BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#118320 Oct 17, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Do any of you Libtards understand "royalties"? Let's say you own a property and you sell an oil lease and the person who bought those rights agreed to pay you X amount of money per gallon of oil pumped out of the ground.
Now, if you are the Federal government, the more they pump out the more money flows into the Treasury of the United States and the more money Obama would be able to spend on his pet project but nooooo, Obama is to stoooooped to know that!!!
But then again, who ever accused a Libtard of having any commonsense?
When we were drawing up deals, we would promote the deal out and keep 1/4 of the well. We might sell some of that or not. All depends on the well. We would purchase the lease from the land owner and he would receive an override interest in the well. Nothing but cash in his pockets. No expenses. We've been doing this a long time. Decades in fact. The wells we are drilling now cost anywhere from 8M to 12M to drill. It helps to have an iron gut.
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#118321 Oct 17, 2012
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
BirfoonBoy, play "Justice" admits he has no answer as his house of cards falls.
Cat got your tongue?
And if she vacations on the beach in Rio, and gets busted for violating Brazilian law, under which country is she under the jurisdiction of?
It's not a difficult question. What is BirfoonBoy's problem? He thinks he is a "Justice" but everyone knows he is a grandiose NPD twerp.
Hee hee.
<quoted text>
it is very simple, under treaty she must obey the laws, but is not on the same footing as a citizen, does not belong to the body politic.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

#118322 Oct 17, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>I suppose if a frog had longer legs, he wouldn't bump his ass when he jumped!
Does that put her on the same footing as a Brazilian citizen? Not!
BirfoonChild, "play Justice" cannot render an opinion according to his play law.

Why is he so afraid? He thinks he is a "Justice". Hee hee. He's a grandiose delusional NPD twerp.

And if she vacations on the beach in Rio, and gets busted for violating Brazilian law, under which country is she under the jurisdiction of? US, IE, GE, BR?

Cat got your tongue? Hee hee hee!
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Suppose a German man and Irish woman have a child while residing in New York? According to US law the child is a US citizen. According to German law, she is a German citizen, and according to Irish law, she is an Irish citizen. She is entitled to passports from all three countries. None of the countries may invalidate her citizenship in any other country.
Does the birfoon think that Ireland by issuing a passport recognizing her Irish citizenship "strips away" her German citizenship? Does the birfoon think that Germany similarly "strips away" her Irish citizenship? Meanwhile the birfoon believes Germany may invalidate -- "strip away" -- her US citizenship.
Just plain crazy.
Grow up.
And if she vacations on the beach in Rio, and gets busted for violating Brazilian law, under which country is she under the jurisdiction of?
Play law doesn't work.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#118323 Oct 17, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
Terri Tanna wrote:
SHEEPLE Buster wrote:
"Say la vie to Obama."
====
<quoted text>
Of course, the one with the GED cannot even spell the phrase correctly, thus turning it into a completely different meaning.
"Let us say LIFE to President Obama!!"
<quoted text>
Oui. The correct sentence is "C'est la vie".
And of course you two clowns missed the point entirely. LMAO
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#118324 Oct 17, 2012
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
BirfoonChild, "play Justice" cannot render an opinion according to his play law.
Why is he so afraid? He thinks he is a "Justice". Hee hee. He's a grandiose delusional NPD twerp.
And if she vacations on the beach in Rio, and gets busted for violating Brazilian law, under which country is she under the jurisdiction of? US, IE, GE, BR?
Cat got your tongue? Hee hee hee!
<quoted text>
I love it when you come-out with BS that has nothing to do with the US Constitution, just irrelevant BS.
Jacques Ottawa

North York, Canada

#118325 Oct 17, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>you just don't get it!
Neither do both houses of congress, the supreme court, 162 tribunals, McCain, the Bush family, Cheney, Grove et al. But you do. Wow.
Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

#118326 Oct 17, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
We will all find out who failed on Nov. 7th.
<quoted text>
One of uor goals is to convince the Independent voters to not vote for Obama and it looks like that is working .... very well!!!
Birfer, what does that have to do with birfers? Further, since when do birfers have goals outside birferism and where are they published?

You can dodge the question all you'd like, but it will remain the same until you answer it.
Jacques Ottawa

North York, Canada

#118327 Oct 17, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
Terri Tanna wrote:
SHEEPLE Buster wrote:
"Say la vie to Obama."
====
<quoted text>
Of course, the one with the GED cannot even spell the phrase correctly, thus turning it into a completely different meaning.
"Let us say LIFE to President Obama!!"
<quoted text>
Oui. The correct sentence is "C'est la vie".

