BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 231065 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Jacques Ottawa

Oshawa, Canada

#126407 Nov 13, 2012
The Truth wrote:
Cops: Woman angered by Obama re-election runs over husband for not voting
Source: Orlando Sentinel
PHOENIX — An Arizona woman, in despair at the re-election of Democratic President Barack Obama, ran down her husband with the family car in suburban Phoenix on Saturday because he failed to vote in the election, police said Monday.
Holly Solomon, 28, was arrested after running over husband Daniel Solomon following a wild chase that left him pinned underneath the vehicle.
Daniel Solomon, 36, was in critical condition at a local hospital but is expected to survive, Gilbert police spokesman Sgt. Jesse Sanger said.
Police said Daniel Solomon told them his wife became angry over his "lack of voter participation" in last Tuesday's presidential election and believed her family would face hardship as a result of Obama winning another term.
Read more: http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/bre...
----------
The stupid is stong in this one. Note that this took place in Arizona, which Romney won! Thus, her husband's vote would have zero impact because Romney already won the State. Of course, this just happens to be the same State as the Gifford shooting. Perhaps some folks take Rush Limbaugh and Fox News way too literally.
And she is a sane birther! Imagine the rest.
Jacques Ottawa

Oshawa, Canada

#126409 Nov 13, 2012
keyedup wrote:
WEDNESDAY NOV 8
FOX DID YOU A GRAND DISSERVICE AND MADE MILLIONS DOING IT...
For liberals like me, Fox News was the channel to watch last night. As it became clear early on that Obama was going to take this thing, my household quickly switched the channel from CNN to Fox, eager to see the network’s massive breakdown play out in real time. After all, if the job of Fox News these past four years was to make Obama a one-term president, a goal the network not-incidentally shared with the Republican Party, Fox News super-duper seriously failed.
In 2009, White House communications director Anita Dunn called Fox News "either the research arm or the communications arm of the Republican Party.” I don’t know about the “or” part. With massive funds and infinite air time, Roger Ailes’ little network that could spent the past four years demonizing president Obama (after a year of demonizing candidate Obama), and obsessively churning up non-news to scare the shit out of white guys and feed into the GOP bloodstream: from the Black Panthers’ remarkable rise to political power to that thing about the guns and Mexico named after an awesome Vin Diesel movie to the multifront war on Christmas/Christians/Christ to The Great Benghazi Conspiracy of 2012.
And what do they have to show for it? Not a Republican president. Not a Republican Senate. Not a repealed health care law. Adding insult to Tuesday’s injury, Eric Holder is still a free man.
Advertisement
Yes, ratings. Yes, money. I hear you. But if Fox News has any actual interest in helping the Republican Party or the conservative cause—and you can want to do this and make money, just like the GOP!—the network really flubbed it. So what happened, other than the mainstream media oppressors shutting down the truth once again and polling places letting Hispanics in?
In 2009, Gawker published a post titled “What’s Bad for the GOP is Good for Fox News,” arguing that Republicans’ worst nightmare—the election of a black, Democratic president who listens to the rap music and gives young, female, and non-white Americans hope—was actually a dream come true for Rupert Murdoch’s money-minting, 24-hour news network. Pointing to this illustrative graph, Gawker’s John Cook (who, full disclosure, is my husband) wrote that “the more viewers Fox attracts, the more voters the GOP repels.”
But in 2010, the GOP/Fox News Industrial Complex proved Gawker —and many Democrats who assumed Fox had taken things too far—wrong. With the aid of the Fox-bolstered Tea Party revolution, the Fox-created Socialist-in-Chief, the Fox-aired town hall debacles, and the Fox-supported conspiracy theories of Glenn Beck, Republicans won the House and the narrative. We all gave in and started calling it Obamacare. 2012 looked to be a lost cause.
But Fox overreached. The midterm results told Sean Hannity and Gretchen Carlson and Megyn Kelly that they were doing something right, and so they kept at it. Donald Trump phoned in from Trump HQ daily to inform Greta Van Susteren’s viewers about his heroic quest for the missing birth certificate. Glenn Beck presented his irrefutable evidence that everything is connected and all roads lead to the Jews/Kenya/Cass Sunstein. Beck finally got canned in 2011, but Hannity picked up some of his nut-job slack. The liberals on Hannity’s panel got paler and sicklier by design (my theory, at least), and the true-believer conservatives became more insufferably confident and dismissive of any potential Obama revival.
Excellent. And soooo true.
Learn to Read

United States

#126414 Nov 13, 2012
Justice Scalia has already drafted the official response to the "petitions":

“I am afraid I cannot be of much help with your problem, principally because I cannot imagine that such a question could ever reach the Supreme Court. To begin with, the answer is clear. If there was any constitutional issue resolved by the Civil War, it is that there is no right to secede.(Hence, in the Pledge of Allegiance,“one Nation, indivisible.”) Secondly, I find it difficult to envision who the parties to this lawsuit might be. Is the State suing the United States for a declaratory judgment? But the United States cannot be sued without its consent, and it has not consented to this sort of suit.”
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

#126416 Nov 13, 2012
Goat Boy wrote:
<quoted text>
I wonder if Sheriff Joe, and the people of the State of Arizona, know he is not Law Enforcement?
The illegal aliens housed in pink underwear sure know that he is Law Enforcement.
What segment of society do Sheriff's represent in your deluded mind?
Now Sheriff Joe is law enforcement, but not the members of the Arizona Cartoon Posse. The Cartoon Posse included retired law enforcement, self-anointed document 'experts', nut cases from Birtherville, and a variety of Obama haters.

IF there was any real fraud in the document and a crime was committed, real law enforcement would have sent the results to the District Attorney who might file charges.

That didn't happen in this case as the Arizona Cartoon Posse has no legal standing.

Ol' Joe just supported the publicity stunt to get the heat off himself because he was being investigated.
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

#126417 Nov 13, 2012
Goat Boy wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, I know real history.
I just don't believe in your revisionist history.
Why do you use 3 K's for the Republicans when the DemoKKKrats started the organization that bears those letters?
Tell us that fairy-tale again about how the Republicans passed those Jim Crow laws to keep the Blacks under their control.
Please, explain in detail.
Here's the short verson.

The southern racists dems of the 1860's have transformed into and become the southern racists repubs of the 2000's.

I can provide more detail and examples if needed.

Since: Mar 11

Jacksonville, FL

#126419 Nov 13, 2012
NO more American Lady wrote:
Rep. King: Petraeus ‘going to have to testify one way or the other’
“As far as I’m concerned, the intelligence committee has to interview Gen. Petraeus. Whether or not he’s head of the CIA is almost irrelevant to him testifying,” King said.“He’s the only one who would have the facts that we are looking for, so he’s going to have to testify one way or the other.”
http://dailycaller.com/2012/11/10/rep-king-pe...
LtTackleBerry
Apples and oranges stupid punk. You could say that for every "kinetic military action" every undertaken by this country.Don't try to change the subject coward and do the childish " two wrongs make a right." Obama is responsible for many soldiers deaths deployed in Afghanistan by your standard. But I don't blame him for that. I will support him as the CIC in such endeavors but not this.Besides, until we get answers, we don't know who is really responsible. Are you saying you don't want to investigate it at all ? Hell , war criminals from WWII are still hunted down. There is a difference in casualties due to engaging the enemy and outright murder. Second degree murder I grant you, maybe third degree, but we have to know. I lost family in Vietnam, under Johnson, a war Kennedy set in motion but I don't blame them for the deaths.That was a democratic war. Nixon did a surge like we did and then ended the war like he promised. Sound familiar ? I hated the coward hippie protesters here that spit at my brothers when they came home and cursed them.One of my uncles wasn't so lucky. That is people like you now. Cowardly cowering hippie protesting haters of the USA and a stain on our great country. My family was drafted, they didn't choose to go to a war but they did the honorable thing when they were called up like most good young men of that time did.
I hate you and traitors like you. I can't say what I to say to you on-line but I can hope you talk trash like this in real life to a newly returned veteran. They will stomp a mud hole in your ass.
=======
LtTackleBerry
I recall that Watergate was about the heroics of the press to reveal corruption at the highest levels of government. Now, the MSM is helping cover up the biggest scandal apparently seen at the highest levels of Government. People, I think for many reasons millions of us need to go to Washington D.C. in a peaceful but firm manner and demand answers.!o million people can surround the whole damn D.C. seats of power.. The press is not going to do its job. How can we honor the fallen on Veterans day when people in this administration allowed an American ambassador and our seals ( there is no ex-navy seals ) to be mowed down , murdered by a planned terrorist attack. Evidence of prior warnings is documented, more security requested, its all recorded on audio and video, the ambassadors "diary" . How can we deploy anyone overseas now if they and the families do not even believe the CIC will have their backs ? Somebody told rescue to stand down. Then the lying video story is just obscene in how long they stuck to the lie and how forcefully they propagated it.
Please don't let their deaths be for nothing. We left our men behind. We are a nation without honor if we do not make this right and see justice brought to bear on the guilty parties in government. I ask an old question ; " What did the President know and when did he know it ? " This is just heartbreaking.
======
Amen Bro AMEN <3
Newt Gingrich was on Fox and Friends this morning and he contradicted what had been said about Gen. Partaeus' testimony in front of the closed-door House hearing a month a go. It had been leaked that Gen. Peytaeus had backed Obama's story that it was a protest about that Youtube film but Newt said it was the exact opposite of what Gen. Peytaeus had actually said.
This would give credence that Obama is blackmailing Peyraeus and had him resign before the new hearings this week.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#126420 Nov 13, 2012
NO more American Lady wrote:
Rep. King: Petraeus ‘going to have to testify one way or the other’
“As far as I’m concerned, the intelligence committee has to interview Gen. Petraeus. Whether or not he’s head of the CIA is almost irrelevant to him testifying,” King said.“He’s the only one who would have the facts that we are looking for, so he’s going to have to testify one way or the other.”
http://dailycaller.com/2012/11/10/rep-king-pe...
LtTackleBerry
Apples and oranges stupid punk. You could say that for every "kinetic military action" every undertaken by this country.Don't try to change the subject coward and do the childish " two wrongs make a right." Obama is responsible for many soldiers deaths deployed in Afghanistan by your standard. But I don't blame him for that. I will support him as the CIC in such endeavors but not this.Besides, until we get answers, we don't know who is really responsible. Are you saying you don't want to investigate it at all ? Hell , war criminals from WWII are still hunted down. There is a difference in casualties due to engaging the enemy and outright murder. Second degree murder I grant you, maybe third degree, but we have to know. I lost family in Vietnam, under Johnson, a war Kennedy set in motion but I don't blame them for the deaths.That was a democratic war. Nixon did a surge like we did and then ended the war like he promised. Sound familiar ? I hated the coward hippie protesters here that spit at my brothers when they came home and cursed them.One of my uncles wasn't so lucky. That is people like you now. Cowardly cowering hippie protesting haters of the USA and a stain on our great country. My family was drafted, they didn't choose to go to a war but they did the honorable thing when they were called up like most good young men of that time did.
I hate you and traitors like you. I can't say what I to say to you on-line but I can hope you talk trash like this in real life to a newly returned veteran. They will stomp a mud hole in your ass.
=======
LtTackleBerry
I recall that Watergate was about the heroics of the press to reveal corruption at the highest levels of government. Now, the MSM is helping cover up the biggest scandal apparently seen at the highest levels of Government. People, I think for many reasons millions of us need to go to Washington D.C. in a peaceful but firm manner and demand answers.!o million people can surround the whole damn D.C. seats of power.. The press is not going to do its job. How can we honor the fallen on Veterans day when people in this administration allowed an American ambassador and our seals ( there is no ex-navy seals ) to be mowed down , murdered by a planned terrorist attack. Evidence of prior warnings is documented, more security requested, its all recorded on audio and video, the ambassadors "diary" . How can we deploy anyone overseas now if they and the families do not even believe the CIC will have their backs ? Somebody told rescue to stand down. Then the lying video story is just obscene in how long they stuck to the lie and how forcefully they propagated it.
Please don't let their deaths be for nothing. We left our men behind. We are a nation without honor if we do not make this right and see justice brought to bear on the guilty parties in government. I ask an old question ; " What did the President know and when did he know it ? " This is just heartbreaking.
======
Amen Bro AMEN <3
Newt Gingrich was on Fox and Friends this morning and he contradicted what had been said about Gen. Partaeus' testimony in front of the closed-door House hearing a month a go. It had been leaked that Gen. Peytaeus had backed Obama's story that it was a protest about that Youtube film but Newt said it was the exact opposite of what Gen. Peytaeus had actually said.
This would give credence that Obama is blackmailing Peyraeus and had him resign before the new hearings this week.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#126421 Nov 13, 2012
Johannes wrote:
<quoted text>
Now Sheriff Joe is law enforcement, but not the members of the Arizona Cartoon Posse. The Cartoon Posse included retired law enforcement, self-anointed document 'experts', nut cases from Birtherville, and a variety of Obama haters.
IF there was any real fraud in the document and a crime was committed, real law enforcement would have sent the results to the District Attorney who might file charges.
That didn't happen in this case as the Arizona Cartoon Posse has no legal standing.
Ol' Joe just supported the publicity stunt to get the heat off himself because he was being investigated.
Who said he did not send it to the DA? You can not make a DA do anything!
Oh, the investigation did not stop because of Sheriff Joe's investigation.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#126422 Nov 13, 2012
Johannes wrote:
<quoted text>
Here's the short verson.
The southern racists dems of the 1860's have transformed into and become the southern racists repubs of the 2000's.
I can provide more detail and examples if needed.
Or so you say. It is you Dems who have put the blacks in the ghettos and you keep them stupid by sending them to ghetto schools.
Fact, only 63% of all Democrats in Congress voted for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 compared to 80% of all Republicans.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#126423 Nov 13, 2012
Johannes wrote:
<quoted text>
Here's the short verson.
The southern racists dems of the 1860's have transformed into and become the southern racists repubs of the 2000's.
I can provide more detail and examples if needed.
Please do give examples?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#126425 Nov 13, 2012
Learn to Read wrote:
Justice Scalia has already drafted the official response to the "petitions":
“I am afraid I cannot be of much help with your problem, principally because I cannot imagine that such a question could ever reach the Supreme Court. To begin with, the answer is clear. If there was any constitutional issue resolved by the Civil War, it is that there is no right to secede.(Hence, in the Pledge of Allegiance,“one Nation, indivisible.”) Secondly, I find it difficult to envision who the parties to this lawsuit might be. Is the State suing the United States for a declaratory judgment? But the United States cannot be sued without its consent, and it has not consented to this sort of suit.”
And your link? The USSC does not publish "drafts"!!!
Lacey

UK

#126426 Nov 13, 2012
http://adf.ly/EfbCH do u beleive the obama romney conspricy its all to do with bush
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#126427 Nov 13, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
No, so-called patriot warrior, it's not me. I have ONE moniker, unlike you. And I told you, he/she writes better than me.
LMAO at this silly fool.
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

#126428 Nov 13, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Who said he did not send it to the DA? You can not make a DA do anything!
Oh, the investigation did not stop because of Sheriff Joe's investigation.
So did the Cartoon Posse sent the results to the DA or not?

Why didn't the DA file charges?

It's all a publicity stunt.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#126429 Nov 13, 2012
The Truth wrote:
Sad America-loving conservatives already demanding secession
Aw, the party of 'Merika has an enormous post-election sad:
In the aftermath of last week's presidential election, residents in at least nineteen states have put up petitions on the government's "We the People" petitioning website seeking the right to secede from the rest of the country.[…]
Petitions for secession filed from Louisiana and Texas have already received well over 10,000 signatures. Per the website's own rules, petitions that garner 25,000 signatures or more within 30 days require a response from the Obama administration.
Apparently this is the part of the conservative realization that (1) yes, the president is still a scary black man, and (2) nobody in America but them has a problem with that. There's also been some premise going around that Obama's moderateness and centrism the last four years only goes to prove how much he's going to be a crazy secret-Muslim radical during the next four years, and if you can unpack that logic, you've got me beat. I have no idea what they're going on about. Oh, and the Texas version has already topped the 25K threshold, so congratulations, Texas conservatives! You'll be getting a special note from the Obama administration suggesting where you can go!
This doesn't seem to be a purely regional thing, since even folks in Oregon and New York are piping up with their own petitions (and really, if you're an Oregon or New York conservative, I feel a good amount of pity for you, I really do). But I've said it before, and I'll say it again: This notion of conservative secession has its merits. Of course, as "True America" we'd want to attach some constraints to the separatists: no nuclear weapons, get your own damn military, and we'll be carving out territory for you that consists entirely of places close to sea level, so that you can ignore climate change from the best possible vantage point. But this sounds pretty doable, once the logistics get worked out. So what are you going to call yourselves? United Galts of America? New Jesusland? That's great, we'll send you a card.
You are a certifiable nutcase. What poor azz third world country did you sneak in from? Pure trash.
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

#126430 Nov 13, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Or so you say. It is you Dems who have put the blacks in the ghettos and you keep them stupid by sending them to ghetto schools.
Fact, only 63% of all Democrats in Congress voted for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 compared to 80% of all Republicans.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act...
It's not a dem vs repub thing....it's a conservative racists vs a liberal thing. I don't care what they call themselves. The fact remains that the conservative racist southern democrat has evolved into the conservative racist southern republican.

If Abe Lincoln were alive today he'd be a dem and not a repub.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#126431 Nov 13, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, and like a pit bull, stupid.
The irrelevant and insignificant queer from canada speaks! LMAO

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#126433 Nov 13, 2012
Therealnews com wrote:
<quoted text>
The President’s Opening Bid on a Grand Bargain: Aim High
By Robert Reich / November 12, 2012 / http://tinyurl.com/aevft55
I hope the President starts negotiations over a “grand bargain” for deficit reduction by aiming high. After all, he won the election. And if the past four years has proven anything it’s that the White House should not begin with a compromise.
Assuming the goal is $4 trillion of deficit reduction over the next decade (that’s the consensus of the Simpson-Bowles commission, the Congressional Budget Office, and most independent analysts), here’s what the President should propose:
First, raise taxes on the rich – and by more than the highest marginal rate under Bill Clinton or even a 30 percent (so-called Buffett Rule) minimum rate on millionaires. Remember: America’s top earners are now wealthier than they’ve ever been, and they’re taking home a larger share of total income and wealth than top earners have received in over 80 years.
Why not go back sixty years when Americans earning over $1 million in today’s dollars paid 55.2 percent of it in income taxes, after taking all deductions and credits? If they were taxed at that rate now, they’d pay at least $80 billion more annually — which would reduce the budget deficit by about $1 trillion over the next decade. That’s a quarter of the $4 trillion in deficit reduction right there.
A 2% surtax on the wealth of the richest one-half of 1 percent would bring in another $750 billion over the decade. A one-half of 1 percent tax on financial transactions would bring in an additional $250 billion.
Add this up and we get $2 trillion over ten years — half of the deficit-reduction goal.
Raise the capital gains rate to match the rate on ordinary income and cap the mortgage interest deduction at $12,000 a year, and that’s another $1 trillion over ten years. So now we’re up to $3 trillion in additional revenue.
Eliminate special tax preferences for oil and gas, price supports for big agriculture, tax breaks and research subsidies for Big Pharma, unnecessary weapons systems for military contractors, and indirect subsidies to the biggest banks on Wall Street, and we’re nearly there.
End the Bush tax cuts on incomes between $250,000 and $1 million, and — bingo — we made it:$4 trillion over 10 years.
And we haven’t had to raise taxes on America’s beleaguered middle class, cut Social Security or Medicare and Medicaid, reduce spending on education or infrastructure, or cut programs for the poor.
Mr. President, I’d recommend this as your opening bid. With enough luck and pluck, maybe even your closing bid. And if enough Americans are behind you, it could even be the final deal./ http://robertreich.org/post/35591032374
Sanders: Going Over 'Fiscal Cliff' Better than Bad Tax Deal
Senator says new Congress could recover 'in the first month or two'
November 12, 2012 / http://tinyurl.com/a4vxhsj
Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., said Monday that if the lame-duck Congress can't agree on a tax deal by the end of the year, briefly going over the "fiscal cliff" is preferable to accepting a bad deal.
“Is it better to deal with this issue in the next session rather than accept a bad agreement in this session?” Sanders said during a press conference at his Burlington office. "Yes, it is.”/ http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2012/11/...
Why don't you tax everyone who makes over $250K a year 100% for income over $250? Woodn't you end the deficit in just one year?
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#126434 Nov 13, 2012
Therealnews com wrote:
<quoted text>
The President’s Opening Bid on a Grand Bargain: Aim High
By Robert Reich / November 12, 2012 / http://tinyurl.com/aevft55
I hope the President starts negotiations over a “grand bargain” for deficit reduction by aiming high. After all, he won the election. And if the past four years has proven anything it’s that the White House should not begin with a compromise.
Assuming the goal is $4 trillion of deficit reduction over the next decade (that’s the consensus of the Simpson-Bowles commission, the Congressional Budget Office, and most independent analysts), here’s what the President should propose:
First, raise taxes on the rich – and by more than the highest marginal rate under Bill Clinton or even a 30 percent (so-called Buffett Rule) minimum rate on millionaires. Remember: America’s top earners are now wealthier than they’ve ever been, and they’re taking home a larger share of total income and wealth than top earners have received in over 80 years.
Why not go back sixty years when Americans earning over $1 million in today’s dollars paid 55.2 percent of it in income taxes, after taking all deductions and credits? If they were taxed at that rate now, they’d pay at least $80 billion more annually — which would reduce the budget deficit by about $1 trillion over the next decade. That’s a quarter of the $4 trillion in deficit reduction right there.
A 2% surtax on the wealth of the richest one-half of 1 percent would bring in another $750 billion over the decade. A one-half of 1 percent tax on financial transactions would bring in an additional $250 billion.
Add this up and we get $2 trillion over ten years — half of the deficit-reduction goal.
Raise the capital gains rate to match the rate on ordinary income and cap the mortgage interest deduction at $12,000 a year, and that’s another $1 trillion over ten years. So now we’re up to $3 trillion in additional revenue.
Eliminate special tax preferences for oil and gas, price supports for big agriculture, tax breaks and research subsidies for Big Pharma, unnecessary weapons systems for military contractors, and indirect subsidies to the biggest banks on Wall Street, and we’re nearly there.
End the Bush tax cuts on incomes between $250,000 and $1 million, and — bingo — we made it:$4 trillion over 10 years.
And we haven’t had to raise taxes on America’s beleaguered middle class, cut Social Security or Medicare and Medicaid, reduce spending on education or infrastructure, or cut programs for the poor.
Mr. President, I’d recommend this as your opening bid. With enough luck and pluck, maybe even your closing bid. And if enough Americans are behind you, it could even be the final deal./ http://robertreich.org/post/35591032374
Sanders: Going Over 'Fiscal Cliff' Better than Bad Tax Deal
Senator says new Congress could recover 'in the first month or two'
November 12, 2012 / http://tinyurl.com/a4vxhsj
Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., said Monday that if the lame-duck Congress can't agree on a tax deal by the end of the year, briefly going over the "fiscal cliff" is preferable to accepting a bad deal.
“Is it better to deal with this issue in the next session rather than accept a bad agreement in this session?” Sanders said during a press conference at his Burlington office. "Yes, it is.”/ http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2012/11/...
Tell us brainless one, what exactly will raising taxes on the rich do for the counrty? The difference in taxes collected will be marginal. Then the wealthy will lose confidence in the economy and not invest. We'll be right where we are now. Do you think the wealthy owe you something?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#126435 Nov 13, 2012
Silly Libtards, the One Percenters of Greece and France are moving to more friendly countries. They can do that as they are rich.
Just look at the State of New York who's Democrat governor, Andrew Cuomo, is trying to cut taxes for the rich so they will move back to NY and pay some taxes.
Why do you think John Kerry kept his $4M yacht in Rhode Island instead of Mass.? To avoid paying $750K in taxes to Mass. What he was doing was not illegal and the only reason why he did relocate his yacht and pay those taxes was so he did not look like a hypocrite. Not that he is not a hypocrite, he just did not want to look like one.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Community Mourns Chicago Boxer After Fatal Shoo... 13 min former democrat 1
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 36 min Ghey Ghost 1,458,600
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 1 hr SweLL GirL 9,854
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 2 hr Brian_G 62,318
The Color of Crime in Chicago. 3 hr ScrewHRC-NPelosi 15
Should TRUMP use this? 3 hr YES4Sure ITs True 9
last post wins! (Dec '10) 7 hr honeymylove 2,752
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 9 hr Legal Analysis 104,521

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages