It's play law that is a children's game.<quoted text>
You and your stupid azz games are done, you lost. A pollock trying to understand the U.S. Constitution; therein lies the problem! LMAO pigeon
It is Justice Birfoon's contention that one is under the jurisdiction of the country in which one holds citizenship even while temporarily visiting in a foreign country.(According to BirfoonBoy, Obama was under the jurisdiction of the British crown when he was born.) He believes his fantasy is based on treaties.
Suppose a German man and Irish woman have a child while residing in New York. According to US law the child is a US citizen. According to German law, she is a German citizen, and according to Irish law, she is an Irish citizen. She is entitled to passports from all three countries. None of the countries may invalidate her citizenship in any other country.
She goes on vacation to Brazil. While in Brazil, UNDER WHICH COUNTRY'S LAWS IS SHE SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION?
It's a straightforward question of law with a simple answer. The problem is birfoon play law crashes and burns when applied to this question.
And neither of you can answer because children's fantasy play law always crashes and burns.