BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 242122 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#118917 Oct 19, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Tune in to Fox News this Friday at 10 p.m. ET for a "Special Report" investigation on the Libya consulate attack.
ĎSpecial Reportí investigates death and deceit in Benghazi
Published October 18, 2012; FoxNews.com
Bret Baier anchors an investigation into the violent fiasco in Libya that ended in the deaths of a U.S. ambassador and three other Americans.
The special includes Baier's exclusive interview with the head of the U.S. Embassy's Site Security Team, and the latest developments from Benghazi.
It will also include additional reports from the White House and the campaign trail -- where voters are asking: What did President Obama know, and when did he know it?
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10/18/sp...
You see,ģogue, the whole report is biased, slanted, from the start. Read the headline again : "ĎSpecial Reportí investigates death and deceit in Benghazi". That's Fox News for you. Most of its listeners are idiots who will love the headline, they can't help it, they will instantly believe it, and not even listen past it. They don't want to.

Why can't the preview read : "Startling new facts on the Bengazi attack?" I suppose then, not one single birther or tea bagger would bother tuning in.

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#118918 Oct 19, 2012
#118,722
"WILLARDíS BIGGEST HURDLE
"Who dares to answer the questions that are most troubling to Willard when he asks,'Are you better off today than you were four years ago:'
"1. The United States equity markets have gone up 121% during the administration of Barack HUSSEIN Obama. YES or NO? This is largest gain during the first term of any American president. YES or NO? This percentage gain is more than SEVEN and ONE-HALF times greater than during the first term of R.Reagan. YES or NO.
"2. THE CREDITWORTHINESS OF THE UNITED STATES TREASURY HAS BEEN AT ITS HIGHEST LEVEL THROUGHOU 2012. YES OR NO? DURING THE FOURTH YEAR OF R.REAGANíS FIRST TERM THE CREDITWORTHINESS OF THE UNITED STATES WAS MORE THAN FOUR AND ONE-HALF TIMES WORSE THAN IT IS AT PRESENT. YES OR NO?
"3. The marginal federal income tax rate for a joint filing couple with $66,000 of taxable income is the lowest it has been since the implementation of Amendment XVI. YES or NO? This rate is one-third of the marginal federal income tax rate for a comparable couple during the fourth year of R.Reaganís first term. YES or NO?
"4. For most of 2012, the inflation rate has averaged less than 2.2% per month. YES or NO? During the fourth year of R.Reaganís first term the inflation rate averaged more than 4.3% per month. YES or NO?
"5. Willard is substantially better off than he was four years ago based on gains in excess of $100 million in his stock and bond portfolio as the result of the current administrationís economic policies. YES or NO?
"Please help our candidate out. How should Willard respond to these hard economic facts?"
====
SHEEPLE Buster wrote:
Absolutely we are NOT better off than we four years ago.
1) We had a AAA credit rating then.
HOW TERRIBLE THAT THE CREDITWORTHINESS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA HAS BEEN DOWNGRADED.
Please provide the date on which this terrible Obama tragedy occurred and identify how many basis points this has cost the United States Treasury on its Long Bond offerings. Thank you. You must be a Great American.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#118919 Oct 19, 2012
TaxNoMore wrote:
Jacques Ottawa
Toronto, Canada
sez
So well presented...and true.
I would like a conservative here to tell us about ONE piece of social legislation for the simple folks instead of the rich brought about by Republicans in the last 100 years.
ONE.
(Sorry, had to remove one sentence fr ur text to make room.(farmers'...)
//////////
The Dwight D. Eisenhower National System of Interstate and Defense Highways (commonly known as the Interstate Highway System, Interstate Freeway System or the Interstate) is a network of freeways that forms a part of the National Highway System of the United States.
The system is named for President Dwight D. Eisenhower, who championed its formation.
//////////
So well presented...and true.
Highways are social legislation? I suppose, to NASCAR people with their confederate flags...Hye, why not social legislation in the form of nuclear submarines, aircraft carriers and ICBMs? Incidentally, if for those who don't agree with those things, they still have to pay for 'em.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#118920 Oct 19, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
You do cherish that expression, "slap in the face", don't you? Specially as it always invariably apply to women.


A "slap in the face" is a very common phrase Mr. Genius. Not to mention, I have no idea who these posters are nor do I know whether they are male or female. You have issues, many issues. Deal with them or shut up!

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#118922 Oct 19, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
"I have consistently stated that the unprecedented 121% gain in the U.S. equity markets is not evenly distributed."
====
Guru wrote:
NONE of your statement here is true. Enjoy your boy's demise in 19 days. Well see if you are in here then.
I have never supported your president on this or any other thread.
Do you DENY that the U.S. markets have gone up 121% during your president's first term? Please provide the Class with the highest gain during his term according to your calculations. Please provide exact dates for your calculation.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#118923 Oct 19, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
You seem agitated again jacqazz. You know one side of me because of your own choice. Remember? Sure you do. Those trademarked names are reserved you and your sockpuppets, no one else. Congrats. Personally, I think Romney would have an interest in hearing from an Energy Company that has been doing business since the 50's and enjoys an excellent reputation of eithics, honesty and success. You're just a jealous cry baby jacqazz. Go find someone who will pet your ego for you. You might want to get off your pity pot first. Act like an azz, get treated like an azz. It's a very simple concept for most people. Tissue?
I know your main side, that of a boor, no-culture bully, who, after 5 minutes with Romney, could not refrain from indulging in name-calling and profanity. It's you, can't be camouflaged, and like an evil genie in a bottle, cannot be kept inside.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#118925 Oct 19, 2012
TaxNoMore wrote:
Jacques Ottawa
Toronto, Canada
sez
So well presented...and true.
I would like a conservative here to tell us about ONE piece of social legislation for the simple folks instead of the rich brought about by Republicans in the last 100 years.
ONE.
(Sorry, had to remove one sentence fr ur text to make room.(farmers'...)
//////////
This bill, signed by President and railroad enthusiast Abraham Lincoln, provided for the construction of a transcontinental railroad by two companies, each being granted ownership of the land they used in their construction.
The Union Pacific would start form the east, while the Central Pacific would begin building in the west.
Both companies would meet somewhere between Omaha and California, approximately 1,700 miles apart.
//////////
So well presented...and true.
I said last 100 years. Please join LRS's remedial reading class.

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#118926 Oct 19, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Guru wrote:
"The stock market??? You must be kidding. Adjusting for inflation it is at 11,000, not 13,000+."
====
Dare you prove him wrong! I totally agree with him and I am the Rogue Scholar!
Please show the Class ANY MEASURE OF THE UNITED STATES EQUITY MARKETS THAT IS HIGHER THAN 10,000.
I will gladly demonstrate the poster's error. Please tell me what deflator (an actual number) that I should use. Thank you. You must be a Great American.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#118929 Oct 19, 2012
Just Sayin wrote:
<quoted text>
This is a fine example of one foreign infiltrator supporting another foreign infiltrator.
Forget the judges who can be bought and intimidated.
The polls are telling the true story. Obama's lies are catching up with him.
You and your birther ilk boasted of your country being the greatest in the world. Okay. Yet, 166 judges , all members of Congress and the senate, all of them, all supreme court judges,Romney, Bush family, have been bought and intimidated? Chicago is Shitcago, California is a commie state, and more. Your president is a fraud,is not a real American? Are those all conditions that would make it the greatest country in the world? I'm not saying that, as I think it ranks very very high, maybe the best. But YOU don't seem to think so.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#118931 Oct 19, 2012
TaxNoMore wrote:
<quoted text>
//////////
You're a big bag of blowhard communist shit!
When facts are shown that cannot be disputed you do not reply, disappear, switch topics or you resort to name-calling.
You are a cowardly piece of COMMUNIST shit!
Just like your COMMUNIST black messiah!
Typical trash talk from a birther. I reply to every post addressed to me, every question. Name me one I have not replied to and I will do so immediately. Try me. And I never use the kind of above language, don't have to.

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#118932 Oct 19, 2012
"Everyone knows that he has made more money on his investments during the past three years than during his entire previous career due to the unprecedented CREATION OF WEALTH via the equity and bond markets. Willard would have to be an economics idiot not to have made at least $100 million since the beginning of 2009."
====
President Starky wrote:
Then we can all agree that President elect Romney is (as Bill Clinton stated) a "Stellar businessman"...[SIC]
I'm told he did a nice job managing the Salt Lake-Park City Olympics.
=
His enormous growth in net worth (without taxation BTW) has nothing to do with his talent as a businessperson and everything to do with following the simple equity strategy developed by Prof. Markowitz and his colleagues at the University of Chicago beginning in the 1960s and the economic policies of this administration. NO NEED TO BE A GOOD BUSINESSPERSON WHEN ONE LISTENS TO THE REALLY SMART PEOPLE AT OUR GREAT NATION'S GREAT UNIVERSITIES.

“Stuffs gettin better ”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#118933 Oct 19, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
#118,722
"WILLARDíS BIGGEST HURDLE
"Who dares to answer the questions that are most troubling to Willard when he asks,'Are you better off today than you were four years ago:'
"1. The United States equity markets have gone up 121% during the administration of Barack HUSSEIN Obama. YES or NO? This is largest gain during the first term of any American president. YES or NO? This percentage gain is more than SEVEN and ONE-HALF times greater than during the first term of R.Reagan. YES or NO.
"2. THE CREDITWORTHINESS OF THE UNITED STATES TREASURY HAS BEEN AT ITS HIGHEST LEVEL THROUGHOU 2012. YES OR NO? DURING THE FOURTH YEAR OF R.REAGANíS FIRST TERM THE CREDITWORTHINESS OF THE UNITED STATES WAS MORE THAN FOUR AND ONE-HALF TIMES WORSE THAN IT IS AT PRESENT. YES OR NO?
"3. The marginal federal income tax rate for a joint filing couple with $66,000 of taxable income is the lowest it has been since the implementation of Amendment XVI. YES or NO? This rate is one-third of the marginal federal income tax rate for a comparable couple during the fourth year of R.Reaganís first term. YES or NO?
"4. For most of 2012, the inflation rate has averaged less than 2.2% per month. YES or NO? During the fourth year of R.Reaganís first term the inflation rate averaged more than 4.3% per month. YES or NO?
"5. Willard is substantially better off than he was four years ago based on gains in excess of $100 million in his stock and bond portfolio as the result of the current administrationís economic policies. YES or NO?
"Please help our candidate out. How should Willard respond to these hard economic facts?"
====
<quoted text>
HOW TERRIBLE THAT THE CREDITWORTHINESS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA HAS BEEN DOWNGRADED.
Please provide the date on which this terrible Obama tragedy occurred and identify how many basis points this has cost the United States Treasury on its Long Bond offerings. Thank you. You must be a Great American.
Easy Bake is relegated to repetitive drone, asking the same (nobody cares) question and believing that her genius-like insight will reach top levels and her dumb dumbness will attract the eye of some elitists who will not only pin President elect Romney down on that question, but totally decimate Romney's chances of winning.
The elites will then elevate Easy Bake to the elite status she so craves and she will finally,FINALLY receive that long overdue recognition she and "the entire class" know she so deserves.

"Stuff's gettin better"
2012
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#118934 Oct 19, 2012
TaxNoMore wrote:
<quoted text>
//////////
It should come as no surprise that Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a Republican.
In that era, almost all black Americans were Republicans.
Why?
From its founding in 1854 as the anti-slavery party until today, the Republican Party has championed freedom and civil rights for blacks.
And as one pundit so succinctly stated, the Democrat Party is as it always has been, the party of the four Sís:
slavery,
secession,
segregation
and now socialism.
He ceased being a republican as soon as JFK arrived on the scene. He ceased being a republican when the house Repubs repudiated every bill presented to them for the betterment of social justice for African-Americans . He probably died belonging to neither party.

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#118935 Oct 19, 2012
SHEEPLE Buster wrote:
Still haven't found that Obama long form birth certificate with a raised visible seal, huh?
I'll take your response as a NO, you still haven't found that Obama long form birth certificate with a raised visible seal.
Thanks for confirming that.
Would anyone even start to examine the undoubtedly fraudulent documents posted online until YOU address the threshold predicate:

#118,675
Terri Tanna wrote:
There is no point in belaboring any discussion regarding the authenticity of President Obama's purported state-issued birth documents until the poster establishes where our sacred Constitution, any statute, any controlling case law, or legal tradition requires a state-issued birth document to establish presidential eligibility.
To the knowledge of the Class state-issued birth documents have never been held to have ANY BEARING on presidential eligibility under present law.

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#118937 Oct 19, 2012
Guru wrote:
are you nuts? The DOW hit an all time high of just over 14,000 in Sept of '07.
How is that responsive?
My posts have always dwelt with the gains in the United States EQUITY MARKETS.
Just Sayin

Toledo, OH

#118938 Oct 19, 2012
Jobless Claims Surge to 4-Month High as US Admits 'Timing' Is Distorting Data

Weekly applications for U.S. unemployment benefits jumped 46,000 last week to a seasonally adjusted 388,000, the highest in four months. The increase represents a rebound from the previous week's sharp drop. Both swings were largely due to technical factors.

The four-week average of applications, a less volatile measure, rose slightly to 365,500, the Labor Department said Thursday. That is still a level consistent with modest hiring.

A department spokesman said the seasonally adjusted numbers "are being distorted ... by an issue of timing."

Normally, many applicants delay filing for benefits until the start of a quarter because doing so can produce larger checks. It turns out that California didn't experience the expected jump in applications until the second week of this quarter. That shift had the effect of sharply lowering the seasonally adjusted number two weeks ago and sharply boosting it last week.

Read more on Newsmax.com : U.S. Jobless Claims Rise Sharply, Govt Flags Seasonal Factors
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#118939 Oct 19, 2012
TaxNoMore wrote:
Not too knowledgeablde about your own country, are you? Since JFK, YOU tell us who has championed "black' rights. Start with that. Eisenhower was the last Lincoln-style Repub who advanced blacks' rights and it happened in Selma. That's it. And from that time on, pretty much all Southern democrats were osctracized from an embarrassed Democratic party or just left. George Wallace was such a Democrat. I was not aware he was endorsed by the real Democrats when he ran for the presidency.
//////////
It was the Democrats who fought to keep blacks in slavery and passed the discriminatory Black Codes and Jim Crow laws.
The Democrats started the Ku Klux Klan to lynch and terrorize blacks.
The Democrats fought to prevent the passage of every civil rights law beginning with the civil rights laws of the 1860s, and continuing with the civil rights laws of the 1950s and 1960s.
Go back. Rep-read my post if you are able , then join LRS's grammar school remedial reading class. I said last 100 years. I'm aware of Lincoln. I'm also aware of Teddy Roosevelt, one-time Republican. Should be interesting should you one day improve your reading skills to read his latest biography and learn of his views of blacks and the ordinary worker.

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#118940 Oct 19, 2012
Guru wrote:
By the way, I will go one on one with you on finance, real estate, you name it any day in here.
Why don't you begin by briefly describing the influence Markowitz and his colleagues have had on your equity investment approach. Thank you in advance. You must be a Great American.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#118942 Oct 19, 2012
TaxNoMore wrote:
Not too knowledgeablde about your own country, are you?
Since JFK, YOU tell us who has championed "black' rights.
Start with that.
Eisenhower was the last Lincoln-style Repub who advanced blacks' rights and it happened in Selma.
That's it.
And from that time on, pretty much all Southern democrats were osctracized from an embarrassed Democratic party or just left.
George Wallace was such a Democrat.
I was not aware he was endorsed by the real Democrats when he ran for the presidency.
//////////
During the civil rights era of the 1960s, Dr. King was fighting the Democrats who stood in the school house doors, turned skin-burning fire hoses on blacks and let loose vicious dogs.
It was Republican President Dwight Eisenhower who pushed to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1957 and sent troops to Arkansas to desegregate schools.
President Eisenhower also appointed Chief Justice Earl Warren to the U.S. Supreme Court, which resulted in the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision ending school segregation.
Much is made of Democrat President Harry Trumanís issuing an Executive Order in 1948 to desegregate the military.
Not mentioned is the fact that it was Eisenhower who actually took action to effectively end segregation in the military.
I've already acknowledged and said all of the above. And the democrats blocking doors to schools were not 1960s democrats and you know it.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#118943 Oct 19, 2012
TaxNoMore wrote:
Not too knowledgeablde about your own country, are you?
Since JFK, YOU tell us who has championed "black' rights.
Start with that.
Eisenhower was the last Lincoln-style Repub who advanced blacks' rights and it happened in Selma.
That's it.
And from that time on, pretty much all Southern democrats were osctracized from an embarrassed Democratic party or just left.
George Wallace was such a Democrat.
I was not aware he was endorsed by the real Democrats when he ran for the presidency.
//////////
In March of 1968, while referring to Dr. Kingís leaving Memphis, Tenn., after riots broke out where a teenager was killed,
Democrat Sen. Robert Byrd (W.Va.),
a former member of the Ku Klux Klan,
called Dr. King a ďtrouble-makerĒ who starts trouble,
but runs like a coward after trouble is ignited.
A few weeks later, Dr. King returned to Memphis and was assassinated on April 4, 1968.
Byrd was a KKK. Byrd renounced his membership and became a leading advocate of civil rights. Changed his view, is that not how it's supposed to be?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min USAsince1680 1,566,967
Trump Sounds like a fool 6 hr Average voter 9
I Hate my life and mom (Aug '07) 7 hr RACE 1,761
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 7 hr RACE 11,032
last post wins! (Apr '13) 7 hr Concerned_American 2,577
Craig's list personal ad. 8 hr This is good 1
Steve Wilkos : talk show host ? or simple mi... (Feb '08) 12 hr Talk show host k... 469

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages