BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

Full story: Chicago Tribune

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Comments (Page 5,496)

Showing posts 109,901 - 109,920 of174,493
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“ad maiora nati sumus ”

Since: Sep 09

Justice Scalia is an Oxymoron

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#124366
Nov 8, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Guru wrote:
Here is obama's new RETIREMENT gift house in Kailua, Hawaii...$35Million dollars! WITH PICS
http://www.wnd.com/2012/09/secret-retirement-...
Too bad it will sit vacant until January 2017 to be occupied.
Frank

Spokane, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#124368
Nov 8, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Atticus Tiberius Finch wrote:
<quoted text>
Final poll on November 6th:
Obama beat Romney 55 percent to 43 percent among women, according to Reuters/Ipsos Election Day polling. That 12-point victory nearly matched Obama's 13-point win among female voters over Republican John McCain in 2008.
Sorry about that.. Goon
Obama basically won the uninformed vote of the large urban areas. He won the large cities and Romney won every where else. Even in states like California,Obama did not win more counties than Romney. Maybe the electoral college system should be based on legislative districts instead of the system we have now. I haven't seen any statistics,but I would be inclined to believe that if the vote was divided fairly in 235 legislative districts and a candidate needed 118 to win, we would be congratulating Romney.
Learn to Read

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#124369
Nov 8, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Grand Birther wrote:
How did poor Kentucky get it in its head that EVs based on population was unfair?

How is it fair to count North Dakota's population as equal to California's?

DUH
Well that would produce the result that Tacky wants - therefore it would be fair (of course so would only allowing people named Tacky to vote but he hasn't thought of that yet)
Learn to Read

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#124372
Nov 8, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Atticus Tiberius Finch wrote:
<quoted text>Final poll on November 6th:
Obama 50.4%
romney 48.1%
Amazing how when the Birfoons thought Mitt might win the popular vote they were yammering for that as the standard. Now they want to county the number of squares on a map of each color ... Why not the number of registered vehicles (with more weight given to "American" cars)

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#124373
Nov 8, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Grand Birther wrote:
How did poor Kentucky get it in its head that EVs based on population was unfair?
How is it fair to count North Dakota's population as equal to California's?
DUH
Do you question our Founding Father's wisdom?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#124374
Nov 8, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Grand Birther wrote:
How did poor Kentucky get it in its head that EVs based on population was unfair?
How is it fair to count North Dakota's population as equal to California's?
DUH
How about each state gets one vote regardless of size or population?
Fox News Makes You Stupid

Bay Shore, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#124375
Nov 8, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

America Got Stupid wrote:
<quoted text>
There was more red than blue in California.
There always is.
I expect that to be the case in both 2014 and 2016.
California will vote for a Republican President after 4 more years of Obama.
Greenspan Concedes He `Found a Flaw' in His Free-Market Ideology
Oct. 23 (Bloomberg)-- Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, under a grilling from lawmakers at a congressional hearing today, conceded a flaw in his free-market ideology that contributed to a ``once-in-a-century credit tsunami.''
``Yes, I found a flaw,'' Greenspan said in response to questions from to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.``That is precisely the reason I was shocked because I'd been going for 40 years or more with very considerable evidence that it was working exceptionally well.'' http://tinyurl.com/5ea9ng
Greenspan said he was ``partially'' wrong in his opposition in recent years to the regulation of derivatives. He said in a May 2005 speech that ``private regulation generally has proved far better at constraining excessive risk-taking than has government regulation.''
Committee Chairman Henry Waxman, a California Democrat, said Greenspan had ``the authority to prevent irresponsible lending practices that led to the subprime mortgage crisis.''
``You were advised to do so by many others,'' he told Greenspan.``And now our whole economy is paying the price.''
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news...

Twenty-five people at the heart of the meltdown
26 January 2009 / http://tinyurl.com/bwrl8l
The worst economic turmoil since the Great Depression is not a natural phenomenon but a man-made disaster in which we all played a part. In the second part of a week-long series looking behind the slump, Guardian City editor Julia Finch picks out the individuals who have led us into the current crisis
1. Alan Greenspan, chairman of US Federal Reserve 1987- 2006 2. Mervyn King, governor of the Bank of England 3. Bill Clinton, former US president 4. Gordon Brown, prime minister 5. George W Bush, former US president 6. Senator Phil Gramm 7. Abby Cohen, Goldman Sachs chief US strategist 8. Kathleen Corbet, former CEO, Standard & Poor's 9. Hank" Greenberg, AIG insurance group 10. Andy Hornby, former HBOS boss
11. Sir Fred Goodwin, former RBS boss 12. Steve Crawshaw, former B&B boss
13. Adam Applegarth, former Northern Rock boss 14. Dick Fuld, Lehman Brothers chief executive 15. Ralph Cioffi and Matthew Tannin 16. Lewis Ranieri 17. Joseph Cassano, AIG Financial Products 18. Chuck Prince, former Citi boss 19. Angelo Mozilo, Countrywide Financial 20. Stan O'Neal, former boss of Merrill Lynch
21. Jimmy Cayne, former Bear Stearns boss 22. Christopher Dodd, chairman, Senate banking committee 23. Geir Haarde, Icelandic prime minister 24. The American public
25. John Tiner, FSA chief executive, 2003-07 26. Andrew Lahde 27. John Paulson, hedge fund boss 28. Professor Nouriel Roubini 29. Warren Buffett, billionaire investor 30. George Soros, speculator 31. Stephen Eismann, hedge fund manager 32. Meredith Whitney, Oppenheimer Securities
Noway Duh

Clearlake, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#124376
Nov 8, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
The Dems worked hard to get their supporters out to the polls.
Karl Rove spent millions of billionaires' money on TV commercials.
Sorry, they couldn't buy the election. We the People have spoken.
Some think that is unfair.
Tough.
Your a brain dead dip shite obot! Oshite spent plenty to buy off the the alphabet networks and News anchors to nun and blabber on about Oshite for the past five years! He has spent billions to to buy votes! How stupid can you be? You the brain dead stupid have just fudged America! Hope you are the first to choke on it! Now that you entitled the bustard to scraw America another four years worst than anything Bush ever did America is in the toilet! Can't wait to see all you libtards get flushed down it!
Fox News Makes You Stupid

Bay Shore, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#124377
Nov 8, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you question our Founding Father's wisdom?
The Constitution 101:

In the Federalist Papers it said: We were not going to have a monarchy, and we were not going to have a democracy.$$$$$$$

And to this day we have neither. For two hundred years we have had an oligarchical system in which men of property can do well (Dumbya Bush), and others are on their own.$$$$$$$

American politics is essentially a family affair, as are most oligarchies. When the father of the Constitution, James Madison, was asked how on earth any business could get done in Congress when the country contained 100 million people whose representatives would number half a thousand, Madison took the line that oligarchy's iron law always obtains: A few people invariably run the show; and keep it, if they can, in the family.$$$$$$$

Our founding fathers had such a fear and loathing of democracy that they invented the Electoral College so that the popular voice of the people could be throttled, much as the Supreme Court throttled the Floridians on December 12, 2000.$$$$$$$

We were to be neither a democracy, subject to majoritarian tyranny, nor a dictatorship, subject to Caesarean folly.$$$$$$$

As American media is controlled by that corporate America which provides us with political candidates a well-informed electorate is not possible.$$$$$$$
Learn to Read

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#124378
Nov 8, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

America Got Stupid wrote:
<quoted text>
We must create districts within a State that can award a States current electoral votes to the person that wins that district.
.
The States have that option (see Nevraska). Perhaps you can persuade KY to follow suit
Learn to Read

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#124379
Nov 8, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>How about each state gets one vote regardless of size or population?
Does DC also get one?

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#124380
Nov 8, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

America Got Stupid wrote:
<quoted text>
That is only true in your convoluted fantasy, MORON!
I know how the system is set up now and it is unfair.
Obama micro-targeted the populated area's alone in state's like Ohio and won the State.
A candidate should not be able to neglect the rural areas within a State and win the State.
This is not fair, as the population centers contain most all of the Blacks, Hispanics, and illegal aliens who are mostly all DemocRATS allowed to vote by crooked DemocRATS.
Ohio is almost all red, save for the population centers that were blue.
http://www.politico.com/2012-election/map/#/P...
Ohio's electoral votes should have been split between the candidates.
If a State is mostly red, it should be giving most of electoral votes to the Republicans.
We need a new Electoral system.
We must create districts within a State that can award a States current electoral votes to the person that wins that district.
All States need to be of equal importance.
Each state decides for itself how electors are chosen. Ever hear of states' rights?
GBPfan

Colorado Springs, CO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#124381
Nov 8, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Frank wrote:
<quoted text>The election on Tuesday proved that there are over 50 million idiots in the United States willing to vote for an idiot. Election day polling concluded that priorities were: 1.Economy/employment 2.Honesty/integrity. 3.Change in government. 4.Bipartisanship. 5. Cut debt/spending. Romney should have won by a landslide. 1.Obama'a economy is worst than terrible/unemployment is much higher than predicted and three percent higher than Obama promised in 2008. 2.Obama can;s open his mounth with out telling a lie.-- Monday's papers should have had the head line "Obama Lies". 3.If our country needs change,why are people voting for more of the same garbage we had for the last four years,'double down'. 4.Obama has proven for four years that he will not work with Congress and has ignored the values,principles and beliefs of over half the country. 5.Obama increased the debt by over 6 trillion dollars his first four years and intends to increase the debt more than and additional 6 trillion dollars during his next four years. Our country deserves better.
And Romney never lies because you can find a clip of him saying anything you want him to say. ROFLMAO! Too bad for you, Romney and all of his supporters there aren't enough idiots in this country to believe Republican lies. The smart people know who created the problems in the economy and they know who will fix it. A Democrat, just like the last time! The only thing Republicans are good for is creating large debt and destroying the economy, and then whining that the Democrats aren't fixing it fast enough.

“ad maiora nati sumus ”

Since: Sep 09

Justice Scalia is an Oxymoron

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#124382
Nov 8, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

America Got Stupid wrote:
<quoted text>
That is reason for creating districts, DUMB-ASS!
I know how the system is set up now and it is unfair.
Obama micro-targeted the populated area's alone in state's like California and Ohio and won the States.
http://www.politico.com/2012-election/map/#/P...
This is the problem and the solution to having fair elections.
A candidate should not be able to neglect the rural areas within a State and win the State.
This is not fair, as the population centers contain most all of the Blacks, Hispanics.
Illegal aliens who are mostly all DemocRATS are allowed to vote by crooked DemocRATS.
This must be stopped.
Ohio is almost all red, save for the population centers that were blue.
http://www.politico.com/2012-election/map/#/P...
Ohio's electoral votes should have been split between the candidates.
If a State is mostly red, it should be giving most of electoral votes to the Republicans.
We need a new Electoral system.
We must create districts within a State that can award a States current electoral votes to the person that wins that district.
All States need to be of equal importance.
It has been tried before but the United States Supreme Court has held it be unconstitutional in Reynolds v. Sims, 377 US 533 (1964) in which Chief Justice Warren wrote:

Legislators represent people, not trees or acres. Legislators are elected by voters, not farms or cities or economic interests. As long as ours is a representative form of government, and our legislatures are those instruments of government elected directly by and directly representative of the people, the right to elect legislators in a free and unimpaired fashion is a bedrock of our political system. It could hardly be gainsaid that a constitutional claim had been asserted by an allegation that certain otherwise qualified voters had been entirely prohibited from voting for members of their state legislature. And, if a State should provide that the votes of citizens in one part of the State should be given two times, or five times, or 10 times the weight of votes of citizens in another part of the State, it could hardly be contended that the right to vote of those residing in the disfavored areas had not been effectively diluted. It would appear extraordinary to suggest that a State could be constitutionally permitted to enact a law providing that certain of the State's voters could vote two, five, or 10 times for their legislative representatives, while voters living elsewhere could vote only once. And it is inconceivable that a state law to the effect that, in counting votes for legislators, the votes of citizens in one part of the State would be multiplied by two, five, or 10, while the votes of persons in another area would be counted only at face value, could be constitutionally sustainable. Id. at 562

“ad maiora nati sumus ”

Since: Sep 09

Justice Scalia is an Oxymoron

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#124384
Nov 8, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Amazing how when the Birfoons thought Mitt might win the popular vote they were yammering for that as the standard. Now they want to county the number of squares on a map of each color ... Why not the number of registered vehicles (with more weight given to "American" cars)
It has been tried before but the United States Supreme Court has held it be unconstitutional in Reynolds v. Sims, 377 US 533 (1964) in which Chief Justice Warren wrote:

"Legislators represent people, not trees or acres. Legislators are elected by voters, not farms or cities or economic interests. As long as ours is a representative form of government, and our legislatures are those instruments of government elected directly by and directly representative of the people, the right to elect legislators in a free and unimpaired fashion is a bedrock of our political system. It could hardly be gainsaid that a constitutional claim had been asserted by an allegation that certain otherwise qualified voters had been entirely prohibited from voting for members of their state legislature. And, if a State should provide that the votes of citizens in one part of the State should be given two times, or five times, or 10 times the weight of votes of citizens in another part of the State, it could hardly be contended that the right to vote of those residing in the disfavored areas had not been effectively diluted. It would appear extraordinary to suggest that a State could be constitutionally permitted to enact a law providing that certain of the State's voters could vote two, five, or 10 times for their legislative representatives, while voters living elsewhere could vote only once. And it is inconceivable that a state law to the effect that, in counting votes for legislators, the votes of citizens in one part of the State would be multiplied by two, five, or 10, while the votes of persons in another area would be counted only at face value, could be constitutionally sustainable. Id. at 562
Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#124385
Nov 8, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Birther is Stupid wrote:
<quoted text>
There was more red than blue in California.
There always is.
I expect that to be the case in both 2014 and 2016.
California will vote for a Republican President after 4 more years of Obama.
You are high or stupid.

President Barack Hussein Obama won the popular vote by a huge margin. Democrats were voted in at all levels.

Go play in the sandbox with the other children, Tacky.

“ad maiora nati sumus ”

Since: Sep 09

Justice Scalia is an Oxymoron

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#124386
Nov 8, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

America Got Stupid wrote:
<quoted text>
I said no such thing RETARD!
I have NEVER said that legal Blacks and Hispanics, or Gays and Women's vote should not be counted.
I know how the system is set up now and it is unfair.
Obama micro-targeted the populated area's alone in state's like Ohio and won the State.
A candidate should not be able to neglect the rural areas within a State and win the State.
This is not fair, as the population centers contain most all of the Blacks, Hispanics, and illegal aliens who are mostly all DemocRATS allowed to vote by crooked DemocRATS.
Ohio is almost all red, save for the population centers that were blue.
http://www.politico.com/2012-election/map/#/P...
Ohio's electoral votes should have been split between the candidates.
If a State is mostly red, it should be giving most of electoral votes to the Republicans.
We need a new Electoral system.
We must create districts within a State that can award a States current electoral votes to the person that wins that district.
All States need to be of equal importance.
It has been tried before but the United States Supreme Court has held it be unconstitutional in Reynolds v. Sims, 377 US 533 (1964) in which Chief Justice Warren wrote:

Legislators represent people, not trees or acres. Legislators are elected by voters, not farms or cities or economic interests. As long as ours is a representative form of government, and our legislatures are those instruments of government elected directly by and directly representative of the people, the right to elect legislators in a free and unimpaired fashion is a bedrock of our political system. It could hardly be gainsaid that a constitutional claim had been asserted by an allegation that certain otherwise qualified voters had been entirely prohibited from voting for members of their state legislature. And, if a State should provide that the votes of citizens in one part of the State should be given two times, or five times, or 10 times the weight of votes of citizens in another part of the State, it could hardly be contended that the right to vote of those residing in the disfavored areas had not been effectively diluted. It would appear extraordinary to suggest that a State could be constitutionally permitted to enact a law providing that certain of the State's voters could vote two, five, or 10 times for their legislative representatives, while voters living elsewhere could vote only once. And it is inconceivable that a state law to the effect that, in counting votes for legislators, the votes of citizens in one part of the State would be multiplied by two, five, or 10, while the votes of persons in another area would be counted only at face value, could be constitutionally sustainable. Id. at 562
Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#124387
Nov 8, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you question our Founding Father's wisdom?
Rogue the Barely Literate misunderstands what he reads.

Sad.
Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#124388
Nov 8, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
How about each state gets one vote regardless of size or population?
Well, Tootsie, that wouldn't be representative democracy. Why do you hate the republican for of government now that birfoons and cons have been soundly rebuked?

You're not learning a lesson from Tuesdays lost, and the GOP will be doomed to fail miserably -- again -- if you don't catch on fast.

Time to leave politics to the people who understand it, Tootsie.
GBPfan

Colorado Springs, CO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#124389
Nov 8, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

America Got Stupid wrote:
These are the kind of people that DemocRATS elect.
REPORT: Jesse Jackson Jr. in plea deal talks with feds...
Yep, he may have to serve his term from prison if that is allowed.
If you are trying to claim no Republican has done anything illegal, you are proving that YOU are stupid. Fortunately, America is not as stupid as you.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 109,901 - 109,920 of174,493
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

108 Users are viewing the Chicago Forum right now

Search the Chicago Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min Yeah 1,078,817
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 14 min danetoo 67,890
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr Hey now 45,763
IL Who do you support for Governor in Illinois in ... (Oct '10) 1 hr nuguyntwn 3,827
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 1 hr frankensnorter 48,848
The Liberty Brothers Interview: Colonel Kratos,... 1 hr Must be you 7
Voting Whites NO LONGER hold majority in Ohio. 2 hr WeDoneOutBabiedThemDevils 1
•••

Beach Hazards Statement for Cook County was issued at July 23 at 4:15PM CDT

•••
•••
Chicago Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••