BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

Full story: Chicago Tribune

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...
Comments
105,001 - 105,020 of 174,681 Comments Last updated 5 min ago
LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#118497
Oct 18, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

keyedup wrote:
SORRY LOSERS SCHOOL'S OUT EARLY I HAVE THINGS TO DO !!!!!!!!
WORLD ENDS FOR TEABAGS NOV 7 2012
"Teabaggers *repent* your end is in sight"
Do you do a stand-up routine anywhere? LMAO

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#118500
Oct 18, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Just as we had guessed, many of the "undecided voters" were Obama plants. Liberals are much more likely to be untruthful than Conservatives.
A dozen years ago my older sister was called for jury duty along with a coworker. Since they were to sit on DUI cases they were asked several questions one of which whether or not they, or a family member, had been seriously injured or killed in a DUI accident, to which my sister said yes and she was dismissed. Another question was do you, or have you, had an alcohol problem to which her coworker said "no" and he was impaneled. The problem was he had a serious alcohol problem as was often drunk at work!!!
Libtards are always in denial as they think they are free-thinkers.

NBC Nightly News Showcases ‘Undecided Voter’ Trashing Romney Hours After She Declares for Obama: 10/18/2012 ; By Brent Baker

A not so undecided “undecided voter.” At 10:12 AM EDT Wednesday on CNN, faux “undecided voter” Susan Katz, who had asked Mitt Romney at the debate the night before how he’s different from George W. Bush, told Carol Costello she voted for Barack Obama in 2008 and plans to do so again this year because “I saw in President Obama someone who has ripened with time who deserves another four years to see his vision through.”(“Ripened”?)

A little more than eight hours later, NBC’s Andrea Mitchell, on Nightly News, looked at debate reaction from “undecided voters chosen to ask questions” who “were not entirely happy with what they heard,” starting with Susan Katz whom Mitchell showcased trashing Romney for liking “to be in charge,” as if that’s a bad thing for a President.

Katz, outside of the event venue:“I know he is a very bright man, but I got the feeling that he likes to be in charge, and he doesn’t necessarily allow for other people to express their points of views.”
http://www.mrc.org/biasalerts/nbc-nightly-new...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#118501
Oct 18, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

keyedup wrote:
<quoted text>I was 18 in 62 at Ft Eustes Va,my mos was 00B,Cam ranh bay bay a while then went to work in Laos for CAT for 2 years,forward Observer...back to country in 65 with a engerneer boat company clearing blocked rivers,left nam in 67...loved every minute a dunb ass kid...
Sorry, I thought Army MOS's started with 11, 11 being infantry. I was a 100BO (later changed to 150BO in 1982) and I was a 150CC for my last nine years!
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#118502
Oct 18, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Guru wrote:
<quoted text>
nailed it!
You forget the pencil marks. They were handwritten. More importantly, Fukino was just ONE of the three Hawaii officials that we know all of whom have seen the original birth certificate in the file. Fukino, Onaka and the current Director of Health, Fuddy. All of whom say that the is a birth certificate in the file and that it shows that Obama was born in Hawaii.

In addition, there is a fourth official, whose name is not known, the clerk who filled in the computer form that generated the short-form birth certificate. That is done by a clerk looking at the document in the files and filling in the facts on the computer form. If there were no original document in the files, that could not be done. And if the original document did not show that Obama was born in Honolulu, the clerk could not enter "Honolulu." But she or he did enter Honolulu.

So we have at least four witnesses, and there is the teacher who wrote home to her father, named Stanley, about a birth recently in Hawaii to a woman named Stanley.( http://web.archive.org/web/20110722055908/htt... ).

In addition to this evidence, there is the birth notices that were sent to the Hawaii newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961. Only the DOH could send notices to the section of the papers called "Health Bureau Statistics," where Obama's notice appeared, and the DOH only sent those notices for births that it had issued birth certificates for, and it only issued birth certificates for births in Hawaii. Hawaii law did not allow birth notices to be issued for births outside of Hawaii until 1982.

In addition to this proof that Obama was born in Hawaii, there is absolutely no proof that he was born in any foreign country.

It should be obvious that a child born outside of the USA requires either a US visa on a foreign passport or to be entered on the mother’s US passport to get to the USA. This is not only the case now, it was the case in the 1960s as well.

Those documents or the applications for them would still exist and would have been found easily IF Obama was born outside of the USA. But no such document has been found. The Kenyan government, btw, has stated that it did an investigation of the claims that Obama was born there, and it determined that the claims are not true.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#118503
Oct 18, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

keyedup wrote:
<quoted text>I was 18 in 62 at Ft Eustes Va,my mos was 00B,Cam ranh bay bay a while then went to work in Laos for CAT for 2 years,forward Observer...back to country in 65 with a engerneer boat company clearing blocked rivers,left nam in 67...loved every minute a dunb ass kid...
What is funny is that Terri Tunna likes to make fun of grunts and all the grunts seem to be Libtards. What a hoot!

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#118505
Oct 18, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
He da Justice and you da dipshat!
And neither of you can answer because children's fantasy play law always crashes and burns.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
It is Justice Birfoon's contention that one is under the jurisdiction of the country in which one holds citizenship even while temporarily visiting in a foreign country.(According to BirfoonBoy, Obama was under the jurisdiction of the British crown when he was born.) He believes his fantasy is based on treaties.

Suppose a German man and Irish woman have a child while residing in New York. According to US law the child is a US citizen. According to German law, she is a German citizen, and according to Irish law, she is an Irish citizen. She is entitled to passports from all three countries. None of the countries may invalidate her citizenship in any other country.

She goes on vacation to Brazil. While in Brazil, UNDER WHICH COUNTRY'S LAWS IS SHE SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION?

What's so difficult about the question, Mr. "Justice" Dale?
You da "Justice"!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#118506
Oct 18, 2012
 

Judged:

3

2

1

Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
You forget the pencil marks. They were handwritten. More importantly, Fukino was just ONE of the three Hawaii officials that we know all of whom have seen the original birth certificate in the file. Fukino, Onaka and the current Director of Health, Fuddy. All of whom say that the is a birth certificate in the file and that it shows that Obama was born in Hawaii.
In addition, there is a fourth official, whose name is not known, the clerk who filled in the computer form that generated the short-form birth certificate. That is done by a clerk looking at the document in the files and filling in the facts on the computer form. If there were no original document in the files, that could not be done. And if the original document did not show that Obama was born in Honolulu, the clerk could not enter "Honolulu." But she or he did enter Honolulu.
So we have at least four witnesses, and there is the teacher who wrote home to her father, named Stanley, about a birth recently in Hawaii to a woman named Stanley.( http://web.archive.org/web/20110722055908/htt... ).
In addition to this evidence, there is the birth notices that were sent to the Hawaii newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961. Only the DOH could send notices to the section of the papers called "Health Bureau Statistics," where Obama's notice appeared, and the DOH only sent those notices for births that it had issued birth certificates for, and it only issued birth certificates for births in Hawaii. Hawaii law did not allow birth notices to be issued for births outside of Hawaii until 1982.
In addition to this proof that Obama was born in Hawaii, there is absolutely no proof that he was born in any foreign country.
It should be obvious that a child born outside of the USA requires either a US visa on a foreign passport or to be entered on the mother’s US passport to get to the USA. This is not only the case now, it was the case in the 1960s as well.
Those documents or the applications for them would still exist and would have been found easily IF Obama was born outside of the USA. But no such document has been found. The Kenyan government, btw, has stated that it did an investigation of the claims that Obama was born there, and it determined that the claims are not true.
LMAO!!!
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#118507
Oct 18, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

SHEEPLE Buster wrote:
<quoted text>
Still haven't found that Obama long form birth certificate with a raised visible seal, huh?
Obama has shown both his short form birth certificate (which is sufficient, it is the legal birth certificate of Hawaii, used by thousands of people to get their US passports every year), and his long form birth certificate, and the officials in Hawaii of both parties in Hawaii have repeatedly confirmed that they sent it to him and that ALL the facts on it are correct, and this is further confirmed by the public Index Data file and by the birth notices sent to the newspapers of Hawaii by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961.

The fact that the raised seal does not show up on a computer scan of the document put into PDF does not disprove:(1) the short form birth certificate; (2) the long form birth certificate and the confirmation of the officials and the Index Data; (3) the birth notices sent to the newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961; (4) the fact that Hawaii is thousands of miles from any foreign country and the notion that Obama's mother would have traveled thousands of miles (much less tens of thousands to Kenya, which has said, BTW, that Obama was not born there) ALONE is highly unlikely.

Once again, the fact that a scan put into PDF does not pick up the raised seal does not disprove the facts above.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#118508
Oct 18, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
And neither of you can answer because children's fantasy play law always crashes and burns.
<quoted text>
You and your stupid azz games are done, you lost. A pollock trying to understand the U.S. Constitution; therein lies the problem! LMAO pigeon
LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#118509
Oct 18, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama has shown both his short form birth certificate (which is sufficient, it is the legal birth certificate of Hawaii, used by thousands of people to get their US passports every year), and his long form birth certificate, and the officials in Hawaii of both parties in Hawaii have repeatedly confirmed that they sent it to him and that ALL the facts on it are correct, and this is further confirmed by the public Index Data file and by the birth notices sent to the newspapers of Hawaii by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961.
The fact that the raised seal does not show up on a computer scan of the document put into PDF does not disprove:(1) the short form birth certificate; (2) the long form birth certificate and the confirmation of the officials and the Index Data; (3) the birth notices sent to the newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961; (4) the fact that Hawaii is thousands of miles from any foreign country and the notion that Obama's mother would have traveled thousands of miles (much less tens of thousands to Kenya, which has said, BTW, that Obama was not born there) ALONE is highly unlikely.
Once again, the fact that a scan put into PDF does not pick up the raised seal does not disprove the facts above.
LMAO!!!
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#118510
Oct 18, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Guru wrote:
<quoted text>
look, Ann Coulter is often wrong. She even said that last night on Bill Maher. She said Romney would never get this far, and now he is leading Gallup by 51% to 45% for obama. Again, I could go on, but you are just quoting everybody on the planet and not giving facts like I am. Cutting and pasting can go on forever, and your sources are weak at best. Again, nice try.
I agree that she is often wrong. But she is not alone.

She AND Glenn Beck AND Bill O'Reilly AND the National Review (and the editorial page of the Wall Street Journal, and the Economist magazine) all do not believe Sheriff Joe, and Rush Limbaugh will not even discuss it. That shows a trend.

Rational people, like the CONSERVATIVE secretary of state of Arizona, who asked Hawaii to confirm that it has Obama's birth certificate and to confirm that some of the facts on it are accurate (Hawaii actually confirmed ALL the facts on Obama's birth certificate), and Hawaii does that, and the CONSERVATIVE secretary of state of Arizona accepts that as evidence. And nobody in Congress is calling for an investigation. That means that they believe the Hawaii birth certificate, and the confirmation of the facts on it by the officials in Hawaii, and the birth notices in the Hawaii newspapers----and they do not believe Sheriff Joe and the birther "experts."
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#118511
Oct 18, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
LMAO!!!
You are not discussing the facts.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#118513
Oct 18, 2012
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree that she is often wrong. But she is not alone.
She AND Glenn Beck AND Bill O'Reilly AND the National Review (and the editorial page of the Wall Street Journal, and the Economist magazine) all do not believe Sheriff Joe, and Rush Limbaugh will not even discuss it. That shows a trend.
Rational people, like the CONSERVATIVE secretary of state of Arizona, who asked Hawaii to confirm that it has Obama's birth certificate and to confirm that some of the facts on it are accurate (Hawaii actually confirmed ALL the facts on Obama's birth certificate), and Hawaii does that, and the CONSERVATIVE secretary of state of Arizona accepts that as evidence. And nobody in Congress is calling for an investigation. That means that they believe the Hawaii birth certificate, and the confirmation of the facts on it by the officials in Hawaii, and the birth notices in the Hawaii newspapers----and they do not believe Sheriff Joe and the birther "experts."
LMAO!!!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#118514
Oct 18, 2012
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
You are not discussing the facts.
LMAO!!!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#118515
Oct 18, 2012
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
You are not discussing the facts.
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
LMAO!!!
She doesn't get it. We HAVE BEEN discussing the facts for four years. It is now up to this election ..... and it does not look good for Obummer Boy. It's like 1980 all over again except for the fact it will not be the White Peanut Man but the Black Peanut Man getting the boot. And for the very same reason too! Libtards never learn!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#118516
Oct 18, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
And neither of you can answer because children's fantasy play law always crashes and burns.
<quoted text>
LMAO!!!
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#118517
Oct 18, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Guru wrote:
<quoted text>
Lingle; you don't know her. people in HI are nice. They are Asian. They hate confrontation. And she is smart.
...same for the rest of your post. HI is different from where you live, by a lot. Hard to explain, unless you live there.
Is it your contention that most people in Hawaii believe that Obama was not born in Hawaii? If so, Linda Lingle would not be serving her political ambitions by lying and saying that he WAS born in Hawaii.

If it were ever actually proved that Obama were not born in Hawaii, then Linda Lingle's future in politics would be over. So she has no motive to lie about the matter. It is true that she might not have actually seen the document herself, but if not she accepts the words of her two appointees.

Since we do not know whether or not Lingle actually saw the birth certificate in the files herself, we cannot count her as a witness. We can count Fukino, Onaka and the current Director of Health, Fuddy, and the clerk who filled in the short form from the facts on the document in the files, and the teacher who wrote home. And there is confirming evidence from the birth notices that were sent to the newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961, and from the public Index Data file.

Still, although Linda Lingle is not a witness, the fact that she said it indicates that she believes her two appointees and does not believe the birther claims that Obama was born in a foreign country. There is, BTW, absolutely no evidence that Obama was born in any foreign country. And, if he were, there would have to be evidence since his parents would have to get him a US passport, or enter him on his mother's US passport to get him to the USA---and no such document has been found.(And the Bush Administration was in charge of the State Department for eight years and could easily have found it, if it existed. It would be in multiple files, not just in passport files.)

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#118518
Oct 18, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

keyedup wrote:
<quoted text>I was 18 in 62 at Ft Eustes Va,my mos was 00B,Cam ranh bay bay a while then went to work in Laos for CAT for 2 years,forward Observer...back to country in 65 with a engerneer boat company clearing blocked rivers,left nam in 67...loved every minute a dunb ass kid...
Oh, excuse me. A 00B is a driver.(page iv)
http://www4.army.mil/FA40/files/downloads/000...
Sooo, according to Terri Tunna, not only were you a grunt but a truck driver too!
Now, that is Terri Tunna's opinion and not mine as I have respect for everyone regardless for occupation or profession. But Terri Tunna does not talk to little people like you ...... unless you voted for Obama and then you are really a smart person!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#118519
Oct 18, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

A question often asked by a new pilot is how far can my aircraft fly and I was no exception.
I had graduated flight school just six weeks early and I had been in Vietnam about two weeks
when I was asking another FNG how far could a Huey fly? And we we went to my hooch where
I had some maps and got out the big one and drew a line on the map between Vung Tau and
Manilla. It was about a thousand miles.
We then figures a Huey could make it about 300 miles out before we ran out of fuel, which is
not good! So I then got out the Dash-Ten and noticed they had aux-fuel tanks and on paper
we installed two 150 gallon tanks increasing our fuel load to 520 gallons and and figured
we could make it about 700 miles out before the engine coughed and we went swimming.
And while we we doing our planning our platoon leader walked by my room and heard two
young pilots talking about taking a Huey to ... the Philippines. I short order we were in front
of the CO ,with the XO and platoon leader, as he informed us we were being investigated
or conspiracy to desert and steal an aircraft. All of a sudden I thought I would be finishing
my thirty year carrier in the Army at Fort Leavenworth.
I don't recall which of us started to tell the CO what we were up to and I am not sure who's
eye were bigger but after a minute the CO suddenly started to laugh,,, as did the XO and our
platoon leader and we were dismissed. For a while I thought fighting sharks in the middle
of the ocean would have been a good option.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#118520
Oct 18, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Is it your contention that most people in Hawaii believe that Obama was not born in Hawaii? If so, Linda Lingle would not be serving her political ambitions by lying and saying that he WAS born in Hawaii.
If it were ever actually proved that Obama were not born in Hawaii, then Linda Lingle's future in politics would be over. So she has no motive to lie about the matter. It is true that she might not have actually seen the document herself, but if not she accepts the words of her two appointees.
Since we do not know whether or not Lingle actually saw the birth certificate in the files herself, we cannot count her as a witness. We can count Fukino, Onaka and the current Director of Health, Fuddy, and the clerk who filled in the short form from the facts on the document in the files, and the teacher who wrote home. And there is confirming evidence from the birth notices that were sent to the newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961, and from the public Index Data file.
Still, although Linda Lingle is not a witness, the fact that she said it indicates that she believes her two appointees and does not believe the birther claims that Obama was born in a foreign country. There is, BTW, absolutely no evidence that Obama was born in any foreign country. And, if he were, there would have to be evidence since his parents would have to get him a US passport, or enter him on his mother's US passport to get him to the USA---and no such document has been found.(And the Bush Administration was in charge of the State Department for eight years and could easily have found it, if it existed. It would be in multiple files, not just in passport files.)
LMAO!!!

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

74 Users are viewing the Chicago Forum right now

Search the Chicago Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min RoxLo 1,080,568
IL Who do you support for Governor in Illinois in ... (Oct '10) 6 min guest 3,832
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 12 min Gray 67,990
Abby July 25, 2014 14 min Pippa 10
Amy 7-26 44 min edogxxx 4
Abby 7-26 1 hr PEllen 5
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 2 hr Joe Rock Extreme Auto 48,920
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 6 hr edogxxx 97,541
•••
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••