BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story
Guru

Canyon Country, CA

#118652 Oct 18, 2012
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
You forget the pencil marks. They were handwritten. More importantly, Fukino was just ONE of the three Hawaii officials that we know all of whom have seen the original birth certificate in the file. Fukino, Onaka and the current Director of Health, Fuddy. All of whom say that the is a birth certificate in the file and that it shows that Obama was born in Hawaii.
In addition, there is a fourth official, whose name is not known, the clerk who filled in the computer form that generated the short-form birth certificate. That is done by a clerk looking at the document in the files and filling in the facts on the computer form. If there were no original document in the files, that could not be done. And if the original document did not show that Obama was born in Honolulu, the clerk could not enter "Honolulu." But she or he did enter Honolulu.
So we have at least four witnesses, and there is the teacher who wrote home to her father, named Stanley, about a birth recently in Hawaii to a woman named Stanley.( http://web.archive.org/web/20110722055908/htt... ).
In addition to this evidence, there is the birth notices that were sent to the Hawaii newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961. Only the DOH could send notices to the section of the papers called "Health Bureau Statistics," where Obama's notice appeared, and the DOH only sent those notices for births that it had issued birth certificates for, and it only issued birth certificates for births in Hawaii. Hawaii law did not allow birth notices to be issued for births outside of Hawaii until 1982.
In addition to this proof that Obama was born in Hawaii, there is absolutely no proof that he was born in any foreign country.
It should be obvious that a child born outside of the USA requires either a US visa on a foreign passport or to be entered on the mother’s US passport to get to the USA. This is not only the case now, it was the case in the 1960s as well.
Those documents or the applications for them would still exist and would have been found easily IF Obama was born outside of the USA. But no such document has been found. The Kenyan government, btw, has stated that it did an investigation of the claims that Obama was born there, and it determined that the claims are not true.
I didn't forget the pencil marks. Neither did Arpaio and Zullo. They were there because all of the docs in HI were checked that way then. They even found the lady who did it or was in charge of it. She is 90 years old now. She said that they did that to double check everything, and it was done manually. She said two people would go over the document, and check each other. And she stated emphatically that they did not make mistakes. The "9" and several others were not mistakes, the mistake made was when the forger imported the term AFRICAN for obama's race (impossible because there is no African race, Africa is a continent, not a race, and white people are born in Africa too). The forger did not know what the pencil marks represented, that is clear because there are several mistakes. Vera K Lee I believe is the lady's name or that is close. Easy to look up. I think she signed it VKLee...again, easy to go back and look.

No, the pencil marks were standard and are on all original birth certificates in Hawaii, or were then. That was standard practice there.

This has all been recorded and shown on WND. Don't take my word for it, check it yourself. Forgive my typos, I am not checking for them.

...this is too easy, got anything else for me?
Jacques Ottawa

North York, Canada

#118654 Oct 18, 2012
This is for Rogue. It has to do with underestimating your opponent, as was done at the Bay of Pigs, in Indochina, Afghanistan and Iraq. The consequences can be soooo costly, right?

Obama learned that lesson the hard way. He underestimated Romney the night of that first debate. He had a big lead nationally, and firmly held all swing states. He didn't prep. Was taken aback when Romney changed his tune 180 degrees. He was only prepared for the same old routine from Romney and got creamed. Gotta hand it to Romney. That first debate could very well cost Obama the election, which up to then he had in his pocket, with what appeared to be an insurmountable lead of 6 to 8 points, with 65% of the women for him. Yes, Rogue, he overestimated his standing among the electorate and, biggest sin of all, underestimated his adversary, and he may just pay a very high price for it. The 2nd debate, however well he did, was too little too late. Same for third, he'd have to win by 90-10, and Romnney's not gonna let that happen. Too bad.
Guru

