BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 194781 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Guru

Canyon Country, CA

#127532 Nov 16, 2012
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama gone 2017!
You funny man GB.
Make me laugh long time.
I give him about 12-18 months the way he is going...

Either way this dude is gonna wish he never stole that election ...especially if he gets impeached which looks very likely depending on what Patraeus says today.

Maybe Biden will lend us his chains to help drag him out of the WH and send him back to Kenya where he belongs.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#127533 Nov 16, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Hello, hello, is there anybody in there?
We have strict immigration laws that are simply being ignored by this admin.
Terry Buckeye wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, sure! This just happened during the Obama administration. After all, not a single illegal immigrant entered on GWB's watch, right? And if you say that they DID, then it begs the question; were you as vehement in calling for Bush's ouster?
No, two wrongs to not make a wright. And that is one of the things Bush did not do that made me unhappy with him.

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#127534 Nov 16, 2012
America Got Stupid wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't agree with anything you said, but I find this statement to be absolutely breathtakingly appalling, as well as very telling about your mental state.
Have you seen Obama's college grades, because you would be the only known person to have done so.
You have no data from college on which to base your assumption, and that is all that it is, AN ASSUMPTION!
We have real data from his first term, and none of it would cause one to conclude that your assumption is correct either.
In fact that data would force one to concede that the exact opposite was true.
Obama is either a genius orchestrating the downfall of America without anyone else knowing it, or he is seriously stupid.
Since I, and many others, know that he is orchestrating the downfall of America, we can rule out that he is a genius, and the known data proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that he is seriously stupid, just like you.
Delude yourself much?
What we all know for sure is that Obama is a winner and you, McCain and Romney are not just losers, but by every measure appear to be sore losers . LOL

Obama gone 2017!

You funny man GB.

Make me laugh long time.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#127535 Nov 16, 2012
Guru wrote:
<quoted text>
Harvard Law...the TV show dummy.
No idea what that is. Am I missing something?
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#127536 Nov 16, 2012
Testimony today wrote:
<quoted text>
Testimony today proved Obama was aware of the terrorist attacks by the CIA at 5pm on 9/11/12. He lied.
Thought it was behind closed doors. You birthers have so much "inside information". Thanks for sharing it ha ha.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#127537 Nov 16, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, we love good news, there just hasn't been any in four years. Really.
How about the DJIA doubling in less than 4 years? How about the lowest oil import dependency in 20 years and increased local production? How about a start to universal health care for everyone, which would be 100% but Repubs said no?; how about successful rescue of Big 3 and increase in Chrysler hiring and refuting Romhey campaign lies about move to China? How about Bin Laden and his lieutenants' deaths? How about withdrawal from Iraq though GWB had forgotten to craft an exit plan? How about soon-to-come withdrawal from Afghanistan? Do you want more? Plenty waiting in the wings.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#127538 Nov 16, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
When has he ever told the truth?
When have YOU ever told the truth? What about that whopper on "inside knowledge" on how the Supremes intended to kill Obamacare? You lied on that one, huge one, for which we have not heard from you. Now this testimony behind closed doors comming out the same day? One of you birthers fantasized what was said, posted it on some looney web site no doubt and you voracious hyenas pounced all over it. When it is all proven false, I expect we won't hear further from you.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#127539 Nov 16, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
When has he ever told the truth?
and, yes, Rogue, did you not say that the General would NOT testify? Did you not? Will I hear from you on this one?
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#127540 Nov 16, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
This is the same kind of inside information that Rogue got on the supreme court, the 9 supremes agreeing on day 1 that they would vote down Obama care. So much inside info, these birthers, like the last presidential election. Wrong. All the way, and then they get upset that they were, are wrong and talk fraud, lies, etc. How it must suck to be wrong, not most of the time, but ALL the time.
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
That was correct. And then Obama blackmail Chief Justice Roberts to change sides.
Do you even realise how insane that is? What was the blackmail about?

