• Sections
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

# BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 241670 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Since: Dec 11

#130317 Nov 28, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Boolean logic may work for math but it is not applicable in this case.
Boolean logic is designed for use in computer programming, not math. A computer has to have a set of rules. There is no room for guesswork. That's why, if you fed both statements into a computer, it'd come out with the only logical answer. You can rail against it. You can curse about the unfairness of life. Hell, you can do a rain dance if you want. But you cannot change what is simply by saying it isn't so.

Judged:

2

2

2

Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Dec 11

#130320 Nov 28, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
If, Then, Else. Mean anything to you? Your logic is severely flawed.
Ok. You show me the flow of your logic using the two givens. 1. An alien cannot be President. 2. Barack Obama is the President. Show me another conclusion, other than 3. Barack Obama is not an alien. The ELSE part of the statement is only valid if one or the other of the statements is false. Not at issue here.

Judged:

1

1

Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Dec 11

#130321 Nov 28, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
I believe the statement was; "as an alien he is not eligible for the Presidency. Logic? LMAO!!!
You may L your AO, but the statement was "An alien can't be President". You're trying to use If-Then-Else when there was no Else given. The structure of the statement is If A AND B, not If A OR B. Certainly, if one of the statements was false, then you could have other outcomes. But I like to keep my feet firmly planted in reality.

Since: Dec 11

#130322 Nov 28, 2012
LRS wrote:
Ever worked with truth tables?
Of course! That is exactly what we're dealing with here. Map it out given the two statements. It's a pretty short map, given that we're dealing with two TRUE statements. If we had a FALSE to throw in, you might get the results you're trying to force.
Jacques Ottawa

#130323 Nov 28, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Unless you know Terry personally, you have no idea who or what he is. pigeon
You are so right. But tell you what, I've read what he's posted here. It's always logical, sensible and full of respect, in spite of the crass manner in which you stuffed birthers reply to him. You don't know him, so you assume he's a phoney unAmerican like you, which btw is pure projection. I don't know him either, yet, when I don't know someone, I give him/her the benefit of the doubt. His contributions here have only confirmed what I've initially thought of him, namely a gentleman and a scholar. Oh, and patriot, though he never says so. Doesn't have to, it shines.
Jacques Ottawa

#130324 Nov 28, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
What a load of crap. As far as America and Americans are concerned you are a visitor! You are not part of "We", understand? You want to be but you never will. You're disrespectful to America by being disrespectful to its people. pigeon
Fool. In terms of "we", I never said "we" when referring to the U.S. Find me one instance, just ONE, not two where I wrote "we" as pertains to being part of the US. Being disrespectful to slugs like you is NOT being disrespectful to the people of the US as you do NOT represent the true fabric of your nation. I like and respect the US as a whole but have no wish to become an American citizen, no more than you would wish to be a citizen of any other country.

Again, and as concerns disrespect, you initiated it , as I never do that. I'm just responding in kind with printable words for any age. You, on the other hand, a self-professed christian, oh boy... Your filthy germinating mind even conjures up words that , as you wrote 2 days ago, do not even appear in the dictionary. You are trash and do not deserve to be an American. But birth is accidental. Your gain, the US's loss. Why, you've even accused 100% Americans here of being Pollock (sic, LRS tm reg'd) and invited another one to leave.
Jacques Ottawa

#130325 Nov 28, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
A mere5 percentage point rise in income tax from all that earn over \$250,000 is far from a drop in the bucket. I predict Congress and the president will agree on anywhere from \$400,000 to 500,000 ceiling.
<quoted text>
Yep, it drives the Libtards crazy that people have more money than they do. But they do not realize that people get jobs from rich people! Ever been hired by a poor person?
At some point the One Percenters will take their money to a new state or a new country. And just who builds those mansions that rich people live in? And the cars, planes, yachts, etc. that they buy?
You do not make poor people rich by making rich people poor. Just look at the rich people who have fled Greece and are now fleeing France?
It is sad that the Libtards do not realize they are the bigots and the racists.
Very few have left France and Greece. And ironically, those that are leaving, specially the Greek tycoons, are the very ones that brought their countries to their knees, to the fiscal abyss. How you revere those people, rogue. And how you can call litlle middle class people bigots and racists because they want millionaires to pay their fair share is beyond me. To want that is not to hate them or demean them, what's the matter with you?
Jacques Ottawa

#130326 Nov 28, 2012
You're possibly the only person I know who would coin the terms "oil bigots, tycoon bigots and billionaire bigots". Do you even see how that makes not one iota of sense?
Jacques Ottawa

#130327 Nov 28, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Oh, it was NOT racism when the Loony-lefties opposed Clarence Thomas, Colon Powell or Condi Rice but if you oppose a liberal, who just happens to be black, you are a ... racist!!! What Flaming hypocrites!!!
Oh, pick the video up at 3:00 when the Touré TV clips cuts in.
MSNBC Host: Touré TV: McCain Racist for Opposing Susan Rice
Clarence Thomas? NOT racism. His accuser was white? This was a serious charge, Rogue. As to Powell and Rice, I don't recall their being opposed by democrats on grounds that even resembled racism. Can you elaborate on that?
Jacques Ottawa

#130328 Nov 28, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Taxes will not sustain an economy.
<quoted text>
Ever hear of the Laffer curve?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laffer_curve
Yes.
Justice Dale
#130329 Nov 28, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
And that precisely what Terry is doing. What are YOU doing to protect it? Not one congressman, not one senator, not one Justice of the supreme court, not one Republican candidate for the presidency of vice-presidency or for congress agrees with you or your birther ilk on this BC thing. Not a single one. You are a bunch of haters, envious losers, and sooooo isolated on your firing range. Go back to your gun-racked reb-flagged pickup trucks and lynch some black effigies, it'll make you feel a whole lot better.
I see no need to reply, you don't need my help to prove you are a fool.
Jacques Ottawa

#130330 Nov 28, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Uh, you know Dixie Dude just might have a Dixie Chick? You think you know about people when you have no earthly clue what-so-ever. In the above post, you've determined she is really he, he is racist to the hilt, he's hanging little black dolls/figures, he wants to return to the days of lynching at will and you follow this up with a question about baseball. You are nuts jacqazz, just plain old crazy! Can you say Holier Than Thou? You're laughable jacqazz! Would you say any of that to his/her face? LMAO!!!
Yes, right to his face.
Justice Dale
#130332 Nov 28, 2012
Terry Buckeye wrote:
<quoted text>
Then, by your own admission, the President is a citizen, as he IS the POTUS. If an alien CAN'T be POTUS, and if Barack Obama IS POTUS, then, by extrapolation of the facts, Barack Obama is not an alien. That is straight-line logic.
Your straight-line logic has one flaw, aliens are not subject to the jurisdiction, thereof, therefore they are not citizens.
Justice Dale
#130334 Nov 28, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
good enough for him.
Jacques Ottawa

#130335 Nov 28, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
This is for Jacques. Please read carefully. It does not say "individual income". It is about "household income".
I know you are having trouble with read comprehension so I have kept my sentences short. This is also from a Geo. Soros approved source.
From 24/7 Wall St: Median household income in the United States declined for the second straight year, according to data released from the U.S. Census Bureau today. Income was \$50,502 in 2011, more than 8 percent below the 2007 pre-recession peak.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/22/amer ...
<quoted text>
I DID specify in my very fist post that it was "family income". It is you who have selective reading comprehension.
Just like "MARTA, Moving Africans Rapidly Through Atlanta" which you seem to think is racist when "African" is not of any particular race. You seem to see racism, sexism, homophobia, etc. everywhere you look. Sad, very sad.
1.I'm a fair guy. Okay, I believe you, you wrote household and I therefore erred and apologize;

2. "MARTA" is definitely racist as it refers to Africans, and yes, Africans are not a race, BUT it is so clearly implied that Africans are black, so therefore it IS racist. Way-out racist. Are you trying to tell us that the expression "MARTA, Moving Africans Rapidly Through Atlanta" applies to even ONE white person? Tell me this, Rogue, and in the spirit of answering questions like I do, like I just did, would you state that the acronym "MARTA" encompasses any white dudes? Do the words African or afro-American imply white caucassian people?
LRS
#130336 Nov 28, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, right to his face.
Why do I not believe you? LMAO!!!
LRS
#130337 Nov 28, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, right to his face.
I'll put a \$100 up that says Dixie Chick would lay you out cold! And Dixie Dude would be laughing his azz off watching. LOL
Justice Dale
#130338 Nov 28, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Ænd you'd have us believe, following those two brilliant replies, including the "squeeling" one (sic) that you wrote those posts on the 14th amendment et al when you exchanged with Atticus? My god, is plagiarism the new (well getting old) standard and catchword for birthers and tea partyers?
That would be "squeel" (sic), looks better than squeal.
Plagiarism? Where?
Justice Dale
#130339 Nov 28, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
55,000 in Vietnam alone by inventing the Gulf of Tonkin incident. 4,000 in Iraq by inventing non-existent WMDs and Taliban presence in Baghdad. You're welcome.
WW1, WWII, Korea, all respectful of the US constitution. As was Yugoslavia, the constitution, the UN and NATO.
Thank you for showing us, the US Constitution is not play law.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#130341 Nov 28, 2012
What I think is funny is that your Libtards think that Christian Theocracies are evil but Muslim one are great. How is Jimmy "the White Peanut Man" Carter's Iran project workin' out. Yep, that Shaw of Iran was an evil autocrat but that Imam Ruhollah Khomeini and his successors wurkin'out. Yep, some real nice guys. No gays in Iran. No atheists either. And if you are a Christian or Jew, as long as you are happy with scarps they throw you, you can live.
And just who is The Egyptian and Libyan things wurkin' out for Barrack "The Black Peanut Man" Obama wurkin' out? Yep, I don't care who rules any country so long as they are not a threat to America and Americans. And yes, the current regime in Egypt is a threat to our only ally in that part of the world, Israel.

#### Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

### Chicago Discussions

Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 hr VetnorsGate 1,549,439
Spanx-they're for me. 2 hr Spanx ME 2
Black Humor. NO not that black. 2 hr GenePoolDead 5
America should let all immigrants in, why not? 2 hr Rooster panties 2
last post wins! (Apr '13) 7 hr honeymylove 2,549
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 9 hr They cannot kill ... 10,854
Why are White men obsessed with Latina women? (Feb '10) 9 hr LuvHardCock 209

#### Chicago Jobs

More from around the web