"ensconced"? Did you mean ensconded?Would an average American faced with evidence of fraud that exists against Obama get this kind of treatment from our court system?
In the February 2012 ruling of Georgia judge Michael Malihi—a ruling based neither in law nor fact—Barack Obama has been carefully ushered through an extra-legal judicial process designed to keep him ensconced in the White House.
State and federal law has been ignored and the Constitution thrown aside in perhaps the most disgraceful abuse of the public trust in the nation’s history.
(But heh, the State of Georgia did get permits for 2 Nuclear power plants for that disregard of the Constitutional requirement that Obama can't meet.)
A week ago, Florida Circuit Judge Kevin Carroll denied plaintiff Michael Voeltz’s challenge to Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility, setting aside Florida statute in the process!
In fact, rather than deal with what he found to be some very inconvenient Florida law, the judge chose to base his decision on a movie script as he paraphrased a scene from Miracle on 34th Street:“The fictional Judge Henry X. Harper from New York declares this man to be president, this court will not dispute it,” ruled Carroll. The laws of the land, even the Constitution, have become objects of mockery and derision to those charged with holding such things in the highest regard.
Yep, SHEEPLE clearly believe in fairy tales!
Do you wish to continue your childish little game?