Canyon Country, CA

#118655 Oct 18, 2012
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Half was roughly half. The pencil marks were handwritten, as were the signatures. More importantly, Fukino is only one of the three officials who stated that they saw the birth certificate in the files.
Obama's birth certificate exists, and the officials in Hawaii in fact stated that they sent a copy to Obama, and at least one reporter said that she had felt the seal. The embossed seal simply does not come out in a PDF scan.
We know that Obama has a Hawaii birth certificate in several ways.
The first is the short-form birth certificate. It is generated by a clerk in the Hawaii DOH reading the information in the files and entering it in a computer form. For that to happen there has to be a document in the files. The clerk would have had to have been lying, and the confirmations by the Republican officials in 2008 would have to be lies as well--and why would they do that for a Democrat?
And, we know that Obama had a birth certificate in 1961 from the notices sent to the newspapers by the DOH in that year.
We know that only the DOH could send those notices in three ways. First because the representative of the newspapers said so, second because the representative of the DOH said so and third because the section of the newspaper was called "Health Bureau Statistic"---which obviously meant that the facts in it came from the Health Bureau, the DOH. In 1961, the DOH was not allowed to issue birth certificates to children born outside of Hawaii, and it only sent birth notices to the papers for children born in Hawaii.
Some birthers claim that in 1961 Hawaii granted birth certificates to anyone whose relatives applied, but the officials in Hawaii have denied that was the case. They insist that the law in 1961 did not allow the DOH to issue a birth certificate that said "born in Honolulu (or any Hawaii location)" unless the child was actually born in that location and that there was evidence of it. And, you know, there are hundreds of thousands of people who were alive and living in Hawaii in 1961, and after that statement was made not one of them wrote to the newspapers or blogged that it was a lie.
So we know that Obama had a Hawaii birth certificate.
Your claim is that although this certificate exists and although the officials in Hawaii stated that they sent both the short form and the long form versions of it to him, and despite a reporter having said that she felt the seal on it--that both the officials in Hawaii and the reporter are lying because the embossed seal does not show up on a PDF scan. Well, prove your claim. Show a scanned Hawaii BC in PDF with a raised seal on it.
Recently the Conservative secretary of state of Arizona asked Hawaii to confirm that Obama was born there and to confirm other facts on his published birth certificate. Hawaii did, and the Conservative secretary of state of Arizona accepted it as evidence that Obama was born in Hawaii, and ruled that Obama will be on the ballot in Arizona in November.
Obama's mother lived in Hawaii. Obama's father was studying in Hawaii. There is not a shred of evidence that either of them went from Hawaii to any other country in 1961---and certainly not to Kenya, where the Kenyan government said that it checked on the "born in Kenya" claim and found that it was false. Hawaii is thousands of miles from any foreign country, and pregnant women rarely traveled late in pregnancy in those days, and yet you and other birthers think that there could be a chance that Obama was born outside of the USA and that the officials of both parties in Hawaii are lying about that fact.
...this is all spam folks. She has to be a democratic operative, as I refuted all of this last night in here. I hope you get your penny a post lady, but I doubt you will. I will put up all the info for everyone to read on my next post here- from over 100 years of law enforcement led by Arpaio/Zullo. They have it all. They also just gave it to Congress at the RNC.
Jacques Ottawa

North York, Canada

#118656 Oct 18, 2012
American Lady wrote:
<quoted text>
ding...ding....ding....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =8oG-uSZ2HKsXX
Not very intelligent. When you don't know, can't answer, have not a clue, it's best to tiptoe away fromt he fray, don't you think? I like Chuck Berry as much or more than the next guy, but to use a Berry video for a reply is , what's the word...? Oh yeah, pitiful.
Guru

Canyon Country, CA

#118657 Oct 18, 2012
EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT OBAMA'S FRAUDULENT BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS HERE....DOZENS OF DOCUMENTS, FORENSICS, LAW ENFORCEMENT DOCUMENTS, ETC ON OBAMA'S FORGERIES. FROM THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE, TO THE SELECTIVE SERVICE CARD, ETC. ALL SHOWN
http://www.wnd.com/...

...it doesn't get better than this. All of Eleen's posts are easily debunked right here by law enforcement officials. Enjoy!
Guru

Canyon Country, CA

#118658 Oct 18, 2012
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Half was roughly half. The pencil marks were handwritten, as were the signatures. More importantly, Fukino is only one of the three officials who stated that they saw the birth certificate in the files.
Obama's birth certificate exists, and the officials in Hawaii in fact stated that they sent a copy to Obama, and at least one reporter said that she had felt the seal. The embossed seal simply does not come out in a PDF scan.
We know that Obama has a Hawaii birth certificate in several ways.
The first is the short-form birth certificate. It is generated by a clerk in the Hawaii DOH reading the information in the files and entering it in a computer form. For that to happen there has to be a document in the files. The clerk would have had to have been lying, and the confirmations by the Republican officials in 2008 would have to be lies as well--and why would they do that for a Democrat?
And, we know that Obama had a birth certificate in 1961 from the notices sent to the newspapers by the DOH in that year.
We know that only the DOH could send those notices in three ways. First because the representative of the newspapers said so, second because the representative of the DOH said so and third because the section of the newspaper was called "Health Bureau Statistic"---which obviously meant that the facts in it came from the Health Bureau, the DOH. In 1961, the DOH was not allowed to issue birth certificates to children born outside of Hawaii, and it only sent birth notices to the papers for children born in Hawaii.
Some birthers claim that in 1961 Hawaii granted birth certificates to anyone whose relatives applied, but the officials in Hawaii have denied that was the case. They insist that the law in 1961 did not allow the DOH to issue a birth certificate that said "born in Honolulu (or any Hawaii location)" unless the child was actually born in that location and that there was evidence of it. And, you know, there are hundreds of thousands of people who were alive and living in Hawaii in 1961, and after that statement was made not one of them wrote to the newspapers or blogged that it was a lie.
So we know that Obama had a Hawaii birth certificate.
Your claim is that although this certificate exists and although the officials in Hawaii stated that they sent both the short form and the long form versions of it to him, and despite a reporter having said that she felt the seal on it--that both the officials in Hawaii and the reporter are lying because the embossed seal does not show up on a PDF scan. Well, prove your cla...
Recently the Conservative secretary of state of Arizona asked Hawaii to confirm that Obama was born there and to confirm other facts on his published birth certificate. Hawaii did, and the Conservative secretary of state of Arizona accepted it as evidence that Obama was born in Hawaii, and ruled that Obama will be on the ballot in Arizona in November.
Obama's mother lived in Hawaii. Obama's father was studying in Hawaii. There is not a shred of evidence that either of them went from Hawaii to any other country in 1961---and certainly not to Kenya, where the Kenyan government said that it checked on the "born in Kenya" claim and found that it was false. Hawaii is thousands of miles from any foreign country, and pregnant women rarely traveled late in pregnancy in those days, and yet you and other birthers think that there could be a chance that Obama was born outside of the USA and that the officials of both parties in Hawaii are lying about that fact.
EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT OBAMA'S FRAUDULENT BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS HERE....DOZENS OF DOCUMENTS, FORENSICS, LAW ENFORCEMENT DOCUMENTS, ETC ON OBAMA'S FORGERIES. FROM THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE, TO THE SELECTIVE SERVICE CARD, ETC. ALL SHOWN
http://www.wnd.com/ ...
...it doesn't get better than this. All of Eleen's posts are easily debunked right here by law enforcement officials. Enjoy!
Guru

Canyon Country, CA

#118659 Oct 18, 2012
from WND-

just some examples of the 100's...

" How does Obama's document stack up against genuine BC?

..., when I saw that some of the typed letters on the Obama long-form birth certificate did not match ... "Where’s the Birth Certificate?" are available only from the WND Superstore And as WND has .... "Obtaining an authentic Obama-era birth certificate from Hawaii was also difficult because most people
Author: Jerome R. Corsi Category: Front Page Date: 09/11/2011
CNN 'birther buster' report 'perpetrates fraud'
120606cnn

... certificate as if it were Obama’s original 1961 record. But it turned out to be someone else's birth ... viewers were led to believe was Obama’s birth certificate. Close examination of a screen ... a year old.“Where’s the Birth Certificate? The Case Barack Obama Is Not Eligible
Author: Jerome R. Corsi Date: 06/06/2012
Arpaio investigator: Hawaii still covering up for Obama
120918hawaiipostcard

... apparently is to hide away Obama’s original birth certificate, if it exists and then deny anyone ... out of sequence with Obama’s birth certificate number and with the birth certificate numbers ... ;s birth certificate was filed with the Hawaii registrar two days after Obama and one day before
Author: Jerome R. Corsi Date: 09/18/2012
Get insider's view of Arpaio's Obama probe
corsicover

...-Enforcement Investigation into Barack Obama’s Birth Certificate and His Eligibility ... Investigation into Barack Obama’s Birth Certificate and His Eligibility to be President" at WND's Superstore.... of probable cause that the Barack Obama birth certificate presented to the nation is a forgery. Now learn more
Date: 03/03/2012
Sheriff Joe probe to dwarf Watergate?
120527arpaioz

..., Ariz., has made a startling declaration: President Obama’s birth certificate is fraudulent ..., Sheriff Arpaio’s investigative posse definitively believes the birth certificate is not authentic ... certificate that Mr. Obama revealed to the public in April 2011. Their stunning conclusion: The document
Date: 07/20/2012
Evidence of Obama's roots convincing
Obama_15

... a talk in Morristown given by Dr. Jerome Corsi concerning President Barack Obama’s eligibility ..., logically presenting evidence to support his every position. Corsi claims the president’s birth ... of the birth certificate that was released by the president. Each expert said the document was indeed
Date: 04/06/2012
Stunning numbers want Congress to probe Obama's eligibility

... birth certificate, compared to 59 percent of women." Jerome Corsi’s new book, "Where ...’s the Birth Certificate?", is now available for immediate shipping, autographed .... In fact, releasing the birth certificate that Obama released may have made worse his standing
Author: Bob Unruh Category: Front Page Date: 06/26/2011
Obama lawyer: Birth certificate irrelevant to eligibility
obama_smiling

... at and can say,'Okay, this is what has been produced as his [Obama’s] birth certificate ... An attorney representing Barack Obama has argued in court that the long-form birth certificate ... that New Jersey law does not require Obama to present a valid birth certificate to establish his
Author: Jerome R. Corsi Date: 04/16/2012
GOP congressman joins 'birthers'
leftfield300

... after ThinkProgress reported the Florida congressmen questioning whether President Obama’s birth ... at all the evidence.” He called for credence to be given to birth certificate investigations ... certificate is “legitimate,” confirmed today that he is indeed a birther. When asked
Date: 03/20/2012
Video 'proves' Obama birth certificate is fake

... Jerome Corsi’s new book, "Where’s the Birth Certificate?", is now available
Category: Front Page Date: 05/16/2011

12345678910Next..."
Guru

Canyon Country, CA

#118661 Oct 18, 2012
Here is obama's new RETIREMENT gift house in Kailua, Hawaii...$35Million dollars! WITH PICS
http://www.wnd.com/2012/09/secret-retirement-...
Guru

Canyon Country, CA

#118662 Oct 18, 2012
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Half was roughly half. The pencil marks were handwritten, as were the signatures. More importantly, Fukino is only one of the three officials who stated that they saw the birth certificate in the files.
Obama's birth certificate exists, and the officials in Hawaii in fact stated that they sent a copy to Obama, and at least one reporter said that she had felt the seal. The embossed seal simply does not come out in a PDF scan.
We know that Obama has a Hawaii birth certificate in several ways.
The first is the short-form birth certificate. It is generated by a clerk in the Hawaii DOH reading the information in the files and entering it in a computer form. For that to happen there has to be a document in the files. The clerk would have had to have been lying, and the confirmations by the Republican officials in 2008 would have to be lies as well--and why would they do that for a Democrat?
And, we know that Obama had a birth certificate in 1961 from the notices sent to the newspapers by the DOH in that year.
We know that only the DOH could send those notices in three ways. First because the representative of the newspapers said so, second because the representative of the DOH said so and third because the section of the newspaper was called "Health Bureau Statistic"---which obviously meant that the facts in it came from the Health Bureau, the DOH. In 1961, the DOH was not allowed to issue birth certificates to children born outside of Hawaii, and it only sent birth notices to the papers for children born in Hawaii.
Some birthers claim that in 1961 Hawaii granted birth certificates to anyone whose relatives applied, but the officials in Hawaii have denied that was the case. They insist that the law in 1961 did not allow the DOH to issue a birth certificate that said "born in Honolulu (or any Hawaii location)" unless the child was actually born in that location and that there was evidence of it. And, you know, there are hundreds of thousands of people who were alive and living in Hawaii in 1961, and after that statement was made not one of them wrote to the newspapers or blogged that it was a lie.
So we know that Obama had a Hawaii birth certificate.
Your claim is that although this certificate exists and although the officials in Hawaii stated that they sent both the short form and the long form versions of it to him, and despite a reporter having said that she felt the seal on it--that both the officials in Hawaii and the reporter are lying because the embossed seal does not show up on a PDF scan. Well, prove your claim. Show a scanned Hawaii BC in PDF with a raised seal on it.
Recently the Conservative secretary of state of Arizona asked Hawaii to confirm that Obama was born there and to confirm other facts on his published birth certificate. Hawaii did, and the Conservative secretary of state of Arizona accepted it as evidence that Obama was born in Hawaii, and ruled that Obama will be on the ballot in Arizona in November.
Obama's mother lived in Hawaii. Obama's father was studying in Hawaii. There is not a shred of evidence that either of them went from Hawaii to any other country in 1961---and certainly not to Kenya, where the Kenyan government said that it checked on the "born in Kenya" claim and found that it was false. Hawaii is thousands of miles from any foreign country, and pregnant women rarely traveled late in pregnancy in those days, and yet you and other birthers think that there could be a chance that Obama was born outside of the USA and that the officials of both parties in Hawaii are lying about that fact.
your post here is the biggest pile of dog crap I have ever seen. Just your statements alone about the birth certificates NOT being easily gotten as I have shown you and Arpaio/Zullo both investigated is so easily disproved it is laughable. In Hawaii people can get one just by stating they were born there 60 years ago. Zullo proved that without ANY doubt.

lol!
Guru

Canyon Country, CA

#118663 Oct 18, 2012
Ellen 1- you are one sick person. We understand your 'need' to lie. No problem, in 19 days you will be gone, just like obama.
The LRS

Shreveport, LA

#118664 Oct 18, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Not very intelligent. When you don't know, can't answer, have not a clue, it's best to tiptoe away fromt he fray, don't you think? I like Chuck Berry as much or more than the next guy, but to use a Berry video for a reply is , what's the word...? Oh yeah, pitiful.
That guy in the White House, what's the word.... Oh yeah, despicable!

Miss me yet? LMAO!!!

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

#118665 Oct 18, 2012
LRS wrote:
Mobarf, AND you're supposed to be the patent consultant? Go work in your lab. Frickin' idiot.
HIJ Corp., just patented an oilfield lubricant, claiming a mixture, comprised of components A, B, and C. WXY Corp patented a superior formula, claiming a formula consisting of A, B, C, and D. D is a new compound of which WXY also holds a “composition of matter” patent – they have patented the compound itself. Your oil drilling company is struggling on a new critical project. WXY’s formulation solves all of your problems. HIJ’s formulation does not solve your problems. You hear through the grapevine that your main competitor, Evil Empire, Inc., is engaged in negotiations for an exclusive license to WXY’s formulation. If Evil Empire secures the license and uses the new formulation, it will most likely put you out of business. John Smith, CEO of WXY calls you on the phone and asks if you are interested in an exclusive license. He is eccentric and only wishes to license one company with an exclusive license. You can beat Evil Empire’s price, and they cannot afford to top your best offer. All you have to do is beat their offer, but WXY’s asking price is all you can afford. Your team of lawyers correctly informs you that both of WXY’s patent are “bulletproof” and can withstand any validity challenge in the federal courts. What is your response to John Smith’s offer?
The LRS

Shreveport, LA

#118666 Oct 18, 2012
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
HIJ Corp., just patented an oilfield lubricant, claiming a mixture, comprised of components A, B, and C. WXY Corp patented a superior formula, claiming a formula consisting of A, B, C, and D. D is a new compound of which WXY also holds a “composition of matter” patent – they have patented the compound itself. Your oil drilling company is struggling on a new critical project. WXY’s formulation solves all of your problems. HIJ’s formulation does not solve your problems. You hear through the grapevine that your main competitor, Evil Empire, Inc., is engaged in negotiations for an exclusive license to WXY’s formulation. If Evil Empire secures the license and uses the new formulation, it will most likely put you out of business. John Smith, CEO of WXY calls you on the phone and asks if you are interested in an exclusive license. He is eccentric and only wishes to license one company with an exclusive license. You can beat Evil Empire’s price, and they cannot afford to top your best offer. All you have to do is beat their offer, but WXY’s asking price is all you can afford. Your team of lawyers correctly informs you that both of WXY’s patent are “bulletproof” and can withstand any validity challenge in the federal courts. What is your response to John Smith’s offer?
Now you're an author of fiction? Too damn funny Mobarf. FOS!
ehancock

Arlington, MA

#118667 Oct 18, 2012
Re: "The "9" and several others were not mistakes, the mistake made was when the forger imported the term AFRICAN for obama's race (impossible because there is no African race, "

There is no American race either but you are allowed to enter "American" as your race in Hawaii, and several people did. And there is no "Italian" or "Japanese" race either, but you are allowed to use those terms. In fact, you are allowed and in 1961 were allowed to use any word that you wanted to describe your race.

NO one stood over you and told you what word to use, and there was no list of races that you had to use. So, what was the word that African exchange students normally used to describe their race in the 1960s? Answer: African. So Obama's father could, and did, use it.

Re Arapaio/Zullo. They have been proven to be liars.

http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obama...

and

http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2012/07/indict...

It is clear that rational conservatives do not believe the "birth certificate was forged" claims. Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck and the National Review certainly do not.

And the conservative secretary of state of Arizona asked Hawaii to confirm that Obama was born there and to confirm specified facts on Obama's birth certificate. Hawaii did, stating that it compared the image of Obama's birth certificate with the file copy (which is an additional confirmation that there was a file copy BTW) and that Obama was born there and that the facts match. The secretary of state of Arizona accepted this confirmation and ruled that Obama will be on the ballot in Arizona in November. This indicates that he does not believe the claims that the birth certificate is forged (including those of Sheriff Joe) and that he does believe the officials in Hawaii.

Re: "EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT OBAMA'S FRAUDULENT BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS HERE....DOZENS OF DOCUMENTS, FORENSICS, LAW ENFORCEMENT DOCUMENTS, ETC ON OBAMA'S FORGERIES. FROM THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE, TO THE SELECTIVE SERVICE CARD, ETC. ALL SHOWN
http://www.wnd.com/ ...
...it doesn't get better than this. All of Eleen's posts are easily debunked right here by law enforcement officials. Enjoy! "

All the articles are based on the claims of birther "experts"---who have not proved that they are really experts, and who certainly have not shown that they are fair and impartial. These are two reasons why Ann Coulter, the National Review and the Conservative Secretary of state of Arizona do not believe them.

In short: PDF has layers because PDF is supposed to have layers. There is no "Kerning"--manual typewriters skip. Different fonts--no, just the way that a PDF scan of a document on security paper picks up and depicts the letters.

There are many real experts who say that there is nothing wrong with Obama's birth certificate, including John Woodman, who happens to be a member of the Tea Party and who dislikes Obama and Obama's policies, but shows that the birther "experts" are wrong. They also include Ivan Zatkovich, who was hired by WND to examine the image of Obama's birth certificate, and when he submitted his report that there was nothing wrong with Obama's birth certificate, WND simply did not publish it.

Obama's mother lived in Hawaii. There is not a shred of evidence that she went from Hawaii to any other country in 1961---and certainly not to Kenya, where the Kenyan government said that it checked on the "born in Kenya" claim and found that it was false. Hawaii is thousands of miles from any foreign country, and pregnant women rarely traveled late in pregnancy in those days, and yet you and other birthers think that there could be a chance that Obama was born outside of the USA and that the officials of both parties in Hawaii are lying about that fact.
American Lady

Danville, KY

#118668 Oct 18, 2012
RCP Average-10/7 - 10/17-----47.7-46.7-Romney +1.0

More>>->
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/...

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#118669 Oct 18, 2012
WILLARD’S BIGGEST HURDLE
Who dares to answer the questions that are most troubling to Willard when he asks,“Are you better off today than you were four years ago:”
1. The United States equity markets have gone up 121% during the administration of Barack HUSSEIN Obama. YES or NO? This is largest gain during the first term of any American president. YES or NO? This percentage gain is more than SEVEN and ONE-HALF times greater than during the first term of R.Reagan. YES or NO.
2. The creditworthiness of the United States Treasury has been at its highest level throughout 2012. YES or NO? During the fourth year of R.Reagan’s first term the creditworthiness of the United States was more than FOUR and ONE-HALF times worse than it is at present.
3. The marginal federal income tax rate for a joint filing couple with $66,000 of taxable income is the lowest it has been since the implementation of Amendment XVI. YES or NO? This rate is one-third of the marginal federal income tax rate for a comparable couple during the fourth year of R.Reagan’s first term. YES or NO?
4. For most of 2012, the inflation rate has averaged less than 2.2% per month. YES or NO? During the fourth year of R.Reagan’s first term the inflation rate averaged more than 4.3% per month. YES or NO?
5. Willard is substantially better off than he was four years ago based on gains in excess of $100 million in his stock and bond portfolio as the result of the current administration’s economic policies. YES or NO?
Please help our candidate out. How should Willard respond to these hard economic facts?
ehancock

Arlington, MA

#118670 Oct 18, 2012
Re: "Re: "The "9" and several others were not mistakes, the mistake made was when the forger imported the term AFRICAN for obama's race (impossible because there is no African race, "

The meaning of the numeric code "9" was "Other Non-White. That is a correct code for the word "African"--which has been pointed out was allowed and was normal for African exchange students at the time.

The meaning that Arapio and Zullo claimed that the former registrar in Hawaii told them, and also claimed was in the book was "not filled in." But that is wrong. It meant "other non-white"--meaning that the section WAS filled in.

http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obama...

and

http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2012/07/indict...
American Lady

Danville, KY

#118671 Oct 18, 2012
You know the honeymoon is over, when the comedians start.

The liberals are asking us to give Obama time.
We agree...and think 25 to life would be
appropriate.
--Jay Leno

America needs Obama-care like Nancy
Pelosi needs a Halloween mask.
--Jay Leno

Q: Have you heard about McDonald's'
new Obama Value Meal?
A: Order anything you like and the guy behind you
has to pay for it.
--Conan O'Brien

Q: What does Barack Obama call
lunch with a convicted felon?
A: A fund raiser.
--Jay Leno

Q: What's the difference between
Obama's cabinet and a penitentiary?
A: One is filled with tax evaders, blackmailers,
and threats to society. The other is for housing
prisoners.
--David Letterman

Q: If Nancy Pelosi and Obama were
on a boat in the middle of the ocean and it
started to sink, who would be saved?
A: America !
--Jimmy Fallon

Q: What's the difference between
Obama and his dog, Bo?
A: Bo has papers.
--Jimmy Kimmel

Q: What was the most positive result
of the "Cash for Clunkers" program?
A: It took 95% of the Obama bumper
stickers off the road.
--David Letterman

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

#118672 Oct 18, 2012
The LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Now you're an author of fiction? Too damn funny Mobarf. FOS!
So you admit you do not know the appropriate response.

It's a straightforward matter of patent law.
LRS wrote:
Mobarf, AND you're supposed to be the patent consultant? Go work in your lab. Frickin' idiot.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
HIJ Corp., just patented an oilfield lubricant, claiming a mixture, comprised of components A, B, and C. WXY Corp patented a superior formula, claiming a formula consisting of A, B, C, and D. D is a new compound of which WXY also holds a “composition of matter” patent – they have patented the compound itself. Your oil drilling company is struggling on a new critical project. WXY’s formulation solves all of your problems. HIJ’s formulation does not solve your problems. You hear through the grapevine that your main competitor, Evil Empire, Inc., is engaged in negotiations for an exclusive license to WXY’s formulation. If Evil Empire secures the license and uses the new formulation, it will most likely put you out of business. John Smith, CEO of WXY calls you on the phone and asks if you are interested in an exclusive license. He is eccentric and only wishes to license one company with an exclusive license. You can beat Evil Empire’s price, and they cannot afford to top your best offer. All you have to do is beat their offer, but WXY’s asking price is all you can afford. Your team of lawyers correctly informs you that both of WXY’s patent are “bulletproof” and can withstand any validity challenge in the federal courts. What is your response to John Smith’s offer?

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#118673 Oct 18, 2012
I am not sure why some of the “birthers” are pursuing their inane argument regarding JURISDICTION under the Constitution. It obviously has nothing to do with the issue of President Obama’s natural-born citizenship.
=
Here is the simple response to any question about jurisdiction under our sacred Constitution as applied on a daily basis without controversy.
Any person who is involved as a party to any matter being tried in federal court is under the jurisdiction of the United States of America.
Jurisdiction is the very first element that must be pleaded in any law suit – civil or otherwise. Jurisdiction may not be waived, nor be it be voluntarily conferred. Either the party is subject to the jurisdiction of the federal court under our sacred Constitution or they are not. Thus, anyone who is a party to any matter being tried in federal court is under the jurisdiction of the United States of America.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 14 min scirocco 68,914
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 15 min fetch almighty 1,156,223
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 1 hr KiMare 51,305
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 2 hr LessHypeMoreFact 49,366
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 4 hr JOEL 71,272
last post wins! (Apr '13) 4 hr L Morales 411
Holiday Greetings 6 hr Ebeneizer Scrooge 3
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 6:03 am PST

NBC Sports 6:03AM
Jim Caldwell: No concerns about starting a rookie center
Bleacher Report 8:46 AM
What Are Experts Saying About Vikings?
NBC Sports11:28 AM
Bears extend Roberto Garza through 2015
NBC Sports 7:32 AM
Full-blown Bears house-cleaning could be coming
Bleacher Report 6:10 PM
Could Cutler, Shanahan Reunion Work for Jets?