BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

Full story: Chicago Tribune

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...
Comments
120,821 - 120,840 of 174,518 Comments Last updated 47 min ago
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#137127
Jan 15, 2013
 
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Still wrong - but still spamming the same fable.
Voeltz v. Obama (2nd suit Florida 2012):“In addition, to the extent that the complaint alleges that President Obama is not a “natural born citizen” even though born int he United States, the Court is in agreement with other courts that have considered this issue, namely, that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purpose, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.[Citations to Wong, Hollander, Ankeny].
what is with all of the A? LMAO!!!
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#137128
Jan 15, 2013
 
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
And yet another court refuses to adopt play law:
Tisdale v. Obama (Virginia federal court 2012):“It is well settled that those born in the United States are considered natural born citizens.”
Like I stated, y'all got 114+ years of bad law to correct!! LMAO!!!
Chop-chop!!!
Learn to Read

Bolingbrook, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#137129
Jan 15, 2013
 
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>what is with all of the A? LMAO!!!
Facts and law? I can understand why those concern you.

“Reduce immigration levels”

Since: Dec 06

Kings Mountain, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#137130
Jan 15, 2013
 
Mark Levin Rips Colon Powell: Defends Birthers
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Learn to Read

Bolingbrook, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#137131
Jan 15, 2013
 
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>Like I stated, y'all got 114+ years of bad law to correct!! LMAO!!!
Chop-chop!!!
Like I stated, take your fable on a long walk down a short pier.

Spam on loser.(Don't forget to click your heels three times as you repeat your wish)
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#137132
Jan 15, 2013
 
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Facts and law? I can understand why those concern you.
my only concern, I didn't put them there. So don't be fuching with my post.
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#137133
Jan 15, 2013
 
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Like I stated, take your fable on a long walk down a short pier.
Spam on loser.(Don't forget to click your heels three times as you repeat your wish)
pull your head out and get busy correcting those 114+ years of BOGUS law.
Chop-chop!!!
FISTa LIEberal

Lady Lake, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#137136
Jan 15, 2013
 
Affirmative Diversity wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do they use your picture for the definition?
Have you looked in the mirror lately? There's your answer!
FISTa LIEberal

Lady Lake, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#137137
Jan 15, 2013
 
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
You probably meant to capitalize English, right?
We'll overlook your simple mistake this time.
I guess you are too "case sensitive" don't like english much, little monkee?
FISTa LIEberal

Lady Lake, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#137138
Jan 15, 2013
 
Affirmative Diversity wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do they use your picture for the definition?
Look at you!

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#137139
Jan 15, 2013
 
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>they sure did, you will notice that they did not say "and subject to the jurisdiction, thereof". Only a citizen is subject to the jurisdiction, aliens are here by reciprocal treaties only and are never subject to the Constitution
Under the jurisdiction of the US is EXACTLY the same as subject to the jurisdiction of the US. Grow up.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#137140
Jan 15, 2013
 
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>pull your head out and get busy correcting those 114+ years of BOGUS law.
Chop-chop!!!
Four years of ignorant and delusional whining and sniveling.

And four more years to go.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#137141
Jan 15, 2013
 
Justus von Liebig wrote:
<quoted text>Oooh-Wee birfoon boy just discovered checks and balances. He better report his findings to Chief Justice Roberts. It seems there are no checks or balances on birfoon stupidity.
As Obama should remember when he based the USSC at a State of the Union address.
Learn to Read

Bolingbrook, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#137142
Jan 15, 2013
 
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>Four years of ignorant and delusional whining and sniveling.

And four more years to go.
Some how I suspect he's been ignorant, delusional, whining and sniveling for a lot longer than four years ... The focus of his fantasy may change, but the song remains the same

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#137143
Jan 15, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
As Obama should remember when he based the USSC at a State of the Union address.
I don't recall Obama declaring that he overruled the USSC Rouge, unlike DufusDale. Got a clue?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#137144
Jan 15, 2013
 
Jeep to open a new plant in .... China. And that means countries who would have bought their jeeps, will buying them from .....China.
All the auto bail out was temporarily save UNION jobs. You Democrats and the trade unions have sent millions of U.S. jobs overseas.
I know, I know, in you twisted logic the evil CEO's did but they were forced to my market forces created by you Libtards.
And that is why I will never by another vehicle from either Government Motors or CRYsler.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#137145
Jan 15, 2013
 
So sorry, forgot to leave a link.

ASIA BUSINESS January 15, 2013, 2:35 p.m. ET
Chrysler Looks to Restart Jeep Production in China

By CHRISTINA ROGERS

Chrysler Group LLC majority owner Fiat SpA has struck a deal with Guangzhou Automobile Group to restart Jeep production in China, a major step toward expanding the brand in the world's largest auto market.

The Jeep was first launched in China in 1983, and although production there ended in 2009 when Chrysler filed for bankruptcy, the brand remains well recognized. Today, Jeep sells three models in Chinathe Grand Cherokee, Wrangler and Compassall imported.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142412788...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#137146
Jan 15, 2013
 
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
So? He's still got 4 years and 6 days to make it go back up
There is still a distinct possibility that he won't. Just look at Richard Nixon.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#137147
Jan 15, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
So sorry, forgot to leave a link.
ASIA BUSINESS January 15, 2013, 2:35 p.m. ET
Chrysler Looks to Restart Jeep Production in China
By CHRISTINA ROGERS
Chrysler Group LLC majority owner Fiat SpA has struck a deal with Guangzhou Automobile Group to restart Jeep production in China, a major step toward expanding the brand in the world's largest auto market.
The Jeep was first launched in China in 1983, and although production there ended in 2009 when Chrysler filed for bankruptcy, the brand remains well recognized. Today, Jeep sells three models in Chinathe Grand Cherokee, Wrangler and Compassall imported.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142412788...
"a major step toward expanding the brand in the world's largest auto market"

So Jeep shouldn't expand their brand in China?
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#137148
Jan 15, 2013
 
Justus von Liebig wrote:
<quoted text>Under the jurisdiction of the US is EXACTLY the same as subject to the jurisdiction of the US. Grow up.
not really, aliens here are controlled by treaties between the US and their country of origin, only US citizens are subject to the jurisdiction of the US Constitution.
Aliens do not belong to the US, they are still citizens of their country of origin, unless they are naturalized, then they become subject to the jurisdiction, thereof.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

90 Users are viewing the Chicago Forum right now

Search the Chicago Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 5 min Grey Ghost 1,079,232
Abby 7-24 17 min Sublime1 9
Amy 7-24 24 min boundary painter 16
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 26 min boundary painter 4,546
Last word + 2 (Mar '12) 35 min andet1987 461
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 35 min Terry rigsby 48,872
Word (Dec '08) 48 min boundary painter 4,582
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 6 hr edogxxx 97,516
•••
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••