BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 207548 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Jacques Ottawa

North York, Canada

#122461 Nov 2, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, you attack the messenger and not the message. Sad, very sad.
Fact; Within a few days of the bin Laden attack, the White House published photos of Obama in the crisis room. And the day after Hurricane Sandy, the White House again published photos of Obama in the crisis room. It has now been over seven weeks and still no pictures of Obama in the crisis room!
Fact;On this past Tuesday Obama cancelled his campaigning but what did he do on Sept. 12th? A few short comments and "give me more money, please"!
Fox News has had more coverage on this issue than all the other LSM's combined!
Did you not write a while back that FoxNews was now a leftist tv station?
Jacques Ottawa

North York, Canada

#122463 Nov 2, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
And I will repeat, the stock market would probably be a thousand points LOWER if they thought Romney would not win.
It is my belief that no matter who wins, we will have a double-dip recession early next year. But you wins will decide how long the double-dip recession will last!
Now, how many times do I have to say that before it sinks into you Neanderthal forehead of your's?
My Neanderthal forehead tells me that every prediction you've made on this thread has been wrong. Every one of them. So will that one. And if Romney wins, you'll be hoping it doesn't happen , but if Obama wins, and damn the consequences to the American people and the rest of the world, you'll be orgasming with joy.

Oh, how many times do I have to ask you what you think of Romney's belief that you, a catholic, are an abomination?
Jacques Ottawa

North York, Canada

#122464 Nov 2, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>Hell, it has been 23 days since the media has sent reporter to ask questions. They don't want to hear the truth.
What dream world are you inhabiting?
Jacques Ottawa

North York, Canada

#122465 Nov 2, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey jacqazz, when you're in Vegas it would not be wise to try and cast an illegal vote. Why you could go to prison and then your farts wouldn't make noise any longer. Meet Big Bubba! He's gonna be your bunkmate. LMAO stool
No need. Hey, Justice dept sending 700 (SEVEN HUNDRED) lawyers to Ohio to look over election and ensure all goes smoothly and HONESTLY. Almost as many in Florida. Isn't that like when we send monitors to what you call 3rd world countries? Can you explain that?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#122466 Nov 2, 2012
Even the Huffington Post is no longer ignoring the Benghazi cover-up!

More Benghazi Documents Come To Light As Conservatives Cry Cover-Up
The Huffington Post | By Jon Ward : 11/01/2012

The slow dribble of Benghazi-related news continued on Thursday, as new documents related to the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. consulate in Libya came to light in two separate news reports.

Foreign Policy Magazine's Harald Doornbos and Jenan Moussa reported the discovery of sensitive documents at the U.S. compound in Benghazi, Libya, that revealed that the day of the attack, concerns arose over Libyan police -- who were supposed to be guarding the consulate -- taking pictures of the grounds from a building across the street.
more at;
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/01/beng...
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#122467 Nov 2, 2012
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
And yet you fail
I can see you were a botched abortion, they took your brain and you still lived.
Yep, just an Obotto.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#122468 Nov 2, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
My Neanderthal forehead tells me that every prediction you've made on this thread has been wrong. Every one of them. So will that one. And if Romney wins, you'll be hoping it doesn't happen , but if Obama wins, and damn the consequences to the American people and the rest of the world, you'll be orgasming with joy.
Oh, how many times do I have to ask you what you think of Romney's belief that you, a catholic, are an abomination?
Nice word there jacqazz....."orgasming "???? Still below Neanderthal standards. What's that forehead angle jacqazz? runny stool
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#122469 Nov 2, 2012
UninformedOhio Republican wrote:
<quoted text>
But he's WINNING!!! Why would he need to cover his ass?
Even if the impossible did happen and he wasn't anointed VP, why would he need to spend 2 million in his own district where I though he was the unbeatable hero?
102 americans lay dead and Ryan spends 2 million to "cover his ass." Very vice presidential of him.
Or should I say, very Ayn Randian of him.
Unlike those 102 unfortunate citizens, "Be Prepared".

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#122470 Nov 2, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
And Canada the largest potash producer. Not sure, Wojar, but is China not the largest producer of phosphate? Or does the term "rock" differentiate it from just potash? I'm not well informed on this suject.
Canada does have a phosphate producer, but I'm not sure of Canada's rank in the world. Potash contains potassium, though Potash Corporation does produce phosphate. China is a major phosphate producer, as is the US. I hope this helps.
wojar wrote:
" The United States is the world's leading producer and consumer of phosphate rock, which is used to manufacture phosphate fertilizers and industrial products. "
http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commod ...
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#122471 Nov 2, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
What dream world are you inhabiting?
the one where ACME falls on you. Beep, Beep!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#122472 Nov 2, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
My Neanderthal forehead tells me that every prediction you've made on this thread has been wrong. Every one of them. So will that one. And if Romney wins, you'll be hoping it doesn't happen , but if Obama wins, and damn the consequences to the American people and the rest of the world, you'll be orgasming with joy.
Oh, how many times do I have to ask you what you think of Romney's belief that you, a catholic, are an abomination?
You are so full of recycled dog food!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#122473 Nov 2, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
No need. Hey, Justice dept sending 700 (SEVEN HUNDRED) lawyers to Ohio to look over election and ensure all goes smoothly and HONESTLY. Almost as many in Florida. Isn't that like when we send monitors to what you call 3rd world countries? Can you explain that?
No need? Really? Been there, done that huh? LMAO you moron

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#122474 Nov 2, 2012
Homer Votes 2012 | The Simpsons | Animation on Fox
UninformedOhio Republican

Munster, IN

#122475 Nov 2, 2012
Obama

Wisconsin +5
Pennsylvania +4.6
Ohio +2.3
Iowa +2
New Hampshire +2
Colorado +.9

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#122476 Nov 2, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>Everyone knows the Constitution is has jurisdiction over the US, except for you.
Sorry states stopped creating citizens, Apr 1866.
BirfoonBoy: "Sorry states stopped creating citizens, Apr 1866."

That's news?

Wowee-Zowee, state citizenship became derivative! And aliens in this country were before, and after April, 1866, under the jurisdiction of the United States. Play Law doesn't count.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Only if you're illiterate, schizophrenic, and a grandiose NPD twerp.
The amendment does not define jurisdiction. Thus the pre-existing definition controls, and the pre-existing definition, as indicated by usage of the term in the naturalization Act of 1790 provides that aliens are under the jurisdiction of the US while in this country.
Play Law doesn't count. Play Justices do not rule, except in their fantasy worlds.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#122477 Nov 2, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>I can see you were a botched abortion, they took your brain and you still lived.
Yep, just an Obotto.
Please let me know if you ever grow tired of being pathetic, hateful and wrong
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#122478 Nov 2, 2012
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
BirfoonBoy: "Sorry states stopped creating citizens, Apr 1866."
That's news?
Wowee-Zowee, state citizenship became derivative! And aliens in this country were before, and after April, 1866, under the jurisdiction of the United States. Play Law doesn't count.
<quoted text>
do you know the difference between "under" and "subject to"?
Check it out.

“ad maiora nati sumus ”

Since: Sep 09

Justice Scalia is an Oxymoron

#122479 Nov 2, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>what Howard offer was accepted in its entirety and ratified in 1868.
Wrong.

The personal opinions of the drafters of the 14th Amendment
were irrelevant into the meaning of the final language of the 14th Amendment.

Justice Scalia reminds us that "We are governed by laws, not by the intentions of legislators. As the Court said in 1844: "The law as it passed is the will of the majority of both houses, and the only mode in which that will is spoken is in the act itself ...." Aldridge v. Williams, 3 How. 9, 24 (emphasis added). But not the least of the defects of legislative history is its indeterminacy. If one were to search for an interpretive technique that, on the whole, was more likely to confuse than to clarify, one could hardly find a more promising candidate than legislative history....
Judge Harold Leventhal used to describe the use of legislative history as the equivalent of entering a crowded cocktail party and looking over the heads of the guests for one's friends. Conroy v. Aniskoff, 507 US 511, 519 (Scalia, J., concurring)

Moreover, "While it is generally true that debates in Congress are not appropriate sources of information from which to discover the meaning of the language of a statute passed by that body. Binns v. United States, 194 US 486 , 495(1904)(internal citation omitted)

Finally, the piece de resistance "By repeated decisions of this court it has come to be well established that the debates in Congress expressive of the views and motives of individual members are not a safe guide, and hence may not be resorted to, in ascertaining the meaning and purpose of the law-making body. Aldridge v. Williams, 3 How. 9, 24; United States v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., 91 U.S. 72, 79; United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Association, 166 U.S. 290, 318. Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering, 254 US 443, 474 (1923)

Want more?

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#122480 Nov 2, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>sorry, individual states made citizens in 1790, Apr 1866 changed that, "all persons born in the US and not subject to any foreign power are citizens".
At no time are aliens "subject to the jurisdiction, thereof", unless naturalized, this is plainly stated in the 14th amendment.
BirfoonBoy: "this is plainly stated in the 14th amendment"

Perhaps if you have a special decoder ring from a box of cereal.

Sorry, loser, but ordinary aliens in the US were just as subject to the jurisdiction of the United States before the CRA and 14th amendment as after.

BTW, the 14th Amendment does not expressly define which persons are or are not under the jurisdiction of the United States. Please learn the English language. There is nothing in the amendment that supports the Play Law fantasy that ordinary aliens in the US are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Grow up!
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Dale's Play Law understanding of the Constitution is a product of grandiose fantasy delusions. He thinks the First Congress didn't understand the meaning of "jurisdiction of the United States" as recited in the Naturalization Act of 1790. Aliens were understood to be under the jurisdiction of the United States. Slam dunk.
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#122481 Nov 2, 2012
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Please let me know if you ever grow tired of being pathetic, hateful and wrong
Scooter, you will be second on my list!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 23 min Nostrilis Waxmoron 1,346,855
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 25 min Earthling-1 57,276
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 6 hr They cannot kill ... 7,299
last post wins! (Apr '13) 6 hr They cannot kill ... 609
last post wins! (Dec '10) 6 hr They cannot kill ... 1,582
Word (Dec '08) 14 hr Red_Forman 5,642
NO corkscrew, open win bottle. 15 hr POS Gone 9
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages