BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 231237 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Guru

Canyon Country, CA

#124595 Nov 8, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
<quoted text>
BTW, Nate is an alumnus of The University of Chicago, where real mathematics is taught as a serious subject -- the Queen of the Sciences.
Silver doesn't "call" anything. All he does is he revises his predictions twice every day. That is like reporting a game of basketball. In the last 3 seconds you call the game for the team leading by 12 points, vs calling the game at the tipoff. By that standard, he can never be wrong.

And you think that is "having it 'all' right".-lol! He is leading you by the nose. If you knew anything about science, you would know that. I will put my science degrees against his or yours any day of the week. My mentors were the leaders of medicine, astronomy, anatomy, ecology, physiology, real estate, etc. You would know many of their names by name as they are now known world-wide.

So Terri, you failed the class on real estate, so lets try a new class now here.

Here is QUESTION #1 : what is obama's PLAN for his second term? he still hasn't told us. Maybe you could enumerate that for us.

Question #2 is this- where was obama the night of the attacks on Benghazi? He refuses to release that info. WHY!

We await your answer.
Frank

Spokane, WA

#124597 Nov 8, 2012
Johannes wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry Frank. American is made up of people and the people say OBAMA WON. You are in the minority and YOU LOST.
We all lost November 4,2008 when Obama decided to push his radical left wing agenda on all of us. Now, he is going to double down,without having to face the consequences of his actions.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

United States

#124598 Nov 8, 2012
Guru wrote:
<quoted text>
Silver doesn't "call" anything. All he does is he revises his predictions twice every day. That is like reporting a game of basketball. In the last 3 seconds you call the game for the team leading by 12 points, vs calling the game at the tipoff. By that standard, he can never be wrong.
And you think that is "having it 'all' right".-lol! He is leading you by the nose. If you knew anything about science, you would know that. I will put my science degrees against his or yours any day of the week. My mentors were the leaders of medicine, astronomy, anatomy, ecology, physiology, real estate, etc. You would know many of their names by name as they are now known world-wide.
So Terri, you failed the class on real estate, so lets try a new class now here.
Here is QUESTION #1 : what is obama's PLAN for his second term? he still hasn't told us. Maybe you could enumerate that for us.
Question #2 is this- where was obama the night of the attacks on Benghazi? He refuses to release that info. WHY!
We await your answer.
We the People have decided.

Get over it.
Frank

Spokane, WA

#124599 Nov 8, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
YOU lost and can't come to terms with it. Just hope instead that Obama will do a good job. It's in YOUR interest, in your country's interest and the worl's as well. It's how dems would have reacted had they lost the presidency. But then they are more mature, intelligent and educated than you and your ilk. I suppose that's the main difference.
I want our country to prosper,Obama does not.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

United States

#124600 Nov 8, 2012
Frank wrote:
<quoted text>We all lost November 4,2008 when Obama decided to push his radical left wing agenda on all of us. Now, he is going to double down,without having to face the consequences of his actions.
Frank, We the People decided.

Grow up! Learn how to become an American.
Guru

Canyon Country, CA

#124602 Nov 8, 2012
this is what obama is doing now...he is a coward like no other!

Benghazi documents available to senators only when they are out of town
Posted By Josh Rogin Thursday, November 8, 2012 - 12:16 PM Share

Under pressure from senators, the State Department is allowing some lawmakers to look at cables and other documents related to the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, but only today and tomorrow, when most senators are not in Washington.

COMMENTS (149) SHARE:
Share on twitter Twitter

Share on reddit Reddit

Bookmark and Share More...

Congress is gearing up for a full week of Benghazi-related hearings next week, including a Nov. 13 hearing behind closed doors of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, led by Chairman John Kerry (D-MA). Kerry has written two letters to the State Department requesting congressional access to information and documents related to the circumstances leading up to and during the attack that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens. Several sensitive documents have already been leaked to congressional offices and the media, so the State Department has decided to let some senators view Benghazi documents but not take them home.

