BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

[Grand Birther]

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

<quoted text>
Well, sooner or later may of the left will wake up. We started Global Warming in the late 1950's but it as late as 1977 you Libtards thought we were entering another Little Ice Age and then, in lock step, you switched to the Global Warming step. Now that we have been in Global Cooling for a dozen or so years, it will take you until about 2020 before you change step again.
It is like a heard of buffalo, you follow the Liberal herd!

Poor Rogue, your self delusion knows no bounds.

Even if average global temperatures cooled for a dozen years (they have not), on average, the earth is still warming long term.

As anti-education/anti-science clowns like Rogue Moron like to believe, short term perceived trends negate empirically provable long term trends.

Lololololol

[Grand Birther]

Only in the minds of complete and utter morons was anyone or anything discredited in the moron construct inaptly named Climate Gate.

[Johannes]

Frank wrote:

<quoted text>Here in Washington they have only counted about two thirds of the ballots. Most of these elections are decided by one percent of the vote. How can they be decided when only two thirds of the ballots have been counted? One half of one percent margin would be equivalent to one vote out of two hundred ballots.

STATISTICS

Hey, when all the ballots are finally counted, let us know if things change.

In other words, Rmoney was getting his ass kicked early on and, using higher mathematics, it doesn't look like things will change.

[Johannes]

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

Comparing data between the Medieval Warm Period and the late 20th Century Warm Period.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:2000_Year_T...
Please note the "black" line. That is NASA-GISS's , Dr. James Hansen, who has been discredited as part of Climate Gate. Also notice, it stops at ..... 200$! Why???

You really get off on this global warming crap, don't you?

Ever notice that you are the only one who ever brings it up?

[wojar]

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

Yep, Solar Cycle will go down as the coldest solar cycle in over 90 years!!!
http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/images/ssn_...
Hmmmmm, do you remember the snowmagendon on Halloween 2011 in the Northeast and now them have another major snow storm going on again. Normally winder waits for Thanksgiving but no longer as we enter Global COOLING!

Normally we don't have hurricanes in New Jersey late in October either.

Duh!

[Rogue Scholar 05]

It should be noted that the Obama Administration ignored demands to investigate U.S. complicity in this scandal. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!!!!

Climatic Research Unit email controversy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Climatic Research Unit email controversy
17 November 2009

Climatic Research Unit, University of East Anglia
Also known as "Climategate"
Inquiries House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (UK)[1]
Independent Climate Change Email Review (UK)
International Science Assessment Panel (UK)
Pennsylvania State University (US)
United States Environmental Protection Agency (US)
Department of Commerce (US)
Verdict Exoneration or withdrawal of all major or serious charges
The Climatic Research Unit email controversy (also known as "Climategate")[2][3] began in November 2009 with the hacking of a server at the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia (UEA) by an external attacker. Several weeks before the Copenhagen Summit on climate change, an unknown individual or group breached CRU's server and copied thousands of emails and computer files to various locations on the Internet.
The story was first broken by climate change critics on their blogs, with columnist James Delingpole popularising the term "Climategate" to describe the controversy.[7] Climate change critics and others denying the significance of human caused climate change argued that the emails showed that global warming was a scientific conspiracy, in which they alleged that scientists manipulated climate data and attempted to suppress critics. The accusations were rejected by the CRU, who said that the emails had been taken out of context and merely reflected an honest exchange of ideas.

[Johannes]

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

<quoted text>
But you do know why the Vikings ran amok between the Ninth and Twelfth Centuries, don't you? The Medieval Warm Period!!! During that same period the Mongol population boomed.
And at the end of the Twelfth Century the weather chilled and the Vikings moved south through what would become Russia and places like Normandy. And the Mongols, well Genghis Khan took them to China to find food for his people. Yep, Global COOLING caused widespread famine around 1200 A.D.!!!

But what does that have to do with the Duke of Earl?

[GBPfan]

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

Comparing data between the Medieval Warm Period and the late 20th Century Warm Period.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:2000_Year_T...
Please note the "black" line. That is NASA-GISS's , Dr. James Hansen, who has been discredited as part of Climate Gate. Also notice, it stops at ..... 200$! Why???

Thank you. I hope you and everyone in the Republican party continue to deny science and mathematics. It makes it that much easier to crush you in elections. Please continue to embrace ignorance. It suits you.

[Rogue Scholar 05]

Johannes wrote:

<quoted text>
STATISTICS
Hey, when all the ballots are finally counted, let us know if things change.
In other words, Rmoney was getting his ass kicked early on and, using higher mathematics, it doesn't look like things will change.

We are still having problems here in Flroida. On major polling station in a heavily Democrat area closed it's doors and would not allow the public to view the counting process.
Why is it almost always DEMOCRATS that are vilolating the rules???

[Rogue Scholar 05]

Johannes wrote:

<quoted text>
But what does that have to do with the Duke of Earl?

He was a Viking!

[Rogue Scholar 05]

Grand Birther wrote:

Only in the minds of complete and utter morons was anyone or anything discredited in the moron construct inaptly named Climate Gate.

Who investigated Climate Gate? Obama ignored the scandal and turned a blind eye. The United Nations black-washed their investigation.
Who investigate the police when they do something wrong? The POLICE!!! Asking the UN to investigate their best friends is a J-O-K-E!!!

[wojar]

Frank wrote:

<quoted text>Here in Washington they have only counted about two thirds of the ballots. Most of these elections are decided by one percent of the vote. How can they be decided when only two thirds of the ballots have been counted? One half of one percent margin would be equivalent to one vote out of two hundred ballots.

Did you ever study statistics in college?

[wojar]

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

<quoted text>
Who investigated Climate Gate? Obama ignored the scandal and turned a blind eye. The United Nations black-washed their investigation.
Who investigate the police when they do something wrong? The POLICE!!! Asking the UN to investigate their best friends is a J-O-K-E!!!

Just keep on tilting at windmills; it suits you well.

[Justice Dale]

We have seen that Marxist-Socialism will not work in the US, our pockets are not deep enough.
You want to try National-Socialism, worked great for Hitler, plus it would clear the country of the Marxist-Socialists.
Just what kind of Government do we want?

[Rogue Scholar 05]

GBPfan wrote:

<quoted text>
Thank you. I hope you and everyone in the Republican party continue to deny science and mathematics. It makes it that much easier to crush you in elections. Please continue to embrace ignorance. It suits you.

Cooking data books only fools Libtards like you. Why did you change in the late 1070's from believing in a Little Ice Age to Global Warming? You do know about the University of Colorado's long standing investigation of long term weather don't you. And they are currently a proponent of Global Warming (Climate Change) right now. But did they THINK that way back in 1977???

http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/1550544...

Read it and weep you Idiotard hypocrite!!!! Yep, the Idiotards of UC at Boulder, CO believed in the up and coming next Little Ice Age back in ..... 1977. The Solar Cycle #19 (late 1950's was the most active (hottest) cycle EVER RECORDED and started the Global Warming trend of the last half of the Twentieth Century.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cycle_19
Solar Cycle #19 last only 10.5 years. Short cycels, less than 11.1 years, are an indication that the following cycle will also be hotter.
Compared to Solar Cycle #23 which was extra long and the current solar cycle is the coldest solar cycle in 90 years. There is a delay factor of 5-7 year between a change in the cycle and temperature trends here on earth. Solar Cycle #23 peaked in 2001 but it was not until 2007 that the Earth started to cool down!!!

[Johannes]

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

<quoted text>
We are still having problems here in Flroida. On major polling station in a heavily Democrat area closed it's doors and would not allow the public to view the counting process.
Why is it almost always DEMOCRATS that are vilolating the rules???

Are you saying that the 'rules' state that the public may view the counting process?

Be real....you're just concerned that you might now live in a blue state.

[Johannes]

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

<quoted text>
He was a Viking!

Sorry, I know all the Vikings and Earl isn't a Viking name.

[Rogue Scholar 05]

Why is it that the Summer Solstice is around June 21st yet Summer temperatures do not peak until a month later? And the Arctic Sea Ice does not reach it's maximum retreat until TWO months after the that?
The same thing happens in the Winter. The Winter Solstice is around December 21st yet the lowest temps are usually recorded in late January and the Arctic Sea Ice does not reach it's maximum extent until MARCH!!!
And why do I call you Idiotards???

[wojar]

Frank wrote:

<quoted text>Here in Washington they have only counted about two thirds of the ballots. Most of these elections are decided by one percent of the vote. How can they be decided when only two thirds of the ballots have been counted? One half of one percent margin would be equivalent to one vote out of two hundred ballots.

With 66.4% reporting in Washington, President Obama had a 13 point lead.

What's this BS about one half of one percent margin?

Take your Aricept, Frank.

[Frank]

Learn to Read wrote:

<quoted text>
Gee Frank - maybe you shouldn't have wasted so much time pursuing your Birfoonish fantasy

I should have surrendered my principles,values, and morals?