BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 196974 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

LRS

Shreveport, LA

#125709 Nov 11, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>looks like you are the loser, you voted for the illegal alien.
Hell, Mobarf is an illegal alien.

Since: Mar 11

Jacksonville, FL

#125710 Nov 11, 2012
Presidential bill signings, depending on their popularity, are either done in private or public. In the case of the signing of NAFTA by Bill Clinton, he wanted to take credit for it!!!

Since: Mar 11

Jacksonville, FL

#125711 Nov 11, 2012
Clinton, "I did not have sexual relations with that woman...


Bill Clinton admits to having inappropriate relationship with Monica Lewinsky
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Well, when will Obama has his epiphany?

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#125713 Nov 11, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
Faster than a speeding bullet. More powerful than a locomotive. Able to leap tall buildings in a single bound.
And able to violate the First Law of Thermodynamics.
It's BirfoonBoy!
Learn to Read

Elmhurst, IL

#125714 Nov 11, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>looks like you are the loser, you voted for the illegal alien.
Woops. Looks like loser Dale didn't get the memo. No one that matters agrees with his play law
Learn to Read

Elmhurst, IL

#125715 Nov 11, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>Hell, Mobarf is an illegal alien.
So is your Governor (according to Dalelaw) So what have you done about it?
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

#125717 Nov 11, 2012
Christie-Palin2012 wrote:
Goat Boy wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, that occurred during Bill Clinton's terms.
Remember NAFTA and the CFTT?
<quoted text>
Are you reading that George Soros History book again?
,,,,,,,,,,
Bill Clinton signs NAFTA into law -- December 8, 1993
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =arvU2hFgQvkXX
I have no idea what you are talking about. At least I'm not reading what you are.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#125718 Nov 11, 2012
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
So is your Governor (according to Dalelaw) So what have you done about it?
No need to do anything. His birth certificate is fine. squid

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#125719 Nov 11, 2012
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Woops. Looks like loser Dale didn't get the memo. No one that matters agrees with his play law
You mean Tacky doesn't matter? What about the "exact numerical address"?
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

#125720 Nov 11, 2012
Christie-Palin2012 wrote:
Presidential bill signings, depending on their popularity, are either done in private or public. In the case of the signing of NAFTA by Bill Clinton, he wanted to take credit for it!!!
More of you bs 'all dems are bad, all repubs are good' crap?

Gee, NAFTA was started by a repub, and supported in greater numbers by repubs in both the house and the senate. All Clinton did was to sign the bill the the repubs created.

...just like The Grinch gets credit for the budget and all those things you scream about, this time the repubs also get credit for NAFTA.

You can't have it both ways...as Rmoney found out.
Grand Birther

United States

#125721 Nov 11, 2012
Christie-Palin2012 wrote:
Presidential bill signings, depending on their popularity, are either done in private or public. In the case of the signing of NAFTA by Bill Clinton, he wanted to take credit for it!!!
Nafta was started by Bush.
Learn to Read

Elmhurst, IL

#125722 Nov 11, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>No need to do anything. His birth certificate is fine. squid
Not according to Dale moron
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

#125723 Nov 11, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Just bringing up the point unions are a major reason companies began moving jobs out of the U.S. Ban unions.
The cost of labor is only one factor when companies consider moving offshore.

History has shown us that union brought many needed changes to the workplace. Some union workers are paid far more than their job is worth....but then again, the same thing can be said of many corporate execs.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#125724 Nov 11, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
No need to do anything. His birth certificate is fine. squid
I'm an illegal alien who voted 61 million times. Hee hee.
Learn to Read

Elmhurst, IL

#125725 Nov 11, 2012
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>You mean Tacky doesn't matter? What about the "exact numerical address"?
Amazingly a few weeks ago i eould have said that Tacky had sunk less than the other turds in the bowl and was one of the more "rational Birfoons" - but if he's adopted playlaw I guess we can flush that statement
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#125726 Nov 11, 2012
Just Sayin wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course they are not going to vote for Republicans after Obama expressly targeted them with lies to get their vote.
And you should hope you are not one of Obama's gay useful idiots. There is a long line of dead gays in his past associations. We wouldn't want you to follow in their footsteps.
BTW your Bible interpretations are hilarious. No wonder the atheist population is expanding.
Your comment does not reflect that of an educated person. Rather, the non-religious, not the atheist population, is expanding. As one becomes educated and therefore enlightened, one wants proof of what is advanced by paternalistic old men who would label themselves prophets, popes and archbishops, not to mention immans and rabbis and so forth. As one advances in age, wisdom is tacked on if one remains open to discoveries. The result is inevitable, one believes less and less in organised religion. Refrain from labelling anyone who does not agree with you an atheist. An atheist, I believe, has much more respect for a religious person than vice-versa. Certainly, more tolerance. Atheists, as far as is known, never burnt anyone at the stake for their beliefs.
Guru

Canyon Country, CA

#125727 Nov 11, 2012
Moron-taxes are coming. Enjoy your colon-cleanse.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#125728 Nov 11, 2012
Just Sayin wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong peanut breath. Everything from the Lame Stream Media has to be run by Obama's slaves in the White House and any negative comments are done under the threat of dismissal or something of greater importance.
Obama'a slaves? Thought the man was a wuss? What wuss has slaves?
Guru

Canyon Country, CA

#125729 Nov 11, 2012
The biggest joke of the day is seeing liberal haters of our county and military come in here praising them and all they do for us.

Put down your drugs and get a life you morons. You are not fooling anyone, especially those who served.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#125730 Nov 11, 2012
American Lady wrote:
<quoted text>
God is not mocked in that His law cannot be ignored without punishment (Rom. 2:6-9). Adam and Eve tried it to their sorrow (Gen. 2:15-17; 3:6, 24). Ananias and Sapphira tried it to their death (Acts 5:1-11).
God is not mocked in that He cannot be deceived (Heb. 4:12-13). Achan concealed his sin from others but God was not mocked (Josh. 7). Gehazi, Elisha's servant, tried to gain a personal profit by lying but God was not mocked (2 Kings 5:20-27). Jonah tried to run from Him but God would not be mocked.
The citizen is obliged in conscience NOT to follow the directives of civil authorities when they are 'contrary' to the demands of the moral order, to the fundamental rights of persons or the teachings of the Gospel.
Refusing obedience to civil authorities, when their demands are contrary to those of an upright conscience, finds its justification in the distinction between serving God & serving the 'political community'. "Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar''s, and to God the things that are God's (Mt.22:21).
"We MUST obey God rather than men" (Acts 5:29)
When we citizens are under the oppression of a public authority which oversteps it's competence, we should still not refuse to give or do what is demanded of us by the common good.....but It is legitimate for us to defend our own rights & those of our fellow citizens against the 'abuse of authority' within the limits of the natural law & the Law of the Gospel.
More plagiarism. More unattributed hogwash. Cite yoir sources, unchristian stealer or words.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min Snowball the Elep... 1,275,434
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 20 min TRD 70,159
Ask Amy 8-30-15 52 min mrs gladys kravitz 2
News Prosser teacher charged in sexual assault of teen (Mar '07) 1 hr E Pina 16
abby 8-28-15 1 hr mrs gladys kravitz 5
ask amy 8-29-15 1 hr mrs gladys kravitz 5
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 4 hr Red_Forman 6,409
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages