It is funny that you call me a liar, but you can not prove it. I call you a liar even though you can not show where I lied.
Now, which airline incident were you talking about? The USS Vincennes Incident or something else?
Okay, so now I know what you are talking about. The Libyan airliner shot down by Israel in 1973.<quoted text>
Hypocrite, make-believer. Yes, Vincennes, which you confused with the Libyan (not Egyptian as per my last post, but Libyan as mentioned yesterday, shot down in in 1973) You corrected me, wrote "did you mean the Iranian Airbus?". I meant no such thing, I meant the Libyan 727 three-holer which you were not aware of. Why do I have to repeat everything for you? Both were the result of criminal actions .
I do not dispute piloting or helicopter machinery with you, you obviously are the point man on that. But in politics, specially foreign politics, don't bother, you're out of your league.
Tell me Jacques, did anything else happen in the area in 1973? Like the Yom Kipper War of 1973? If you take the time to read the article, the airliner failed to comply, the Israelis fired warning shots which were also ignored. Israel had every right to shoot that plane down!!! You want to be stupid, you mike get killed.
Oh, bad guys have been known to use airliners for other than flying passengers!!!
Oh, the copilot admits to not only ignoring warnings, but for refusing to comply. Please not, Libya said there were no warnings and THEY LIED!!! Muslims are notorious LIARS!!! Just like Obama!
The copilot, who survived, later said that the flight crew knew the Israeli jets wanted them to land but relations between Israel and Libya made them decide against following instructions. In direct contradiction to the co-pilot's own account the Libyan government stated that the attack occurred without warning. Israel's air force claimed that Flight 114 was a security threat, and that among the possible tasks it could have been undertaking was an aerial spy mission over the Israeli air base at Bir Gifgafa