
Prior to the mid-1960's most blacks were Republicans.
Wrong again.

FDR received 71% of the black votes in 1932. Truman in 1948 received 77% of the black votes.
The highest percent of black votes that a Republican President received prior to the mid 1960s was in 1956 when President Eisenhower got 39% of the black vote.

As you were wrong about the U.S. cutting off of funds for South Vietnam in 1974 and allegedly that FDR prolonged the Great Depression you are again wrong about the black votes prior to mid 1960s.

Do you understand why people on this forum can't take you seriously?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#138130 Jan 20, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Jacques will never admit he was wrong about the inauguration starting at 10:00 a.m.!
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Re-read. I wrote the inauguration started at 10AM. I didn't write the swearing-in. As a matter of fact, it starts at 9AM. See CNN and no, not that socialist network, see Fox.com as its commentators swallow fistfuls of crow when chief justice Roberts intones "CONGRATULATIONS,MR PRESIDENT" as you dance in the streets in a fit of uncontrolabe joy, haha
Okay, so just what was happening at 10:00 a.m.? Oh, I know, Obama was getting dressed for the inauguration!!! Oh, the inauguration started at about 11:55 a.m. and than was when Chief Justice Roberts asked him to repeat after me and ended a minute later when he said congratulation.
Ya know, when a couple gets into bed, it is call foreplay. Now, if you do not understand the difference between when foreplay starts and when coitus starts, you have a big problem.
Tell me, what woman has ever gotten pregnant during foreplay?
See, Jacques will never admit it as he will never understand the difference between here and there.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#138132 Jan 20, 2013
Your Brain on Drugs: Marijuana

“ad maiora nati sumus ”

Since: Sep 09

Justice Scalia is an Oxymoron

#138133 Jan 20, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Here is an example of Libtaridan Logic. When Obama became president four years ago the unemployment rate was ...... 7.8% and the current unemployment rate is also ..... 7.8%. To a Libtard, that means the same number of people are employed but that is not what the unemployed rate says. That rate is the percentage of people still looking for a job.
Now there is a better indicator and that is the Labor Participation Rate which was 65.7% four years ago but has dropped to 63.6% and that mean 6.5 Million MORE Americans are unemployed than when Obama entered the White House and that is BAD.
Yep, the real unemployment rate is not the U-3 Unemployed rate but the U-6 Unemployment Rate which is .... 14.4% or 23 MILLION AMERICAN OUT OF WORK!!! Shame on Obama!!!!
http://portalseven.com/employment/unemploymen...
Here is an example of Rogue Scholar's logic:
Unemployment rate for January 2009: 7.8%
Unemployment rate for January 2013: 7.8%

His conclusion: More Americans are unemployed now (January 2013) then in January 2009.

Why he is wrong:
U.S. Population for January 2009: 305 million
U.S. Population for January 2013: 315 million

The U.S. added 10 MILLION people to the population. As such, even though the U.S. has increased in population by 10 MIILLION the rate of unemployment hasn't increased proportionally to reflect the increase of the population by 3.27%

In conclusion, the rate of unemployment has in fact DECLINED despite the increase of 3.27% of the U.S. population in four years.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#138134 Jan 20, 2013
Atticus Tiberius Finch wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong again.
FDR received 71% of the black votes in 1932. Truman in 1948 received 77% of the black votes.
The highest percent of black votes that a Republican President received prior to the mid 1960s was in 1956 when President Eisenhower got 39% of the black vote.
As you were wrong about the U.S. cutting off of funds for South Vietnam in 1974 and allegedly that FDR prolonged the Great Depression you are again wrong about the black votes prior to mid 1960s.
Do you understand why people on this forum can't take you seriously?
Point #1 Cutting from $2.8B for FY1993 to$700M to $300M for Fy1994, well obvious you have no idea how much war costs. And that answer is 500,000 South Vietnamese MURDERED. Thank you Democrats
Congress places a $1 billion ceiling on military aid to South Vietnam for fiscal year 1974. This figure was trimmed further to $700 million by August 11. Military aid to South Vietnam in fiscal year 1973 was $2.8 billion; in 1975 it would be cut to $300 million. Once aid was cut, it took the North Vietnamese only 55 days to defeat the South Vietnamese forces when they launched their final offensive in 1975.
http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/co...
Point #2, the Great Depression ended in 1946 when we entered a Recession (but not a Depression),
What was the GDP for 1929, 1930,...... 1941? Not the GDP GROWTH RATE as you like to point out but the actual GDP.
How about $103.6B for 1929, with a low of $56.5B in 1933 to $101.4B for 1940 and $126.7B for 1941.
During WWII GDP was forced and it was not until 1946 when we stopped forcing the economy that we did not go back into a Depression.
Oh, FDR boosted government spending 20% over 1932 and had doubled to $15B in 1940 but zoomed to $105B in 1944 and then tapering to $40B in 1946.
Point #3, the question was not what percentage of blacks voted for whom but for which party they identified themselves with.
In 1936 on 44% of Blacks Identified themselves with the Democrat Party and by 1948 it had gone over 50%(probably because Truman had
desegregated the military) and it jumped to over 70% when LBJ endorsed the Civil Rights Act when Goldwater did not. But what has keep the black aligned with the Democrats is ..... Welfare!!!!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#138135 Jan 20, 2013
Barry Goldwaters objection to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was that he thought that Federal government had no right to tell businesses who they should serve for any reason.
Please note that many businesses, primarily in the South, discriminated against Jews well into the 1980's.
Yep, FDR sent thousands of Jews to NAZI gas chambers because he hated Jews!
MS St. Louis
Main article: MS St. Louis
The SS St. Louis sailed from Germany in May 1939 carrying 936 (mainly German) Jewish refugees. On 4 June 1939, it was also refused permission to unload on orders of President Roosevelt as the ship waited in the Caribbean Sea between Florida and Cuba.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#138136 Jan 20, 2013
Hotel Shangri-LA Discriminated Against Jews, Jury Finds
The Huffington Post | By Kathleen Miles
Posted: 08/16/2012

A jury determined Wednesday that the owner of the Hotel Shangri-La in Santa Monica discriminated against Jews during a charity event in July 2010. The owner reportedly yelled "Get the [expletive] Jews out of my pool!" and forced the party to pack up and leave.

The owner, Tehmina Adaya, a Muslim of Pakistani descent, denied charges that she made anti-semitic statements and discriminated against the Jewish group.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#138137 Jan 20, 2013
Admittedly this was written by a right-wing guy but what should be noted here isthat of the seven presidents listed, three are REPUBLICANS. Which I have pointed out before, Republicans will clean their own house while Democrats are happy sleeping with pigs.

The 7 Worst Presidents Of The Last Hundred Years

http://www.rightwingnews.com/john-hawkins/the...
Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

#138138 Jan 20, 2013
Another favourite Roguetardian fantasy is where he pretends his canards are "points" that have not already been thoroughly discredited.

LOLOLOLOL

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#138139 Jan 20, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
But you Democrats have re-enslaved the blacks. You put them in ghettos!
Prior to the mid-1960's most blacks were Republicans.
Atticus Tiberius Finch wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong again.
FDR received 71% of the black votes in 1932. Truman in 1948 received 77% of the black votes.
The highest percent of black votes that a Republican President received prior to the mid 1960s was in 1956 when President Eisenhower got 39% of the black vote.
As you were wrong about the U.S. cutting off of funds for South Vietnam in 1974 and allegedly that FDR prolonged the Great Depression you are again wrong about the black votes prior to mid 1960s.
Do you understand why people on this forum can't take you seriously?
Well, I said you re-enslaved the blacks. What percentage of blacks were living in poverty in 1960? How about today?
Well, in 1960 23% of all blacks were in poverty and that by 2010 (last record) it was 26.7%. And ya know what the difference is? Over 33% of all blacks are on welfare. Yep, you Democrats have really improved the lives of black people all righty!
But all ghetto people know is that they get money from Democrats so they are happy living in ghettos.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#138140 Jan 20, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Froggy wrote:
<quoted text>
Not only does Obummer Boy smoke cigs, he also has been knot to toke.
<quoted text>
Typical for a ghetto boy.
Typical comment of a racist bigot.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#138141 Jan 20, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Jacques will never admit he was wrong about the inauguration starting at 10:00 a.m.!
I said something to the effect "Tune in at 10AM" if I recall correctly. Well, it's 9AM

But, not gonna go back, and if I did write (wish you'd find it,Rogue) that the inauguration is at 10AM, so what? So I erred by 2 hours. Big deal?
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#138142 Jan 20, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Barry Goldwaters objection to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was that he thought that Federal government had no right to tell businesses who they should serve for any reason.
Please note that many businesses, primarily in the South, discriminated against Jews well into the 1980's.
Yep, FDR sent thousands of Jews to NAZI gas chambers because he hated Jews!
<quoted text>
You incredibly wrote : "Yep, FDR sent thousands of Jews to NAZI gas chambers because he hated Jews! " One of the most inportant cabinet posts, sec of the Treasury, was occupied by a Jew, Henry Morgenthau, I believe. How anti-Jewish is that? Yes, FDR may have been negligent as regards the holocaust, as we were here and so many other countries that overlooked Jewish persecution. Argentina and Brasil stood out and took in many Jew-laden ships refused elsewhere. But that FDR sent thousands of Jews to gas chambers is so crazy...never mind.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#138143 Jan 20, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Hotel Shangri-LA Discriminated Against Jews, Jury Finds
The Huffington Post | By Kathleen Miles
Posted: 08/16/2012
A jury determined Wednesday that the owner of the Hotel Shangri-La in Santa Monica discriminated against Jews during a charity event in July 2010. The owner reportedly yelled "Get the [expletive] Jews out of my pool!" and forced the party to pack up and leave.
The owner, Tehmina Adaya, a Muslim of Pakistani descent, denied charges that she made anti-semitic statements and discriminated against the Jewish group.
You posted "The owner, Tehmina Adaya, a Muslim of Pakistani descent". You somehow omitted to mention that she doubtless is liberal democrat.

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#138144 Jan 20, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
The Jackie Robinson and his bright wife I knw through the press and people who knew them could never have been Republicans after 1960. Pretty soon, Rogue will have made Rosa Parks a Republican. One can't help but notice that 95% of the names on his Republican list are pre-1950s, and most pre-1900. No one argues that Lincoln was a Republican. No one argues that the Dems of decades ago were not exactly colour-blling. That is how it was until the late 1950s, poor Rogue, fully 60 years ago. Were Wallace, Maddox, part and parcel of the National Dem party?
Rogue list Condoleezza Rice. What a surprise. One of the proud initiators of the Afghan and Iraqi "successes"
I’ve never understood how Rogue see’s relevance in the 1950’s southern racist Democrats when compared to the big tent all inclusive Democratic Party of today when in fact it is his Party that reflects the very sentiments those 50’s Democrats espoused. They may want “their” country back but I prefer “mine” moving forward. LOL

As for Robinson I’ll let him speak for himself.

“I was not as sold on the Republican party [as I was on Governor Rockefeller].... Every chance I got, while I was campaigning, I said plainly what I thought of the right-wing Republicans and the harm they were doing. I felt the GOP was a minority party in term of numbers of registered voters and could not win unless they updated their social philosophy and sponsored candidates and principles to attract the young, the black, and the independent voter. I said this often from public, and frequently Republican, platforms. By and large Republicans had ignored blacks and sometimes handpicked a few servile leaders in the black community to be their token "n@#$rs". How would I sound trying to go all out to sell Republicans to black people? They're not buying. They know better”
Jackie Robinson
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/10/14/7931...
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#138145 Jan 20, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Admittedly this was written by a right-wing guy but what should be noted here isthat of the seven presidents listed, three are REPUBLICANS. Which I have pointed out before, Republicans will clean their own house while Democrats are happy sleeping with pigs.
The 7 Worst Presidents Of The Last Hundred Years
http://www.rightwingnews.com/john-hawkins/the...
Extreme right wing you mean. And he omitted GWB who alone could have filled all 7 positions. Incredible. Just incredible.Ŕnd his daddy, after 7 GWB finishes as the most inept, would surely come in 8th. What crock.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 23 min Yeah 1,130,095
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr Fair Game 47,626
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 1 hr Cowobunga 50,818
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 4 hr PEllen 98,567
Abby 10-30 4 hr PEllen 34
Homosexual honeymoon 4 hr Liberal 3
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 4 hr Mandela 68,695
Chicago Dating
Find my Match

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]