BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

#126566 Nov 13, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Johannes, Under Reagan it was because of the Democrat controlled Congress. As for Bush, the Dems controlled Congress the last two year and added $2T to the debt.
Johannes has a typical Libtardian response as the Speaker of the House controls the budgetary process!!! The only thing ANY president can do is either sign or veto the budget passed by Congress.
The reason why Bill Clinton did so well as Bill signed into law four of Newt Gingrich's balance budgets!!!
<quoted text>
Can you READ? I mean, can your UNDERSTAND what you read?
Does the House have anything to do with political appointments? NO, only the Senate does.
Does the House have anything to do with Treaties? NO, only the Senate does.
But when it comes to the Budget, the House rules and the only thing the Senate can do is vote yes or no!!! ERGO, the Speaker of the House rules the budgetary process!!!
Oh, and in the last two years of Reagan, Congress passed 17 laws that increased TAXES!!! And they caused to Bank and S&L Debacle of the early 1990's.
Just like laws passed by Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton caused the Housing Mortgage failure which lead to the current recession!!!
I think you are repeating youself.
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

#126567 Nov 13, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Johannes wrote:
<quoted text>
You do know that a college did a study of Rmoney's economic plan for American and they concluded that it was mathematically impossible?
<quoted text>
Don't expect a coherent answer form him. And he claims to be a college graduate too. Sad, very sad.
Just to correct the record...that would be three degrees.

Hey, how's that Army GED working for you?
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#126568 Nov 13, 2012
NO more American Lady wrote:
Petitions seeking White House
approval to ‘secede’
now come
from 47 states. <<<---<<
http://dailycaller.com/2012/11/13/petitions-s...
Laugh, Laugh
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =DXblt-PLPzcXX
Let's see now. Looks like 50 states coming up for secession. So, if they all secede, you get a country for those 50 states. Well, it's right there right now, called the United States of America with a newly-democratically-elected president. Looks like it's all set. Laugh, laugh.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#126569 Nov 13, 2012
American Lady wrote:
I'm going to PROUDLY
knock OFF
NO more
from my name
BACK to
American Lady!...:~D
You want ALL states to secede and you dare call yourself American Lady? Make it NOT American but Benedict Arnold pravda Lady.
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

#126570 Nov 13, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Johannes, Under Reagan it was because of the Democrat controlled Congress. As for Bush, the Dems controlled Congress the last two year and added $2T to the debt.
Johannes has a typical Libtardian response as the Speaker of the House controls the budgetary process!!! The only thing ANY president can do is either sign or veto the budget passed by Congress.
The reason why Bill Clinton did so well as Bill signed into law four of Newt Gingrich's balance budgets!!!
<quoted text>
Can you READ? I mean, can your UNDERSTAND what you read?
Does the House have anything to do with political appointments? NO, only the Senate does.
Does the House have anything to do with Treaties? NO, only the Senate does.
But when it comes to the Budget, the House rules and the only thing the Senate can do is vote yes or no!!! ERGO, the Speaker of the House rules the budgetary process!!!
Oh, and in the last two years of Reagan, Congress passed 17 laws that increased TAXES!!! And they caused to Bank and S&L Debacle of the early 1990's.
Just like laws passed by Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton caused the Housing Mortgage failure which lead to the current recession!!!
Then why did you say the reason was that the dems controlled Congress?

Select one:

1) Red Herring
2) Thomas Nadeau F-upped yet again.
3) Thomas Nadeau doesn't know what he's talking about.
4) Thomas Nadeau loves republiKKKans and hates dems.
5) Thomas Nadeau is just being Thomas Nadeau.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#126571 Nov 13, 2012
Johannes wrote:
<quoted text>
Now, using YOUR Lifer/Birther logic, why didn't Obama court martial James Stavridis? After all Stavridis is white!!!
I am not familiar with any allegations against him. Was there some sort of investigation? Now the Army does an AR 15-6 investigation and I am sure the Navy has a similar proceeding before someone is formally charged.
http://www.apd.army.mil/pdffiles/r15_6.pdf
To the best of my knowledge, you do not court-martial anyone until they have been charged with something!

“WTFU”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#126572 Nov 13, 2012
LOL birthers ..still..HAHA

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#126573 Nov 13, 2012
Johannes wrote:
<quoted text>
Then why did you say the reason was that the dems controlled Congress?
Select one:
1) Red Herring
2) Thomas Nadeau F-upped yet again.
3) Thomas Nadeau doesn't know what he's talking about.
4) Thomas Nadeau loves republiKKKans and hates dems.
5) Thomas Nadeau is just being Thomas Nadeau.
Are you okay. Take a powder. A BC powder, that is!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#126574 Nov 13, 2012
Just in case you do not know what a BC powder is!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BC_Powder
Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

#126575 Nov 13, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Just in case you do not know what a BC powder is!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BC_Powder
Rogue Moron, did you know that jokes are not funny if you have to explain them.

Comedy tip, free of charge.
Uda

Holly, MI

#126576 Nov 13, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Johannes wrote:
<quoted text>
Why did the national debt triple under Reagan/Bush?
<quoted text>
Johannes, Under Reagan it was because of the Democrat controlled Congress. As for Bush, the Dems controlled Congress the last two year and added $2T to the debt.
Johannes has a typical Libtardian response as the Speaker of the House controls the budgetary process!!! The only thing ANY president can do is either sign or veto the budget passed by Congress.
The reason why Bill Clinton did so well as Bill signed into law four of Newt Gingrich's balance budgets!!!
\

Another Poll and this one is right on as well.

Poll: If government careens off fiscal cliff, GOP to shoulder blame

If the U.S. government ends up careening off the "fiscal cliff," Republicans in Congress stand to shoulder most of the blame, according to a new poll released Tuesday.

A majority of Americans said in a new, post-election poll that they do not expect President Barack Obama and members of Congress to reach an agreement to avoid the effects of the fiscal cliff, the combination of automatic spending cuts and tax hikes set to take effect at the beginning of the year.

Fifty-three percent of Americans said Republicans in Congress would be more to blame in that instance, according to a Pew Research Center poll conducted in the days following the election. Twenty-nine percent said that Obama would be more to blame, while 10 percent said both the president and Republicans would share blame.

OK Righties take a Good hard look at yourselves in the mirror. You're gonna own this one too.

The whole damn bunch of you are crazy.

Lets stop your whining and incorrect labeling of Obama "DOUBLING" the entire national debt in his first term as president. It just didn't happen.
American Lady

Danville, KY

#126577 Nov 13, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
pravda Lady.
Obama phenomenon: Hope and disappointment
13.11.2012
U.S. President Barack Obama has made history as a pioneer in many ways...

In addition, he is the first head of state whose father was a Muslim... the first Muslim president. Another reservation about Obama's African roots...the family of his mother.
http://english.pravda.ru/world/americas/13-11...

Thor H.
“Some of the president's opponents argue that his birth certificate is forged, and that he was born in Kenya. If this was true, Obama would not have had the right to run for president. Yet, the "birthers" did not have any evidence to prove their theory.”.

This author is grossly misinformed and I will not entertain his other arguments after answering this one. <<<---<

It is a well-established fact that Obama has not established ANY kind of an identity with the American people. We do not know who—or what--- he is.

The so-called “birthers”—which is a derogatory term for American patriots—have overwhelming evidence of fraud perpetrated against the American people, by the Obama regime.

This evidence is further corroborated by a team of advanced law enforcement investigators and computer experts who examined the “electronic documents,” and publicly pronounced them fakes.

In addition, there is massive evidence of widespread voter fraud, as delivered by rigged electronic voting machines and a myriad of other devices, designed to cheat the American people of government by their own consent.

The American people remain enslaved and impoverished, because our leaders lack the political will and integrity of Vladimir Putin to put an end to our bondage as debt slaves to a central bank.

The vision of the American Revolution is that the men of all nations must remain free from the stranglehold of robber barons, who run their financial steed, roughshod over the tilled fields of decent people the world over, for sport.

America has become a debt slave to the international bankers, who would turn all nations into vassals of one central authority—run by the oligarchy.

That phony storefront of the international bankers is known as the United Nations.

The Marxist vision has prevailed over the American revolutionary model and now the American people are forced to play bully to the world—always looking to pick a fight with every neighbor on the block.

Russia has freedom and wealth; America has slavery and poverty as its lot.

Our country has become a playground for criminal syndicates, due to the porous borders the bankers force it.

The best way to describe Mr. Obama, is: A wrench, deliberately thrown into the machinery of our ship of state.

This man was specially groomed from birth, to destroy the United States of America.

He even had the audacity to run to the United Nations as a common tattle-tale, to deliver the spurious charge of alleged "racism," against a country which had just elected its first black president.

While it is true that Mr. Obama is better than Mr. Romney, in regard to Russian/American relations; he still functions as a Manchukuo puppet emperor, in service to the international bankers.

If recent events in Benghazi are any indication of his statesmanship abilities—and they are—he has NO political future and any agreements he makes will be in future, null and void.

At this juncture in history; the American people are inspired by the success President Vladimir Putin has achieved in removing banking swindlers from Russian soil.

The common American people hope to emulate what Mr. Putin attained, to restore the stolen strength of our own country and also to end the destructive--and forced-- Siamese twin arrangement between the United States of America and Israel.

As thing currently stand; America is in active revolt with twenty states of the Union, ready to secede on hearing that The Great Impostor was “re-elected.”.

America remains under Zionist occupation, until further notice.
American Lady

Danville, KY

#126578 Nov 13, 2012
Uda wrote:
<quoted text>\
Another Poll and this one is right on as well.
Poll: If government careens off fiscal cliff, GOP to shoulder blame
If the U.S. government ends up careening off the "fiscal cliff," Republicans in Congress stand to shoulder most of the blame, according to a new poll released Tuesday.
A majority of Americans said in a new, post-election poll that they do not expect President Barack Obama and members of Congress to reach an agreement to avoid the effects of the fiscal cliff, the combination of automatic spending cuts and tax hikes set to take effect at the beginning of the year.
Fifty-three percent of Americans said Republicans in Congress would be more to blame in that instance, according to a Pew Research Center poll conducted in the days following the election. Twenty-nine percent said that Obama would be more to blame, while 10 percent said both the president and Republicans would share blame.
OK Righties take a Good hard look at yourselves in the mirror. You're gonna own this one too.
The whole damn bunch of you are crazy.
Lets stop your whining and incorrect labeling of Obama "DOUBLING" the entire national debt in his first term as president. It just didn't happen.
Says Barack Obama "said when he was running for office four years ago that he would ==halve== the annual deficit by the end of his first term. That simply has not happened."

Our ruling

In a debate against his Democratic challenger, Lance claimed that Obama "said when he was running for office four years ago that he would halve the annual deficit by the end of his first term. That simply has not happened, ladies and gentlemen, and it is greatly disturbing."

Lance should have said Obama made that pledge soon after he took office, but the congressman’s overall point is solid. The president vowed in February 2009 to cut the annual deficit in half by the end of his first term, and he has not done it.

We rate the statement True.

http://www.politifact.com/new-jersey/statemen...
Guru

Canyon Country, CA

#126579 Nov 13, 2012
Guru wrote:
<quoted text>
Time to out Terri Tanna the tuna again folks. The class will enjoy you response. Here we have Terri talking about "The Calculus"...
"How do you describe your level of proficiency in The Calculus (differential and integral) that is the ENTIRE LANGUAGE OF ECONOMICS TODAY?" as she says in the above.
...yet I'll bet she has absolutely NO CLUE WHATSOEVER what that means, how to apply it, how it applies to current economics and that she cannot explain in plain english a simple example of how it is used.
So, let's TEST her to see if she knows what she is talking about, or if she is just posting BS to try and impress folks here in order to (she thinks) impress you. I bet she is absolutely clueless in calculus and the economy. This simple exercise will prove that.
So, here we go.
OK Terri, please use a simple model like making ...bricks. Please tell us all how making bricks (or anything else) relates to the following concepts in "the calculus" as you call it in terms of economics:
price point,
economics and cost & revenue and profit
fixed costs vs variable costs
revenue as it relates to linear and non-linear costs
break even point
constant fixed costs
instantaneous velocity
instantaneous rate of change
You should have NO PROBLEM with this simple explanation and discussion since you constantly refer to "The Calculus" and how it relates to economics. These are the most basic fundamentals of economics as related to calculus and it's explaining of the different aspects of the economic model.
You are being graded on this simple exercise, A-F. Unfortunately we cannot show delta T calculations here or many of the other calculations as Topix will not support it, so we will keep it simple for you. Just explain in plain english the relationship of the above terms in your model for making a simple item like bricks. As this is a freshman level question and it can't get any simpler this should be a cakewalk for you if you know what you are talking about. It should not take more than a short paragraph for you to explain your answer.
WE AWAIT YOUR RESPONSE.
hey you tuna fish hag....why don't you answer this simple question? Should be easy for an "expert" from the Salvation Army College that you are so proud of. Don't tell me you are still looking up the entire subject from the word economy onward! I thought you were an expert. This is EASY stuff...yet not one word from you on it.

I will keep bringing it up until you start answering.

lol!
Nojackazz slime

Canyon Country, CA

#126580 Nov 13, 2012
Hey jackazz quit jackingoff in here all over the net. it is getting slippery in here from you doing that!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#126581 Nov 13, 2012
Now this woman must really hate Obama!!!

Arizona woman runs down husband with car for not voting: police
PHOENIX (Reuters)- An Arizona woman, in despair at the re-election of Democratic President Barack Obama, ran down her husband with the family car in suburban Phoenix on Saturday because he failed to vote in the election, police said on Monday.
Holly Solomon, 28, was arrested after running over husband Daniel Solomon following a wild chase that left him pinned underneath the vehicle.
http://news.yahoo.com/arizona-woman-runs-down...
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

#126582 Nov 13, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you okay. Take a powder. A BC powder, that is!
I guess we'll just have to keep that in the bucket that contains questions The Lifer is unwilling to answer.

Recent deposits included:
1) The failure of the Army Corps of Engineers levee failure in NO
2) How Obama is a racist for not pushing to court martial a black general, while a similar case involving a white admiral was also not pushed.
American Lady

Danville, KY

#126583 Nov 13, 2012
New York Times Proves Clint Eastwood Correct -- Obama Is Lousy CEO

But the NYT piece is not about any of that. Rather, it is a deep look into the two outstanding flaws in Obama’s executive leadership:

1. How he vastly overrates his capabilities:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/richkarlgaard/201...

The Competitor in Chief
Obama Plays to Win, in Politics and Everything Else

But even those loyal to Mr. Obama say that his quest for excellence can bleed into cockiness and that he tends to overestimate his capabilities. The cloistered nature of the White House amplifies those tendencies, said Matthew Dowd, a former adviser to President George W. Bush, adding that the same thing happened to his former boss.

“There’s a reinforcing quality,” he said, a tendency for presidents to think, I’m the best at this.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/03/us/politics...
American Lady

Danville, KY

#126585 Nov 13, 2012
Johannes wrote:
<quoted text>
Just goes to show one that there are nuts in every state.
November 13, 2012
Was the 2012 Election Stolen?

How could Romney lose, especially by such a wide electoral margin?
Maybe he didn't
At least not legitimately.

Since then, the indications of electoral criminality have been overwhelming. First there are the anecdotes, such as the court-appointed Republican poll watchers illegally expelled from 13 Philadelphia polling places in wards that, in most cases, went 99 percent for Obama; the poll observers who noted what they considered vote fraud but were powerless to stop; and the Democrats who actually bragged about voting more than once.
Then there are the statistics, such as this staggering fact: in 59 Philadelphia districts, Romney failed to get even one vote. Final Obama-Romney tally: 19,605 to 0.
Huh? Not even one person voted GOP accidentally? I mean, there even was a Washington, D.C. councilman who inadvertently voted to approve faux marriage, saying that he didn't know what he was voting for (that would be Marion Barry).
Next, consider this report from The Columbus Dispatch:

And vote fraud is Democrat domain.

And whatever Barack Obama is presently, I don't believe he will be a legitimate president come January 20.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/11/was_th...
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

#126586 Nov 13, 2012
Incest Mom wrote:
<quoted text>
November 13, 2012
Was the 2012 Election Stolen?
How could Romney lose, especially by such a wide electoral margin?
Maybe he didn't
At least not legitimately.
Since then, the indications of electoral criminality have been overwhelming. First there are the anecdotes, such as the court-appointed Republican poll watchers illegally expelled from 13 Philadelphia polling places in wards that, in most cases, went 99 percent for Obama; the poll observers who noted what they considered vote fraud but were powerless to stop; and the Democrats who actually bragged about voting more than once.
Then there are the statistics, such as this staggering fact: in 59 Philadelphia districts, Romney failed to get even one vote. Final Obama-Romney tally: 19,605 to 0.
Huh? Not even one person voted GOP accidentally? I mean, there even was a Washington, D.C. councilman who inadvertently voted to approve faux marriage, saying that he didn't know what he was voting for (that would be Marion Barry).
Next, consider this report from The Columbus Dispatch:
And vote fraud is Democrat domain.
And whatever Barack Obama is presently, I don't believe he will be a legitimate president come January 20.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/11/was_th...
....and that should mean what? Just bs from some right wing birther web site.

Too bad you are unable to think for yourself.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min sonicfilter 1,156,699
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 54 min Mister Tonka 98,888
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 1 hr RACE 4,927
Double Word Game (Dec '11) 1 hr RACE 1,539
Amy 12-28-14 1 hr RACE 11
Dear Abby 12-28 1 hr RACE 7
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 3 hr Frijoles 71,305
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 5:12 pm PST

Bleacher Report 5:12PM
Indianapolis Colts Cap Season with Fitting AFC South Sweep
NBC Sports12:50 AM
Colts cap 11-win season with 27-10 win over Titans - NBC Sports
NBC Sports12:57 AM
Vikings finish off Bears with 13-9 win - NBC Sports
Bleacher Report 3:23 AM
Coby Fleener Realizing His Potential, Developing into Solid TE for Colts Offense
NBC Sports 5:10 AM
League office to review Suh step on Monday