BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

Full story: Chicago Tribune

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Comments (Page 5,568)

Showing posts 111,341 - 111,360 of167,581
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#125756
Nov 11, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

The Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
Are all people from Kentucky as uneducated as you?
I drove there, and most of the people seemed relatively normal.
As long as you don’t ask for directions.
Jacques Ottawa

Ottawa, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#125757
Nov 11, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Christie-Palin2012 wrote:
Clinton, "I did not have sexual relations with that woman...
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Bill Clinton admits to having inappropriate relationship with Monica Lewinsky
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Well, when will Obama has his epiphany?
Mrs Gingrich in hospital bed : "Newt, I have cancer".
Newt Gingrich : "Darling, I've met someone else. I want a divorce".
Jacques Ottawa

Ottawa, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#125758
Nov 11, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

American Lady wrote:
God’s Law Comes First
To you, maybe. Why don't you ask our father for a brain that actually works? Her seems to have missed a few bolts and screws here.
Jacques Ottawa

Ottawa, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#125759
Nov 11, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

American Lady wrote:
<quoted text>
The Supreme Court's War on God
So the supreme court, with its conservative majority, is waging war on god? Makes you feel good, American er hmm communist Lady?
Grand Birther

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#125760
Nov 11, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

FYI, John Kerry received more of the popular vote than Mitt Romney.
American Lady

Danville, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#125761
Nov 11, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Thank you for proving that NAFTA is a U.S. Republican and Canadian conservative intiative all the way. At last, your cut-and-paste has had some use. Not what you intended, thank god you can't understand the written word else you would've held off.
To make matters worse, in 1992, Bill Clinton and a coalition of Republicans and conservative Democrats gave us NAFTA, which turned a trickle of industries leaving our country into a giant sucking sound, as the unfairly ridiculed H. Ross Perot correctly predicted.

Today, corporations’ freedom to abandon American communities and workers and outsource to those countries with the lowest wages and worst working conditions has given them total control over how new advancements in technology and productivity are shared.

As a result of globalization, workers are virtually powerless to negotiate for higher wages or decent working conditions, even during a time of exploding productivity. In addition, corporate executives and their investors want all the benefits of scientific advancements and new technology for themselves. They feel no obligation to share with workers, even those who, over many years of service, were responsible for their previous successes in this country.
Today, if technology doubles the productivity of workers, they don’t see their pay increase or their working conditions improve—half of them get fired. They then enter the labor market and exert further downward pressures on general wage levels.

http://democraticcapitalism.net/brief-2/

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#125762
Nov 11, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

America Got Stupid wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks to Obama, forever we will remain divided.
It is just a matter of time until it becomes official.
Popular vote 2000.

Bush (50,456,002) 47.9 percent, Gore (50,999,897) 48.4 percent.

Had you heard of Obama in 2000 GB? Who divided the country then?

You’re a funny man GB!
American Lady

Danville, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#125763
Nov 11, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

NAFTA and free trade agreements
Guess what. This very same coalition that Truman defeated, Republicans and conservative Democrats, is doing it to the country again. NAFTA and subsequent trade agreements are today’s equivalent to the Taft-Hartley Bill of 1947. Except now, the strategy of pitting workers from different states against each other has been extended to the world “free market.”
Today’s voters have been conned into believing that it is a good idea to pit workers of the world against American workers, and someone needs to educate the public about what’s going on.(Guess what, most of the public knows it anyway—they’re just in denial—so it’ll be easy.)
Of course, if you supported NAFTA and other free trade agreements, you’ve already made a serious mistake. I hope you at least supported strong regulations to protect the environment and workers’ rights. If, like the Republicans, you didn’t, you’ve lost one of the most powerful voter appeals you could have had.
Of course, as everyone now knows, trade agreements that protect workers’ rights aren’t worth the paper they’re written on. Countries in the developing world know full well that their power to attract American corporations is totally dependent upon the extent to which they can offer impoverished workers with no real protections. No matter what they agree to, their enforcement of worker protection agreements are cosmetic at best.

http://democraticcapitalism.net/democrat-cand...
American Lady

Danville, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#125764
Nov 11, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

LABOR'S BALL AND CHAIN

Taft-Hartley has been labor's ball and chain ever since. Early on, labor made a bid at resisting the law. UE, the Steelworkers, and other CIO unions pledged not to cooperate with the new Taft-Hartley Labor Board. CIO president Philip Murray and Mineworkers president John L. Lewis vowed they would not sign the measure's red-scare affidavit. But within a few years, unions were forced to submit.

In 1953, U.S. News and World Report could ask, "Are Unions Slipping? No Growth in Six Years." In 1946, the CIO's membership had been 6.3 million; by 1954, it was 4.6 million. Overall, union membership fell from 33.7 percent of the labor force in 1947 to 31.5 percent in 1950. Although union membership began rising slowly to reach a post-war high of 34.7 percent in 1954, that was followed by a steady decline, aided heavily by the employer tools supplied by Taft-Hartley. Under the legislation, employers can get in the way of almost every union activity -- from organizing the shop to going on strike to mobilizing community support for a campaign.

http://lpa.igc.org/lpv26/lp05.htm

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#125765
Nov 11, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

American Lady wrote:
<quoted text>
Petition for Recount on the 2012 Presidential Election
22,458 Letters and Emails Sent So Far
http://www.petition2congress.com/8222/petitio...
It’s over AL! There will be no recount.
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#125766
Nov 11, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Incest Mom wrote:
<quoted text>
To make matters worse, in 1992, Bill Clinton and a coalition of Republicans and conservative Democrats gave us NAFTA, which turned a trickle of industries leaving our country into a giant sucking sound, as the unfairly ridiculed H. Ross Perot correctly predicted.
Today, corporations’ freedom to abandon American communities and workers and outsource to those countries with the lowest wages and worst working conditions has given them total control over how new advancements in technology and productivity are shared.
As a result of globalization, workers are virtually powerless to negotiate for higher wages or decent working conditions, even during a time of exploding productivity. In addition, corporate executives and their investors want all the benefits of scientific advancements and new technology for themselves. They feel no obligation to share with workers, even those who, over many years of service, were responsible for their previous successes in this country.
Today, if technology doubles the productivity of workers, they don’t see their pay increase or their working conditions improve—half of them get fired. They then enter the labor market and exert further downward pressures on general wage levels.
http://democraticcapitalism.net/brief-2/
You obviously do not read what you copy-n-paste.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#125767
Nov 11, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Johannes wrote:
<quoted text>
The cost of labor is only one factor when companies consider moving offshore.
History has shown us that union brought many needed changes to the workplace. Some union workers are paid far more than their job is worth....but then again, the same thing can be said of many corporate execs.
Unions were fine years ago. It wasn't until they were forcing companies into pension plans, etc. that they simply could not afford that brought about the major problems.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#125769
Nov 11, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
This is christian charity? This is christian love? Going against scripture and judging your brother? And you know what is in his heart? You call yourself a christian?
What is your hangup with Christians jacqazz? You've bashed them at every chance. Sounds as though it borders on hate to me. pigeon

“zero nuclear weapons”

Since: Sep 08

Perryville

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#125770
Nov 11, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

American Lady
Get over it President Obama won

Many people did not want Romney and Ryan in the White House

With their stance on Medicare and Sccial Security and reproductive rights for women. Also their views and the middle and low income wage earners.

Their only caring about the million and billionaires not wanting to tax them.

Their views on immigration were wrong

The American people did not want a far right wing conservative tea party people in the White House

This should be the death blow to the tea party..
Jacques Ottawa

Ottawa, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#125771
Nov 11, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
Is Newt still claiming those two budgets that were balanced after he was run out of Dodge Rogue? The four in a row were fiscal years 98, 99, 2000 and 01. I thought Newt left in Jan, 99.
And of course much like you birfoons Romney’s just wrong about everything.
http://www.factcheck.org/2012/01/factual-flub...
His legacy, after-effect.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#125772
Nov 11, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

nebka wrote:
American Lady
Get over it President Obama won
Many people did not want Romney and Ryan in the White House
With their stance on Medicare and Sccial Security and reproductive rights for women. Also their views and the middle and low income wage earners.
Their only caring about the million and billionaires not wanting to tax them.
Their views on immigration were wrong
The American people did not want a far right wing conservative tea party people in the White House
This should be the death blow to the tea party..
Many people still don't like have an "unknown" in the WH.
Only caring about the rich....BS
Obama failed to enforce Federal Immigration Laws! Views on immigration? BS
The "AMERICAN PEOPLE" don't want a lying fraud as President who doesn't have a clue!
When Omama is done.....it may well be the death of the DIMs! BTW, I said that a long, long time ago.
There simply is no reason for anyone, not a soul, to look up to this so called leader (LMAO).
If you or anyone else thinks for one minute that Omama is going to help small businesses (where real jobs come from) then you've been fooled badly. The only way that hook is coming out is with your stomach attached to it.
Jacques Ottawa

Ottawa, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#125773
Nov 11, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
What is your hangup with Christians jacqazz? You've bashed them at every chance. Sounds as though it borders on hate to me. pigeon
God you're dense. SHE claims to be religious, not me. Then she character-assassinates.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#125774
Nov 11, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Many people still don't like have an "unknown" in the WH.
Only caring about the rich....BS
Obama failed to enforce Federal Immigration Laws! Views on immigration? BS
The "AMERICAN PEOPLE" don't want a lying fraud as President who doesn't have a clue!
When Omama is done.....it may well be the death of the DIMs! BTW, I said that a long, long time ago.
There simply is no reason for anyone, not a soul, to look up to this so called leader (LMAO).
If you or anyone else thinks for one minute that Omama is going to help small businesses (where real jobs come from) then you've been fooled badly. The only way that hook is coming out is with your stomach attached to it.
*having
Jacques Ottawa

Ottawa, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#125775
Nov 11, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

nebka wrote:
American Lady
Get over it President Obama won
Many people did not want Romney and Ryan in the White House
With their stance on Medicare and Sccial Security and reproductive rights for women. Also their views and the middle and low income wage earners.
Their only caring about the million and billionaires not wanting to tax them.
Their views on immigration were wrong
The American people did not want a far right wing conservative tea party people in the White House
This should be the death blow to the tea party..
He hadn't written a concession speech. Ha ha. He could've borrowed Dewey's, he apparently hadn't bothered to write one either.
Uda

Grand Blanc, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#125776
Nov 11, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Christie-Palin2012 wrote:
Presidential bill signings, depending on their popularity, are either done in private or public. In the case of the signing of NAFTA by Bill Clinton, he wanted to take credit for it!!!
You probably didn't know this you really know very little of anything. but NAFTA was the brain child of Bush 42 and was overwhelmingly supported by Republicans in Congress. But yes Clinton did sign it into law but only after Bush 42 had ramrodded it toward legislation. Check it out its been all over the internet with factual credible information. You have a right to an opinion but not the facts. When you get your facts correct just shut up for awhile.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 111,341 - 111,360 of167,581
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

23 Users are viewing the Chicago Forum right now

Search the Chicago Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 hr Yeah 1,034,084
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 1 hr A Bitter Pill 96,123
Cook County issues 1,000th gay marriage license 1 hr Fa-Foxy 2
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 4 hr litesong 42,984
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 4 hr TRD 67,193
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 6 hr lol 47,058
Song Title Game (Dec '11) 6 hr Velvet MJK 1,022
•••
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••