BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 196842 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#123111 Nov 4, 2012
Johannes wrote:
<quoted text>
No problem!
You previously stated that once the repubs got control of the House they would issue numerous subpoenas. That didn't happen.
You also said that once that was done, Obama would be declared an invalid President and any and everything he ever did as President would be undone. That didn't happen either.
You also were promoting several court cases brought by the nut case dentist....those failed as well.
Shall I go on????
Yes, I underestimated the Country Clubbers like Speaker Bonehead. With any luck he will not be Speaker in 2013.
Yes, I do support Dr. Orly Taitz and she has been very effective at keeping the issue alive.
Now, how long did it take you Libtards to give up on Pres. Gore?!? Or Pres. Kerry?!?
Jacques Ottawa

North York, Canada

#123113 Nov 4, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you see my post? Did they poll Israel? NO!!! WHY NOT???
And you speak for all Canada? And BBC polls are just like CNN polls, worthless!
And whom ever the French want, I will vote the opposite.
How could anyone be so off? You're incredible. I answered on Israel, my god, can you not read? I even said Israel represented about 1/1000 ot /% of the world's population. I don't speak for all Canada. Are ylu nuts? I said to your bosom buddy LRS that I got that survey, which is ligthly done by the way, from a far-right Murdoch-like newspaper. And just go to the website that lists foreign nations' preferences in the U.S. presidential race and you'll see, it's 90% in favour of Obama. As to the BBC, yes its editorial policy is center left, but do you think they would publish phoney figures and harm their worldwide reputation for accurate news reporting? Anyhow, the BBC percentage is so wide between Obama and Romney, there is no way they could make it up. Actuallty, it's 75 to 9% in the UK for Obama. Could the BBC be so foolish as to make this up? In conservavitve Spain, it's something like 90% to 7%. Of the countries polled, only Pakistan was pro-Romney, something to be proud of, wow. Isreal was not listed, but I know it's strongly pro-Romney. Well, they're in good company with Pakistan, seeing as Israel is the U.S.'s largest aid recepient and Pakistan the 3rd larges. It's called GRATITUDE.

By accusing the BBC, of all people, of favoritism in its news and polls towards the left, you are putting it in the same league as WND.com and FoxNews. If you wanted to grossly insult the BBC , it worked.
Jacques Ottawa

North York, Canada

#123114 Nov 4, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
None of them count as they can not vote here. Just like the people from New York ca not (or should not) vote here in Florida!
That is a stupid statement. Do you then agree that a country's good standing abroad has no importance? And simply because someone cannot vote, they cannot have an opinion on the elections? Should your child, let's say, be 17, bright, knowledgeable, wise for his age in politics, not be able to express himself? It's what I get from you.

What the survey simply shows is that 90% of the world prefers Obama. Don't you think Romney, if elected, should try to change that simply by being a good president?
Jacques Ottawa

North York, Canada

#123117 Nov 4, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you name just one of my predictions that has not come true?
Let me help. Allow me. The mayoralty race in Jacksonville (newspapers misled you), your prediction that 7 of 8 republican nomination candidates would win it, 168 BC court cases etc etc. Need more?

PS Have asked you this many times now Rogue. What happened to the birther mayoralty candidate in Jacksonsville after he got clobbered in the election? Did he perhaps get a call from , hmm, er, the governor? I'm sure there is no cronyism inside the republican party as you always maintain...
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#123120 Nov 4, 2012
Johannes wrote:
<quoted text>
Why is it that you never have anything intelligent to say?
Strategy pops. I only play up to the level of my opponent. HaHaHa
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#123121 Nov 4, 2012
Grand Birther wrote:
9/20/84 24 human lives were taken in a terrorist attack on a US embassy in Beirut. Fact.
9/21/84 Ronald "the actor" Reagan campaigned in Iowa. Fact.
http://news.google.com/newspapers...
No one cares you dipshat!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#123123 Nov 4, 2012
Grand Birther wrote:
LOL that not a single birfoon can bring themselves to admit that Ronald Reagan campaigned the day after a deadly terrorist attack on a US embassy in which 24 humans lost their lives.
And Bladder Splatter finds humor in this. Worthless POS.
ARGUING with IDIOTS

Chico, CA

#123125 Nov 4, 2012
Grand Birther wrote:
LOL that not a single birfoon can bring themselves to admit that Ronald Reagan campaigned the day after a deadly terrorist attack on a US embassy in which 24 humans lost their lives.
That is because the Gipper did not lie to cover it up like Odumbo!
Jacques Ottawa

North York, Canada

#123126 Nov 4, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Strategy pops. I only play up to the level of my opponent. HaHaHa
If you aim so high, why do you always wind up slithering under that rock of yours?
Jacques Ottawa

North York, Canada

#123127 Nov 4, 2012
Take care, all, see you in a calendar week. Will take in the election in L.V. May even bet. Have a good week.
Ghost of Bush2

Ann Arbor, MI

#123130 Nov 4, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
How little you know. The Newspaper where I got that poll is called the Ottawa Sun. Owned by our Canadian version of Rupert Murdoch, way way to the right of center politically and very very happy with our conservative Canadian govt. Liberal? Ha, hardly.
You mean Ottawa Queerbec, the most LIEberal of all canuck provinces.....sorry canuck kochsukkker, they are very LIEberal.

Romney?Ryan 2012
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

#123132 Nov 4, 2012
Noway Duh wrote:
<quoted text>
To date no document expert has examined Oblama's original BC from Hawaii and claimed it to be authentic, not FB* experts, No one. The hospital listed on his So called BC refuses to confirm their hospital as his place of birth, and his people have refused to explain why every BC from that hospital at that same time has an official state seal and appropriate signatures at the bottom, all missing from the one posted by Oblama on his website.
So?

To date NO Birther organization has even asked to see the physical copy of the birth certificate. If they do not ask for it, and if a court does not ask for it, then why should Obama take it to a document expert?

The fact remains that ONLY birther "experts"---who are not believed by Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck, Bill O'Reilly, the National Review and the conservative secretary of state of Arizona---have made claims about Obama's birth certificate, and they have made their claims only about the image of the birth certificate and not asked to see the original. Well, there are without question problems with the pdf image of the birth certificate. Who ever said that the pdf image would be perfect??? But they did not ask to see the physical copy, the one with the seal on it---why do you suppose that they did not even ask???

If they had asked, and if the White House had turned them down, they could have reported that fact. So why did the birther organizations not even ASK politely to see the physical copy and promise to take it to a certified document expert such as members of the American Board of Forensic Document Examiners or the American Society of Questioned Document Experts or the Association of Forensic Document Examiners? Because, of course, if the real experts saw the physical copy they would say that it was authentic, and the birther myth would collapse.

Instead, the birther organizations and Orly Taite continue to quote people like Paul Irey, who keeps on insisting that Obama never attended Columbia College, even though Columbia University said that he did attend. And they quote nuts like Doug Vogt, who claims that he found the original altar of Abraham. But they do NOT quote such real authorities as:

Dr. Neil Krawetz, an imaging software analysis author and experienced examiner of questioned images, said:“The PDF released by the White House shows no sign of digital manipulation or alterations. I see nothing that appears to be suspicious.”

Nathan Goulding with The National Review:“We have received several e-mails today calling into question the validity of the PDF that the White House released, namely that there are embedded layers in the document. There are now several other people on the case. We looked into it and dismissed it.… I’ve confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home.”

John Woodman, independent computer professional, repeatedly in his book and in various articles that the claims that Obama’s birth certificate was forged were unfounded.

Ivan Zatkovich, who has testified in court as a technology expert, and consultant to WorldNetDaily: "All of the modifications to the PDF document that can be identified are consistent with someone enhancing the legibility of the document." And, by the way, when WND received Zatkovich’s article that said that he found nothing wrong with Obama’s birth certificate, WND simply did not publish it.

More importantly, the allegation that the birth certificate is forged is a side issue. The real issue is where Obama was born, and the officials of Hawaii of both parties, and the Index Data and the birth notices in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961 (sent to the papers by the DOH of Hawaii, which in 1961 was under a Republican governor) all show that he was born in Hawaii.

Since: Dec 10

Selden, NY

#123134 Nov 4, 2012
Johannes wrote:
<quoted text>
The problems that America faces today are the result of the decisions made during the past 30 years. No President will ever be able change our economy until Congress starts thinking differently and puts America first instead of their own personal agenda.
No need to make excuses for Oloser, seems that’s the only skill he has.

Don’t worry we will becoming out of this black hole soon.
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

#123135 Nov 4, 2012
Regarding the seal:

The seal is not missing. Obama has showed the physical copies with the seal on them (BOTH the short form and the long form, and remember the short form is the official birth certificate), but the raised seal of the long form does not show up on the scanned document.

How do we know that Obama's Hawaii birth certificate exists? We know that Obama has a Hawaii birth certificate in several ways.

The first is the short-form birth certificate. It is generated by a clerk in the Hawaii DOH reading the information in the files and entering it in a computer form. For that to happen there has to be a document in the files. In Obama's case that happened back in 2007 (though it was not published until 2008) when Obama was only a candidate for president---long before he became the leading candidate, much less president. The clerk would have had to have been lying in 2007, and the confirmations by the Republican officials in 2008 would have to be lies as well.

In addition, we know that Obama had a birth certificate in 1961 from the notices sent to the newspapers by the DOH in that year. We know that only the DOH could send those notices in three ways. First because the representative of the newspapers said so, second because the representative of the DOH said so and third because the section of the newspaper was called "Health Bureau Statistic"---which obviously meant that the facts in it came from the Health Bureau, the DOH. In 1961, the DOH was not allowed to issue birth certificates to children born outside of Hawaii, and it only sent birth notices to the papers for children born in Hawaii. Oh, and in the DOH was operating under Republican governor.

So we know that Obama had a Hawaii birth certificate.

Your claim is that although this certificate exists and although the officials in Hawaii stated that they sent both the short form and the long form version of it to him, and despite a reporter having said that she felt the seal on it----that the officials in Hawaii of both parties and the reporter and the birth notices in 1961 and the Index Data are lying because the embossed seal does not show up on a PDF scan.

Well, back up your claim with some evidence. Show a PDF scan of a Hawaii long form birth certificate that shows the raised seal.

Recently the Conservative secretary of state of Arizona asked Hawaii to confirm that Obama was born there and to confirm other facts on his published birth certificate. Hawaii did, and the Conservative secretary of state of Arizona accepted it as evidence that Obama was born in Hawaii, and ruled that Obama will be on the ballot in Arizona in November.

Obama's mother lived in Hawaii. Obama's father was studying in Hawaii. There is not a shred of evidence that either of them went from Hawaii to any other country in 1961---and certainly not to Kenya, where the Kenyan government said that it checked on the "born in Kenya" claim and found that it was false.

Hawaii is thousands of miles from any foreign country, and pregnant women rarely traveled late in pregnancy in those days, and yet you and other birthers think that there could be a chance that Obama was born outside of the USA and that the officials of both parties in Hawaii are lying about that fact.
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

#123136 Nov 4, 2012
Re: "The hospital listed on his So called BC refuses to confirm their hospital as his place of birth..."

Ah, but it has:

http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2011/04/kapiol...
Guru

Canyon Country, CA

#123137 Nov 4, 2012
good morning obama loving morons! Enjoy the last two days of that commie freak...cuz in less that 45 hours he will packing his bags!!!
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

#123138 Nov 4, 2012
Guru wrote:
good morning obama loving morons! Enjoy the last two days of that commie freak...cuz in less that 45 hours he will packing his bags!!!
Possibly. But it will not be because of the allegation that Obama was not born in the USA because he was born in the USA, in Hawaii. And it will not be because of the allegation that he is not a Natural Born Citizen because the meaning of Natural Born Citizen comes from the common law, not Vattel, and it refers to the place of birth, and every child born in the USA, except for the children of foreign diplomats, is a Natural Born US Citizen.
Noway Duh

Clearlake, CA

#123140 Nov 4, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
Result of major online poll taken in Canada on Obama-Romney preferences :
1. Who would you rather have crash your wedding? Obama 78%, Romney 22%
2. Who would you rather have a beer with? Obama 80, Romney 20%
3. Who would you rather have over for dinner? Obama 78%, Romney 22%
4. Who would you rather be stuck in an elevator with? Obama 79%, Romney 21%
5. What did you think of Donald Trump's "October Surprise"? 83 % thing it was further proof that he is an idiot.(MY oprinion is that this reinforces my belief that he is simply a front man for money launderers) 17% think he had a point and that Obama should release his records
6. 71% think Obama has a hottrer wife
7. Which endorsement were you most surprised about? 32% Colin Powell, 32% Clint Eastwood, 16% Meatloaf and 20% Lindsay Lohan
8. If you were trapped in a room with a bomb, who would you trust to difuse it? 40% Obama, 14% Romney and 46% hmmm, neither. LoL.
9. 67% think Obama is better for Canada (I would not necessarily agree as GWB was better for Canada than Obama is.)
So Canada wants a beer drinking, party crashing, bomb expert with a hot wife to lead America? LOL! Yah like we listen to what Canada thinks is best for us! Twit!
Guru

Canyon Country, CA

#123141 Nov 4, 2012
Ellen1 wrote:
Regarding the seal:
The seal is not missing. Obama has showed the physical copies with the seal on them (BOTH the short form and the long form, and remember the short form is the official birth certificate), but the raised seal of the long form does not show up on the scanned document.
How do we know that Obama's Hawaii birth certificate exists? We know that Obama has a Hawaii birth certificate in several ways.
The first is the short-form birth certificate. It is generated by a clerk in the Hawaii DOH reading the information in the files and entering it in a computer form. For that to happen there has to be a document in the files. In Obama's case that happened back in 2007 (though it was not published until 2008) when Obama was only a candidate for president---long before he became the leading candidate, much less president. The clerk would have had to have been lying in 2007, and the confirmations by the Republican officials in 2008 would have to be lies as well.
In addition, we know that Obama had a birth certificate in 1961 from the notices sent to the newspapers by the DOH in that year. We know that only the DOH could send those notices in three ways. First because the representative of the newspapers said so, second because the representative of the DOH said so and third because the section of the newspaper was called "Health Bureau Statistic"---which obviously meant that the facts in it came from the Health Bureau, the DOH. In 1961, the DOH was not allowed to issue birth certificates to children born outside of Hawaii, and it only sent birth notices to the papers for children born in Hawaii. Oh, and in the DOH was operating under Republican governor.
So we know that Obama had a Hawaii birth certificate.
Your claim is that although this certificate exists and although the officials in Hawaii stated that they sent both the short form and the long form version of it to him, and despite a reporter having said that she felt the seal on it----that the officials in Hawaii of both parties and the reporter and the birth notices in 1961 and the Index Data are lying because the embossed seal does not show up on a PDF scan.
Well, back up your claim with some evidence. Show a PDF scan of a Hawaii long form birth certificate that shows the raised seal.
Recently the Conservative secretary of state of Arizona asked Hawaii to confirm that Obama was born there and to confirm other facts on his published birth certificate. Hawaii did, and the Conservative secretary of s....
lol...I have never heard of such crap as this. ARPAIO and ZULLO and all of the forensic fraud experts have so PROVED beyond any doubt whatsover that his "birth certificate" that you refer to is a fraud it is beyond any question. They are law enforcement officers with a combined over 100 years of doing exactly what this is all about. Other countries concur with them.

Your little story here does nothing to refute any of that. Besides, you have no clue whatsoever about what you are talking about here. Typical.

There are so many things wrong with your facts here that have been 100% totally disproved that it is not necessary to do it all over again. The nly thing I will say is that it is IMPOSSIBLE to have over 20 different fonts on one typewriter for an "E", and all of the rest of the letters...many of them didn't even exist in 1961. Also over 45 different layers of imported scans withing one document? Impossible! It is all on WND if you look, all the forensics, law enforcement prrof. Or just google the 2 hours video by Arpaio/Zullo that was live-streamed on TV. It is all right there for you to see. After 10 minutes you will know exactly why obama is a fraud and a forger. There really is no way around this unless you have your head in the sand about a mile deep.

You are an OBOT...with two days left.
Noway Duh

Clearlake, CA

#123142 Nov 4, 2012
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Possibly. But it will not be because of the allegation that Obama was not born in the USA because he was born in the USA, in Hawaii. And it will not be because of the allegation that he is not a Natural Born Citizen because the meaning of Natural Born Citizen comes from the common law, not Vattel, and it refers to the place of birth, and every child born in the USA, except for the children of foreign diplomats, is a Natural Born US Citizen.
Can't wait until he loses and all you brainwashed zealot obot loony lefties have a mental breakdown and in your misery search for some sort of location to pray at but seeking to place a monument at the place of his birth you realize there isn't such a sight on US soil! Lol!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 5 min red and right 1,274,426
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 40 min IB DaMann 54,488
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 3 hr Doug77 6,395
abby8-27-15 5 hr Sublime1 14
ask amy 8-27 6 hr PEllen 7
The Amazing Cashew 7 hr OH Im NUTS 1
Get an online store. Earn $$$$ (Jun '13) 7 hr Shaiilesh 2
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 12 hr RACE 100,626
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages