BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 240915 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#122852 Nov 3, 2012
Henry wrote:
Will this be an honest election or will Obama win due to fraud?
So, you'll have it both ways, right? Romney wins, you win. Obama wins, it's fraud, you win. Okay.
Guru

Canyon Country, CA

#122853 Nov 3, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
Terri Tanna wrote:
"Please do a great public service for the Class by telling them where they can find "natural law" written down for anyone to study.
IF you fail to point to a specific writing (or writings), you are admitting that there is NO SUCH thing 'natural law.'"
PLEASE, PLEASE, do not fail the Class.
====
<quoted text>
You admit to having much worldly knowledge.
YOU tell us where the Class can find the totality of "natural law" written down.
WTF are you yakking about now lady....?!!
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#122854 Nov 3, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>why would I want to imitate a "bicycle seat sniffer", like you?!!
No one, absolutely no one could think up "bicycle seat sniffer". You've GOT to have done it. How sick. At least, stick to women's bicycle seats.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#122856 Nov 3, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
You need to go easy on the Red Kool Aid!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =3R3imS2OZbcXX
Rogue, Rupert Murdoch is a pile of excrements, as are most of his TV networks and newspapers. Except for the Wall Street Journal and The Time of London because the entire editorial staffs have threatened to quit if he so much as even enters the building. In spite of that, one can still smell his rotten influence. Man should be jailed in both the UK and the US.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#122857 Nov 3, 2012
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong.
You asked. I checked and even went so far as to confirm its accuracy.
Now you're pretending like you asked a different question initially.
I did my part. Now the aegis is on you to explain in your own words how you think polls are skewed and by what methods a pollster would do so.
We're still waiting on you to support your idiotic opinion of jurisdiction with a Supreme Court case that agrees with you.
A man of your great wealth and knowledge should be able to answer simple statistics and con law questions with ease.
No reply from you is an admission that you're incapable of answering the simple questions.
Then why not answer the question? You're backed into a corner in case you haven't noticed. LMAO Simple question; what was the margin of error? Dance puppet, dance! Do the Cha Cha!! LMAO at this imbecile.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#122858 Nov 3, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't know what Reagan did the day after the attacks in Lebanon. Why don't you tell us and make sure you have a link to back-up you statement.
He already told you there was hardly any internet in those days. You don't read too good, do you? Ask Sioux, LRS, Guru if here is a vacancy in their grade 2 remedial reading class. I know they don't attend a lot - and like you, it shows.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#122859 Nov 3, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
So, you'll have it both ways, right? Romney wins, you win. Obama wins, it's fraud, you win. Okay.
Well actually, Osambo is already a fraud!
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#122860 Nov 3, 2012
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong.
You asked. I checked and even went so far as to confirm its accuracy.
Now you're pretending like you asked a different question initially.
I did my part. Now the aegis is on you to explain in your own words how you think polls are skewed and by what methods a pollster would do so.
We're still waiting on you to support your idiotic opinion of jurisdiction with a Supreme Court case that agrees with you.
A man of your great wealth and knowledge should be able to answer simple statistics and con law questions with ease.
No reply from you is an admission that you're incapable of answering the simple questions.
GB, don't bother. He loves these childish games. When he is stumped, and that's 99.9% of the time, he either answers with dirty filthy sexual-tainted homophobe profanity or just goes on asking like you never answered. He and his birther friends, when not shooting at tin cans and watermelons and ingurgiting cheap beer and contraband whiskey, have fun playing puerile jokes on intelligent people, thereafter roaring with hearty redneck laughter. The are certain they look smart and dapper. Sigh. So sad. Only they know how it sucks to be them.
Justice Dale

United States

#122861 Nov 3, 2012
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong.
You asked. I checked and even went so far as to confirm its accuracy.
Now you're pretending like you asked a different question initially.
I did my part. Now the aegis is on you to explain in your own words how you think polls are skewed and by what methods a pollster would do so.
We're still waiting on you to support your idiotic opinion of jurisdiction with a Supreme Court case that agrees with you.
A man of your great wealth and knowledge should be able to answer simple statistics and con law questions with ease.
No reply from you is an admission that you're incapable of answering the simple questions.
don't need a USSC case to determine who is "subject to the jurisdiction, thereof", just read the first sentence of the 14th amendment. Yep, it is so plainly stated, any other interpretation of said would be a violation of the Constitution.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#122863 Nov 3, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
He already told you there was hardly any internet in those days. You don't read too good, do you? Ask Sioux, LRS, Guru if here is a vacancy in their grade 2 remedial reading class. I know they don't attend a lot - and like you, it shows.
The jacqazz from Canada is a dirty diaper. runny stool. LMAO shat for brains Just think jacqazz, everytime you fill those britches up, you get a little dumber! LOL I wouldn't worry too much about that flight. Really. LMAO!!!
Pdamerica

New York, NY

#122864 Nov 3, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
You need to go easy on the Red Kool Aid!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =3R3imS2OZbcXX
Everything I post is factual and nobody can disprove me!

=========

Who Is Funding the Health Care Furor?
WALL STREET IS BEHIND REPUBLICAN DICK ARMEY AND THE TEA BAGS!/ September 18, 2009 / http://tinyurl.com/nhnz68 A Bill Moyers essay on the protests in Washington, D.C. and whose funding opposition to health care reform.
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/09182009/wa...
Justice Dale

United States

#122865 Nov 3, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
No one, absolutely no one could think up "bicycle seat sniffer". You've GOT to have done it. How sick. At least, stick to women's bicycle seats.
hahahaha!! I can tell you aren't from the US, but it is funny you made the connection to a girl's seat! We use to call them "Snarfs" in the 50'ies, those that sniffed girls bicycle seats.
Really funny how your latent traits has surfaced.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#122866 Nov 3, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Rogue, Rupert Murdoch is a pile of excrements, as are most of his TV networks and newspapers. Except for the Wall Street Journal and The Time of London because the entire editorial staffs have threatened to quit if he so much as even enters the building. In spite of that, one can still smell his rotten influence. Man should be jailed in both the UK and the US.
Then how come Fox News is by far the most popular Cable news network?
But George Soros is a nice guy?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#122867 Nov 3, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
You need to go easy on the Red Kool Aid!
http://www.youtube.com/watch ...
Pdamerica wrote:
<quoted text>
Everything I post is factual and nobody can disprove me!
=========
Who Is Funding the Health Care Furor?
WALL STREET IS BEHIND REPUBLICAN DICK ARMEY AND THE TEA BAGS!/ September 18, 2009 / http://tinyurl.com/nhnz68 A Bill Moyers essay on the protests in Washington, D.C. and whose funding opposition to health care reform.
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/09182009/wa...
Your source is outdated.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#122868 Nov 3, 2012
Pdamerica wrote:
<quoted text>
Everything I post is factual and nobody can disprove me!
=========
Who Is Funding the Health Care Furor?
WALL STREET IS BEHIND REPUBLICAN DICK ARMEY AND THE TEA BAGS!/ September 18, 2009 / http://tinyurl.com/nhnz68 A Bill Moyers essay on the protests in Washington, D.C. and whose funding opposition to health care reform.
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/09182009/wa...
PBS???? HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa Get real fool.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#122869 Nov 3, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't know what Reagan did the day after the attacks in Lebanon. Why don't you tell us and make sure you have a link to back-up you statement.
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
He already told you there was hardly any internet in those days. You don't read too good, do you? Ask Sioux, LRS, Guru if here is a vacancy in their grade 2 remedial reading class. I know they don't attend a lot - and like you, it shows.
Yes there was. Ever hear of CASSSS (CAS-Qube)? I was using CAS Qube in 1986! Remember the IBM 286 machines with duel 5.25" floppy drives and a 10 Meg Winchester? I do!!!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#122870 Nov 3, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>hahahaha!! I can tell you aren't from the US, but it is funny you made the connection to a girl's seat! We use to call them "Snarfs" in the 50'ies, those that sniffed girls bicycle seats.
Really funny how your latent traits has surfaced.
SNARFS? I love it!!! Fits our flapper friends extremely well. Priceless.
Ellen1

Dedham, MA

#122871 Nov 3, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>don't need a USSC case to determine who is "subject to the jurisdiction, thereof", just read the first sentence of the 14th amendment. Yep, it is so plainly stated, any other interpretation of said would be a violation of the Constitution.
The US Supreme Court has ruled that "subject to the jurisdiction" means ALL the people who are in the USA with the sole exception of foreign diplomats and their families.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#122872 Nov 3, 2012
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Rogue Moron, I must have miseed the post that explains what geese are doing in Canada right now?
Maybe you were busy preparing you explanation for what Reagan was doing campaigning the day after the attacks in Lebanon in 1984?
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't know what Reagan did the day after the attacks in Lebanon. Why don't you tell us and make sure you have a link to back-up you statement.
Well Tootsie, I am still waiting. Oh, bye the way, the Beirut bombings were on Oct 23, 1983 and that was not an election year so why would Reagan be out campaigning for anyone?
Pdamerica

New York, NY

#122873 Nov 3, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
PBS???? HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa Get real fool.
The U.S. establishment media in a nutshell
April 5, 2008 / http://tinyurl.com/92b2dze
In the past two weeks, the following events transpired. A Department of Justice memo, authored by John Yoo, was released which authorized torture and presidential lawbreaking. It was revealed that the Bush administration declared the Fourth Amendment of the Bill of Rights to be inapplicable to "domestic military operations" within the U.S. The U.S. Attorney General appears to have fabricated a key event leading to the 9/11 attacks and made patently false statements about surveillance laws and related lawsuits. Barack Obama went bowling in Pennsylvania and had a low score.
Here are the number of times, according to NEXIS, that various topics have been mentioned in the media over the past thirty days:
"Yoo and torture" - 102
"Mukasey and 9/11" -- 73
"Yoo and Fourth Amendment" -- 16
"Obama and bowling" -- 1,043
"Obama and Wright" -- More than 3,000 (too many to be counted)
"Obama and patriotism" - 1,607
"Clinton and Lewinsky" -- 1,079
http://www.salon.com/2008/04/05/media_15/

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min VetnorsGate 1,535,494
Trump Puddy Comment Worst Ever 32 min Earl 3
Trump Just Sux 2 hr They cannot kill ... 2
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 2 hr They cannot kill ... 10,706
GOP: Kids should be financially independent soo... 4 hr Liar Don 9
Bottomless wife? 4 hr Kink 6
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 4 hr Margarite 105,187

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages