BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 225646 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

American Lady

Danville, KY

#135804 Jan 7, 2013
American Lady wrote:
<quoted text>
Free to enter a Bar & Smoke ...
While enjoying my Margarita ...
and people watching ...

AL said:
I had no idea your cultural tastes were so wide-ranging.
Bar & smoke? Btw, most civilized states have a no-smoking policy in all public establishments, including bars. I knew you were not quite with the times, but...
Er, what're they watching? Rather, WHO are they watching? American er hmm Pravda Lady, sloopy or Patriot "ha ha give me a break" warrior?
==========

Nothing a bout "cultural" ...
My "cultural LIFE" would be so far ABOVE yours, you wouldn't UNDERSTAND or COMPREHEND it!

That was/is a 'way' to RELAX ...
That was taken ...

YEARS back ...

because of "weenies WHINING about smoke" ...

By HELL, they didn't HAVE TO "go" in THERE!
Did THEY ???

hummmm

YET "you" libTARDS want to HAVE IT YOUR WAY!

nada ... NOT gonna work!

FREEDOM will RING again !!!!!!!!

LET FREEDOM RING

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#135805 Jan 7, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
One should be smart enough not to compare apples and oranges. AHEM, not to mention I didn't say food stamps were THE problem. Food stamps aren't the problem, just as guns are not the problem. BTW, in your mind, how do you compare a Gov. program to a private citizen owning something he purchased with his own money? Comical nonsense!
Well now, I suppose we are learning a little something after all. I suppose from now on you’ll not compare the government’s finances to how you run your home as so many wing nuts are oft prone to do.
Frank

Spokane, WA

#135806 Jan 7, 2013
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Roberts will swear in Obama again. In fact, he will do so twice, on January 20 in a private ceremony, and again on January 21 in the public Inauguration ceremony.
On Friday the votes of the Electoral College were counted by Congress. Obama won every single one of the 332 Electoral Votes that he won in the general election. Not one single elector changed her or his vote from Obama to Romney. Not one single elector refused to vote or voted for a candidate other than Obama and Romney. The same thing in fact happened in 2008 and in 2012. Not one single elector in the 532 electors in the country changed her or his vote because of the claims of birthers. Not one single member of Congress refused to confirm the results of the election.
The reason is that (1) not one of the Electors or members of Congress believes the nutty idea that Obama was born in a foreign country; and (2) not one of them believe the crazy birther theory that two citizen parents are required to make a Natural Born US Citizen since the US Supreme Court ruled in the Wong Kim Ark case that the meaning comes from the common law and refers to the place of birth.
These views are, btw, shared by such conservative leaders as Paul Ryan, Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck and the National Review. None of these people or institutions believe that Obama’s birth certificate was forged, and none believe that the officials in Hawaii of BOTH parties (including the former Republican governor) are lying when they say that they sent the short form and long form birth certificates to Obama and that the original birth certificate exists in the files of the DOH and that it shows that Obama was born in Hawaii.
The problem is that Obama does not believe our country is a great place. Obama wants our country to be considered a third world nation,nothing more. Obama is the worst President in the history of The United States. Since November 2,2008 when Obama was elected the National debt has increased by over six trillion,the number of unemployed has more than doubled,the number of people on welfare has reached an all time high. How could people vote for this man in 2012? How could they have voted for him in 2008,knowing that he hates our country and our Constitution?
Jacques Ottawa

Vaughan, Canada

#135808 Jan 7, 2013
American Lady wrote:
American Lady wrote:
<quoted text>
Free to enter a Bar & Smoke ...
While enjoying my Margarita ...
and people watching ...
AL said:
I had no idea your cultural tastes were so wide-ranging.
Bar & smoke? Btw, most civilized states have a no-smoking policy in all public establishments, including bars. I knew you were not quite with the times, but...
Er, what're they watching? Rather, WHO are they watching? American er hmm Pravda Lady, sloopy or Patriot "ha ha give me a break" warrior?
==========
Nothing a bout "cultural" ...
My "cultural LIFE" would be so far ABOVE yours, you wouldn't UNDERSTAND or COMPREHEND it!
That was/is a 'way' to RELAX ...
That was taken ...
YEARS back ...
because of "weenies WHINING about smoke" ...
By HELL, they didn't HAVE TO "go" in THERE!
Did THEY ???
hummmm
YET "you" libTARDS want to HAVE IT YOUR WAY!
nada ... NOT gonna work!
FREEDOM will RING again !!!!!!!!
LET FREEDOM RING
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =-5KEgu_AjvsXX
I agree. Your "cultural LIFE" as you put it, is so above mind, as is plainly demonstrated in your above post. BTW, I never even intimated that MY culture life was above or below yours. I just said what I liked.

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#135809 Jan 7, 2013
Atticus Tiberius Finch wrote:
<quoted text>
Yet another of Rogue Scholar's classic predictions.
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you name just one of my predictions that has not come true?
Of course he’ll deny he ever said it so,
http://www.topix.com/forum/state/ca/TC6SGHF80...
Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

#135810 Jan 7, 2013
In Kentucky, Freedumb means you can poison other people wherever and however you want.

YEE HAW
Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

#135811 Jan 7, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
But our laws did not originate in the Magna Charta. Depending on your point of view it could be the Jewish holy books. But all of our current laws are based on our Constitution and had nothing to do with England.

LOL WUT?!?!
Forum carlsbad nm

Lovington, NM

#135812 Jan 7, 2013
Someone should send Honey Boo Boo a doll.
Giving her a pig is just child abuse.

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#135813 Jan 7, 2013
Frank wrote:
<quoted text>The problem is that Obama does not believe our country is a great place. Obama wants our country to be considered a third world nation,nothing more. Obama is the worst President in the history of The United States. Since November 2,2008 when Obama was elected the National debt has increased by over six trillion,the number of unemployed has more than doubled,the number of people on welfare has reached an all time high. How could people vote for this man in 2012? How could they have voted for him in 2008,knowing that he hates our country and our Constitution?
Because your Obama is purely a figment of your imagination Frank and the majority of the electorate were not familiar with him and they never will be. The electorate in turn had no choice but to vote for the Obama they knew who in no way bears a resemblance to your imaginary one.
Jacques Ottawa

Vaughan, Canada

#135814 Jan 7, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you name just one of my predictions that has not come true?

Ha ha. I made a list a month ago, ran out of characters, as 4000 were not sufficient. Let's start with the tea party mayor of Jacksonville, then the 192 court cases on Obama's BCc, then your repub presidential candites who were gonna be the next president, the whole gamut, then the obamacare supreme court decision that was decided well in advance, remember?, then the presidential election, then Gen Petreaus not testifying you predicted, and Hillary Clinton coming up, etc etc, gasp, winded, so many.
Jacques Ottawa

Vaughan, Canada

#135815 Jan 7, 2013
Forum carlsbad nm wrote:
Someone should send Honey Boo Boo a doll.
Giving her a pig is just child abuse.
Wrong. It's pig abuse. But then she already has her mother, why another pig?
Jacques Ottawa

Vaughan, Canada

#135816 Jan 7, 2013
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Of course he’ll deny he ever said it so,
http://www.topix.com/forum/state/ca/TC6SGHF80...
This one November 4, from the famed Kentuckian. Try as he may, though, he lost by a nose to Rogue when it came to wrong predictions, ANY predictions :

Vote Romney for Victory wrote:
Only 3 more days until Obama gets his well deserved pink slip into obscurity, and an asterisk next to his name to denote that he was fraudulent pResident.

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#135817 Jan 7, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree. Your "cultural LIFE" as you put it, is so above mind, as is plainly demonstrated in your above post. BTW, I never even intimated that MY culture life was above or below yours. I just said what I liked.
American Lady wrote:
<quoted text>
Most of his mothers relatives are dead, aren't they ???
With "no one" but the mooslim side to BACK anything up !!!
http://www.obamaspast.com/
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly why we maintain vital records AL. So that folks can’t just make stuff up after everyone is dead and gone and attempt to submit some wacky belief, baseless theories or nutty conspiracy to the world as the truth and expect it to trump facts.
American Lady wrote:
<quoted text>
Show me "his" history !!!
Poppo wrote:
Thus far no response from AL as like most birfoon’s she assumes Obama must have been born on the moon or some such place. Yet when her fantasy is exposed for what it is no response. Obviously way more info than she even believed existed so she’ll just ignore it and stick to her fantacy.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#135818 Jan 7, 2013
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
Well now, I suppose we are learning a little something after all. I suppose from now on you’ll not compare the government’s finances to how you run your home as so many wing nuts are oft prone to do.
The Government's finances? There's no such thing. The people provide the Government with money. So, I'll compare and complain if I choose to. You really don't need to worry how I run my home.
Forum carlsbad nm

Lovington, NM

#135819 Jan 7, 2013
Today a Washington spokesman said that Obama had
already sworn in
before that there would be no torturting.
We think our country is civilized. Who tortures anyone?

