BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 194696 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

#122678 Nov 3, 2012
Change my Diaper wrote:
<quoted text>
I asked you to specifically name a publication that has never published any misinformation.
You just admitted that there isn't one.
Kentucky Loser, you are illiterate and wrong as usual.

I wrote that real news sources have perhaps made mistakes. They then issue retractions and correct the mistake.

WND purposely misleads birfoons. They need to perpetuate the birfoon fantasy so you continue to go to the website and they continue to make advertising revenue.

Do you understand the difference?
Just Sayin

Toledo, OH

#122679 Nov 3, 2012
Guru

Canyon Country, CA

#122680 Nov 3, 2012
Wall Street donors opening their checkbooks for Mitt Romney
The financial industry's support for the Republican nominee marks a sharp reversal from four years ago, when the industry supported Barack Obama over John McCain.

cha-ching! Wall St bets on winners. AMERICAN IS ABOUT TO COME ROARING BACK!

obama says things can't change. obama says you have to settle...

Romney says WE HAVE TO CHANGE! WE AREN'T GOING TO SETTLE...WE HAVE TO ASPIRE TO GREATER THINGS, AND THIS ECONOMY IS GOING TO COME ROARING BACK!
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#122681 Nov 3, 2012
ARGUING with IDIOTS wrote:
Sources find Obama admin financed Bengazi attack!
Blather blather blather. Is there any lie you won't paste?
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#122682 Nov 3, 2012
Real Change is Coming wrote:
<quoted text>Psst, MORON, if I was a blind party lemming, I would still be a DemocRAT like you, voting for the usurper Obama, RETARD!
it must suck to be wrong every day of your life Tacky. Why don't you take a day off?
ARGUING with IDIOTS

Chico, CA

#122684 Nov 3, 2012
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>Blather blather blather. Is there any lie you won't paste?
I just copy a post from the left and replace Romney's name with Obama!
Guru

Canyon Country, CA

#122688 Nov 3, 2012
obama says "vote for revenge!"...

Mitt says "vote for love of country!"

...there is a huge difference between a real President and obama.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#122689 Nov 3, 2012
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Kentucky Klown Kar, did you ever notice that it's only a manufactured controversy (a nontroversy if you will) and no one cares except birfoons.
Do you know what tautological means, Klown Kar?
Also, not one birfoon has been able to articulate what a Romney win would have to do with birfoons. Other than voting Republican as they would have anyway, what effect have birfoons had on the 2012 election.
Just post the verifiable data and well analyze it together, Kentucky.
Well Toosie, the Birther movement is only one factor which will help defeat Obama. It is called a intangible as no one will be able to give an actual value to anyone factor.
Why was John McCain defeated four years ago. One was the Religious Conservatives did not turn out but in 2012 it looks like they will and guess who they will NOT vote for this time?
Same goes for the Jewish vote. Normally about 90% of all Jews vote Democrat but in 1980, and again in 1984, a lot of them voted for Reagan and again the same number will vote for ..... Romney. Be aware of the Neo Cons (Reagan Jews).
Guru

Brooklyn, NY

#122690 Nov 3, 2012
Change my Diaper wrote:
<quoted text>
A nontroversy??? That isn't even a word
Kentucky Klown Kar, I coined the word nontorversy to refer to when people like birfoons make stuff up.

Have you ever noticed that it's a manufactured controversy and only among birfoons is anything controversial?

I also noticed that you were AGAIN unable to articulate what a Romney win would mean for birfoons. Other than voting Republican as they would have anyway, and despite having long been sold out by the GOP, what would a Romney win have to do with birfoons?

You can simply post the verifiable data and we'll go over it together, Klown Kar.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#122692 Nov 3, 2012
Yep, Jews make up only 2% of our country's voters but in New York, New Jersey and Florida they are about 4% of the voters but they are twice as likely to vote as most other groups so here in Florida they will make up about 7-8% of all votes cast. And if just one third of all Jews in Florida vote Romney, that is about 2% of the vote and that in itself way be the straw that broken the Muslim camels back!
Be aware of the Neo Cons (Relgious Right)!!!
The Rolling Stones - Sweet Neo Con
Guru

Oregon, OH

#122693 Nov 3, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Well Toosie, the Birther movement is only one factor which will help defeat Obama. It is called a intangible as no one will be able to give an actual value to anyone factor.
Rogue Moron, you really are a moron. Above is where you admit the unimportance of the birfoon gallery.

All birfoons are going to do is vote Republican as they would have anyway.

Your claim was that birfoons are influencing independent voters. You could back up your claim with data or you can admit you pulled it out of your grandma's arse.

You call it intangible and then go on to analogize it with other BS for which you have TANGIBLE data or at least data that can be verified. Do you even understand the words you write?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#122695 Nov 3, 2012
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Kentucky Loser, you are illiterate and wrong as usual.
I wrote that real news sources have perhaps made mistakes. They then issue retractions and correct the mistake.
WND purposely misleads birfoons. They need to perpetuate the birfoon fantasy so you continue to go to the website and they continue to make advertising revenue.
Do you understand the difference?
And MSNBC does not?
Pdamerica

Bay Shore, NY

#122696 Nov 3, 2012
keyedup wrote:
<quoted text>This fool proves artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity.
Amen!

lol
Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

#122697 Nov 3, 2012
Change my Diaper wrote:
<quoted text>
I asked you to specifically name a publication that has never published any misinformation.
You just admitted that there isn't one.
They all make mistakes.
Now where is the PROOF that WND purposely misleads its audience?
Kentucky Klown Kar, you are too stupid to understand the difference between purposely misleading readers like WND admittedly does and accidentally making a mistake. Not only are you wrong, you're wayyyyy off as usual.

"We publish some misinformation." -- Joe Farah, owner & editor-in-chief WND

That is from an interview with Joe Farah that I have posted here dozens of times for your benefit and edification. You can pretend otherwise, but why bother.

Good god, these birfoons are so stupid.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#122699 Nov 3, 2012
keyedup wrote:
O'Reilly Denies Fox History Of Slandering Obama On Benghazi
On his Fox News show Friday night, Bill O'Reilly claimed that no one here has ever called President Obama a murderer or liar over his handling of the attack on the U.S. compound in Benghazi, Libya.
But several Fox stooges have accused Obama of purposely allowing Americans to die in Benghazi, and just last week, O'Reilly himself questioned a fellow Fox News host about having labeled the president a liar on Libya.
So not only is O'Reilly a liar about it, he can not even remember that just a a week aho he questioned a fellow Fox News host about having labeled the president a liar on Libya.
O'Reilly addressed the issue on his Friday show when guest Geraldo Rivera told him that President Obama deserves an apology for the way he's been treated in the press following the Benghazi attack.
Rivera said this: "The president of the United States been absolutely slandered over this story. He's been called a murderer and a liar."
O'Reilly then said this: "OK. But not by anybody here, and not by rational people."
And now the truth, Fox News hosts, contributors, and regular guests have suggested that the Obama administration made a political decision to let Americans die in Benghazi.
O'Reilly even questioned fellow Fox host Jeanine Pirro last week about having labeled Obama a liar on her show.
On his October 25 show, O'Reilly aired a clip from Pirro's Fox show Justice with Judge Jeanine.
In the clip, Pirro addresses President Obama on Libya, saying this: "You knew in real time from the men on the ground being savaged what was happening. You knew through video surveillance what was happening. You knew from a cable within 24 hours that the attack was by militants. So what's the punishment for lying? For incompetence? Has anyone been prosecuted?"
O'Reilly then welcomed Pirro to his program by highlighting her charge that Obama was lying about Libya. O'Reilly said this: "So you just called the president of the United States a liar."
Pirro responded with this: "I think that when you don't state the true facts that there are certain words that you can use and that's appropriate."
Despite O'Reilly's claim to the contrary, this is not the first time someone on Fox has labeled Obama a liar over the Benghazi attack. It happens almost every day by someone at Fox, either a host or a guest.
And then O'Reilly lies that nobody on Fox has called Obama a liar, when he himself had a Fox News employee on his own show where he asked her about calling Obama a liar. Talk about dishonest, that's about as dishonest as a so-called journalist can be.
Osambo is a liar, cheat, fraud and the biggest coward to set foot in the White House. Didn't want you to overlook the point.
Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

#122701 Nov 3, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
And MSNBC does not?
LOL, look at Rogue Moron doing his best to deflect from the fact that WND is purposely misleading him to make money.

Sorry, Rogue Moron, but I've never posted (or even looked at MSNBC for that matter) anything from MSNBC and claimed it is true. Birfoons however think everything they link to WND is doctrine. Do you see the difference?

When a real news outlet makes a mistake they issue a retraction or correction.

WND has not done so since 2006.
Pdamerica

Bay Shore, NY

#122702 Nov 3, 2012
ARGUING with IDIOTS wrote:
Sources find Obama admin financed Bengazi attack!
Fox News Makes You Stupid!

========

FOX News Whistle blowers. UNBELIEVABLE
http://tinyurl.com/4d7wbm
&fe ature=related

==========

FBI agent John O’Neill said: All of the answers, and all of the clues allowing us to dismantle Usama bin Laden’s al Qaeda organization can be found in Saudi Arabia.

In August of 2001 FBI special agent John O’Neill complained bitterly that the United States State Department ---- and behind it the oil lobby ---- who make up President Bush’s entourage, blocked attempts to prove UBL’S guilt for the USS Cole.

The US ambassador to Yemen Republican Barbara Bodine forbade O’Neill and his FBI team from entering Yemen.

John O’Neill, a much-admired special agent, resigned in frustration with the Bush administration and took a new job as head of security at the World Trade Center.
He died in the September 11, 2001 attacks.
Jacques Ottawa

North York, Canada

#122703 Nov 3, 2012
Observer wrote:
<quoted text>
Why doesn't Little Barry borrow a ton of money from China as he did to help that cesspool Haiti?.....I would rather my grand kids pay for their own than a cesspool that delivers human trafficking and drug trade... Just a thought.... Things that make ya go hummmmm
Try observing to see if you can find your own brain. Good luck with that.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#122704 Nov 3, 2012
keyedup wrote:
O'Reilly Denies Fox History Of Slandering Obama On Benghazi
......And then O'Reilly lies that nobody on Fox has called Obama a liar, when he himself had a Fox News employee on his own show where he asked her about calling Obama a liar. Talk about dishonest, that's about as dishonest as a so-called journalist can be.
Then you should have no problem proving that allegation, should you? Or are you just recycling dog food again?

And this from Media Matters; m Here they say that people have "SUGGESTED" which does not mean that Fox News employees said that they called Obama a liar!!! You see, even Media Matters can not show an example!!!
"In reality, Fox News hosts, contributors, and regular guests have suggested that the Obama administration made a political decision to let Americans die in Benghazi."
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2012/11/02/oreil...
If you can't show us and example, shut up!!!
Jacques Ottawa

North York, Canada

#122705 Nov 3, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Please learn the difference between then and than! dumbazzes
There's that child correcting obvious typos. Watch out for them "thing's" (LRS tm reg'd)

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min John Galt 1,264,534
News Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 40 min Adolph Dawetter 52,071
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 3 hr PEllen 100,306
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 3 hr Ariel Sharon 70,149
amy august 2 4 hr Blunt Advice 5
Abby August 3 4 hr Blunt Advice 7
Ask Amy August 3 4 hr Sublime1 8
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages