BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#135952 Jan 8, 2013
During the Arab War of 1948 half of all Muslims inside Israel fled. Those that stay swore to be faithful citizens of Israel and they keep their property. The ones who left, forfeited their property.
Just like after our Revolutionary War, 5% of citizens refused to swear allengiance to the American government and they were forced to leave and they to LOST their property.
Now, lets compare that to the Jews who were east of the Green Line. The Muslims forced them to leave regardless to weather or not they would swear allegiance to Jordan. their property was STOLEN from them. Do you see the difference or will your bigotry prevent you from seeing the difference?
Ya know, I have brought this up time and time again and you can not accept International Law. Why? Is your forehead bone to thick?
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#135953 Jan 8, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
No one does - but Jewish terrorist groups exist and are becoming an increasing issue in certain parts of the world
Yea, the papers have been spilling over with stories of Jewish terrorists. LOL!
Learn to Read

Elmhurst, IL

#135954 Jan 8, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>So Rogue told you how he was betting?
Easy to predict - He always picks the losing side

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#135955 Jan 8, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Attacked a clearly-maked American ship. Numerous dead and wounded. Attacked a clearly-marked UN peacekeeping post with a huge UN sign on the roof with F-16s - killed all those inside; Shot down a Libyan civilian 707 killing all onboard in broad daylight. Humongous aerial attacks against Gaza. How about the Kind David Hotel in 1948?
I have address each and everyone of those issue and you still do not GET IT!!! So I will try again.
The ONLY ONE on this forum who has flown in combat is ME!!! Do you know what a dark grey ship looks at at 400 mph? No, imagine you are told there are enemy ships and aircraft in the area. The attack on the USS Liberty was an accident and Israel paid was reparations. Case settled.
Again, the U.N. peace keepers were harboring Lebanese terrorists. They were NOT peacekeeps but were taking sides again Israel and were therefore NOT neutral and Israel had every right to attack them!!!
The attacks in Gaza were against legitimate military targets. The Muslims are directly responsible for endangering THEIR own civilians. Being cowards, Muslims will use innocent civilians as human shields in direct violation of the Geneva Accords.
Now, about the "Boeing" "707" you are probably talking about the "AIRBUS" "A300" that was shot down during the USS Vincennes. But being the stupid idiot that you are you can not tell the difference between a four-engine jet and a two-engine jet. You do know that FOUR does not equal TWO, don't you?
In any event, if you are close enough to get a visual ID on any aircraft, YOU HAVE JUST F-ed up!!! Yes, the U.S. assumed full responsibility and paid reparations to Iran and the victims but is is IRAN who staged the incident and are responsible!!! But you are such a ignorant bigot, you will never see the light of day.
Sad, very sad to be a Libtard!
I have shot down everyone of you points again and in a week or two you will bring up the same lame points as you are a a bigot and will never "get it"!!!
Learn to Read

Carpentersville, IL

#135956 Jan 8, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>Yea, the papers have been spilling over with stories of Jewish terrorists. LOL!
In parts if the world the reports are too numerous. RomperStomper doesn't see it in the swamp rat gazette so assumes it didn't really happen

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#135957 Jan 8, 2013
Jacques, tell me, how many engines to you see on this plane?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Iranair655s...
Now, How many engines to you see on this airplane?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Boeing_707-...
Now, I don't expect you to know the difference between a Boeing and an Airbus but you should be able to count the difference between two and four!
Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

#135958 Jan 8, 2013
Another day of birfers simply substituting their own version of reality because they can't handle the truth.
Frank

Spokane, WA

#135959 Jan 8, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
You'd need to talk to the good Dr. about that, not me. Man, ND got crushed in all phases of the game! Way out of their league. SEC rules!
Except when they play Oregon.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#135960 Jan 8, 2013
Oh, if you want to see a real cool Boeing, this is a Boeing 314 and the last of the great Pan Am Clippers!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_314
Oh, yes, I did have a college instructor, a Mr. Crenshaw, Embry-Riddle, who flew Pan Am clippers in the 1930's to and from ...... China!!! I have met a lot of famous aviators.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#135962 Jan 8, 2013
Another great Pan Am Clipper

Martin M-130
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Martin M-130 was a commercial flying boat designed and built in 1935 by the Glenn L. Martin Company in Baltimore, Maryland, for Pan American Airways. Only three M-130s were built: the China Clipper, the Philippine Clipper and the Hawaii Clipper. A fourth flying boat (designated as M-156) called the Russian Clipper was built for the Soviet Union which was essentially identical to the three Pan Am models except that it had a larger wing (giving it a longer range) and twin vertical stabilizers.
Martin designated them as the Martin Ocean Transports, but to the public they were all referred to as the China Clipper, a name which evolved into a generic term for Pan Am's entire fleet of large flying boats - the Martin M-130, Sikorsky S-42, and Boeing 314.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_M-130
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#135963 Jan 8, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
In parts if the world the reports are too numerous. RomperStomper doesn't see it in the swamp rat gazette so assumes it didn't really happen
Too numerous? Seems like I would have seen some of them. But I have not!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#135964 Jan 8, 2013
Grand Birther wrote:
Another day of birfers simply substituting their own version of reality because they can't handle the truth.
The troll belches!
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

#135965 Jan 8, 2013
WelbyMD wrote:
<quoted text>When this usurper is exposed for the treasonous fraud that he is and faces the justice of a U.S. Marine Firing Squad.
Obama was born a Brit in Kenya before his Indonesian adoption. The Hawaiian Birth Certificate is forged and he is using a stolen Social Security number. The Russians, Freemasons, and the Order of Skull&Bones put this Big Brother in office to usher in their New World Order. Obama isn't even half-black is gay and is an illegal-alien.
Only a few loony people believe that kind of crap. Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck and the National Review and John McCain, Mitt Romney, Paul Ryan and Chief Justice Roberts certainly DO NOT believe it.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#135966 Jan 8, 2013
Justus von Liebig wrote:
<quoted text>Roderick Arrington Jr., beaten to death for not reading bible.
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Alabama 42 ND 14 LMAO!(ND is insignificant)
Koran-Bible. Two murders. Two unjuistiable murders. You lose. Again and again, so once more you come back with irrelevant college football. Do you think that any sane person cannot see you were wrong? Again.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#135967 Jan 8, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
No, but there have been too many instances of "Christian" parents allowing their children to suffer and die rather than seek medical care. But of course death at the hands of your parents' faith is only evidence of an evil religion if your parents practice Islam.
<quoted text>
And just what percentage of Americans are CHRISTIANS? Muslims? 78.8% of Americans identify themselves as .... Christians. Whereas only 0.6% identify themselves as ..... Muslims. In other words, for every Muslim in America, there are about 160 Christians.
Again, I will repeat myself. It is not the religions that are perverted, it is the individuals who are. And a disproportional number of Muslims are perverted!!! They will kill any infidel to include gays, lesbians, transgenders, bi-sexuals, etc. But since you Libtards are Christian bigots, I will never be able to talk any cents into you!
This is incredible. Being sermoned by you on anything, especially religions, is like Gomer Pyle giving a class on trigonometry. To die laughing for.
Grand Birther

United States

#135968 Jan 8, 2013
Rut Roh, Birfers!

Gen. McChrystal: "I personally don't think there's any need for that kind of weaponry on the streets and particularly around the schools in America. I believe that we've got to take a serious look. I understand everybody's desire to have whatever they want, but we've got to protect our children, we've got to protect our police, we've got to protect our population. And I think we have to take a very mature look at that."

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/m...

Too bad "mature" and "contemporary conservative" are mutually exclusive terms.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#135969 Jan 8, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, so in YOUR perverted logic, armed forces are TERRORISTS!!!
As far as the pre-1967 borders, Israel won an unjust war against the Arabs and IAW the Hague Conventions they have the right to occupy captured territories indefinitely!!!
At the end of WWII we had the right to occupy Japan and Germany forever but we did not. And just why did we give Japan and Germany their sovereignty back? Because we were satisfied that they will live in peace with us and you can not say that about the Muslims!!!
Again, Israel has the RIGHT to occupy captured territory forever!!! Get it through your Neanderthal brain!!!
But then anyone who equates our armed forces to terrorists are incapable of any rational thought!
Why do you do this to yourself? Are you conscious how ridiculous you look to all posters here?

1. Israel does not need terrorists. It has an army, an air force and a navy, plus the best intelligence service in the world and tons of money from worldwide donors;
2. Palestine has no air force, no army no navy and very little money. It is embargoed by Israel and arms just trickle in. It is FORCED to resort to terrorism. I'm NOT saying terrorism is okay, IT IS NOT. But neither is indiscriminately bombing cities and refugee camps where the kill ratio was 60-1 in the last confrontation;
3. Your understanding of occupied territories is totally "stooged". I can't find another word that fits so well. Israel was the aggressor in the 6-day 1967 war, an act of aggression that gave it the occupied land that is now under dispute. I dare you to show me that the Palestinians or the Egyptians started that war. That was 1973, Yom Kipur. So, all the lands occupied by Israel are ILLEGALLY occupied as, they were gotten through direct aggression. Got it? It's time they gave it back;
4.Somehow you brought Germany/Japan into the equation. Oh, so Germany and Italy and Japan were given their countries back because they promised to keep the peace? Well, not too bright now is that, specially as we know what the Germans did after the 1st WW with their country being given back. They got their sovereingty back because it was time to give it back, no other reason. Otherwise , we would've reaped the same revolts that the Soviet empire foisted on Russia in 1989.

You preach what you believe to be knowledge, Rogue, You are so prejudiced for and against in all cases no matter what the evidence glaring at you. Too bad. But don't throw that stuff at me, it won't work. I don't even have to consult anything to post the above, I know it. And unless it's obvious, I don't take sides the way you do. In the Israeli-Palestine conflict, I do not take sides. I've told you many times, but you don't read, don't get it. Here it goes again. If I were Palestinian, I would act exactly the way they are acting. And if I were Israeli, I would act exactly the way they are acting, except I'd give back the occupied territories illegally begotten through aggression. A lot of Israelis agree with that, btw.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#135970 Jan 8, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
No one does - but Jewish terrorist groups exist and are becoming an increasing issue in certain parts of the world
That is true.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#135971 Jan 8, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
Justus von Liebig wrote:
<quoted text>Roderick Arrington Jr., beaten to death for not reading bible.
<quoted text>
Koran-Bible. Two murders. Two unjuistiable murders. You lose. Again and again, so once more you come back with irrelevant college football. Do you think that any sane person cannot see you were wrong? Again.
jackfish, I don't think you capable of understanding the score I just posted! As for the post, I knew it was too complicated for ya. BTW, it is you who is wrong. Murder must include intent. Again for the REALLY slow, one group is praying for their child while the other is beating the crap out of a child. Somehow this confuses you? Was it not you and Mobarfa who were boasting about ND just a week or so ago? Yes, I think it was. They were dismantled and left lying about, a part here, a part there. LMAO!

You really should have read the post that started this "abuse"/"belief " debate. LTR was talking about holistic healing. Please tell us how your warped mind can compare praying for healing and beating the crap out of a child. Actually, that would be beating the life out of! Two totally different mindsets. You're messed up in the head man!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#135972 Jan 8, 2013
Grand Birther wrote:
Rut Roh, Birfers!
Gen. McChrystal: "I personally don't think there's any need for that kind of weaponry on the streets and particularly around the schools in America. I believe that we've got to take a serious look. I understand everybody's desire to have whatever they want, but we've got to protect our children, we've got to protect our police, we've got to protect our population. And I think we have to take a very mature look at that."
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/m...
Too bad "mature" and "contemporary conservative" are mutually exclusive terms.
I'm betting that in the end no one will have taken our guns. Too bad!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Obama pardons 2 Illinoisans, including former M... 4 min Le Duped 7
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 5 min Nostrilis Waxman 1,153,446
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 16 min market indicators 98,836
How long to do this? 20 min Jako Hondasaki 1
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 1 hr scirocco 70,993
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 2 hr TRD 68,880
Deat Abby 12-16 3 hr cheluzal 71
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 2:17 pm PST

ESPN 2:17PM
Cutler: 'Crossed my mind' Bears tenure over
NBC Sports 3:13 PM
Colts hope to avoid distractions of Dallas stadium - NBC Sports
NBC Sports 3:25 PM
Bears clearly looking to move in another direction
NBC Sports 3:44 PM
Lions preparing for the cold - NBC Sports
Bleacher Report 3:47 PM
Cutler's Benching Too Little, Too Late for Bears