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

United States

#135820 Jan 7, 2013
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
Well now, I suppose we are learning a little something after all. I suppose from now on you’ll not compare the government’s finances to how you run your home as so many wing nuts are oft prone to do.
What kills me is that wingnuts always use that bogus analogy, but don't see the contradiction when they make a mortgage payment.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

United States

#135821 Jan 7, 2013
Atticus Tiberius Finch wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong.
As far back as in 1798, The United State Supreme Court in United States v. Worrall, 2 US 384, 394-395 (1798) recognized that our jurisprudence was based on English common law:
"When the American colonies were first settled by our ancestors, it was held, as well by the settlers, as by the judges and lawyers of England, that they brought hither, as a birth-right and inheritance, so much of the COMMON LAW, as was applicable to their local situation, and change of circumstances. But each colony judged for itself, what parts of the COMMON LAW were applicable to its new condition...."
Similarly, the court in Wheaton v. Peters , 33 US 591, 658-659 (1834)observed:
It is insisted, that our ancestors, when they migrated to this country, brought with them the English common law, as a part of their heritage. That this was the case, to a limited extent, is admitted. No one will contend, that the common law, as it existed in England, has ever been in force in all its provisions, in any state in this union. It was adopted, so far only as its principles were suited to the condition of the colonies: and from this circumstance we see, what is common law in one state, is not so considered in another. The judicial decisions, the usages and customs of the respective states, must determine, how far the common law has been introduced and sanctioned in each.
The court in Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 US 145 , 150 ,fn 14.(1968)noted our common law heritage in criminal proceedings:
The recent cases, on the other hand, have proceeded upon the valid assumption that state criminal processes are not imaginary and theoretical schemes but actual systems bearing virtually every characteristic of the common-law system that has been developing contemporaneously in England and in this country. The question thus is whether given this kind of system a particular procedure is fundamental—whether, that is, a procedure is necessary to an Anglo-American regime of ordered liberty.
The court in Smith v. Alabama, 124 U. S. 465, 478 (1888) stated in clear and concise language the common law's influence on the constitution:
"The interpretation of the Constitution of the United States is necessarily influenced by the fact that its provisions are framed in the language of the English common law, and are to be read in the light of its history."
Finally, as recent as 2000, the court in Carter v. United States, 530 US 255, 266 (2000) stated:
We have not hesitated to turn to the COMMON LAW for guidance when the relevant statutory text does contain a term with an established meaning at common law.
Rouge will have no coherent answer, but he'll forget what you said and repost his claptrap in a few weeks.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#135822 Jan 7, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
What kills me is that wingnuts always use that bogus analogy, but don't see the contradiction when they make a mortgage payment.
It must not have worked that time. Please try again. LOL

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#135823 Jan 7, 2013
For the second time with in the past few months a British MUSLIM mother beat her small child to death because he "failed to memorize Qur’an passages"! Hw nice!!!

Woman jailed in Britain for beating son to death after he failed to memorize Qur’an passages
By The Associated Press | Associated Press

LONDON - A British judge on Monday sentenced a woman he called a "devoted and loving mother" to at least 17 years in prison for beating her son to death after he failed to memorize passages from the Qur’an.
A jury at Cardiff Crown Court in Wales convicted 33-year-old Sara Ege last month of murdering 7-year-old Yaseen and burning his body to destroy the evidence.
Judge Wyn Williams said Ege beat Yaseen repeatedly with a stick over several months, causing internal injuries.
He said that, on the day he died in 2010, Yaseen had been kept home from school to memorize verses from the Muslim holy book, and that his failure "was the trigger for the beating" that killed him.
The judge agreed with defence arguments about India-born Ege's state of mind, saying she was "a devoted and loving mother" who suffered from depression and had been a victim of domestic violence.
Still, he said, she subjected her son to "prolonged cruelty."
Ege admitted killing her son in a confession taped by police, but later retracted it and blamed her husband, Yousef. He was tried and acquitted on a charge of failing to prevent his son's death.
Ege sobbed as the judge passed sentence. Williams said the 2 1/2 years she had spent in secure psychiatric units since her arrest would count toward her 17-year minimum sentence.
http://news.yahoo.com/woman-jailed-britain-be...

Since: Jan 13

Clearwater, FL

#135824 Jan 7, 2013
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
Because your Obama is purely a figment of your imagination Frank and the majority of the electorate were not familiar with him and they never will be. The electorate in turn had no choice but to vote for the Obama they knew who in no way bears a resemblance to your imaginary one.
Well said, Poppo. By the way, on election night 2008,the first time Obama was elected, the Fox News gang were wringing their hands, trying to figure out how Obama could have possibly won. Brit Hume made some very revealing remarks. He said:

"Well, when people listen to us here at Fox News talk about Obama...I mean..exit polling indicates that people who got their information about Obama from Fox News, they had a generally negative view of him. But people who...voters who just watched Obama and listened to him for themeselves, listened to his speeches, seem to have a more positive view of him"

That says it all.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min TheIndependentMaj... 1,432,222
last post wins! (Apr '13) 42 min They cannot kill ... 1,693
Four letter word game (Dec '11) 1 hr PEllen 2,066
last post wins! (Dec '10) 1 hr They cannot kill ... 2,549
Double Word Game (Dec '11) 1 hr PEllen 3,187
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr Mothra 61,479
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 1 hr PEllen 9,534

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages