BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

[Frank]

Learn to Read wrote:

<quoted text>
Gee Frank - maybe you shouldn't have wasted so much time pursuing your Birfoonish fantasy

I should have surrendered my principles,values, and morals?

[wojar]

Frank wrote:

<quoted text>Here in Washington they have only counted about two thirds of the ballots. Most of these elections are decided by one percent of the vote. How can they be decided when only two thirds of the ballots have been counted? One half of one percent margin would be equivalent to one vote out of two hundred ballots.

Do you know what it means when the confidence level is 99%? Statistics 101.

[wojar]

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

Why is it that the Summer Solstice is around June 21st yet Summer temperatures do not peak until a month later? And the Arctic Sea Ice does not reach it's maximum retreat until TWO months after the that?
The same thing happens in the Winter. The Winter Solstice is around December 21st yet the lowest temps are usually recorded in late January and the Arctic Sea Ice does not reach it's maximum extent until MARCH!!!
And why do I call you Idiotards???

That's news? Maybe you should report your findings to the AAAS.

[Learn to Read]

Frank wrote:

<quoted text>I should have surrendered my principles,values, and morals?

Why? Were you running for office?

[Rogue Scholar 05]

Solar Cycle #19 was the most active (hottest) cycle ever recorded with over 400 tears of sun spot data recorded.
http://www.solen.info/solar/cycl19.html
There is a relationship between the umber of sunspots and the amount of solar radiation. And there is also a relationship between the length of the cycle and the cycle that follows it.
The Solar Storm of February 11, 1958 is considered to be the worth Solar Storm of the last century!!!
http://www.solarstorms.org/SRefStorms.html

The Current Solar Cycle is the coldest recorded in 90 years. If this trend continues, we will be entering another Little Ice Age! But we will not know for another five years if that will happen!
Certainly Global Warming is OVER!!!

[Cry Baby TEArs]

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

<quoted text>
How about each state gets one vote regardless of size or population?

Obama - 26 states won

Romney - 24 states won

Romney, still a losing failure under your solution.

But keep trying, I'm sure you will be able to come up with a new crazy way to give republicans a path to victory.

Hey, how about just letting the Governers from each state decide? That sounds fair. Ohh, or what about just letting the House of Representatives vote for president? Better yet, how about we just decide elections with Rasmussen/Fox polls?

Or we could just go back to the old fasion way for republicans to win the White House, just throw out every citizens vote and have the Supreme Court decide.

[Rogue Scholar 05]

Obly half of all Climatoligist believe that the "Global Warming" of the last half of the 20th Century was anything more than a warming trend and less than 10% feel it had anything to do with anything mankind was doing.
On a global scale, mankind is like an ant trying to rape an elephant. The elephant will not feel a damn thing!
For some reason, Libtards think mankind is more powerful than Mother Nature. Even if we detonated all the nuclear bombs on the Earth, the Earth will have recovered within months. And the only thing anyone on the moon would realize is that there would be fewer city lights on Earth!

[Rogue Scholar 05]

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Why is it that the Summer Solstice is around June 21st yet Summer temperatures do not peak until a month later? And the Arctic Sea Ice does not reach it's maximum retreat until TWO months after the that?
The same thing happens in the Winter. The Winter Solstice is around December 21st yet the lowest temps are usually recorded in late January and the Arctic Sea Ice does not reach it's maximum extent until MARCH!!!
And why do I call you Idiotards???

wojar wrote:

<quoted text>
That's news? Maybe you should report your findings to the AAAS.

They understand cause and effect. It is you Idiotads that do not!!!

[Rogue Scholar 05]

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
How about each state gets one vote regardless of size or population?

Cry Baby TEArs wrote:

<quoted text>
Obama - 26 states won
Romney - 24 states won
Romney, still a losing failure under your solution.
But keep trying, I'm sure you will be able to come up with a new crazy way to give republicans a path to victory.
Hey, how about just letting the Governers from each state decide? That sounds fair. Ohh, or what about just letting the House of Representatives vote for president? Better yet, how about we just decide elections with Rasmussen/Fox polls?
Or we could just go back to the old fasion way for republicans to win the White House, just throw out every citizens vote and have the Supreme Court decide.

I am not crying. I am working on the Election of 2014 when I hope we retake the Senate!

[Johannes]

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
How about each state gets one vote regardless of size or population?
<quoted text>
I am not crying. I am working on the Election of 2014 when I hope we retake the Senate!

Hope and Change.....sounds nice to me.

[Rogue Scholar 05]

Johannes wrote:

<quoted text>
You really get off on this global warming crap, don't you?
Ever notice that you are the only one who ever brings it up?

Ever notice that it snowed in Yucaipa? Have you figured out why? How often does it snow in Mexico City? It did earlier this year!!!
Snow in Mexico City
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

[wojar]

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

Obly half of all Climatoligist believe that the "Global Warming" of the last half of the 20th Century was anything more than a warming trend and less than 10% feel it had anything to do with anything mankind was doing.
On a global scale, mankind is like an ant trying to rape an elephant. The elephant will not feel a damn thing!
For some reason, Libtards think mankind is more powerful than Mother Nature. Even if we detonated all the nuclear bombs on the Earth, the Earth will have recovered within months. And the only thing anyone on the moon would realize is that there would be fewer city lights on Earth!

Just keep on making up facts Rouge.

"This overwhelming consensus among climate experts was confirmed by an independent study that surveyed all climate scientists who have publicly signed declarations supporting or rejecting the consensus position. It found that 97-98% of climate experts support the consensus. Moreover, the study found that the small number of scientists rejecting the consensus had published, on average, around half as many papers each as the large majority of scientists accepting the consensus position."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/ap...

BTW, Rougie, I was never invited to a Democratic Pity Party on November 7th.

Hee hee hee.

[MyTwoCents]

Just Sayin wrote:

<quoted text>
It figures that most Obama supporters did not own any foreclosed homes and as a result would not be interested in any money laundering that is going on in the White House.
43 Trillion dollars? That's more than our deficit. Seems as thought the taxpayer is getting shafted again.

That's right, President Obama supporters did not own any foreclosed homes; we have jobs and pay our bills.

>

[Jacques Ottawa]

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

<quoted text>
We are still having problems here in Flroida. On major polling station in a heavily Democrat area closed it's doors and would not allow the public to view the counting process.
Why is it almost always DEMOCRATS that are vilolating the rules???

Well, nothing has changed. Your biased predictions have once more wrong. Now it's "On major polling station in a heavily Democrat area closed it's doors and would not allow the public to view the counting process." More hearsay. Can you give us the source? A/nd it makes no difference, as Obama could lose Florida and he'd still be YOUR president, like it or not. But, unlike Romney, Obama is smarter and has better strategists, as they knew where to concentrate their campaign.

[Rogue Scholar 05]

Ya know, there are NO Youtube posting of snow in Yacaipa before 2010!!! Did it snow in 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004, etc. in Yacaipa or is it a recent phenomena in Yacaipa? Yep, snow in Yacaipa in 2010, 2011 and 2012 but one before those years!!!!

snow yucaipa california
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

snow video 31812. Yucaipa,CA
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

snowing in Yucaipa in APRIL!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Yucaipa snow in APRIL!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Yucaipa snow 01222010
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Yucaipa California Snow March 18, 2012
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

[wojar]

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

I am not crying. I am working on the Election of 2014 when I hope we retake the Senate!

Thank you. Keep it up. UR a liability.

I was working for Barack Obama, Chris Murphy (for Senate), and Elizabeth Esty (for House). All won. We kicked A**.

I particularly enjoyed Chris Murphy's victory. WWE soft-porn queen multimillionaire Linda McMahon tried to buy a senate seat for the second time. She's now wasted almost $100 Mil of her own money trying to buy a Senate seat.

In 2010 she was defeated by Senator Richard Blumenthal. At a rally several weeks ago in Waterbury CT, Senator Blumenthal showed up and reminded us that he had faced her millions of dollars in TV ads and beat her, and that he was confident that Murphy would win for the same reason: "She has millions of dollars, we have something far more valuable: we have you working for us!"

[Jacques Ottawa]

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

<quoted text>
We are still having problems here in Flroida. On major polling station in a heavily Democrat area closed it's doors and would not allow the public to view the counting process.
Why is it almost always DEMOCRATS that are vilolating the rules???

And Rogue, what about your contention that Obama was losing some black voters? Hmmm, 93% for him in 2008, 93% last Tuesday. If that is "slipping away..." Same for catholics, they still voted 50%+ for Obama. As for catholics who went to church weekly, it was a pro-Romney vote, once a month, pro-Obama and, atheists, overwhelminglhy Obama. What does that tell you? Oh, Obama was also losing the Latin vote, according to one of your many many opinions. Well, wrong again. You, Rogue, should have been a meteorologist.

[Jacques Ottawa]

Justice Dale wrote:

We have seen that Marxist-Socialism will not work in the US, our pockets are not deep enough.
You want to try National-Socialism, worked great for Hitler, plus it would clear the country of the Marxist-Socialists.
Just what kind of Government do we want?

To call you "Justice" is the greatest misnomer in the history of monikers. I come back from a short vacation and you are even more ignorant and uninformed than ever. To label something you don't like as socialism or liberal or whatever is so puerile, and particularly so lacking in political knowledge, it's just too much.

[Rogue Scholar 05]

Ya know, every now and then there is something freakish that happens. So it snows where it normally does not snow. But when it snows two year in a row you think, "Hmmmm". But if it snows three years in a year you say, What the F"!!!

[Jacques Ottawa]

wojar wrote:

<quoted text>
With 66.4% reporting in Washington, President Obama had a 13 point lead.
What's this BS about one half of one percent margin?
Take your Aricept, Frank.

Frank does not understand that the Democrats did not make up those Washington numbers, wojar. He also does not understand that the losing Repub candidate conceded after 20% of the votes were in. Frank does not comprehend that, should there be a major change in the counting of votes infavour of the Repub candidate,(highly unlikely), the Repub would be the victor, no matter what the counting said after 66% of the vote is counted. Ask Dewey.