BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 194840 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#130675 Nov 29, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
A Constitutional Republic is a state where the officials are elected as representatives of the people, and must govern according to existing constitutional law that limits the government's power over citizens.
A Constitutional Republic is the current form of government in the United States.
Not one of you dweebs can prove the US Constitution isn't the jurisdiction over the United States.
With that said, not one of you can prove that an alien is "subject to the jurisdiction, thereof", which is the Constitution.
Looks like Ark was DOA. Yep, just a piss-poor attempt to change the Constitution and failed.
Now! What are you going to do with 114+ years of BOGUS law?
Looks like Play Justice Dale needs to have his mommy put him to bed for a nap.

Four years of Play Law and $1.25 can get the Play Justice on a bus.

The constitution is the supreme law of the US, and ordinary aliens in this country are subject to the jurisdiction of the US.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#130676 Nov 29, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>sorry, the Constitution does not recognize a dual-citizenship and the US government can't strip a citizenship away, unless naturalized.
Aliens have never been "subject to the jurisdiction, thereof", the US Constitution, if this were so you would be a citizen, just by setting foot on US soil.
Sorry, citizenship by birth in this country grants US citizenship to persons born here. It has no bearing on foreign citizenship. Similarly, foreign citizenship by birth of a child of US citizens born in a foreign country does not strip the child of US citizenship.

Dale needs to put his play justice robe and gavel back in his toy box.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#130677 Nov 29, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Ark was an exception and the court was wrong! English common law was not followed in this country as it was in England. So everyone born on US soil is NOT a US citizen. Period.
C.f., Allan Benny, Julia Lynch, Look Tin Sing, inter alia.

You are entitled to your own opinion, but not to your own facts.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#130678 Nov 29, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>You can't read into the Constitution what isn't there, to recognize a dual-citizenship will take an amendment.
The Fuller court had the same problem.
Sorry, citizenship by birth in the US is not a "recognition" of dual citizenship. It concerns US citizenship without regard to the political condition of the parents of a person born here.(Except for children of foreign ambassadors and foreign hostile occupying troops.)

Now put your play robe and gavel away in your toy box where they belong and grow up.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#130679 Nov 29, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>the courts have using the premise that aliens are subject to the Constitution, they are not.
I don't have to argue or get an amendment, the Constitution has spoken.
According to Play Law they are not. Who cares?

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#130680 Nov 29, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>like I stated before, by operation of the 14th, there are no dual-citizens. You don't get US citizenship at birth if you are subject to another nation.
Nobody cares about operation of Play Law interpretation of the 14th.

Grow up.
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no mention of dual citizens being treated differently from any other citizens. If they were born in the USA they, like all the other citizens born in the USA, were born subject to the jurisdiction of the USA.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#130681 Nov 29, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>no such thing as a dual-citizen in the US, per the Constitution. The US government does not have the authority to strip a citizenship from a child that is passed from his father and the father's nation. That will have to be done by naturalization later in his life.
Sorry, Play Justice, birthright citizenship in the US neither "strips" nor affirms foreign citizenship.

Now put your play robe and gavel away in your toy box where they belong.
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
AS I stated before, everyone born in the USA except the children of foreign diplomats is born subject to the jurisdiction of the USA and is not subject to another nation. You are right about dual citizenship not being mentioned. By it not being mentioned, it means that dual citizens born in the USA are to be treated just like every other child born in the USA.

“life under BO”

Since: Sep 12

buena vista

#130682 Nov 29, 2012
Johannes wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, I don't live in one of the top 47% states who do not pay income tax as you do. LMAO!!!
No, dingus you live in the worst managed state in the entire country. You must be so proud.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#130683 Nov 29, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>I see you are having problems with the comma, also see you have not pointed out the laws Howard used in penning the Citizenship Clause.
Finish your assignment!
“They became such in virtue of national law, or rather natural law which recognizes persons born WITHIN THE JURISDICTION of every country as being subjects or citizens of that country. Such persons were, therefore, citizens of the United States as WERE BORN IN THE COUNTRY or were made by naturalization.” Senator Jacob Howard, Cong. Globe 39th Cong., 1st Sess, 2765 (1866).[emphasis added]

Grow up, loser.
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
So he said two different things. And by the way, the only people who are born in the USA who are "foreigners, aliens" are those who are the children of foreign diplomats.
John Bingham, another of the writers of the 14th Amendment, said:
“Who does not know that every person born within the limits of the Republic is, in the language of the Constitution, a natural-born citizen.” Rep. Bingham, The congressional globe, Volume 61, Part 2. pg. 2212 (1869)”
And still another, Senator Lyman Trumbull, said:
"It is the common law of this country, and of all countries, and it was unnecessary to incorporate it in the Constitution, that a person is a citizen of the country in which he is born…. I read from Paschal's Annotated Constitution, note 274:‘All persons born in the allegiance of the king are natural born subjects, and all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural born citizens. Birth and allegiance go together.’ Such is the rule of the common law, and it is the common law of this country as well as of England. There are two exceptions, and only two, to the universality of its application. The children of ambassadors are, in theory, born in the allegiance of the powers the ambassadors represent, and slaves, in legal contemplation, are property, and not persons.”—Sen. Trumbull, Cong. Globe. 1st Session, 42nd Congress, pt. 1, pg. 575 (1872)
Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

#130684 Nov 29, 2012
Birfers, what's the lie of the day?

Are birfers pretending their silly cases haven't "been heard?"

Are birfers pretending they have a new, secret interpretation of "jurisdiction" that only they know?(And they cannot support with case law)

Must be fun to play pretend on the internet all day and cash those government cheques, eh birfers?

LMAO!!!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#130685 Nov 29, 2012
Just me wrote:
<quoted text>
I thought you laughed your AO a long time ago. I thought GB didn't have a life but it was you who repeatedly posted all day on Thanksgiving while others were spending time with their loved ones. Can't you find anything more productive to do with your life?
Remain silent little boy!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#130686 Nov 29, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! That was 2 fu's you gave me, you want to make that 3! hahahaha!!!!
I think she wants your wood. LMAO!!!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#130687 Nov 29, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
So, who shoved the crack up your crack? LMAO!!! Moocher, Tax Evader, Drain on Society.
Johannes wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, I don't live in one of the top 47% states who do not pay income tax as you do. LMAO!!!
So you admit you do not pay California states income taxes! Is that why you still vote in South Dakota?
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

#130688 Nov 29, 2012
sage won wrote:
<quoted text>
No, dingus you live in the worst managed state in the entire country. You must be so proud.
Yep, Louisiana is one of the top states comprising the 47% who pay no income tax.
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

#130689 Nov 29, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
So, who shoved the crack up your crack? LMAO!!! Moocher, Tax Evader, Drain on Society.
<quoted text>
So you admit you do not pay California states income taxes! Is that why you still vote in South Dakota?
Really??? Admit what???

Are you fabricating yet again???

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#130691 Nov 29, 2012
Johannes wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, I don't live in one of the top 47% states who do not pay income tax as you do. LMAO!!!
You still have not explained why the people of New York City did not evacuate? Just because they were not told to does not mean they should not have taken the initiative themselves. You see, Libtards are soooo stupid they have to be told to evacuate.
And you still have not responded to my response. Look on the map and you see red-spots and those are the evacuation sites. They are all within walking distance.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/63096264/NYC-Hurric...
Now, take the time, look at the map, notice the evacuation areas and the evacuation sites. Now, tell me that anyone with an IQ over 90 should be able to read it and take action necessary to save his life?
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

#130692 Nov 29, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
You still have not explained why the people of New York City did not evacuate? Just because they were not told to does not mean they should not have taken the initiative themselves. You see, Libtards are soooo stupid they have to be told to evacuate.
And you still have not responded to my response. Look on the map and you see red-spots and those are the evacuation sites. They are all within walking distance.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/63096264/NYC-Hurric...
Now, take the time, look at the map, notice the evacuation areas and the evacuation sites. Now, tell me that anyone with an IQ over 90 should be able to read it and take action necessary to save his life?
You still have not admitted that the Army Corps of Engineers designed and constructed the levees around NO and that they admitted their design was flawed.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#130693 Nov 29, 2012
LRS wrote:
The Buttflaps have been severely clownstomped today! LMAO!!!!!
The birfoons were destroyed on November 6th.

Put your clown costume back in your toy box, little boy.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#130694 Nov 29, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
So you admit you do not pay California states income taxes! Is that why you still vote in South Dakota?
Johannes wrote:
<quoted text>
Really??? Admit what???
Are you fabricating yet again???
No, you said you voted in South Dakota, RIGHT? But you live in Yucaipa, CA, RIGHT?
And it DID snow in Yucaipa, CA on April 9, 2011, RIGHT?
http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/gallery...
Or do you have selective memory too?

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#130695 Nov 29, 2012
Where is her birth certificate?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/22/vale...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 8 min TheIndependentMaj... 1,265,127
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 1 hr RACE 100,327
abby8-5-15 1 hr RACE 1
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 1 hr RACE 6,265
Word (Dec '08) 1 hr RACE 5,387
abby8-4-15 10 hr Kuuipo 13
amy 8-4 11 hr mrs gladys kravitz 5
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages