BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

[Romney Flip Flopper Liar]

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

<quoted text>
Ah, several points here. Your link was written in 2009 and Ashcroft was no longer AG after 2005. Then you did not mention that after 9/11 ALL Speakers of the House also flew exclusively by government jets to include Speaker San Fran Nan Pelosi who insisted that the plane she flew in could fly non-stop to San Francisco which meant a 200 passenger B757 .... for just one person!!!
Of course CBS will not tell us how AG Holder is getting around these days but I can guess!!!

The original piece was reported on July 26, 2001.

I thank you for pointing that out too me. CBS changed to 2009.

This just proves how corrupt CBS news really are.

==========

CBS Falsifies Iraq War History
By Robert Parry January 28, 2008 / http://tinyurl.com/36adxb
There’s a cynical old saying that the victors write the history. CBS’s “60 Minutes” demonstrated how that process works on Jan. 27 in airing Scott Pelley’s interview with the FBI agent who de-briefed former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein.
In a world of objective reality, a reporter might say that the United States launched an unprovoked invasion of Iraq on March 19, 2003, under the false pretense that Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction, even after Iraq had repeatedly – and accurately – announced that its WMD had been destroyed in the 1990s.

On Dec. 7, 2002, Iraq even sent to the United Nations a 12,000-page declaration explaining how its WMD stockpiles had been eliminated. In fall 2002, Hussein’s government also allowed teams of U.N. inspectors into Iraq and gave them free rein to examine any site of their choosing.

Those inspections only ended in March 2003 when President George W. Bush decided to press ahead with war despite the U.N. Security Council’s refusal to authorize the invasion and its desire to give the U.N. inspectors time to finish their work.
But none of that reality is part of the history that Americans are supposed to know. The officially sanctioned U.S. account, as embraced by Bush in speech after speech, is that Saddam Hussein “chose war” by defying the U.N. over the WMD issue and by misleading the world into believing that he still possessed these weapons.
In line with Bush’s version of history,“60 Minutes” correspondent Pelley asked FBI interrogator George Piro why Hussein kept pretending that he had WMD even as U.S. troops massed on Iraq’s borders, when a simple announcement that the WMD was gone would have prevented the war. http://www.consortiumnews.com/2008/012808.htm...

[Romney Flip Flopper Liar]

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

<quoted text>
Ah, several points here. Your link was written in 2009 and Ashcroft was no longer AG after 2005. Then you did not mention that after 9/11 ALL Speakers of the House also flew exclusively by government jets to include Speaker San Fran Nan Pelosi who insisted that the plane she flew in could fly non-stop to San Francisco which meant a 200 passenger B757 .... for just one person!!!
Of course CBS will not tell us how AG Holder is getting around these days but I can guess!!!

Behind TV Analysts, Pentagon’s Hidden Hand
April 20, 2008 / http://tinyurl.com/3u6rty
In the summer of 2005, the Bush administration confronted a fresh wave of criticism over Guantánamo Bay. The detention center had just been branded “the gulag of our times” by Amnesty International, there were new allegations of abuse from United Nations human rights experts and calls were mounting for its closure.
Records and interviews show how the Bush administration has used its control over access and information in an effort to transform the analysts into a kind of media Trojan horse — an instrument intended to shape terrorism coverage from inside the major TV and radio networks.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/20/washington/...

Pentagon’s Pundits: A Look at the Defense Department’s Propaganda Program / April 22, 2008 / http://tinyurl.com/64ln28
The New York Times has revealed new details on how the Pentagon recruited more than 75 retired military officers to appear on TV outlets as so-called military analysts ahead of the Iraq war to portray Iraq as an urgent threat. The Times reported the Pentagon continues to use the analysts in a propaganda campaign to generate favorable news coverage of the administration’s wartime performance. We speak with Col. Sam Gardiner (Ret.) and Peter Hart, of Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting.
http://www.democracynow.org/2008/4/22/pentago...

[Ghost of Bush]

Romney Flip Flopper Liar wrote:

<quoted text>
The original piece was reported on July 26, 2001.
I thank you for pointing that out too me. CBS changed to 2009.
This just proves how corrupt CBS news really are.
==========
CBS Falsifies Iraq War History
By Robert Parry January 28, 2008 / http://tinyurl.com/36adxb
There’s a cynical old saying that the victors write the history. CBS’s “60 Minutes” demonstrated how that process works on Jan. 27 in airing Scott Pelley’s interview with the FBI agent who de-briefed former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein.
In a world of objective reality, a reporter might say that the United States launched an unprovoked invasion of Iraq on March 19, 2003, under the false pretense that Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction, even after Iraq had repeatedly – and accurately – announced that its WMD had been destroyed in the 1990s.
On Dec. 7, 2002, Iraq even sent to the United Nations a 12,000-page declaration explaining how its WMD stockpiles had been eliminated. In fall 2002, Hussein’s government also allowed teams of U.N. inspectors into Iraq and gave them free rein to examine any site of their choosing.
Those inspections only ended in March 2003 when President George W. Bush decided to press ahead with war despite the U.N. Security Council’s refusal to authorize the invasion and its desire to give the U.N. inspectors time to finish their work.
But none of that reality is part of the history that Americans are supposed to know. The officially sanctioned U.S. account, as embraced by Bush in speech after speech, is that Saddam Hussein “chose war” by defying the U.N. over the WMD issue and by misleading the world into believing that he still possessed these weapons.
In line with Bush’s version of history,“60 Minutes” correspondent Pelley asked FBI interrogator George Piro why Hussein kept pretending that he had WMD even as U.S. troops massed on Iraq’s borders, when a simple announcement that the WMD was gone would have prevented the war. http://www.consortiumnews.com/2008/012808.htm...

I would take care of your own back yard first, cause another storm is coming to your hood this week, and it hay have snow with it.

[Ghost of Bush]

Jacques Ottawa wrote:

<quoted text>
Nice try? I psted a newspaper poll taken here for the hell of it.

Nice try canuck kochsukker, your source from a LIEberal newspaper.

[Ghost of Bush]

Jacques Ottawa wrote:

<quoted text>
Rogue, it's not just us. See Poppo's post of other nations worldwide. In Canada, believe me, and I know, the suspense over this U.S. election is spell-binding, you could cut it with a knife, as the majority of us are so scared sh*tless that Romney will be elected. But if Obama ran here, believe me, he is so popular, he could save millions and not even campaign for one minute, he'd be a shoo-in.

ovomit lied, people died!!!!! Romney/Ryan 2012

[Ghost of Bush]

Grand Birther wrote:

WSJ poll:
Approve/disapprove of Obama's handling of Sandy
68% approve
15% disapprove

Your numbers are backwards grand afterbirther

[Jacques Ottawa]

Ghost of Bush wrote:

<quoted text>
Nice try canuck kochsukker, your source from a LIEberal newspaper.

How little you know. The Newspaper where I got that poll is called the Ottawa Sun. Owned by our Canadian version of Rupert Murdoch, way way to the right of center politically and very very happy with our conservative Canadian govt. Liberal? Ha, hardly.

[Jacques Ottawa]

Ghost of Bush wrote:

<quoted text>
I would take care of your own back yard first, cause another storm is coming to your hood this week, and it hay have snow with it.

If you are so convinced of your position Iraq-wise, could you at least try responding intelligently? Since you're so right, it should but take less than a minute, no?

[Johannes]

Goat Fukkkker wrote:

<quoted text>
Since you have no intelligence, you can't understand what intelligence is.
Yep, that explains it perfectly.

Sorry Goat Boy, a poster who can only post 'LMAO' is the one lacking intelligence.

[Johannes]

Goat Boy wrote:

Where is the LSM on this?
FLASH: US Knew Three Hrs Before Attack Terrorist Group Gathering Weapons

What? Just more bs from Birtherville?

[Johannes]

Ah, is Goat Boy upset and putting little sad faces on all my comments again?

Such a low level thinker he is.

[Rogue Scholar 05]

Ohio is a key battleground state and all of the candidates have campaigned here during the past months.

Biden had a rally in Copley in August, 2008 Obama had a rally in Fairlawn in Sept, and Romney had a rally in Cuyahoga Falls just last week... these 3 communities are all within a 5 mile radius of Akron .

The cost of the Biden rally was $10,549 and Copley sent a bill to the "Obama for America " campaign but never received a penny.

The cost of the Obama visit was $34,166 and Fairlawn sent a bill to the Obama campaign but has never been paid either... this cost excludes a $21,304 additional cost for the Akron convention center which the Democratic Mayor of Akron donated for the "privilege of hosting a sitting president."

Romney's campaign visit ? They contacted Cuyahoga Falls in advance, organized the plan, and promised to pay any extra expenses the city would incur. The city sent them a bill for $7,050 and the Romney campaign promptly paid it in full.

Quoting the Mayor of Cuyahoga Falls, "I think it's self-evident who is accountable for their deeds and who isn't, who's accountable for their actions and who keeps blaming everyone else."

Indeed, there's a stark contrast between these candidates.

Ref source - http://www.ohio.com/news/local/bob-dyer-romne...

[Johannes]

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

Ohio is a key battleground state and all of the candidates have campaigned here during the past months.
Biden had a rally in Copley in August, 2008 Obama had a rally in Fairlawn in Sept, and Romney had a rally in Cuyahoga Falls just last week... these 3 communities are all within a 5 mile radius of Akron .
The cost of the Biden rally was $10,549 and Copley sent a bill to the "Obama for America " campaign but never received a penny.
The cost of the Obama visit was $34,166 and Fairlawn sent a bill to the Obama campaign but has never been paid either... this cost excludes a $21,304 additional cost for the Akron convention center which the Democratic Mayor of Akron donated for the "privilege of hosting a sitting president."
Romney's campaign visit ? They contacted Cuyahoga Falls in advance, organized the plan, and promised to pay any extra expenses the city would incur. The city sent them a bill for $7,050 and the Romney campaign promptly paid it in full.
Quoting the Mayor of Cuyahoga Falls, "I think it's self-evident who is accountable for their deeds and who isn't, who's accountable for their actions and who keeps blaming everyone else."
Indeed, there's a stark contrast between these candidates.
Ref source - http://www.ohio.com/news/local/bob-dyer-romne...

How's that Army Corps of Engineers and their failed levves coming along?

[Rogue Scholar 05]

Jacques Ottawa wrote:

<quoted text>
Rogue, it's not just us. See Poppo's post of other nations worldwide. In Canada, believe me, and I know, the suspense over this U.S. election is spell-binding, you could cut it with a knife, as the majority of us are so scared sh*tless that Romney will be elected. But if Obama ran here, believe me, he is so popular, he could save millions and not even campaign for one minute, he'd be a shoo-in.

Did you see my post? Did they poll Israel? NO!!! WHY NOT???
And you speak for all Canada? And BBC polls are just like CNN polls, worthless!
And whom ever the French want, I will vote the opposite.

[Rogue Scholar 05]

Jacques Ottawa wrote:

<quoted text>
Israel is less than 1/1000 of /% of the world's populationé
In all of western Europe, for example, ALL nations except I think one (which escapes me)Greece are in favour of Obama. Right or left-leaning, ALL in favour of Obama.

None of them count as they can not vote here. Just like the people from New York ca not (or should not) vote here in Florida!

[Rogue Scholar 05]

Johannes wrote:

<quoted text>
Being able to use a calendar does not provide one with the ability to predict the future.
Unlike you, I never predict the future. You have done this numerous times and each time your prediction have not come true.

Can you name just one of my predictions that has not come true?

[Johannes]

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

<quoted text>
Can you name just one of my predictions that has not come true?

No problem!

You previously stated that once the repubs got control of the House they would issue numerous subpoenas. That didn't happen.

You also said that once that was done, Obama would be declared an invalid President and any and everything he ever did as President would be undone. That didn't happen either.

You also were promoting several court cases brought by the nut case dentist....those failed as well.

Shall I go on????

[Rogue Scholar 05]

Fake Grand Birther wrote:
Rogue Moron thinks 24 people dying at the hands of terrorists is "a minor event."
22 civilians killed
2 military personel killed
9/20/84 - Terrorist bombing kills 24 Americans
9/21/84 - Ronald "the actor" Reagan campaigns in Iowa.
Rogue Moron has a real sick sense of what's minor. Rogue Moron doesn't value human life enough to admit his hero Ronnie did the same thing he criticized Obama for, even though Ronnie's situation was six times worse.
That's how you know Rogue is truely an awful person.

Rogue Scholar wrote:
Where is YOUR link? Here is mine!!!

"Twenty-three people are killed--6 Lebanese employees, 15 Lebanese civilians and others, and two Americans."
http://middleeast.about.com/od/thisdayinmidea ...

Again, YOU make up things and do not provide links. No ambassador was kill and there was no breach of the embassy!!

Jacques Ottawa wrote:

<quoted text>
2 Americans killed. Disaster
21 Lebanese killed. Hey, no prob, dude, NOT Americans.

Ah, the point is not the number of people killed but what country they belonged to. Everyone has a parent, brother, sister, wife, husband, etc. that cares about them but that does not mean I do.
But that does not mean the Fake Grand Birther was correct on her numbers or the fact that Ronald Reagan had gone campaigning that same day. Ronald Reagan went to a memorial event. Did you listen to his speech?
President Ronald Reagan Beirut barracks bombing speech
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Was this a fund raising event like Obama's trip to Las Vegas on 9/12/2012?

[Rogue Scholar 05]

Johannes wrote:

<quoted text>
No problem!
You previously stated that once the repubs got control of the House they would issue numerous subpoenas. That didn't happen.
You also said that once that was done, Obama would be declared an invalid President and any and everything he ever did as President would be undone. That didn't happen either.
You also were promoting several court cases brought by the nut case dentist....those failed as well.
Shall I go on????

Yes, I underestimated the Country Clubbers like Speaker Bonehead. With any luck he will not be Speaker in 2013.
Yes, I do support Dr. Orly Taitz and she has been very effective at keeping the issue alive.
Now, how long did it take you Libtards to give up on Pres. Gore?!? Or Pres. Kerry?!?

[Jacques Ottawa]

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

<quoted text>
Did you see my post? Did they poll Israel? NO!!! WHY NOT???
And you speak for all Canada? And BBC polls are just like CNN polls, worthless!
And whom ever the French want, I will vote the opposite.

How could anyone be so off? You're incredible. I answered on Israel, my god, can you not read? I even said Israel represented about 1/1000 ot /% of the world's population. I don't speak for all Canada. Are ylu nuts? I said to your bosom buddy LRS that I got that survey, which is ligthly done by the way, from a far-right Murdoch-like newspaper. And just go to the website that lists foreign nations' preferences in the U.S. presidential race and you'll see, it's 90% in favour of Obama. As to the BBC, yes its editorial policy is center left, but do you think they would publish phoney figures and harm their worldwide reputation for accurate news reporting? Anyhow, the BBC percentage is so wide between Obama and Romney, there is no way they could make it up. Actuallty, it's 75 to 9% in the UK for Obama. Could the BBC be so foolish as to make this up? In conservavitve Spain, it's something like 90% to 7%. Of the countries polled, only Pakistan was pro-Romney, something to be proud of, wow. Isreal was not listed, but I know it's strongly pro-Romney. Well, they're in good company with Pakistan, seeing as Israel is the U.S.'s largest aid recepient and Pakistan the 3rd larges. It's called GRATITUDE.

By accusing the BBC, of all people, of favoritism in its news and polls towards the left, you are putting it in the same league as WND.com and FoxNews. If you wanted to grossly insult the BBC , it worked.