Oh, btw, do you have proof that Obama blackmailed the chief justice or is it once more a figment of your wild hate-Obama imagination? Will he blackmail him again for the coming inauguration? Put up, Rogue, proof that he blackmailed the chief justice and your sources.

“On Deck”

Since: Aug 08

French Polynesia

#127541 Nov 16, 2012
Washington (AP)- Former CIA director David Petraeus will testify before the House Intelligence Committee Friday on events that led to the death of the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans in an attack on the United State's Consulate at Benghazi, Libya on Sept. 11.
Spokesmen for the committee say the hearing will be closed to the public.

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#127542 Nov 16, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama did not will by any sort of land slide. Just look at the election of 1984 when Ronald Reagan won 425 Electoral College votes compared to Fritz's 13!!!
Although many professional prognosticators see President Obama as the favorite tomorrow, some notable conservatives are dissenting. THEIR MAPS SHOW EVERYTHING FROM A SLIM WIN BY MITT ROMNEY WITH 275 ELECTORAL COLLEGE VOTES TO A 325-VOTE LANDSLIDE, with some maps putting Wisconsin, Minnesota, Pennsylvania and even Michigan in play.
http://www.denverpost.com/politics-national/2...

Romney’s 325 fantasy win would be a landslide but Obama’s 332 actual win is not? Nice try Rogue!
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#127543 Nov 16, 2012
Guru wrote:
part 3/3-
"
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia has said there is no such right. But historians would note that Thomas Jefferson said states “should separate from our companions only when the sole alternatives left, are the dissolution of our Union with them, or submission to a government without limitation of powers.”
His letter, posted online at Constitution.org , sheds light on the arguments raised on the Obama administration’s online petition site, where dozens of petitions are seeking permission for virtually all of the states to leave the union.
Jefferson wrote about the expansion of power then by the federal government “towards the usurpation of all the rights reserved to the States, and the consolidation in itself of all powers, foreign and domestic; and that too, by constructions which, if legitimate, leave no limits to their power.”
He continued:“Take together the decisions of the federal court, the doctrines of the president, and the misconstructions of the constitutional Compact acted on by the legislature of the federal branch, and it is but too evident, that the three ruling branches of that department are in combination to strip their colleagues, the State authorities; of the powers reserved by them, and to exercise themselves all functions foreign and domestic.”
He targeted the same authority that Obama has cited in his promotion of Obamacare:“Under the power to regulate commerce, they assume indefinitely that also over agriculture and manufactures, and call it regulation to take the earnings of one of these branches of industry, and that, too, the most depressed, and put them into the pockets of the other, the most flourishing of all.
“Under the authority to establish post roads, they claim that of cutting down mountains for the construction of roads, of digging canals, and aided by a little sophistry on the words ‘general welfare,’ a right to do, not only the acts to effect that, which are specifically enumerated and permitted, but whatsoever they shall think, or pretend will be for the general welfare. And what is our resource for the preservation of the Constitution?”
Political debate at that point, reasoned Jefferson, was futile.
“Reason and argument? You might as well reason and argue with the marble columns encircling them. The representatives chosen by ourselves? They are joined in the combination, some from incorrect views of government, some from corrupt ones, sufficient voting together to outnumber the sound parts; and with majorities only of one, two, or three, bold enough to go forward in defiance.”
And he continued:“[We must] keep ourselves in a situation to profit by the chapter of accidents; and separate from our companions only when the sole alternatives left, are the dissolution of our Union with them, or submission to a government without limitation of powers. Between these two evils, when we must make a choice, there can be no hesitation.”
NOW THAT IS FUNNIER THAT HELL!!!
You do realise that no one will read this trash, do you? Not even you, bleary-eyed after one paragraph.

“On Deck”

Since: Aug 08

French Polynesia

#127544 Nov 16, 2012
Jacques,
"Closed to the public" means behind closed-doors.
loose
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#127545 Nov 16, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep, there are 1.5 million unenforced court deportation orders.
Join the worldwide club, Rogue. Any reason why you should be different from other so-called "have" countries?
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#127546 Nov 16, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
No use explaining, you are too uneducated, too vulgar, to understand.
Guru wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey JOCK ITCH...get a life you steaming TURD!
If ever I needed confirmation of my above post, there it is. Merci, monsieur Harvard, ha ha.

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#127547 Nov 16, 2012
Guru wrote:
<quoted text>
I give him about 12-18 months the way he is going...
Either way this dude is gonna wish he never stole that election ...especially if he gets impeached which looks very likely depending on what Patraeus says today.
Maybe Biden will lend us his chains to help drag him out of the WH and send him back to Kenya where he belongs.
The birfoon has forever had a problem with his sweet dreams turning to nightmares. No doubt it has something to do with his mental stability, but good luck with that. Everything else has failed so why not.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#127548 Nov 16, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Any country can stop them. Mexico does. Oh, they normally do not get upset if you have plenty of money and do not work. But if you want to work it is far harder to get a permit.
Mexico has alien immigration problems on the scale of the U.S., Canada and western Europe? Again, you utter insane statements. The only illegal aliens they have are a bunch of middle-class American and Canadian snowbirds who emigrate to Mexico's little Americanized towns to spend the winter. Do you think that illegal American immigration to Mexico has become a problem? You should be more careful before uttering such wild sourceless declarations. Is your excuse again to be that someone is blackmailing the Mexicans?

“On Deck”

Since: Aug 08

French Polynesia

#127549 Nov 16, 2012
Jacques,
I'm not a disgraced attorney, but if I am not mistaken, "closed to the public" also means that there has been a gag order placed on the Petraeus testimony.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#127550 Nov 16, 2012
Guru wrote:
Hey JOCK ITCH from Ottowa....sit on this and rotate!
http://www.wnd.com/2012/11/now-white-house-pe...
WND.com ? Fool. Apart from a few wackos like you, who reads the crap and lies coming out of that fascist website? How many names, total, on that petition? How many doublings and triplings of the same name? How many non-Texans, for example, have signed for that state's secession as I proved the other day (130 out of 388 out-of-state). You are delusional, totally out of wack and a very very sorry loser. YOU LOST YOUR ELECTION. YOUR "SAVIOUR" STRUCK OUT, and now blaming free democratic party condoms for his defeat. Do you now realise what a pathetic clown you and your birther ilk are? Do you realise how Obama beat the crap out of you? Will you be challenging him to fisticuffs now like your friend and bosom buddy LRS loves to do when he has nothing left (not that he and you EVER had anything.) Harvard Law? ha ha. Real estate tycoon? Ho ho.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#127551 Nov 16, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Obama is very worried that most of the states will revolt. Oh Libtards, just in case you forgot, the USSC ruled that the state mandates by ObamaCare were UNConstitutional!
U.S. gives states more time to make Obama health law decision
By Deborah Charles and James B. Kelleher | Reuters – 3 hrs ago
WASHINGTON/CHICAGO (Reuters)- The federal government on Thursday gave states another month to decide if they will operate insurance exchanges under the new U.S. healthcare law, after some Republican governors stalled in the hope President Barack Obama would lose last week's election.
The delay was the second time in a week that Health and Human from Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius showed flexibility on deadlines as a way to entice states to cooperate in implementing Obama's signature domestic achievement.
http://news.yahoo.com/u-gives-states-another-...
Let's see how many of the 50 states will go along. I predict 46, both repub and Dem states. You?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 5 min John Galt 1,264,861
abby8-4-15 55 min blunt advice 9
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 55 min forgotten memories 6,263
News Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 1 hr CDC 52,074
amy 8-4 1 hr blunt advice 4
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 1 hr Mister Tonka 100,317
Song Title Game (Dec '11) 1 hr boundary painter 1,199
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages