Your uninformed opinion does not count.<quoted text>
I told you exactly what a Natural born citizen was and explained why!
A Natural born citizen can only be born of TWO US citizens, anywhere in the world, but their loyalties will only be to the US....Shove your misleading links and kindly exhibit some common sense if you possess any.
Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are "natural born citizens" and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are "natural born citizens" eligible to serve as President ..."---- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005)[Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagans attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]
Here are some of the SEVEN state court rulings and the one federal court ruling, all of which have ruled that Obama is a Natural Born Citizen due to the Wong Kim Ark supreme court case (which btw was AFTER Minor v. Happersett) having ruled that every child born in the USA is a Natural Born US citizen due to the fact that Natural Born came from the common law and referred to the PLACE OF BIRTH:
Ankeny v. Governor of Indiana (Indiana 2008 Appellate Court) ruling:Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are natural born Citizens for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.
Tisdale v. Obama (Virginia federal court 2012) ruling:It is well settled that those born in the United States are considered natural born citizens.
Purpura v. Obama (New Jersey 2012) ruling:No court, federal, state or administrative, has accepted the challengers position that Mr. Obama is not a natural born Citizen due to the acknowledged fact that his father was born in Kenya and was a British citizen by virtue of the then applicable British Nationality Act. Nor has the fact that Obama had, or may have had, dual citizenship at the time of his birth and thereafter been held to deny him the status of natural born. It is unnecessary to reinvent the wheel here. The petitioners legal position on this issue, however well intentioned, has no merit in law. Thus, accepting for the point of this issue that Mr. Obama was born in Hawaii, he is a natural born Citizen regardless of the status of his father.
Voeltz v. Obama (2nd suit Florida 2012) ruling:In addition, to the extent that the complaint alleges that President Obama is not a natural born citizen even though born int he United States, the Court is in agreement with other courts that have considered this issue, namely, that persons born within the borders of the United States are natural born citizens for Article II, Section 1 purpose, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.[Citations to Wong, Hollander, Ankeny].
Allen v. Obama (Arizona 2012) ruling:Most importantly, Arizona courts are bound by United States Supreme Court precedent in construing the United States Constitution, Arizona v. Jay J. Garfield Bldg. Co., 39 Ariz. 45, 54, 3 P.2d 983, 986(1931), and this precedent fully supports that President Obama is a natural born citizen under the Constitution and thus qualified to hold the office of President. Contrary to Plaintiffs assertion, Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874), does not hold otherwise