"We are currently in the process of gathering and reviewing record responsive to Congressional requests. Our efforts have already identified a large volume of potentially responsive records that address the security situation leading up to the attack," State Department Assistant Secretary for Legislative Affairs David Adams wrote to Kerry on Nov. 2 in a letter obtained by The Cable.

"To facilitate your committee's work, we want to offer you and other members of the committee the opportunity to review these cables and memoranda. This set of material contains classified and other sensitive information... Mindful of these concerns, the Department is prepared to make copies of these documents available for the committee's in camera review."

One senior GOP Senate staffer told The Cable that State is only making the documents available for senators and committee staff to view today and tomorrow, which won't actually allow the members to prepare for the hearing. Staffers for committee members are also not allowed to see the material.

"Funny since no member is in town," the aide said. "The timing and limited access clearly demonstrates the administration cares more about playing politics with the tragedy than accepting responsibility."

Committee members Bob Corker (R-TN) and Johnny Isakson (R-GA) sent Clinton a letter Nov. 2 asking that the documents be sent to the committee, not just made available for viewing on a limited basis.

"Over the past several weeks, cables, emails and other communications regarding the security situation in Benghazi prior to and since the attack on our consulate have been leaked to some Congressional offices and media outlets, resulting in conflicting reports in the press. We have also called for the official transmittal of these documents and are still awaiting your response," Corker and Isakson wrote. "On September 25, 2012 and again on October 3, 2012, we sent you letters requesting that all communications between the diplomatic mission in Libya and the State Department related to the security situation be transmitted to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee without delay. We respectfully ask for an update on the status of our requests for these documents."

UPDATE: Thursday afternoon, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) annouced the witness list for the Nov. 15 Benhgazi closed hearing at the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. The witnesses will be Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, CIA Director David Petraeus, FBI Deputy Director Sean Joyce,Under Secretary of State for Management Pat Kennedy,andNational Counterterrorism Center Director Matthew Olsen.
Guru

Canyon Country, CA

#124603 Nov 8, 2012
Frank wrote:
<quoted text>We all lost November 4,2008 when Obama decided to push his radical left wing agenda on all of us. Now, he is going to double down,without having to face the consequences of his actions.
this is what obama is doing now...he is a coward like no other!

Benghazi documents available to senators only when they are out of town
Posted By Josh Rogin Thursday, November 8, 2012 - 12:16 PM Share

Under pressure from senators, the State Department is allowing some lawmakers to look at cables and other documents related to the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, but only today and tomorrow, when most senators are not in Washington.

COMMENTS (149) SHARE:
Share on twitter Twitter

Congress is gearing up for a full week of Benghazi-related hearings next week, including a Nov. 13 hearing behind closed doors of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, led by Chairman John Kerry (D-MA). Kerry has written two letters to the State Department requesting congressional access to information and documents related to the circumstances leading up to and during the attack that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens. Several sensitive documents have already been leaked to congressional offices and the media, so the State Department has decided to let some senators view Benghazi documents but not take them home.

"We are currently in the process of gathering and reviewing record responsive to Congressional requests. Our efforts have already identified a large volume of potentially responsive records that address the security situation leading up to the attack," State Department Assistant Secretary for Legislative Affairs David Adams wrote to Kerry on Nov. 2 in a letter obtained by The Cable.

"To facilitate your committee's work, we want to offer you and other members of the committee the opportunity to review these cables and memoranda. This set of material contains classified and other sensitive information... Mindful of these concerns, the Department is prepared to make copies of these documents available for the committee's in camera review."

One senior GOP Senate staffer told The Cable that State is only making the documents available for senators and committee staff to view today and tomorrow, which won't actually allow the members to prepare for the hearing. Staffers for committee members are also not allowed to see the material.

"Funny since no member is in town," the aide said. "The timing and limited access clearly demonstrates the administration cares more about playing politics with the tragedy than accepting responsibility."

Committee members Bob Corker (R-TN) and Johnny Isakson (R-GA) sent Clinton a letter Nov. 2 asking that the documents be sent to the committee, not just made available for viewing on a limited basis.

"Over the past several weeks, cables, emails and other communications regarding the security situation in Benghazi prior to and since the attack on our consulate have been leaked to some Congressional offices and media outlets, resulting in conflicting reports in the press. We have also called for the official transmittal of these documents and are still awaiting your response," Corker and Isakson wrote. "On September 25, 2012 and again on October 3, 2012, we sent you letters requesting that all communications between the diplomatic mission in Libya and the State Department related to the security situation be transmitted to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee without delay. We respectfully ask for an update on the status of our requests for these documents."

UPDATE: Thursday afternoon, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) annouced the witness list for the Nov. 15 Benhgazi closed hearing at the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. The witnesses will be Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, CIA Director David Petraeus, FBI Deputy Director Sean Joyce,Under Secretary of State for Management Pat Kennedy,andNational Counterterrorism Center Director Matthew Olsen.
Just me

Los Angeles, CA

#124604 Nov 8, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Probably the same thing we did. Encourage like thinkers to get out and vote.
I'm not sure to whom you refer when you say "we" but just exactly how did you encourage people to vote?
Maude

Lynbrook, NY

#124605 Nov 8, 2012
Bill Clinton campaigned for OBAMA for one reason, so that OBAMA puts Hillarys name in for the SUPREME COURT. Mark my words you heard it here first.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

United States

#124606 Nov 8, 2012
Guru wrote:
this is what obama is doing now...he is a coward like no other!
Benghazi documents available to senators only when they are out of town
UR a day late and a dollar short.

Last time I checked, the election is over.

Grow up, loser!
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

#124608 Nov 8, 2012
Frank wrote:
<quoted text>We all lost November 4,2008 when Obama decided to push his radical left wing agenda on all of us. Now, he is going to double down,without having to face the consequences of his actions.
Well, the majority of Americans think Obama can do a better job. Perhaps it is YOU and your radical right wing agenda.

Sorry, Frank, you are so far out on the fringe that you can't even see it.
Rasmussen

Thornton, IL

#124609 Nov 8, 2012
Are our polls accurate, even remotely

Yes - 100%
No -- 0.0%

Margin of error -/- 100%
Rasmussen

Thornton, IL

#124610 Nov 8, 2012
Sorry, we're terrible, just...just terrible.

Awful.

Did I mention terrible?
Guru

Canyon Country, CA

#124611 Nov 8, 2012
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
UR a day late and a dollar short.
Last time I checked, the election is over.
Grow up, loser!
wrong again moron. The election is in 2016, <4 years from now. Wise up stupid!
Oblivious GOP Fool

Hammond, IN

#124612 Nov 8, 2012
Guru wrote:
<quoted text>
wrong again moron. The election is in 2016, <4 years from now. Wise up stupid!
Right on dude. We are going to send Obummer packing in 2016.

Rasmussen has Obama with a zero percent chance of being re-elected in 2016.

Take our country back.

Patriots unite.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

United States

#124613 Nov 8, 2012
Guru wrote:
<quoted text>
wrong again moron. The election is in 2016, <4 years from now. Wise up stupid!
Having fun moving the goalposts?

You lost, big time. All of your fantasy prognostications bit the dust.

Hee hee hee.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

United States

#124615 Nov 8, 2012
Oblivious GOP Fool wrote:
<quoted text>
Right on dude. We are going to send Obummer packing in 2016.
Rasmussen has Obama with a zero percent chance of being re-elected in 2016.
Take our country back.
Patriots unite.
Hee hee hee!

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

United States

#124618 Nov 8, 2012
Guru wrote:
<quoted text>
wrong again moron. The election is in 2016, <4 years from now. Wise up stupid!
Huh?

2016? You think Obama is running for a third term?

You think Benghazi will be an issue in 2016?

Grow up!
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
UR a day late and a dollar short.
Last time I checked, the election is over.
Grow up, loser!
Cry Baby TEArs

Hammond, IN

#124620 Nov 8, 2012
America Got Stupid wrote:
<quoted text>
Why am I smelling tuna, SKANK?
I don't know. Is it because you are within 25 yards of your mothers vagina?
KCS

Burbank, CA

#124622 Nov 8, 2012
Noway Duh wrote:
POLITICS
Theblaze.com
THE BLAZE RADIO’S SEVERIN: OBAMA VICTORY IS NOT TERRIBLE, IT’S ‘CATASTROPHIC’
Posted on November 7, 2012 at 9:18amPrint »Email »Comments (134)
JAY SEVERIN
A New York native and graduate of Vassar College, Jay Severin is a veteran conservative campaign strategist. As a strategic advisor to Republican incumbents […]
Author's Website
&#8203;Listen to Jay Severin exclusively (and for free) on TheBlaze radio &#8203;weekdays from 2-5 here.
–
In these few nostalgic hours I’ll be spending on the soil of the former United States of America (R.I.P.)– prior to the departure of my one-way flight to Iceland – let’s consider the electoral outcome.
Obama’s win is not terrible, as many of us imagine.
Not terrible. It is Catastrophic.
The nature, magnitude and impact of an Obama victory has never quite been understood.
Among patriots, one commonly hears “We Can’t Survive Another Four Years of Obama.”
Actually, we might.
Make no mistake:“make it” means like the victim of a hideous car crash, whose relatives are told by physicians “we think she’ll ‘Make It’“….(but she’ll never be the same.)
Oh, we may “make it” through another Obama sentence.
But we’ll never be the same.
It will be profoundly dreadful: confiscatory taxes; massive government growth; exploding deficit; widespread unlawfulness protected – nay, promoted – by the government; uncontrolled illegal immigration; open, unbridled racial preferences in every facet of life; hostility and grave threats – and perhaps dismantling – of various Free Speech sources, especially Talk Radio and Any Media unsupportive of Obama. Oba-Medicine, the absolute end of personal choice in medical care, including – Yes- Death Panels, for real; the gutting of our military; Obama’s promised post-election “flexibility”(i.e. surrender) toward our blood enemies and other forms of Gangster Government by a Gangster President should be expected.
Ultimately, America will be presided over by an un-American domestic enemy of the Constitution of the United States of America. Someone who isn’t, has never been, American in any sense of the word. Other than that, we’ll “make it,” on paper.
Individuals, business and families will be ruined – their future plans snatched away forever. And that all is not even the worst of it.
The Real Reason Obama’s win is horrific is not his next four years, per se, despite the limited preview above.
No.
The horror (the horror) is what Obama’s electoral victory means beyond four years.
It means we’ve reached the dreaded tipping point: the moment at which those who rely on someone else (you) for their living now control the vote.
It means the takers make up at least 50%+1.
That means we haven’t merely been sentenced to another FOUR years of Obamunism (aka Marxism, Socialism)– but an endless series of Obamas.
If we couldn’t win this one – given Obama’s manifest failings and grotesque beliefs and values coupled with a terrible economy – someone please explain to me how we win in 2016, and with whom?!
The demographic and political numbers for us become exponentially less hospitable as every day passes – e.g. even Texas – Texas!– hovers on the edge of tipping into Blue State status.
If Texas become the next New York and California (and beware Florida!)– an automatic, massive infusion of electoral votes, could that same person please explain to me how any non-Democrat candidate rationalizes a viable Electoral College strategy?
Save your time. It doesn’t exist.
WE don’t exist. By WE, I mean the America in which you and I grew up.
.
Your right the America you want is gone, past you by.I bet your in your doomsday shelter now counting shells and gun parts ready for the inevitable war between the mongrel races and the real american's who survived the Obama armageddon. Pararanoid delusional freak.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min Jake 1,460,434
News Scientists say they have proved climate change ... (Dec '08) 5 min Dudley 7,968
last post wins! (Dec '10) 43 min They cannot kill ... 2,764
last post wins! (Apr '13) 44 min They cannot kill ... 1,977
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 2 hr Burn Gas for Fun 62,366
Are democrats destroyed? 2 hr enter username 17
Should TRUMP use this? 8 hr ITs TRUE USE IT 10

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages