BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 192305 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#123895 Nov 6, 2012
Obama leading in Florida.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#123896 Nov 6, 2012
Obama leading in South Carolina.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#123897 Nov 6, 2012
Obama leading in North Carolina.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#123899 Nov 6, 2012
Obama leading in Ohio.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#123900 Nov 6, 2012
Hey guys, I will not count my eggs until the chicken lays 'em. It is gonna be a hard days-night and I am not going to drive myself crazy. See you guys tomorrow.

“life under BO”

Since: Sep 12

buena vista

#123901 Nov 6, 2012
Vote Romney for Victory wrote:
<quoted text>
*B. Hussein Obama 2008-2012
There, that is better.
You forgot to include the asterisk that denotes that Obama was a fraudulent and illegal pResident.
My bad. lol

“life under BO”

Since: Sep 12

buena vista

#123902 Nov 6, 2012
Johannes wrote:
<quoted text>
Hogwash??? OK,....here's the link. READ IT!!!!
So let's set that speculation aside and look at who the people are who actually pay no income tax. Romney's statements are a little unclear, but it appears that the 47 percent figure represents all of those who pay no income tax, rather than the Democratic base. His problem is that those people are disproportionately in red states -- that is, states that tend to vote Republican:
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2...
Are they paying lot of federal taxes in Detroit, jo jo?

I don't think so.

“life under BO”

Since: Sep 12

buena vista

#123903 Nov 6, 2012
Johannes wrote:
<quoted text>
Hogwash??? OK,....here's the link. READ IT!!!!
So let's set that speculation aside and look at who the people are who actually pay no income tax. Romney's statements are a little unclear, but it appears that the 47 percent figure represents all of those who pay no income tax, rather than the Democratic base. His problem is that those people are disproportionately in red states -- that is, states that tend to vote Republican:
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2...
We know that the majority of blacks and mexicans overwhelmingly support Obama, we also know they tend to be in the lower income brackets, therefore we know they are a large part of the 47% who pay no federal taxes.

Common sense also tells us that the liberal elite who scream for higher taxes and more welfare have no intention of seeing their own taxes go up. Anyone who believes that is naive or a fool, or both.
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

#123904 Nov 6, 2012
sage won wrote:
<quoted text>
Are they paying lot of federal taxes in Detroit, jo jo?
I don't think so.
While you might not think so, you offer no data, facts, links to support you claim. Sorry if you don't like the truth.

That's the trouble with folks. When something comes along that they don't like, they just bury their head in the sand and pretend it isn't so.

“life under BO”

Since: Sep 12

buena vista

#123905 Nov 6, 2012
Johannes wrote:
<quoted text>
That's your opinion.
How would you characterise GW Bush?
His biggest mistake was Iraq, other than that he did a great job, considering he had to deal with the aftermath of 9/11, a little fact liberals ALWAYS ignore. In 2007 he had the deficit down to around $180 billion dollars, pretty good I say, especially comparing him to Mr. Trillion dollar plus Obama.

He also sounded the warning on the coming subprime mortgage disaster and was shouted down by the likes of criminal Bawney Frank when he tried to reform F and F..
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

#123906 Nov 6, 2012
sage won wrote:
<quoted text>
We know that the majority of blacks and mexicans overwhelmingly support Obama, we also know they tend to be in the lower income brackets, therefore we know they are a large part of the 47% who pay no federal taxes.
Common sense also tells us that the liberal elite who scream for higher taxes and more welfare have no intention of seeing their own taxes go up. Anyone who believes that is naive or a fool, or both.
1)'majority of blacks and mexicans support Obama'...OK

2)'tend to be in the lower income bracket'...OK

3)'large part of the 47%...that's a stretch and an assumption...false

You are just ignoring the data.....still stuck with your head in the sand.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#123907 Nov 6, 2012
Vote Romney for Victory wrote:
<quoted text>Rules and regulations are written for a reason, they are to be followed.
Laws are written and must be followed.
Requirements must be met.
?
And since no laws or regulations support your Birfoon fantasies. And since every court has told you that your fable is not the law ... Like a "tru patriot" you crap on the Constitution and make up play laws

“life under BO”

Since: Sep 12

buena vista

#123908 Nov 6, 2012
Johannes wrote:
<quoted text>
While you might not think so, you offer no data, facts, links to support you claim. Sorry if you don't like the truth.
That's the trouble with folks. When something comes along that they don't like, they just bury their head in the sand and pretend it isn't so.
Detroit is a disaster, a disgrace, do we really need a pie chart to say Detroiters aren't paying a lot in federal taxes? Really?

Do we need a graph to show minorities in the lower income groups aren't paying federal taxes and in fact are receiving federal monies?

Really?

Do you think raising the tax on the rich to 39% will save America?

My single girlfriend ensconced in the middle class is not looking forward to her taxes going up next year, BTW.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#123909 Nov 6, 2012
Mourdock fading in Indiana. Skid? Oh Skid! Looks like real danger here

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#123910 Nov 6, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Hey guys, I will not count my eggs until the chicken lays 'em. It is gonna be a hard days-night and I am not going to drive myself crazy. See you guys tomorrow.
Agree; it ain't over 'till it's over.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#123911 Nov 6, 2012
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
And since no laws or regulations support your Birfoon fantasies. And since every court has told you that your fable is not the law ... Like a "tru patriot" you crap on the Constitution and make up play laws
Amazing. It's election night and birfoons are still quibbling over Play Law.

Go figure.

Whoever wins, wins, and birfoon play law theories will never amount to a bucket of spit.
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

#123912 Nov 6, 2012
sage won wrote:
<quoted text>
His biggest mistake was Iraq, other than that he did a great job, considering he had to deal with the aftermath of 9/11, a little fact liberals ALWAYS ignore. In 2007 he had the deficit down to around $180 billion dollars, pretty good I say, especially comparing him to Mr. Trillion dollar plus Obama.
He also sounded the warning on the coming subprime mortgage disaster and was shouted down by the likes of criminal Bawney Frank when he tried to reform F and F..
I think Iraq was a mistake and there was no reason to invade. He bumbled the planning....remember when he said that they didn't have a plan for so much resistance. DUH!!!! What did he expect? Very poor planning. Because of our actions, Iraq turned into a magnet for all the terrorists. There were probably more terrorists after we invaded than prior.

I think he should have focused on Afganistan and gotten OBL.

He will be remembered for the Iraq invasion and the lingering war......just like LBJ and VietNam.

9/11 was a wake up call and Bush did a fine job getting the USA better prepared for any future attacks.

He just wasn't the type of man that people would look up to and have any confidence in. Reminds me of Alfed E Newman....sort of a bumbler.
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

#123913 Nov 6, 2012
sage won wrote:
<quoted text>
Detroit is a disaster, a disgrace, do we really need a pie chart to say Detroiters aren't paying a lot in federal taxes? Really?
Do we need a graph to show minorities in the lower income groups aren't paying federal taxes and in fact are receiving federal monies?
Really?
Do you think raising the tax on the rich to 39% will save America?
My single girlfriend ensconced in the middle class is not looking forward to her taxes going up next year, BTW.
Well, yes you do need pie charts, data, facts, graphs to prove you point. Without any data, it's pure speculation.

Who would have thought that the 47% live in the republican south? Well, the data shows it to be so.

Don't really know anything about Detriot except that it is economically depressed.
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#123915 Nov 6, 2012
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
The US Supreme Court interprets the meaning of the US Constitution, and it has ruled six to two (one not voting) that every child born in the USA except for the children of foreign diplomats is a Natural Born Citizen. What the Supreme Court says is the law. What you say is no more than your uninformed opinion.
But can not change the meaning as written! Get yourself an amendment.
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#123916 Nov 6, 2012
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Nonsense. When a person is naturalized in the US, the US does not "strip" the person of foreign citizenship. Renunciation is an act between the person and the country whose citizenship s/he renounces. US law cannot operate to nullify anyone's citizenship in a foreign country, and no country can deny US citizenship to a person granted US citizenship. Play Law doesn't count.
<quoted text>
I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform :noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 12 min shinningelectr0n 1,251,797
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 36 min IBdaMann 53,990
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 6 hr Sublime1 99,902
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 13 hr RACE 6,144
Word (Dec '08) 13 hr RACE 5,325
Dear Abby July 3, 2015 13 hr RACE 5
Amy July 3, 2015 15 hr mrs gladys kravitz 3
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages