BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#122838 Nov 3, 2012
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL, birfoon continues to play move the goalposts while failing miserably to articulate simple answers to simplel questions.
Can birfoon explain in his own words how polls are skewed? By what methods would a pollster skew a poll?
This is simple stats 101 stuff here. You'd think a very wealthy person like LRS would be able to answer this with ease.
You'd also think that a gentelman and scholar like LRS would be able to answer this simple interrogatory: Can you suuport your child's opinion on jurisdiction with Supreme Court case law?
Birfoon would rather act like a child than answer simple questions. Perhaps birfoon is a child.
Funny, you say I keep changing the goalposts yet my question has been the same from day one! Imbecile. runny stool (you're just one log on that fresh steaming pile) LMAO
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

#122839 Nov 3, 2012
Henry wrote:
Will this be an honest election or will Obama win due to fraud?
Fraud you say? Shouldn't that question be asked of GW Bush?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#122840 Nov 3, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you really so stupid that you don't realize how stupid you are -- even when scholarship smacks you right in the face?
Hey Tootsie, how's the weather in Toledo? I know you can not look until the sun goes down but I am sure you can ask one of your victims!
UninformedOhio Republican

Munster, IN

#122841 Nov 3, 2012
Ohio

Obama - 51
Romney- 45

Ouch, looks like failed Jeep lie was too blatant to even uninform the uninformed Ohio republicans.

Romney already working on new ad charging that Obama secretly worked with Castro to ship LeBron James's talents to the Cubans of Miami.

Maybe that one will stick.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#122842 Nov 3, 2012
Johannes wrote:
<quoted text>
Fraud you say? Shouldn't that question be asked of GW Bush?
Now, now, just because Owl Gore could not punch enough voter cards does not mean Bush did anything. Besides, the Supremes agreed! Get over it, It was twelve years ago!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#122844 Nov 3, 2012
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL, birfoon continues to play move the goalposts while failing miserably to articulate simple answers to simplel questions.
Can birfoon explain in his own words how polls are skewed? By what methods would a pollster skew a poll?
This is simple stats 101 stuff here. You'd think a very wealthy person like LRS would be able to answer this with ease.
You'd also think that a gentelman and scholar like LRS would be able to answer this simple interrogatory: Can you suuport your child's opinion on jurisdiction with Supreme Court case law?
Birfoon would rather act like a child than answer simple questions. Perhaps birfoon is a child.
It is not the pollster who is skewing the polls. It is a known fact the the group that is least likely to answer a pollsters question is someone from the Religious Right. In 2008 a lot of the Religious Right did not show up to vote but this year they will and their number one concern is that they do not want to be forced to pay for anyone's abortion!!!
The pollsters know this and they refuse to take it into consideration. At least Rasmussen admits it!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#122845 Nov 3, 2012
Pdamerica wrote:
<quoted text>
Fox News Makes You Stupid!
Smarten Up.
MPs say Rupert Murdoch unfit to run company
May 2, 2012 / http://tinyurl.com/7lqquss
Rupert Murdoch is not fit to run a major international company, MPs said on Tuesday, finding him ultimately responsible for the illegal phone hacking that has corroded his global media empire and damaged the political establishment.
The MPs said the 81-year-old News Corp chief lacked credibility, his son James appeared incompetent and the company was guilty of "wilful blindness" towards its staff at the News of the World tabloid.
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/05/02/uk-b...
UK lawmakers: Rupert Murdoch unfit to lead company
May 1, 2012 / http://tinyurl.com/6q7gfjd
A committee of British lawmakers called Rupert Murdoch unfit to run his global media empire -- a finding that reflects just how deeply the phone hacking scandal born of his defunct News of the World has shaken the relationship between the press and politics.
The divisive ruling Tuesday against Murdoch, his son James and three of their executives also exposed the waning influence of the media tycoon, and could jeopardize his control of a major broadcaster.
http://www.businessweek.com/ap/2012-05/D9UG4R...
You need to go easy on the Red Kool Aid!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#122846 Nov 3, 2012
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Rogue Moron, I must have miseed the post that explains what geese are doing in Canada right now?
Maybe you were busy preparing you explanation for what Reagan was doing campaigning the day after the attacks in Lebanon in 1984?
I don't know what Reagan did the day after the attacks in Lebanon. Why don't you tell us and make sure you have a link to back-up you statement.
Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

#122847 Nov 3, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
It is not the pollster who is skewing the polls. It is a known fact the the group that is least likely to answer a pollsters question is someone from the Religious Right. In 2008 a lot of the Religious Right did not show up to vote but this year they will and their number one concern is that they do not want to be forced to pay for anyone's abortion!!!
The pollsters know this and they refuse to take it into consideration. At least Rasmussen admits it!
Lol, Rogue Moron is making stuff up again, as is his wont and MO.
American Lady

Danville, KY

#122848 Nov 3, 2012
This is one of the comments on Bloomberg...
Another "SMART" libTARD :)
----------
Like Reply
RussReasonable 1 day ago
If Romney can't read this article and understand it's content he has no business being elected President of the US.

I don't believe he misunderstood this article, not for a second. Romney is too smart to not be able to read and understand what this article says.

He is simply LYING, with the cynical political goal of confusing voters in Ohio.

Romney continues to be at the front of the line to support shifting jobs from the USA to overseas. He continues to profit from Bain Capital, who continues to shift US jobs overseas.

Romney supports changing tax law to prevent US taxes of overseas income. This 'territorial' tax change would in fact encourage additional overseas investments in jobs at the cost of US jobs.

A Romney Presidency combined with a Republican Congress and Republican Senate is a sure fired GUARANTEE to send US jobs overseas.

Get real.

==========
Article:
Fiat Says Jeep Output May Return to China as Demand Rises

"THE GIST OF IT"...localizing-means to CHINA

“The volume opportunity for us is very significant,” Manley, who is also president of the Jeep brand, said in an interview at Chrysler’s Auburn Hills, Michigan, headquarters.“We’re reviewing the opportunities within existing capacity” as well as “should we be

*******localizing******* the entire Jeep portfolio or some of the Jeep portfolio.”-------

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-10-21/fiat...

I should change "SMART" ...
to "educated" ... ;-)
Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

#122849 Nov 3, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny, you say I keep changing the goalposts yet my question has been the same from day one! Imbecile. runny stool (you're just one log on that fresh steaming pile) LMAO
Wrong.

You asked. I checked and even went so far as to confirm its accuracy.

Now you're pretending like you asked a different question initially.

I did my part. Now the aegis is on you to explain in your own words how you think polls are skewed and by what methods a pollster would do so.

We're still waiting on you to support your idiotic opinion of jurisdiction with a Supreme Court case that agrees with you.

A man of your great wealth and knowledge should be able to answer simple statistics and con law questions with ease.

No reply from you is an admission that you're incapable of answering the simple questions.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#122851 Nov 3, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
It is not the pollster who is skewing the polls. It is a known fact the the group that is least likely to answer a pollsters question is someone from the Religious Right. In 2008 a lot of the Religious Right did not show up to vote but this year they will and their number one concern is that they do not want to be forced to pay for anyone's abortion!!!
The pollsters know this and they refuse to take it into consideration. At least Rasmussen admits it!
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Lol, Rogue Moron is making stuff up again, as is his wont and MO.
Well Tootsie, who will you blame on Nov. 7th? The TEA Party? The Religious Right? The Neo Cons?
Jacques Ottawa

North York, Canada

#122852 Nov 3, 2012
Henry wrote:
Will this be an honest election or will Obama win due to fraud?
So, you'll have it both ways, right? Romney wins, you win. Obama wins, it's fraud, you win. Okay.
Guru

Canyon Country, CA

#122853 Nov 3, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
Terri Tanna wrote:
"Please do a great public service for the Class by telling them where they can find "natural law" written down for anyone to study.
IF you fail to point to a specific writing (or writings), you are admitting that there is NO SUCH thing 'natural law.'"
PLEASE, PLEASE, do not fail the Class.
====
<quoted text>
You admit to having much worldly knowledge.
YOU tell us where the Class can find the totality of "natural law" written down.
WTF are you yakking about now lady....?!!
Jacques Ottawa

North York, Canada

#122854 Nov 3, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>why would I want to imitate a "bicycle seat sniffer", like you?!!
No one, absolutely no one could think up "bicycle seat sniffer". You've GOT to have done it. How sick. At least, stick to women's bicycle seats.
Jacques Ottawa

North York, Canada

#122856 Nov 3, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
You need to go easy on the Red Kool Aid!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =3R3imS2OZbcXX
Rogue, Rupert Murdoch is a pile of excrements, as are most of his TV networks and newspapers. Except for the Wall Street Journal and The Time of London because the entire editorial staffs have threatened to quit if he so much as even enters the building. In spite of that, one can still smell his rotten influence. Man should be jailed in both the UK and the US.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#122857 Nov 3, 2012
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong.
You asked. I checked and even went so far as to confirm its accuracy.
Now you're pretending like you asked a different question initially.
I did my part. Now the aegis is on you to explain in your own words how you think polls are skewed and by what methods a pollster would do so.
We're still waiting on you to support your idiotic opinion of jurisdiction with a Supreme Court case that agrees with you.
A man of your great wealth and knowledge should be able to answer simple statistics and con law questions with ease.
No reply from you is an admission that you're incapable of answering the simple questions.
Then why not answer the question? You're backed into a corner in case you haven't noticed. LMAO Simple question; what was the margin of error? Dance puppet, dance! Do the Cha Cha!! LMAO at this imbecile.
Jacques Ottawa

North York, Canada

#122858 Nov 3, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't know what Reagan did the day after the attacks in Lebanon. Why don't you tell us and make sure you have a link to back-up you statement.
He already told you there was hardly any internet in those days. You don't read too good, do you? Ask Sioux, LRS, Guru if here is a vacancy in their grade 2 remedial reading class. I know they don't attend a lot - and like you, it shows.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#122859 Nov 3, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
So, you'll have it both ways, right? Romney wins, you win. Obama wins, it's fraud, you win. Okay.
Well actually, Osambo is already a fraud!
Jacques Ottawa

North York, Canada

#122860 Nov 3, 2012
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong.
You asked. I checked and even went so far as to confirm its accuracy.
Now you're pretending like you asked a different question initially.
I did my part. Now the aegis is on you to explain in your own words how you think polls are skewed and by what methods a pollster would do so.
We're still waiting on you to support your idiotic opinion of jurisdiction with a Supreme Court case that agrees with you.
A man of your great wealth and knowledge should be able to answer simple statistics and con law questions with ease.
No reply from you is an admission that you're incapable of answering the simple questions.
GB, don't bother. He loves these childish games. When he is stumped, and that's 99.9% of the time, he either answers with dirty filthy sexual-tainted homophobe profanity or just goes on asking like you never answered. He and his birther friends, when not shooting at tin cans and watermelons and ingurgiting cheap beer and contraband whiskey, have fun playing puerile jokes on intelligent people, thereafter roaring with hearty redneck laughter. The are certain they look smart and dapper. Sigh. So sad. Only they know how it sucks to be them.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 6 min Bluestater 1,190,559
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 28 min adamski 51,452
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 55 min Cold Front 69,114
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 4 hr Road Kill Cafe 51,346
Atheists can't prove there is no God. (Mar '11) 13 hr Sumpins Up 220
Dear Abby 3-1-15 13 hr tiredofit 3
Couple of goodies. What say you? 13 hr LetsGiveItATry 2
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 7:18 am PST

Bleacher Report 7:18AM
Best Options to Replace Briggs This Offseason
Bleacher Report 8:12 AM
Buzz: Colts Eyeing Trades for Veteran WRs Including Marshall
Bleacher Report 1:14 PM
Could Bears Ever Get Fair Trade Value for Forte?
Bleacher Report 1:40 PM
Wayne Undergoes Surgery on Triceps
NFL 2:44 PM
Reggie Wayne had surgery, mulling Colts future