BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

[Jacques Ottawa]

LRS wrote:

<quoted text>
You do realize you're talking out of your azz, no? My parents are old and can't do much anymore. We still had a nice Thanksgiving. Ignored? Not hardly. Shhhh now peon.

Your parents are old? Two or three months back, to attract pity and sympathy,(like Himmler without the charm) you wrote that your mother had died a few months before. Guess we'll file that latest one with the two beautiful nurse girl friends, ha ha.

[Jacques Ottawa]

LRS wrote:

Omama is literally running companies out of this country.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/...

Where does it say Obama's administration is responsible for the exodus of low-paying jobs? Where in this USA Today article does it say that? It does mention, yes, that this job outsourcing has been going on for 10 years, of which only 4 are Obama's, correct? And, not unlike your cut-and-paste bosom buddy, American er hmm Pravda Lady, you don't read too well and understand even less, do you? Read the following, it is from the US Today news story that YOU posted, not me :

QUOTE "Once services are offshored, there's little chance they'll come back to the U.S., Dorr says. By contrast, manufacturers have returned some production to the U.S. recently, largely because of a narrowing wage gap between the U.S. and China, rising shipping costs and falling U.S. energy costs — factors that generally haven't affected service jobs.

One exception: call-center jobs. About 500,000 were offshored from 2006 to 2010, according to the Communications Workers of America. Many have returned to the U.S. the last few years because of cultural gaps between representatives and customers that hurt sales, says Hal Sirkin, senior partner of Boston Consulting Group.

Yet CWA spokeswoman Candice Johnson called the jobs that have come back "a drop in the bucket" UNQUOTE

Birfoons' lack of reading and understanding skills is well-known. Juicy headlines is what they thrive on, as witness this USA Today one, slug. Sorry about halting your Obama bad-news orgasm in midstream, LOSER.

[Rogue Scholar 05]

American Lady wrote:

WHY I'M SUING NBC
On the night of February 26, 2012, after enduring a prolonged physical attack from Trayvon Martin, screaming for help countless times and receiving no help, and all the while in fear for my life, I shot Trayvon Martin in self-defense. I did not shoot to take his life, I shot to save my own.
The night of the shooting I was taken to the Sanford police station and was read my Miranda rights. Aware I had the right to remain silent, I chose to tell investigators what happened. In the hours and days that followed, I cooperated completely with the authorities, and during that thorough investigation, the consensus among law enforcement was that I should not be charged.
However, in the days and weeks following the shooting a story was promoted that I am a racist and a murderer. These untruths spread through the community, the government, and the nation, amplified by a media frenzy seeking ratings over truth. This was no more apparent than when NBC repeatedly edited the recording of a call I made, intentionally misrepresenting me as a racist. Unfortunately, their plan worked, truth suffered that day, and my family and I have suffered every day since. That is why I am filing a lawsuit against NBC. The details of the complaint can be found on a website created by my legal team: www.gzvnbc.com .
What happened that night was a tragedy: a tragedy that NBC exploited, creating an opportunity for profit. I am holding NBC accountable for its actions. If NBC had not spread lies and falsifications about me, this lawsuit would not exist. This lawsuit is a product of NBC's intentional distortion of facts. I do not know, because of my situation, how I will be able to provide for my wife and myself in the future, and so I expect NBC to be held responsible. The unjustified public persecution of me because of NBC's actions is wrong. It shouldn't have happened to me, and it shouldn't happen to anyone.
In the last several months, the prosecutors have released evidence regarding this case, and the evidence speaks for itself regarding my innocence. As this lawsuit moves forward, I hope the existence of this exonerating evidence will be broadcast with at least a fraction of the publicity afforded to the lies and misrepresentations. I deserve that and those who have been misinformed deserve that. However, that will be up to the ethical journalists who will spread the truth without regard or concern for political or social pressure.
http://therealgeorgezimmerman.com/index.php/2...
First Served ! George Zimmerman Sues NBC – Defamation, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, demand for preservation of evidence, demand for jury trial
http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2012/12/0...
yippee !!!!!!!!:)

Yep, the Libtards forgot what happened to them during the Richard Jewell case.
Libel cases
After his exoneration, Jewell filed a series of lawsuits against the media outlets which he claimed had libeled him, primarily NBC News and The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, and insisted on a formal apology from them. L. Lin Wood was the lead attorney in all of Jewell's Libel cases.

[Rogue Scholar 05]

In 2006, Jewell said the lawsuits were not about money, and that the vast majority of the settlements went to lawyers or taxes. He said the lawsuits were about clearing his name.[2]
[edit]Richard Jewell v. Piedmont College
Jewel filed suit against his former employer Piedmont College, Piedmont College President Raymond Cleere and college spokesman Scott Rawles.[9] Jewell's attorneys contended that Cleere called the FBI and spoke to the Atlanta newspapers, providing them with false information on Jewell and his employment there as a security guard. Jewell's lawsuit accused Cleere of describing Jewell as a "badge-wearing zealot" who "would write epic police reports for minor infractions."[1]
Piedmont College settled for an undisclosed amount.[11]
[edit]Richard Jewell v. NBC
Jewell sued NBC News for this statement, made by Tom Brokaw: "The speculation is that the FBI is close to making the case. They probably have enough to arrest him right now, probably enough to prosecute him, but you always want to have enough to convict him as well. There are still some holes in this case". Even though NBC stood by its story, the network agreed to pay Jewell $500,000.[9]
[edit]Richard Jewell v. New York Post
This section does not cite any references or sources.(June 2012)
Although Jewell was considered a hero at first, four days later The Atlanta Journal published stories stating that the FBI was considering Jewell as a lead suspect who fit the profile of a “lone bomber”. Articles then appeared in numerous media outlets, including The New York Post. One New York Post article read,“He was a fat, failed former sheriff's deputy who spent most of his working days as a crossing guard, and yearned to go further”.}
.....
Richard Jewell v. Cox Enterprises (d.b.a. Atlanta Journal-Constitution)
Jewell sued the Atlanta Journal-Constitution newspaper, which stated Jewell was "an individual with a bizarre employment history and aberrant personality". It also said Jewell "fit the profile of a lone bomber." According to Jewell, the paper's headline, which read FBI suspects 'hero' guard may have planted bomb, "pretty much started the whirlwind".[10]
The Atlanta Journal went as far as to compare Richard Jewell's case to that of serial killer Wayne Williams.[12]
The newspaper was the only defendant that did not settle with Jewell. The lawsuit remained pending for several years, after having been considered at one time by the Supreme Court of Georgia, and had become an important part of case law regarding whether journalists could be forced to reveal their sources. The case was dismissed by Judge John R. Mather in December 2007, four months after Jewell's death. The paper claimed this was proof of the accuracy of their coverage.[13]
[edit]CNN
Although CNN settled with Jewell for an undisclosed monetary amount, CNN maintained its coverage was fair and accurate.[14]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Jewell

[Rogue Scholar 05]

Aftermath [Richard Jewell

In July 1997, U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno, prompted by a reporter's question at her regular weekly news conference, expressed regret over the FBI's leak to the news media that led to the widespread presumption of his guilt, and apologized outright, saying, "I'm very sorry it happened. I think we owe him an apology. I regret the leak."

[LRS]

Poppo wrote:

<quoted text>
Nice dream AL, but when you wake you’ll find it’s only birfoon folly and has nothing to do with reality.
Barack Hussein Obama II, 44th POTUS. Now that’s real.

Shhhh oldman.....you're sounding like a lunatic.

[Jacques Dufault]

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

Aftermath [Richard Jewell
In July 1997, U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno, prompted by a reporter's question at her regular weekly news conference, expressed regret over the FBI's leak to the news media that led to the widespread presumption of his guilt, and apologized outright, saying, "I'm very sorry it happened. I think we owe him an apology. I regret the leak."

Rogue, the fact of the matter is, you are so confident in your predictions, and so far have been wrong with pretty much every one of them. Instead of saying, "I think this and that will end up this way or will win or lose", you always write "It will end up this way and we'll win". Temper those predictions, for no one knows for sure how things will evolve. You were wrong on your mayor (you blamed the press - c'mon), you were wrong on Supreme court Obamacare, you were wrong on all the Obama BC challenges in 180 courts, you were dead wrong on the Presidential election, dead wrong on Michigan, Florida and other states. Dead wrong on yesterday's CA Supreme court case, again on Obama's eligibility.

Now you're still going on about the Zimmerman-Martin case. One would swear you were there when it happened, and you are so sure that Zimmerman is innocent and Martin guilty. So-called "libtards" (Rogue, tm reg'd) are less sanguine about this, have you noticed? They are waiting for the trial, testimonies, facts and hearsay to be heard when the time comes, not predicting anything. Although no specific predictions on the outcome of any future trial on your part, you've vouched and sworn Zimmerman's innocence and Martin's guilt. Why? On what grounds? On what grounds would you prematurely find either guilty or innocent? There were no witnesses.

Your your predictions so often turn to ridicule, like yesterday's CA supreme court ruling that there IS no case. Instead of saying, "I was wrong", you plead "jerking your chain" or "red herring". And, seems you never learn. Which limb are you gonna go out on the next time? Oh, the job count coming out today. You may be right, I would tend to agree with you on bad numbers, whatever the reason, but unlike you, I'm not predicting anything good or bad, as it's outside my control as it is yours. But what say you if you're wrong? That Obama concocted the numbers? That the numbers are not real, that the real rate is different, much worse?

[LRS]

Jacques Ottawa wrote:

<quoted text>
Your parents are old? Two or three months back, to attract pity and sympathy,(like Himmler without the charm) you wrote that your mother had died a few months before. Guess we'll file that latest one with the two beautiful nurse girl friends, ha ha.

Child, ever heard of a step-mother? Doh....

[LRS]

Jacques Ottawa wrote:

<quoted text>
Where does it say Obama's administration is responsible for the exodus of low-paying jobs? Where in this USA Today article does it say that? It does mention, yes, that this job outsourcing has been going on for 10 years, of which only 4 are Obama's, correct? And, not unlike your cut-and-paste bosom buddy, American er hmm Pravda Lady, you don't read too well and understand even less, do you? Read the following, it is from the US Today news story that YOU posted, not me :
QUOTE "Once services are offshored, there's little chance they'll come back to the U.S., Dorr says. By contrast, manufacturers have returned some production to the U.S. recently, largely because of a narrowing wage gap between the U.S. and China, rising shipping costs and falling U.S. energy costs — factors that generally haven't affected service jobs.
One exception: call-center jobs. About 500,000 were offshored from 2006 to 2010, according to the Communications Workers of America. Many have returned to the U.S. the last few years because of cultural gaps between representatives and customers that hurt sales, says Hal Sirkin, senior partner of Boston Consulting Group.
Yet CWA spokeswoman Candice Johnson called the jobs that have come back "a drop in the bucket" UNQUOTE
Birfoons' lack of reading and understanding skills is well-known. Juicy headlines is what they thrive on, as witness this USA Today one, slug. Sorry about halting your Obama bad-news orgasm in midstream, LOSER.

Isn't it strange they expect this trend to continue until 2016? I believe that's when Omama will be gone (if not sooner). Strange indeed. Why, that makes one think businesses don't like Omama's policies and have no confidence in him. Shhhh lil boy blue.

[Rogue Scholar 05]

But I also wish that he file a law suit against the New Black Panthers. It is obvious that Eric Holder will NOT conduct a criminal investigation against them so he should go through with a civil lawsuit.
It is just like the Southern Poverty Law Firm's suits against the KKK and other white hate groups. You would think that if the SPLF was really interested in racial law suits that they would join this one too.

First Served ! George Zimmerman Sues NBC – Defamation, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, demand for preservation of evidence, demand for jury trial
Posted on December 6, 2012 by sundance
http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2012/12/0...

[LRS]

It came upon the midnight clear,
That glorious song of old,
From angels bending near the earth
With news of joy foretold,
"Peace on the earth, good will to men
From heaven's all gracious King."
The world in solemn stillness lay,
To hear the angels sing.
Still through the cloven skies they come,
Love's banner all unfurled;
And still their heavenly music floats
Over all the weary world.
Above its sad and lowly plains
Old echoes plaintive ring,
And ever over its Babel sounds
The blessed angels sing.
Yet with the woes of sin and strife
The world has suffered long;
Beneath the Angel-strain have rolled
Two thousand years of wrong;
And man at war with man hears not
The love-song which they bring;
O! hush the noise, ye men of strife,
And hear the Angels sing.
O ye, beneath life's crushing load
Whose forms are bending low,
Who toil along the climbing way
With painful steps and slow;
Look now! for glad and golden hours
Come swiftly on the wing;
O rest beside the weary road
And hear the angels sing.
For lo! the days are hastening on,
By prophets seen of old,
When with the ever-circling years
Shall come the time foretold,
When the new heaven and earth shall own
The Prince of Peace their King,
And the whole world send back the song
Which now the angels sing.

[Rogue Scholar 05]

Is NYC Subway Pusher a “Hate Criminal?”
- Erik Rush, December 7, 2012

In my personal view, a crime is a crime, but I think it bears mentioning that Ki Suk Han was an individual of Korean descent, and Naeem Davis is black. Had a white man been accused of hurling a black man in front of a train, a racial motive would automatically be presumed. The reasons for such might be specious, but it all comes down to the history between whites and blacks in America.
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/arti...

[LRS]

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

But I also wish that he file a law suit against the New Black Panthers. It is obvious that Eric Holder will NOT conduct a criminal investigation against them so he should go through with a civil lawsuit.
It is just like the Southern Poverty Law Firm's suits against the KKK and other white hate groups. You would think that if the SPLF was really interested in racial law suits that they would join this one too.
First Served ! George Zimmerman Sues NBC – Defamation, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, demand for preservation of evidence, demand for jury trial
Posted on December 6, 2012 by sundance
http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2012/12/0...

It's just more of Omama's war on the white man. Omama should be careful what he wishes for. This was a punk, acting like a punk which got his butt shot. Simple as that. No sympathy here.

[Jacques Ottawa]

LRS wrote:

<quoted text>
Child, ever heard of a step-mother? Doh....

LOSER, you've been caught. Again and again. Instead of being embarrassed, and slithering back under your favourite rock, you persist in your lies and BS. Even your staunchiest birther allies are ignoring you now, can't you see that? Jut imagine, a birther embarrassed by another...birther? LoL. THAT is the height of embarrassment.

[Jacques Ottawa]

LRS wrote:

It came upon the midnight clear,
That glorious song of old,
From angels bending near the earth
With news of joy foretold,
"Peace on the earth, good will to men
From heaven's all gracious King."
The world in solemn stillness lay,
To hear the angels sing.
Still through the cloven skies they come,
Love's banner all unfurled;
And still their heavenly music floats
Over all the weary world.
Above its sad and lowly plains
Old echoes plaintive ring,
And ever over its Babel sounds
The blessed angels sing.
Yet with the woes of sin and strife
The world has suffered long;
Beneath the Angel-strain have rolled
Two thousand years of wrong;
And man at war with man hears not
The love-song which they bring;
O! hush the noise, ye men of strife,
And hear the Angels sing.
O ye, beneath life's crushing load
Whose forms are bending low,
Who toil along the climbing way
With painful steps and slow;
Look now! for glad and golden hours
Come swiftly on the wing;
O rest beside the weary road
And hear the angels sing.
For lo! the days are hastening on,
By prophets seen of old,
When with the ever-circling years
Shall come the time foretold,
When the new heaven and earth shall own
The Prince of Peace their King,
And the whole world send back the song
Which now the angels sing.

Ever heard of Himmler or Hitler reading from the Talmud? Well, you, slug LRS, posting hymns and the likes, is even more farfetched and unreal than the aforementioned two nazis reciting said Talmud. Hyprocrite, chalk-covered dung heap.

[wojar]

Jacques Ottawa wrote:

<quoted text>
Your parents are old? Two or three months back, to attract pity and sympathy,(like Himmler without the charm) you wrote that your mother had died a few months before. Guess we'll file that latest one with the two beautiful nurse girl friends, ha ha.

Now that's a gotcha!

[LRS]

Jacques Ottawa wrote:

<quoted text>
LOSER, you've been caught. Again and again. Instead of being embarrassed, and slithering back under your favourite rock, you persist in your lies and BS. Even your staunchiest birther allies are ignoring you now, can't you see that? Jut imagine, a birther embarrassed by another...birther? LoL. THAT is the height of embarrassment.

As usual jacqazz is wrong yet again. LMAO You sure seem to enjoy calling people liars lil man. Does that somehow make you feel better? BTW, what is embarrassing about a step-mother? Are you attempting to insult her in some way? Free airboat ride? LOL Poor lost soul you, so full of hate and anger! Aimlessly drifting about, never accomplishing anything, just complaining how the world isn't fair. Were you not taught that at an early age like everyone else?

[wojar]

LRS wrote:

<quoted text>
Child, ever heard of a step-mother? Doh....

And the dog ate your homework?

ROFLMAO.

Jacques Ottawa wrote:

Your parents are old? Two or three months back, to attract pity and sympathy,(like Himmler without the charm) you wrote that your mother had died a few months before. Guess we'll file that latest one with the two beautiful nurse girl friends, ha ha.

[LRS]

Jacques Ottawa wrote:

<quoted text>
Ever heard of Himmler or Hitler reading from the Talmud? Well, you, slug LRS, posting hymns and the likes, is even more farfetched and unreal than the aforementioned two nazis reciting said Talmud. Hyprocrite, chalk-covered dung heap.

But I didn't think you called people ugly names? LMAO liar

[LRS]

wojar wrote:

<quoted text>Now that's a gotcha!

I do firmly believe it is way over your head.