Of course it can't be done. It can't be done because a scan of a Hawaii birth certificate on security paper and put into pdf does not pick up an image of the raised seal.<quoted text>
How do you prove that with a fraudulent long form birth certificate?
It can't be done!
If I give you counterfeit money for goods or services rendered, have I really paid my bill?
I think not!
If I show you a fraudulent long form birth certificate, have I really PROVEN where I was born?
I think not!
SHEEPLE, we are still waiting for you to post ANY COPY of Obama's long form birth certificate that contains a raised visible embossed seal that was released to the public in April 2011.
Even the hard copies do not contain that seal,(but they do contain that same one-of-a-kind error).
All copies are fraudulent documents.
You are failing this assignment spectacularly because the smart people know it can't be done.
The fact that the raised seal does not show up on a computer scan of the document put into PDF does not disprove:(1) the short form birth certificate; (2) the long form birth certificate;(3) the confirmation of the officials of BOTH parties and the Index Data; (4) the birth notices sent to the newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961 (and ONLY the DOH could send those notices to the "Health Bureau Statistics" section of the papers, and in 1961 the DOH only sent them for births IN Hawaii); (5) the fact that Hawaii is thousands of miles from any foreign country; and (6) the Hawaii teacher who wrote home to her father, named Stanley, about the birth in Hawaii of a child to a woman named Stanley.
The notion that Obama's mother would have traveled thousands of miles late in pregnancy (much less tens of thousands to Kenya, which has said, BTW, that Obama was not born there) ALONE (since a FOI Act request has showed that Obama senior stayed in Hawaii throughout 1961) is highly unlikely.