BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 189898 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#130452 Nov 28, 2012
Grand Bither wrote:
<quoted text>
Here's yet another issue on which the Supreme Court disagrees with birfoons.
Why are birfoons always wrong?
Birfoons do like to agree with the supreme court when it suits them. Like the re-affirmation of the 2nd amendment. Oh, they love the supremes on that one.

And do we hear the so-called "libtards" (rogue tm reg'd) go on and on about that one? For months, years, criticize the judgement? No. Why? Because the Supreme court has spoken and not everyone will agree, but hey, you go on with life. Birthers and tea partyers can't do that, they stamp their little feet and turn blue instead. Pathetic.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#130453 Nov 28, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>you still having problems, reading?
YOU have problems writing. Why the comma following "problems?". Punctuation not your strong suit, is it? Second time in 3 days you made the same mistake.
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

#130454 Nov 28, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
You consider $5M to a charity a stunt? Wonder how the charities feel about that? Omama didn't "cowboy up"! sad very sad
Oh get real! Just about everything Trump does is for his publicity.

Obama is not required to participate in Trump stunts. End of story.

Hey, since Donald has so much money, why doesn't he give some to charity?...quietly...
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

#130455 Nov 28, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>if foreign law has no force, why do we have a naturalization process?
So that the former foreigners can vote, of course. Moreover, a naturalized US citizen has the protection of the USA when traveling abroad, which foreigners do not have.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#130456 Nov 28, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>if foreign law has no force, why do we have a naturalization process?
We have about 196 countries on this planet. Each has its own laws. Those laws count in each respective country and NEVER across its borders into another sovereign country. Geez.
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#130457 Nov 28, 2012
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Dream on. That is your fantasy. The law holds that every child born in the USA except for the children of foreign diplomats is a Natural Born US Citizen.
not so, the law states, you must be "subject to the jurisdiction, thereof", the US Constitution. Those born here that are subjects of, or subject to any foreign power, do not acquire US citizenship.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#130459 Nov 28, 2012
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
(1) when a supporter of your political opponent makes you an offer, it is common sense to ignore it; (2) It is not a good precedent for the President of the United States to do something for an offer of money by an individual, even if the money is for charity; (3) if Trump wanted to give $5 million to charity, he could give it without making an "offer" to Obama.
Do you think repeating the same old shat over and over makes one bit of difference? I guess you missed the point. It was a challenge to Omama and Omama declined. Makes no sense if his papers are all legit! What is Omama hiding? Something, that's for sure.
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#130460 Nov 28, 2012
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
The only people in the USA who are not subject to the jurisdiction of the USA are foreign diplomats and their families.
aliens have never been "subject to the jurisdiction, thereof",(US Constitution), this is only the right of a citizen, you know "We the People of the United States".
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#130462 Nov 28, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
YOU have problems writing. Why the comma following "problems?". Punctuation not your strong suit, is it? Second time in 3 days you made the same mistake.
Why not?
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

#130463 Nov 28, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>not so, the law states, you must be "subject to the jurisdiction, thereof", the US Constitution. Those born here that are subjects of, or subject to any foreign power, do not acquire US citizenship.
Every child born in the USA except for the children of foreign diplomats is a Natural Born US Citizen. Everyone who is in the USA even if only visiting is subject to the jurisdiction of the USA except for foreign diplomats.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#130464 Nov 28, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>Why not?
Because it's incorrect and misplaced punctuation. How can pause after "problems"? You didn't write those perfectly-written depositions when discussing the constitution. You are incapable of even knowing where to place a comma.
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

#130465 Nov 28, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>aliens have never been "subject to the jurisdiction, thereof",(US Constitution), this is only the right of a citizen, you know "We the People of the United States".
If aliens are in the USA and are not foreign diplomats, they are subject to the USA because they must obey the laws of the USA. Foreign diplomats, who are not subject to the USA do not have to obey the laws of the USA (but if they don't, we can declare them persona non grata, and send them home).
American Lady

Danville, KY

#130466 Nov 28, 2012
My posts aren't showing up :(
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

#130467 Nov 28, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you think repeating the same old shat over and over makes one bit of difference? I guess you missed the point. It was a challenge to Omama and Omama declined. Makes no sense if his papers are all legit! What is Omama hiding? Something, that's for sure.
It is a good thing that Obama declined. It would not be a good precedent for the president of the USA to do ANYTHING for a money offer from a rich person, even if the money were to be given to charity.
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#130468 Nov 28, 2012
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
So that the former foreigners can vote, of course. Moreover, a naturalized US citizen has the protection of the USA when traveling abroad, which foreigners do not have.
So, foreigners don't have the protection of their country when traveling abroad?
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#130469 Nov 28, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
We have about 196 countries on this planet. Each has its own laws. Those laws count in each respective country and NEVER across its borders into another sovereign country. Geez.
I guess every treaty is void.
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#130471 Nov 28, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Because it's incorrect and misplaced punctuation. How can pause after "problems"? You didn't write those perfectly-written depositions when discussing the constitution. You are incapable of even knowing where to place a comma.
here,,,,,,,,,,you place them where they belong, OK.(Ref. Mark Twain)

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#130472 Nov 28, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>A
Constitutional Republic is a state where the officials are elected as representatives of the people, and must govern according to existing constitutional law that limits the government's power over citizens.
A Constitutional Republic is the current form of government in the United States.
Get use to it, Puss.
Which has nothing to do with Play Justice Dale's insipid theory of jurisdiction which renders the "constitutional republic" something less than a sovereign nation.

Grow up.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Dale's play law interpretation is play law.
Don't forget to put on your engineer's cap when you play with your choo choo train, Play Justice. All aboard the crazy train!
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#130473 Nov 28, 2012
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
If aliens are in the USA and are not foreign diplomats, they are subject to the USA because they must obey the laws of the USA. Foreign diplomats, who are not subject to the USA do not have to obey the laws of the USA (but if they don't, we can declare them persona non grata, and send them home).
They are under the jurisdiction of, local, state and Fed statutes, but never subject to the Constitution, unless naturalized.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#130474 Nov 28, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>I guess every treaty is void.
Play Law is void. Grow up.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 min Yeah 1,233,031
Amy 5-26-15 24 min mrs gladys kravitz 5
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 25 min Go Blue Forever 99,557
Abby 5-26-15 26 min tiredofit 5
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 2 hr Earthling-1 53,530
amy 5-25-15 2 hr RACE 5
Music Artists A to Z (Feb '14) 2 hr _Zoey_ 408
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]