BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 191982 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#122801 Nov 3, 2012
#122,484
Real Change is Coming wrote:
CHANGE! See the 28 Large Newspapers That Endorsed Obama Last Election and Are Now Endorsing Romney
Real Change is Coming wrote:
“In 2008, an unproven Obama promised things would turn out differently with him in charge.“Change we can believe in” is how he put it. Four years later we realize it was all made up.”
–Fitchburg Sentinel & Enterprise
LARGE NEWSPAPERS?

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#122802 Nov 3, 2012
#122,484
Real Change is Coming wrote:
CHANGE! See the 28 Large Newspapers That Endorsed Obama Last Election and Are Now Endorsing Romney
Real Change is Coming wrote:
“Sure, funding for public broadcasting is an insignificant part of the budget, but if Obama isn’t even willing to cut one one-hundreth of 1 percent of federal spending for something that is non-vital to America, then the president is not serious about reducing spending at all.
If Obama is not serious about that, he is the wrong person for the job.”
–The Joplin Globe
LARGE NEWSPAPERS?
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#122803 Nov 3, 2012
Atticus Tiberius Finch wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong.
"Although the congressional debate concerning § 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment was limited, that debate clearly confirms the understanding that the phrase "within its jurisdiction" was intended in a broad sense to offer the guarantee of equal protection to ALL within a State's boundaries, and to all upon whom the State would impose the obligations of its laws. Indeed, it appears from those debates that Congress, by using the phrase "person within its jurisdiction," sought expressly to ensure that the equal protection of the laws was provided to the ALIEN POPULATION. Representative Bingham reported to the House the draft resolution of the Joint Committee of Fifteen on Reconstruction (H. R. 63) that was to become the Fourteenth Amendment.[13] Cong. Globe, 39th Cong., 1st Sess., 1033 (1866)."
Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202, 214 (1982)(emphasis added)
Need More? Okay
"The Amendment [14th], in clear words and in manifest intent, includes the children born, within the territory of the United States, of ALL OTHER PERSONS, of whatever race or color, domiciled within the United States. EVERY CITIZEN OR SUBJECT OF ANOTHER COUNTRY, while domiciled here, is within the allegiance and the protection, and consequently SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION, OF THE UNITED STATES. His allegiance to the United States is direct and immediate, and, although but local and temporary, continuing only so long as he remains within our territory, is yet, in the words of Lord Coke, in Calvin's Case, 7 Rep. 6a, "strong enough to make a natural subject, for if he hath issue here, that issue is a natural-born subject;" and his child, as said by Mr. Binney in his essay before quoted, "if born in the country, is as much a citizen as the natural-born child of a citizen, and by operation of the same principle." United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 693 (1898))(emphasis added)
Question: what is your problem?
by your logic, your first para is irrelevant.
The USSC can not change the constitution, only citizens are "subject to the jurisdiction, thereof", as plainly stated in the first sentence of the 14th amend.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#122804 Nov 3, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
#122,484
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
LARGE NEWSPAPERS?
Well Tootsie, "LARGE" is relative, isn't it? New York City is the 19th largest city in the world by population. And Shitcago is not in the top 50!

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#122805 Nov 3, 2012
Real Change is Coming wrote:
There is NO CONTROVERSY with Mitt Romney
SURE THERE IS.
As much as we "Wild Women Wild about Willard" love him, if Willard didn't get into HLS/BS solely because of his father, why wasn't his academic record strong enough to merit an invitation to try for The Law Review?

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#122806 Nov 3, 2012
Guru wrote:
Polls...
Rassmusen R 50 O 48
Gallup R 52 O 47
Star R 51 O 48
CBS R 17 O 98
NBC R 2 O 164
MSNBC R 0 O 3,000
yep.
Would you want to bet that NOT ONE of the people surveyed by any of those polling services is eligible under the United States Constitution to cast a vote for the President of the United States of America?
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#122807 Nov 3, 2012
Atticus Tiberius Finch wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong again Skippy.
"The Supreme Court has extended significant constitutional protections to aliens within the United States, without distinguishing between those who are here legally or illegally, or between residents and visitors. See, e.g., Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 369, 6 S.Ct. 1064, 1070, 30 L.Ed. 220 (1886)("The Fourteenth Amendment ... is not confined to the protection of citizens....[Its] provisions are universal in their application, to all persons within the territorial jurisdiction [of the United States]."); In re Ross, 140 U.S. 453, 464, 11 S.Ct. 897, 900, 35 L.Ed. 581 (1891)(holding that although fifth and sixth amendments do not apply to trials conducted in consular courts, their guarantees apply to "citizens and others within the United States, or who are brought there for trial"). US v. Verdugo-Urquidez, 856 F. 2d 1214, 1222 (9th Cir. 1988), reversed on other grounds, United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez, 494 US 259 (1990)
The USSC can not change the Constitution, nor its meaning without an amendment. Aliens have never been subject to the jurisdiction, thereof, this is why we have a naturalization act.
Guru

Canyon Country, CA

#122808 Nov 3, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
<quoted text>
Please do a great public service for the Class by telling them where they can find "natural law" written down for anyone to study.
IF you fail to point to a specific writing (or writings), you are admitting that there is NO SUCH thing a "natural law."
PLEASE, PLEASE, do not fail the Class.
Look who's talking...you already got your FAIL!
http://ebengregory.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp...
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#122809 Nov 3, 2012
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Looks like Dale needs to have his medication adjusted.
<quoted text>
answer the question, Puss!
Guru

Canyon Country, CA

#122810 Nov 3, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Isn't it funny that Grand Birther, Toledo, OH disappears, you pop back in. Are you in Ohio two policing for Obama? You do know Obama will lose Ohio, don't you?
nailed it!

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#122811 Nov 3, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Isn't it funny that Grand Birther, Toledo, OH disappears, you pop back in. Are you in Ohio two policing for Obama? You do know Obama will lose Ohio, don't you?
Wild Women Wild for Willard are doing whatever we can for our Willard.
BIG DICK

Canyon Country, CA

#122812 Nov 3, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you really so stupid that you don't realize how stupid you are -- even when scholarship smacks you right in the face?
Morris says you are going down with/on Obama.

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#122813 Nov 3, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
you still can't get around the fact, aliens have never been nor ever will be "subject to the jurisdiction, thereof", the only way to change this is through an amendment to the Constitution.
You have dodged this question in the past:
Is it YOUR contention that an alien may not sue a United States citizen in a U.S. federal court?
Simple question asking for a YES or a NO.
BIG DICK

Canyon Country, CA

#122814 Nov 3, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
<quoted text>
Would you want to bet that NOT ONE of the people surveyed by any of those polling services is eligible under the United States Constitution to cast a vote for the President of the United States of America?
MORRIS says he has a pole just for you, with a shiny little helmet on top of it.
Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

#122815 Nov 3, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Well Tootsie, "LARGE" is relative, isn't it? New York City is the 19th largest city in the world by population. And Shitcago is not in the top 50!
Rogue Moron, I must have miseed the post that explains what geese are doing in Canada right now?

Maybe you were busy preparing you explanation for what Reagan was doing campaigning the day after the attacks in Lebanon in 1984?

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#122816 Nov 3, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
"Please do a great public service for the Class by telling them where they can find "natural law" written down for anyone to study.
IF you fail to point to a specific writing (or writings), you are admitting that there is NO SUCH thing 'natural law.'"
PLEASE, PLEASE, do not fail the Class.
====
Guru wrote:
Look who's talking...you already got your FAIL!
http://ebengregory.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp -
You admit to having much worldly knowledge.
YOU tell us where the Class can find the totality of "natural law" written down.
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#122817 Nov 3, 2012
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
BirfoonBoy doesn't know what he thinks.
<quoted text>
"In the first section of the act of Congress approved March 26, 1790 (1 Stat. at Large, 102), it is enacted:
‘That any alien being a free white person, who shall have resided within the limits and UNDER THE JURISDICTION of the United States for the term of two years, may be admitted to become a citizen thereof.’"
Grow up.
<quoted text>
"may be (not will be) admitted to become a citizen thereof." If this is aquired, then he is "subject to the jurisdiction, thereof".
One can be under the jurisdiction without being subject to the jurisdiction, thereof.
Aliens have never been subject to the jurisdiction, thereof.
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#122818 Nov 3, 2012
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Somehow he seems to believe that "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States" means "all persons subject to the jurisdiction of the United States are citizens."
Bizarre.
Play Justice Dale is not working with a full deck.
that is right all persons "subject to the jurisdiction, thereof", are citizens. Aliens are under the jurisdiction of the US, but are not subject to the jurisdiction, thereof.

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#122819 Nov 3, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
Aliens have never been subject to the jurisdiction, thereof.
Is it YOUR contention that an alien may not sue a United States citizen in a U.S. federal court?
Simple question asking for a YES or a NO.
Jacques Ottawa

North York, Canada

#122821 Nov 3, 2012
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Why would there be geese in Canada right now?
They've migrated south, thanks for pointing it out, and hopefully, have dropped some of their enormous "goodies" on LRS's head.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min Yeah 1,250,627
News Should we really be OK with the surgical remova... 45 min Psylocke 78
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 1 hr White_Lightning 6,138
Word (Dec '08) 1 hr White_Lightning 5,321
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr Agents of Corruption 53,923
News Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 2 hr Mark 52,015
Last word + 2 (Mar '12) 4 hr Red_Forman 960
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 8 hr PEllen 99,878
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages