BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#130981 Nov 30, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>Hahaha!!!~ You really sound stupid! Backup and reload, sounds like you are talking out of your flabby ass.
Ha ha, replies with LRS-type crass clueless vulgar diatribe. Very LRS-like indeed, can't explain his imbecilic statements, goes schoolyard DOH on me.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#130982 Nov 30, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>You want to start with the War Between the States, there was nothing civil about it.
You have fallen off. Ask LRS for referral to Nurse Ratched asap.
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#130983 Nov 30, 2012
American Lady wrote:
<quoted text>
Agree !!!
==========
Why so many 20-year-olds are failing to grow up
After lunch at a friend’s house at the weekend, I told her she must be proud of her daughter, who not only has a rather brilliant academic brain but is also very beautiful.
‘Yes, I’m very proud of her,’ sighed my friend.‘But I still have to remind her to do the dishes, and she still has the cheek to complain if we forget to buy her make-up remover when we do the weekly shop.’
Far from being a teenager, my friend’s daughter is 28. She’s moved back home while she continues her post-graduate studies because she’d rather be in her parents’ comfortable South London semi than the grim bedsit her meagre part-time earnings would afford.
This is not to say that her parents aren’t happy to have her back — they adore her and want to do their best for her. But, at the same time, they’re starting to worry whether she’ll ever grow up.
Nor is she in any way unusual. Eight out of ten 18 to 24-year-olds still live at home today, as do a third of 25 to 34-year-olds — so perhaps it’s no wonder that they’ve opted to see themselves as adolescents far past their teenage years. According to new research published this week, most of them no longer regard 21 as a coming of age and don’t even consider themselves adults until they’re 30.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-218...
why should they grow-up, they have mommy and daddy to depend on. I didn't follow that train wreck, I followed my own track, learn from your mistakes and I am still learning. Sometimes "no" is a hard thing to say, and it is a hard thing to hear, been there. We as a nation are not giving our children guidance.
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#130984 Nov 30, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Ha ha, replies with LRS-type crass clueless vulgar diatribe. Very LRS-like indeed, can't explain his imbecilic statements, goes schoolyard DOH on me.
just spam!
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#130985 Nov 30, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
You have fallen off. Ask LRS for referral to Nurse Ratched asap.
Spam!

“zero nuclear weapons”

Since: Sep 08

Perryville

#130986 Nov 30, 2012
American Lady wrote:
Liberal Sh*t 9-10-2011
"take these son-of-a-bi*ches out."
-Jimmy Hoffa
"Before we get to the next level we need to realize we have a big problem in this country, Foreclosures, The banks will not do loan modifications and we have not come up with a program that we can keep people in their homes. We need to find a way to make these banks write down the principle and keep the interest rates low at 4% "
-Maxine Waters
"The real enemy is the TEA PARTY!!!"
-Fredrica Wilson
"Actually we're fighting 4 wars, the 4th war is the was started by the TEA Party against our president."
-Cedric Richardson
"The TEA Party is stopping that change.... Some of these folks in Congress would would love to see us as second class citizens, some of these folks in Congress would like to see us hanging from a tree"
-Andre Carson
Liberal Sh*t 8-28-2011
"What it's about is building a car that is safe to drive and economical to keep that will get an honest to goodness 60 MPG and save families real money at the pump."
John Stossel asks, "why does the government have to force it?"
John, it makes sense but the problem is our market is held hostage by global oil price shocks that we can't control, that's why Detroit keeps getting blind sided by them, the last time that happened we almost lost GM and Chrysler and only because the American Taxpayers stepped up with an 80 Billion Dollar Loan, saved that from happening.
-Bob Deans (Natural Resources Defense Council)
Wow, we gave them a loan. The way I remember it, they held a gun to my head and told me to give them the money.
"When I said Change you can believe in, I didn't say Change you can believe in tomorrow or change you can believe in next week."
-President Obama
"We can't go back to the time when wall street and giant corporations write the rules."
-Robert Gibbs
When did that time end Robert?
...
“This is a tough game. You can’t be intimidated. You can’t be frightened. And as far as I’m concerned — the tea party can go straight to hell.”
-Maxine Waters
"Our goal is to create a legitimate legal framework for the remaining Guantanamo detainees who cannot be transferred."
-President Obama
“This deal is a sugar-coated Satan sandwich. If you lift the bun, you will not like what you see.”
-Emanuel Cleaver
“What we're trying to do is save the world from the Republican budget. We're trying to save life on this planet as we know it today.”
-Nancy Pelosi
"It's very hard to get inflation during a depressed economy", "If we discovered there was an immanent alien invasion and we needed a massive military build up to counter that, we would be out of this slump in 18 months"
-Paul Krugman
http://theshitliberalssay.blogspot.com/search...
Oh quoting old Jimmy Hoffa one of the direst people the Unions have ever seen.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#130987 Nov 30, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Not content with plagiarism and cute-and-paste, you now cut my posts. Am I surprised, Toby? Toby? Ha ha. What a feckless name.
What are you talking about now? Cut your post? I didn't cut your post. You lost me on this one.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#130988 Nov 30, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Ha ha, replies with LRS-type crass clueless vulgar diatribe. Very LRS-like indeed, can't explain his imbecilic statements, goes schoolyard DOH on me.
What can we say jacqazz? You just bring out the best in people! LMAO!

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#130990 Dec 1, 2012
LRS wrote:
If Omama allows us to go over the cliff, he will be impeached as he should be.
No doubt thinking gives you a migraine Mr. Liars, but Obama won that argument back on Nov, 6th. It’s not nice to repeatedly frustrate the will of the people as eventually there’ll be a price to pay.

Suffice it to say that protecting rich tax cuts at the expense of 95 percent of the working class will not bode well for the rich protectors.

Even the rich protectors have begun to see the folly of their position Mr. Liars. It’s amazing a mere laborer such as yourself cannot.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#130991 Dec 1, 2012
Celebrated historian Bertram Oxley has uncovered a memorandum from former Japanese Emperor Hirohito to Admiral Yamamoto dated December 6, 1941, showing that the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor was motivated by an offensive film made by Charlie Chaplin ridiculing Japanese cuisine.

"Contrary to historical accounts over the last seventy years," Professor Oxley said in an interview today with the BBC, "What appeared to be a meticulously planned surprise attack was actually a spontaneous demonstration by moderate sushi connoisseurs in the Imperial Navy in response to a hateful and offensive movie. Thereafter, extremist elements within the Japanese military co-opted the spontaneous attack, transforming it into the overseas contingency operation sometimes referred to as 'World War II.'"

The discovery has created a sensation in scholarly circles. "This is a remarkable find," declared Reginald Smythe, chairman of the Progressive Historians Association and former Obama State Department official. "Had President Roosevelt condemned this movie­ instead of uttering that infernal 'Day of Infamy' provocation ­ the war could have been avoided and millions of lives would have been saved."

Reached at his home in Houston, former President George H. W. Bush, an aviator in the Pacific during the war, expressed skepticism. "It's simply inconceivable that the Japanese First Air Fleet, with six aircraft carriers, could have staged a spur of the moment attack on an island thousands of nautical miles from the Japanese homeland with such stealth and precision." Most experts dismissed Mr. Bush's remarks, however, since it's widely understood that World War II was primarily his son's fault.

White House spokesman Jay Carney, asked this afternoon about the memo's discovery stated, "Of course, hindsight's 20-20. But one can only wonder how much pain and suffering could have been averted had FDR simply apologized to Hirohito at the outset."

"Fortunately," Carney continued, waving off questions from White House reporters anxious to return to questions about Mitt Romney's grooming habits, "We've evolved to a more sophisticated strategy of leading from behind, so we're unlikely to repeat the disastrous mistakes of the past."

If Hilary had been running the State Department then, we’d all be living on EASY STREET today.


“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

#130992 Dec 1, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>since we have a treaty with Germany, we will try you IAW the statutes where you robbed the bank, but being a German citizen you still are not subject to the US Constitution, otherwise, you are not a citizen.
Sorry, loser, if Germany had jurisdiction, the bank robber would be tried in Germany by a German court. His citizenship has no bearing on the matter. The German bank robber who robs a bank in Kansas is subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. If there is a treaty in which each country recognizes each other's natural right to exercise its sovereign power within its borders, that does not change the FACT that each country exercises dominion over aliens within its jurisdiction and that the aliens are subject to the jurisdiction of the respective host countries. You cannot change that FACT by rewording "subject to the jurisdiction, thereof [of the US]" to "subject to jurisdiction of the constitution".

FACT, ordinary aliens within US borders are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Even if you fantasize that this natural authority of every independent and sovereign nation is derived purely via treaty, it would not change that FACT. UR in denial.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#130993 Dec 1, 2012
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
No doubt thinking gives you a migraine Mr. Liars, but Obama won that argument back on Nov, 6th. It’s not nice to repeatedly frustrate the will of the people as eventually there’ll be a price to pay.
Suffice it to say that protecting rich tax cuts at the expense of 95 percent of the working class will not bode well for the rich protectors.
Even the rich protectors have begun to see the folly of their position Mr. Liars. It’s amazing a mere laborer such as yourself cannot.
Never had a migraine in my life pops. Omama won an argument on migraines? Brilliant pops. A price to pay? LMAO! Taxes on the rich are set to expire anyway. On top of that it won't amount to squat, it's purely a game Omama is trying to play but people are tired of his games. They want answers to our problems and Omama doesn't have them. When Omama says the taxes on the wealthy will help reduce the deficit, he's FOS and everyone with more than one brain cell knows it. You're a dumbazz pops. Wake up! Four years in office and he's done nothing, well except spend money that isn't his. Typical for a common garden variety con man. DoDo bird. LMAO!!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#130994 Dec 1, 2012
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, loser, if Germany had jurisdiction, the bank robber would be tried in Germany by a German court. His citizenship has no bearing on the matter. The German bank robber who robs a bank in Kansas is subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. If there is a treaty in which each country recognizes each other's natural right to exercise its sovereign power within its borders, that does not change the FACT that each country exercises dominion over aliens within its jurisdiction and that the aliens are subject to the jurisdiction of the respective host countries. You cannot change that FACT by rewording "subject to the jurisdiction, thereof [of the US]" to "subject to jurisdiction of the constitution".
FACT, ordinary aliens within US borders are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Even if you fantasize that this natural authority of every independent and sovereign nation is derived purely via treaty, it would not change that FACT. UR in denial.
While here, aliens must obey our laws, that's it. They owe no permanent allegiance to the U.S. Very simply Mobarf. I'm really surprised that a Biologist, Chemist and Patent Pusher (LMAO) can't understand such a simple law. Better back off on the juicing. LMAO!!!

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

#130995 Dec 1, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>since we have a treaty with Germany, we will try you IAW the statutes where you robbed the bank, but being a German citizen you still are not subject to the US Constitution, otherwise, you are not a citizen.
I'm sorry, but you cannot prove reality wrong through reductio ad absurdum. You can only prove a premise to be false that is inconsistent with reality.

The reality is that an alien criminal who commits a crime in the US by being tried and convicted in US courts is in fact subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. This fact proves your premise (only citizens are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States) incorrect, but you cannot prove REALITY incorrect. REALITY proves your premise to be pure fantasy.

Indeed, if "subject to the jurisdiction of the United States" is equivalent to "subject to the jurisdiction of the Constitution" the reality of aliens being subject to the jurisdiction of the United States would make it true that they are "subject to the jurisdiction of the constitution."

Again, a false premise cannot prove reality unreal.

That is, of course, unless you live in a dream world.

Now go put your play robe and gavel away in your toy box where they belong and grow up.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#130996 Dec 1, 2012
nebka wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh quoting old Jimmy Hoffa one of the direst people the Unions have ever seen.
"direst"? The word does not seem to fit. Anyway, the union bosses are just a crocked now as they were then. The only difference now is that they fly by private jet these days.
Yep, it is bad for CEO's to fly by private jets but the LSM will not even talk about the Union Bosses who do!

Obama's Union Buddies Have Their Own Private Jets to Fly to Las Vegas (and Ireland), 02/11/2009

for instance, this private LearJet, shown below taking off in Las Vegas. Machinists union bosses spent $1.8 million (from forced dues) for hangars, jet fuel, jet maintenance, mechanics, pilots, and associated loan repayments in 2006 alone.
http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/machinsts-private...

Salaries for the 10 largest unions’ bosses range from $173,000 for the United Auto Workers’ Bob King to $618,000 for Terence O’Sullivan, the president of the Laborers’ International Union of North America. AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka makes about $283,000 per year. Gerald McEntee, the president of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), makes $480,000. The AFSCME stands to lose the most from any of the governors’ budget victories, as it’s currently the nation’s powerhouse public sector union, with around 1.5 million members nationwide.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2011/03/04/union-bosse...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#130997 Dec 1, 2012
LIFESTYLE | 9/22/2011
Why Warren Buffett owns a private jet

Since the financial crisis and when the leaders of the Big Three automakers showed up in Washington DC in private jets in order to ask for bailout money from Congress, general aviation and private jets, especially those owned or used by corporate leaders, have received considerable flak from politicians and other critics.

Nevertheless Warren Buffett explains why he owns and uses a private jet. In short, Buffet says that having a private jet makes his life better and easier as he needs to do a considerable amount of traveling as the CEO of Berkshire Hathaway.

Its also worth noting that when Buffett bought a Bombardier Challenger 600 over 20ago, he named it the “The Indefensible” due to his past criticisms of such purchases that were made by other corporate CEOs. However and after he started using a private jet for awhile, he realized its value as a business tool. Hence, he renamed his aircraft:“The Indispensable.”(For more on the positive case for business aviation, see No Plane, No Gain.)

In fact, to coin a phrase, he liked it so much he bought the company. Sort of. In fact, Berkshire Hathaway owns NetJets.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/matthewstibbe/201...

Since: Dec 11

Fort Worth, TX

#130998 Dec 1, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>Acerbic! Have you been watching Bill O'Riley! I haven't heard that word in years.
Veritas confundit stultitia.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

#130999 Dec 1, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
While here, aliens must obey our laws, that's it. They owe no permanent allegiance to the U.S. Very simply Mobarf. I'm really surprised that a Biologist, Chemist and Patent Pusher (LMAO) can't understand such a simple law. Better back off on the juicing. LMAO!!!
According to the 14th amendment, a person born in the US who is born subject to the jurisdiction of the US is a citizen of the United States. Such a person is born with permanent allegiance to the United States.

Insofar as aliens are concerned, while here, they are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and they owe local allegiance in reciprocity to protection of the host country. Permanent allegiance to a foreign country does not negate the sovereign right of the United States to exercise its exclusive power within its borders. That's a simple fact of life. Get used to it.

The 14th Amendment does not say that only children born of parents with permanent allegiance to the United States can be born citizens. In fact the 14th does not even mention parents or their permanent allegiance. In other words, permanent allegiance is an inept red herring.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, loser, if Germany had jurisdiction, the bank robber would be tried in Germany by a German court. His citizenship has no bearing on the matter. The German bank robber who robs a bank in Kansas is subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. If there is a treaty in which each country recognizes each other's natural right to exercise its sovereign power within its borders, that does not change the FACT that each country exercises dominion over aliens within its jurisdiction and that the aliens are subject to the jurisdiction of the respective host countries. You cannot change that FACT by rewording "subject to the jurisdiction, thereof [of the US]" to "subject to jurisdiction of the constitution".
FACT, ordinary aliens within US borders are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Even if you fantasize that this natural authority of every independent and sovereign nation is derived purely via treaty, it would not change that FACT. UR in denial.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#131000 Dec 1, 2012
Why does Obama want another $150 BILLION for stimulus? Isn't the recession OVER?!?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#131001 Dec 1, 2012
Or does he know we will be back into another recession within a few months?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 5 min JOEL 71,140
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 6 min IBdaMann 49,256
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 14 min whatever 1,154,621
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 2 hr KiMare 51,267
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 3 hr Yumpin Yimminy 68,897
French researchers find new strain of HIV virus... (Aug '09) 3 hr dango64 6
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 4 hr PEllen 98,858
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 1:21 pm PST

NBC Sports 1:21PM
Brandon Marshall on Dominic Raiola: Dirty player, worse person
NBC Sports 1:23 PM
Lions' Raiola suspended 1 game for stomping on opponent - NBC Sports
Bleacher Report 1:31 PM
Allen (Knee) to Get MRI; Considered Day-to-Day
ESPN 2:14 PM
Bears' Marshall blasts Raiola: A dirty player
NBC Sports 4:10 PM
PFT Whiparound: Jay Cutler will return in Week 17