BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

Full story: Chicago Tribune

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Comments (Page 5,599)

Showing posts 111,961 - 111,980 of167,716
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Jacques Ottawa

Ottawa, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#126448
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Or so you say. It is you Dems who have put the blacks in the ghettos and you keep them stupid by sending them to ghetto schools.
Fact, only 63% of all Democrats in Congress voted for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 compared to 80% of all Republicans.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act...
Rogue, Rogue, you said, clearly, very clearly, prior to Nov 6 that Obama was losing some of the black vote. In 2008, blacks voted 90% for Obama. In 2012, blacks voted 90% for Obama. I'm sure, if the Repubs had not rigged the ballot boxes, it would have been more like 95%. Do you want to discuss the latino vote which you also said was down or do you just want to drop it?
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#126449
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

America Got Stupid wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep, that is certainly a fairy-tale.
Tell us, what party did those who created the Black Codes and the Jim Crow laws represent?
No fantasy allowed for this answer.
Can you name any Democrats besides Strom Thurmond who became a Republican back then?
Do you deny that Robert Byrd was a leader of the KKK and a DemoKKKrat?
Ronald Reagan.
Jacques Ottawa

Ottawa, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#126450
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
No, so-called patriot warrior, it's not me. I have ONE moniker, unlike you. And I told you, he/she writes better than me.
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
LMAO at this silly fool.
That's it? That's your reply? Laaaaaame. Boooooring.
Jacques Ottawa

Ottawa, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#126451
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
You are a certifiable nutcase. What poor azz third world country did you sneak in from? Pure trash.
The Truth wrote:
Sad America-loving conservatives already demanding secession
Aw, the party of 'Merika has an enormous post-election sad:
In the aftermath of last week's presidential election, residents in at least nineteen states have put up petitions on the government's "We the People" petitioning website seeking the right to secede from the rest of the country.[]
Petitions for secession filed from Louisiana and Texas have already received well over 10,000 signatures. Per the website's own rules, petitions that garner 25,000 signatures or more within 30 days require a response from the Obama administration.
Apparently this is the part of the conservative realization that (1) yes, the president is still a scary black man, and (2) nobody in America but them has a problem with that. There's also been some premise going around that Obama's moderateness and centrism the last four years only goes to prove how much he's going to be a crazy secret-Muslim radical during the next four years, and if you can unpack that logic, you've got me beat. I have no idea what they're going on about. Oh, and the Texas version has already topped the 25K threshold, so congratulations, Texas conservatives! You'll be getting a special note from the Obama administration suggesting where you can go!
This doesn't seem to be a purely regional thing, since even folks in Oregon and New York are piping up with their own petitions (and really, if you're an Oregon or New York conservative, I feel a good amount of pity for you, I really do). But I've said it before, and I'll say it again: This notion of conservative secession has its merits. Of course, as "True America" we'd want to attach some constraints to the separatists: no nuclear weapons, get your own damn military, and we'll be carving out territory for you that consists entirely of places close to sea level, so that you can ignore climate change from the best possible vantage point. But this sounds pretty doable, once the logistics get worked out. So what are you going to call yourselves? United Galts of America? New Jesusland? That's great, we'll send you a card.
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
You are a certifiable nutcase. What poor azz third world country did you sneak in from? Pure trash.
That's it? That's your reply? Laaaaaaame, booooooring.
Learn to Read

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#126452
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Gee. Looks like most of the people that want Texas out if the Union aren't in Texas.

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/pea...

Hahahahahaha
Jacques Ottawa

Ottawa, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#126453
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
The irrelevant and insignificant queer from canada speaks! LMAO
Ahh, the word queer comes up again, unsollicited, unmentioned, but good ole reliable LRS brings it up. Almost as obsessed with "queers" as our faithful Rogue is obsessed with Clinton's penis. That's the way it goes, folks, as LRS creaks his closet door open just a tad more, hoping for an encouraging word, a little whispering "come on", but the room is silent, except for the sounds of someone throwing up after the poor unsespecting soul peeked inside the closet, and in shock, wondering why this "blob", onefinger in nose, other in azz, was "switching".
Jacques Ottawa

Ottawa, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#126454
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Why don't you tax everyone who makes over $250K a year 100% for income over $250? Woodn't you end the deficit in just one year?
That's right, Rogue, keep defending the big boys. God, they must love you, specially that you come cheap.
Jacques Ottawa

Ottawa, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#126455
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Tell us brainless one, what exactly will raising taxes on the rich do for the counrty? The difference in taxes collected will be marginal. Then the wealthy will lose confidence in the economy and not invest. We'll be right where we are now. Do you think the wealthy owe you something?
Will that cause Romney to export even more money to the Caymans and more jobs to Mexico and China.? What do you think?
Jacques Ottawa

Ottawa, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#126456
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Learn to Read wrote:
Gee. Looks like most of the people that want Texas out if the Union aren't in Texas.
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/pea...
Hahahahahaha
I counted 388 votes. Stopped counting, awfully boring. However, checked places of residence. 130 are from out of state, not from Texas, accounting for fully 30% of petitioners. I am forced conclude that these 30% just want Texas to get the hell out.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#126457
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Johannes wrote:
<quoted text>
Didn't the national debt triple under Reagan/Bush?
Deflection?
LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#126458
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Jacques Ottawa wrote:
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
No, so-called patriot warrior, it's not me. I have ONE moniker, unlike you. And I told you, he/she writes better than me.
<quoted text>
That's it? That's your reply? Laaaaaame. Boooooring.
I'm still laughing at you fool.
Learn to Read

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#126459
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>I counted 388 votes. Stopped counting, awfully boring. However, checked places of residence. 130 are from out of state, not from Texas, accounting for fully 30% of petitioners. I am forced conclude that these 30% just want Texas to get the hell out.
An equal number seem unwilling to declare place of residence

Also noticed that while showing only fist name and initial limits "creative signing" one EV L did join the effort to toss Texas
LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#126460
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Ahh, the word queer comes up again, unsollicited, unmentioned, but good ole reliable LRS brings it up. Almost as obsessed with "queers" as our faithful Rogue is obsessed with Clinton's penis. That's the way it goes, folks, as LRS creaks his closet door open just a tad more, hoping for an encouraging word, a little whispering "come on", but the room is silent, except for the sounds of someone throwing up after the poor unsespecting soul peeked inside the closet, and in shock, wondering why this "blob", onefinger in nose, other in azz, was "switching".
The words just go together, know what I mean? LMAO
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#126462
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Southern Democrats are members of the U.S. Democratic Party who reside in the American South. In the 19th century, they were the definitive pro-slavery wing of the party, opposed to both the anti-slavery Republicans (GOP) and the more liberal Northern Democrats.

Eventually "Redemption" was finalized in the Compromise of 1877 and the Redeemers gained control throughout the South. As the New Deal began to move Democrats as a whole to the left (at least economically), Southern Democrats largely stayed as conservative as they had always been, with some even breaking off to form farther right-wing splinters like the Dixiecrats. After the Civil Rights Movement successfully challenged the Jim Crow laws and other forms of institutionalized racism, and after the Democrats as a whole came to symbolize the mainstream left of the United States, the form, if not the content, of Southern Democratic politics began to change.

After World War II, during the civil rights movement, Democrats in the South initially still voted loyally with their party. After the signing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, white voters who became tolerant of diversity began voting against Democratic incumbents for GOP candidates. The Republicans carried many Southern states for the first time since before the Great Depression. Rising educational levels and rising prosperity in the South, combined with shifts to the left by the national Democratic Party on a variety of socio-economic issues, led to widespread abandonment of the Democratic Party by white voters and Republican dominance in many Southern states by the 1990s and 2000s.

When Richard Nixon courted voters with his Southern Strategy, many Democrats became Republicans and the South became fertile ground for the GOP, which conversely was becoming more conservative as the Democrats were becoming more liberal. However, Democratic incumbents still held sway over voters in many states, especially those of the Deep South. In fact, until 2002, Democrats still had much control over Southern politics. It wasn't until the 1990s that Democratic control gradually collapsed, starting with the elections of 1994, in which Republicans gained control of both houses of Congress, through the rest of the decade. Southern Democrats of today who vote for the Democratic ticket are mostly urban liberals. Rural residents tend to vote for the Republican ticket, although there are a sizable number of Conservative Democrats.

A huge portion of Representatives, Senators, and voters who were referred to as Reagan Democrats in the 1980s were conservative Southern Democrats. An interesting exception to this trend is Arkansas, where to this day all but one statewide elected officials are Democrats.(The state has, however, given its electoral votes to the GOP in the past three Presidential elections, although in 1992 and 1996, "favorite son" Bill Clinton was the candidate and won each time.)

Another exception is North Carolina. Despite the fact that the state has voted for Republicans in every presidential election from 1980 until 2004, the governorship, legislature, as well as most statewide offices remain in Democratic control, and with the election of Heath Shuler in 2006, the congressional delegation once again is majority Democratic.

“ad maiora nati sumus ”

Since: Sep 09

Justice Scalia is an Oxymoron

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#126463
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

One Sunny day in January 2013, an old man approached the White House from across Pennsylvania Avenue where
he ' d been sitting on a park bench.

He spoke to the U.S. Marine standing guard and said, "I would
like to go in and meet with President Romney ."

The Marine looked at the man and said, "Sir, Mr. Romney is not the President."

The old man said, "Okay," and walked away. The following day the same man
approached the White House and said to the same Marine, "I would like to go
in and meet with President Romney ."

The Marine again told the man, "Sir, as I said yesterday, Mr. Romney not the President."
The man thanked him and again just walked away. The third day the same man
approached the White House and spoke to the very same U.S. Marine, saying,
"I would like to go in and meet with President Romney ."The Marine,
understandably agitated at this point, looked at the man and said, "Sir, this is
the third day in a row you have been here asking to speak to Mr. Romney . I've
told you already that Mr. Romney is not the President. Don't you understand?"

The old man looked at the Marine and said,
"Oh, I understand. I just love hearing it."
The Marine snapped to attention, saluted, and said, "See you tomorrow, Sir"
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#126464
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Deflection?
Confused?
LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#126465
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Will that cause Romney to export even more money to the Caymans and more jobs to Mexico and China.? What do you think?
What does Romney have to do with overseas labor rates? Back to the wealthy for a sec. Actually, the wealthy owe less than anyone else! It's the people that don't do a damn thing that owe the most! The idea that the wealthy owe more is asinine at BEST.
Jacques Ottawa

Ottawa, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#126466
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
The words just go together, know what I mean? LMAO
Lame, lamer and lamest. "Lamestess" even. You definitely do not measure up, "Switcher", definitely. Give up while you're merely behind. Can't you see everyone, including your birther ilk, laughing at you? And please, try to do your switching in private.
Jacques Ottawa

Ottawa, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#126467
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Atticus Tiberius Finch wrote:
One Sunny day in January 2013, an old man approached the White House from across Pennsylvania Avenue where
he ' d been sitting on a park bench.
He spoke to the U.S. Marine standing guard and said, "I would
like to go in and meet with President Romney ."
The Marine looked at the man and said, "Sir, Mr. Romney is not the President."
The old man said, "Okay," and walked away. The following day the same man
approached the White House and said to the same Marine, "I would like to go
in and meet with President Romney ."
The Marine again told the man, "Sir, as I said yesterday, Mr. Romney not the President."
The man thanked him and again just walked away. The third day the same man
approached the White House and spoke to the very same U.S. Marine, saying,
"I would like to go in and meet with President Romney ."The Marine,
understandably agitated at this point, looked at the man and said, "Sir, this is
the third day in a row you have been here asking to speak to Mr. Romney . I've
told you already that Mr. Romney is not the President. Don't you understand?"
The old man looked at the Marine and said,
"Oh, I understand. I just love hearing it."
The Marine snapped to attention, saluted, and said, "See you tomorrow, Sir"
Beautiful. Oh, poetic justice.

Oh, rogue, don't ya just love it? Would you mind repeating the original?
Jacques Ottawa

Ottawa, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#126468
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
What does Romney have to do with overseas labor rates? Back to the wealthy for a sec. Actually, the wealthy owe less than anyone else! It's the people that don't do a damn thing that owe the most! The idea that the wealthy owe more is asinine at BEST.
I understand now . Thank you. In order to pull your weight, as the rich presumably do, what is your plan "about not doing a damn thing and owing the most?"

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 111,961 - 111,980 of167,716
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

61 Users are viewing the Chicago Forum right now

Search the Chicago Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 5 min Incognito4Ever 1,036,659
Abby 4-23 20 min PEllen 29
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 22 min Wicklow 96,268
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 28 min _Zoey_ 4,040
Amy 4-23 47 min cheluzal 40
8 shot across Chicago in less than seven hours 1 hr hands on AR 4
Homeowner shooting dead two teens who broke int... 1 hr hands on AR 4
ask amy 4-22 7 hr Sublime1 69
•••
•••
Chicago Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••