BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#124484 Nov 8, 2012
GBPfan wrote:
<quoted text>
Thank you. I hope you and everyone in the Republican party continue to deny science and mathematics. It makes it that much easier to crush you in elections. Please continue to embrace ignorance. It suits you.
Cooking data books only fools Libtards like you. Why did you change in the late 1070's from believing in a Little Ice Age to Global Warming? You do know about the University of Colorado's long standing investigation of long term weather don't you. And they are currently a proponent of Global Warming (Climate Change) right now. But did they THINK that way back in 1977???

http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/1550544...

Read it and weep you Idiotard hypocrite!!!! Yep, the Idiotards of UC at Boulder, CO believed in the up and coming next Little Ice Age back in ..... 1977. The Solar Cycle #19 (late 1950's was the most active (hottest) cycle EVER RECORDED and started the Global Warming trend of the last half of the Twentieth Century.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cycle_19
Solar Cycle #19 last only 10.5 years. Short cycels, less than 11.1 years, are an indication that the following cycle will also be hotter.
Compared to Solar Cycle #23 which was extra long and the current solar cycle is the coldest solar cycle in 90 years. There is a delay factor of 5-7 year between a change in the cycle and temperature trends here on earth. Solar Cycle #23 peaked in 2001 but it was not until 2007 that the Earth started to cool down!!!
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

#124485 Nov 8, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
We are still having problems here in Flroida. On major polling station in a heavily Democrat area closed it's doors and would not allow the public to view the counting process.
Why is it almost always DEMOCRATS that are vilolating the rules???
Are you saying that the 'rules' state that the public may view the counting process?

Be real....you're just concerned that you might now live in a blue state.
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

#124486 Nov 8, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
He was a Viking!
Sorry, I know all the Vikings and Earl isn't a Viking name.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#124487 Nov 8, 2012
Why is it that the Summer Solstice is around June 21st yet Summer temperatures do not peak until a month later? And the Arctic Sea Ice does not reach it's maximum retreat until TWO months after the that?
The same thing happens in the Winter. The Winter Solstice is around December 21st yet the lowest temps are usually recorded in late January and the Arctic Sea Ice does not reach it's maximum extent until MARCH!!!
And why do I call you Idiotards???

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

#124488 Nov 8, 2012
Frank wrote:
<quoted text>Here in Washington they have only counted about two thirds of the ballots. Most of these elections are decided by one percent of the vote. How can they be decided when only two thirds of the ballots have been counted? One half of one percent margin would be equivalent to one vote out of two hundred ballots.
With 66.4% reporting in Washington, President Obama had a 13 point lead.

What's this BS about one half of one percent margin?

Take your Aricept, Frank.
Frank

Spokane, WA

#124489 Nov 8, 2012
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Gee Frank - maybe you shouldn't have wasted so much time pursuing your Birfoonish fantasy
I should have surrendered my principles,values, and morals?

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

#124490 Nov 8, 2012
Frank wrote:
<quoted text>Here in Washington they have only counted about two thirds of the ballots. Most of these elections are decided by one percent of the vote. How can they be decided when only two thirds of the ballots have been counted? One half of one percent margin would be equivalent to one vote out of two hundred ballots.
Do you know what it means when the confidence level is 99%? Statistics 101.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

#124491 Nov 8, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Why is it that the Summer Solstice is around June 21st yet Summer temperatures do not peak until a month later? And the Arctic Sea Ice does not reach it's maximum retreat until TWO months after the that?
The same thing happens in the Winter. The Winter Solstice is around December 21st yet the lowest temps are usually recorded in late January and the Arctic Sea Ice does not reach it's maximum extent until MARCH!!!
And why do I call you Idiotards???
That's news? Maybe you should report your findings to the AAAS.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#124492 Nov 8, 2012
Frank wrote:
<quoted text>I should have surrendered my principles,values, and morals?
Why? Were you running for office?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#124493 Nov 8, 2012
Solar Cycle #19 was the most active (hottest) cycle ever recorded with over 400 tears of sun spot data recorded.
http://www.solen.info/solar/cycl19.html
There is a relationship between the umber of sunspots and the amount of solar radiation. And there is also a relationship between the length of the cycle and the cycle that follows it.
The Solar Storm of February 11, 1958 is considered to be the worth Solar Storm of the last century!!!
http://www.solarstorms.org/SRefStorms.html

The Current Solar Cycle is the coldest recorded in 90 years. If this trend continues, we will be entering another Little Ice Age! But we will not know for another five years if that will happen!
Certainly Global Warming is OVER!!!
Cry Baby TEArs

Munster, IN

#124494 Nov 8, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
How about each state gets one vote regardless of size or population?
Obama - 26 states won

Romney - 24 states won

Romney, still a losing failure under your solution.

But keep trying, I'm sure you will be able to come up with a new crazy way to give republicans a path to victory.

Hey, how about just letting the Governers from each state decide? That sounds fair. Ohh, or what about just letting the House of Representatives vote for president? Better yet, how about we just decide elections with Rasmussen/Fox polls?

Or we could just go back to the old fasion way for republicans to win the White House, just throw out every citizens vote and have the Supreme Court decide.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#124496 Nov 8, 2012
Obly half of all Climatoligist believe that the "Global Warming" of the last half of the 20th Century was anything more than a warming trend and less than 10% feel it had anything to do with anything mankind was doing.
On a global scale, mankind is like an ant trying to rape an elephant. The elephant will not feel a damn thing!
For some reason, Libtards think mankind is more powerful than Mother Nature. Even if we detonated all the nuclear bombs on the Earth, the Earth will have recovered within months. And the only thing anyone on the moon would realize is that there would be fewer city lights on Earth!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#124497 Nov 8, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Why is it that the Summer Solstice is around June 21st yet Summer temperatures do not peak until a month later? And the Arctic Sea Ice does not reach it's maximum retreat until TWO months after the that?
The same thing happens in the Winter. The Winter Solstice is around December 21st yet the lowest temps are usually recorded in late January and the Arctic Sea Ice does not reach it's maximum extent until MARCH!!!
And why do I call you Idiotards???
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
That's news? Maybe you should report your findings to the AAAS.
They understand cause and effect. It is you Idiotads that do not!!!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#124498 Nov 8, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
How about each state gets one vote regardless of size or population?
Cry Baby TEArs wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama - 26 states won
Romney - 24 states won
Romney, still a losing failure under your solution.
But keep trying, I'm sure you will be able to come up with a new crazy way to give republicans a path to victory.
Hey, how about just letting the Governers from each state decide? That sounds fair. Ohh, or what about just letting the House of Representatives vote for president? Better yet, how about we just decide elections with Rasmussen/Fox polls?
Or we could just go back to the old fasion way for republicans to win the White House, just throw out every citizens vote and have the Supreme Court decide.
I am not crying. I am working on the Election of 2014 when I hope we retake the Senate!
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

#124499 Nov 8, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
How about each state gets one vote regardless of size or population?
<quoted text>
I am not crying. I am working on the Election of 2014 when I hope we retake the Senate!
Hope and Change.....sounds nice to me.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#124500 Nov 8, 2012
Johannes wrote:
<quoted text>
You really get off on this global warming crap, don't you?
Ever notice that you are the only one who ever brings it up?
Ever notice that it snowed in Yucaipa? Have you figured out why? How often does it snow in Mexico City? It did earlier this year!!!
Snow in Mexico City

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

#124501 Nov 8, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Obly half of all Climatoligist believe that the "Global Warming" of the last half of the 20th Century was anything more than a warming trend and less than 10% feel it had anything to do with anything mankind was doing.
On a global scale, mankind is like an ant trying to rape an elephant. The elephant will not feel a damn thing!
For some reason, Libtards think mankind is more powerful than Mother Nature. Even if we detonated all the nuclear bombs on the Earth, the Earth will have recovered within months. And the only thing anyone on the moon would realize is that there would be fewer city lights on Earth!
Just keep on making up facts Rouge.

"This overwhelming consensus among climate experts was confirmed by an independent study that surveyed all climate scientists who have publicly signed declarations supporting or rejecting the consensus position. It found that 97-98% of climate experts support the consensus. Moreover, the study found that the small number of scientists rejecting the consensus had published, on average, around half as many papers each as the large majority of scientists accepting the consensus position."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/ap...

BTW, Rougie, I was never invited to a Democratic Pity Party on November 7th.

Hee hee hee.
MyTwoCents

Park Ridge, IL

#124502 Nov 8, 2012
Just Sayin wrote:
<quoted text>
It figures that most Obama supporters did not own any foreclosed homes and as a result would not be interested in any money laundering that is going on in the White House.
43 Trillion dollars? That's more than our deficit. Seems as thought the taxpayer is getting shafted again.
That's right, President Obama supporters did not own any foreclosed homes; we have jobs and pay our bills.

>
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#124503 Nov 8, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
We are still having problems here in Flroida. On major polling station in a heavily Democrat area closed it's doors and would not allow the public to view the counting process.
Why is it almost always DEMOCRATS that are vilolating the rules???
Well, nothing has changed. Your biased predictions have once more wrong. Now it's "On major polling station in a heavily Democrat area closed it's doors and would not allow the public to view the counting process." More hearsay. Can you give us the source? A/nd it makes no difference, as Obama could lose Florida and he'd still be YOUR president, like it or not. But, unlike Romney, Obama is smarter and has better strategists, as they knew where to concentrate their campaign.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#124504 Nov 8, 2012
Ya know, there are NO Youtube posting of snow in Yacaipa before 2010!!! Did it snow in 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004, etc. in Yacaipa or is it a recent phenomena in Yacaipa? Yep, snow in Yacaipa in 2010, 2011 and 2012 but one before those years!!!!

snow yucaipa california


snow video 31812. Yucaipa,CA
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

snowing in Yucaipa in APRIL!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Yucaipa snow in APRIL!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Yucaipa snow 01222010
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Yucaipa California Snow March 18, 2012
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min Bluestater 1,141,682
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 14 min Patriot AKA Bozo 48,410
EverGreen Belgrade 2 hr voivoda_stjepan_k... 4
mtn cheat 2 hr mtn 1
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 6 hr KiMerde 51,241
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 8 hr j_m_w 98,669
romance 9 hr Yunkee 1
Chicago Dating
Find my Match

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 1:30 pm PST

NFL 1:30PM
Colt McCoy 'pushing' Robert Griffin III, Gruden says
Bleacher Report 4:00 AM
Colts' Week 12 Preview vs. Jags
NBC Sports 9:51 AM
Colts cut return man Griff Whalen, sign RB Zurlon Tipton
NFL10:14 AM
Colts promote Zurlon Tipton, waive Griff Whalen
NBC Sports 4:12 PM
Week 12 skill-position injury report — final