I’ll give you a conservative link GB so you can continue to argue your pointless case, but are you forgetting the case was tried on its merits or as evidenced lack thereof? Witnesses were heard, testimony was given, the whole nine yards, no defense and still no touchdown. What up wit dat GB?<quoted text>
The U.S. Government, led by the usurper in question, refuses to investigate, or allow for introduction of evidence in any court, and the Main Stream Media turns a blind eye because Obama is their guy.
During the Jan. 26 hearing Malihi noted neither Obama nor his Attorney Michael Jablonski appeared or answered and said ordinarily the court would enter a default judgment against a party that fails to participate in any stage of the proceeding.
“Nonetheless, despite defendant’s failure to appear, plaintiffs asked this court to decide the case on the merits of their arguments and evidence,” wrote Malihi, adding,“The court granted plaintiffs’ request.”
In Part I, Malihi basically discredited the eight witnesses and said he found their testimony, as well as the exhibits tendered,“to be of little, if any, probative value, and thus wholly insufficient to support plaintiffs’ allegations.”
In conclusion, Malihi stated,“Given the unsatisfactory evidence presented by the plaintiffs, the court concludes that plaintiffs’ claims are not persuasive.”