What a crawling loser. Edits. Leaves parts out. You think you look smart, don't you? Puerile silly fool.
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
And of course you two clowns missed the point entirely. LMAO
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#118328 Oct 17, 2012
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
BirfoonChild, "play Justice" cannot render an opinion according to his play law.
Why is he so afraid? He thinks he is a "Justice". Hee hee. He's a grandiose delusional NPD twerp.
And if she vacations on the beach in Rio, and gets busted for violating Brazilian law, under which country is she under the jurisdiction of? US, IE, GE, BR?
Cat got your tongue? Hee hee hee!
<quoted text>
Puss! Wipe the crow-egg off of your face and get on with life, such as yours is.
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#118329 Oct 17, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Neither do both houses of congress, the supreme court, 162 tribunals, McCain, the Bush family, Cheney, Grove et al. But you do. Wow.
you are, IRRELEVANT! Hell, I don't even answer your post, this was an exception!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#118330 Oct 17, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
Terri Tanna wrote:
SHEEPLE Buster wrote:
"Say la vie to Obama."
====
<quoted text>
Of course, the one with the GED cannot even spell the phrase correctly, thus turning it into a completely different meaning.
"Let us say LIFE to President Obama!!"
<quoted text>
Oui. The correct sentence is "C'est la vie".
What a crawling loser. Edits. Leaves parts out. You think you look smart, don't you? Puerile silly fool.
<quoted text>
I didn't leave anything out. Merely hit the reply button. Better check that memory of yours. It is getting worse.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

#118331 Oct 17, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>you just don't get it!
Sorry, BirfoonBoy, a country may refuse to accept its citizen's renunciation. C.f., Kenya which routinely refuses to approve renunciation of Kenyan citizenship. Also, in the US, renunciation must be approved.[1]

BirfoonBoy's problem is that I do "get it" and can see through his infantile logic and childish premises.

__________
[1] "In accordance with Section 358 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, while persons seeking to renounce U.S. citizenship submit the necessary documentation to a U.S. consular officer at a U.S. Foreign Service post abroad, the decision whether to approve the renunciation is made by the Department of State in Washington, D.C. Accordingly, unless and until a certificate of loss of nationality is approved by the U.S. Department of State, the oath of renunciation, even though signed by the individual is not/not legally effective in terminating the person's U.S. citizenship."
http://travel.state.gov/law/citizenship/citiz...
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, unless the alien's country of origin agrees to expatriation, the alien's foreign citizenship remains intact. The US cannot revoke foreign citizenship. US law has no force or effect in a foreign country. Similarly, operation of foreign law has no force or effect in the United States.
Play law doesn't count, child.

“Conservatism is a Disease.”

Since: Nov 11

Lake Los Angeles, CA

#118332 Oct 17, 2012
Birthers all have inbreeding depressions.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#118333 Oct 17, 2012
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, loser, but Bingham, Howard, and Trumbull adhered to the jus soli principle and they plainly stated so. They clearly did not believe that children born in this country of ordinary aliens were subject to a foreign power.
Furthermore, they are not the "highest authority" under the US Constitution, which you presumably hold dear. According to the Constitution, the Supreme Court is vested with the judicial Power of the United States, and it interprets the meaning of the Constitution.
Get used to it. And GROW UP!
<quoted text>
Poor little puppet. Still thinks stomping his feet, flailing his arms, and repeating himself while plugging his ears screaming "LALALALALA" wins a debate.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

#118335 Oct 17, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>I love it when you come-out with BS that has nothing to do with the US Constitution, just irrelevant BS.
Huh? You da expert on JURISDICTION!

What's your problem? Every other country is sovereign but not the US? England can invalidate US citizenship of a born US citizen?

Suppose a German man and Irish woman have a child while residing in New York? According to US law the child is a US citizen. According to German law, she is a German citizen, and according to Irish law, she is an Irish citizen. She is entitled to passports from all three countries. None of the countries may invalidate her citizenship in any other country.
Does the birfoon think that Ireland by issuing a passport recognizing her Irish citizenship "strips away" her German citizenship? Does the birfoon think that Germany similarly "strips away" her Irish citizenship? Meanwhile the birfoon believes Germany may invalidate -- "strip away" -- her US citizenship.

Cat got your tongue?

UR a birfoon!
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
BirfoonChild, "play Justice" cannot render an opinion according to his play law.
Why is he so afraid? He thinks he is a "Justice". Hee hee. He's a grandiose delusional NPD twerp.
And if she vacations on the beach in Rio, and gets busted for violating Brazilian law, under which country is she under the jurisdiction of? US, IE, GE, BR?
Cat got your tongue? Hee hee hee!
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#118337 Oct 17, 2012
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, BirfoonBoy, a country may refuse to accept its citizen's renunciation. C.f., Kenya which routinely refuses to approve renunciation of Kenyan citizenship. Also, in the US, renunciation must be approved.[1]
BirfoonBoy's problem is that I do "get it" and can see through his infantile logic and childish premises.
__________
[1] "In accordance with Section 358 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, while persons seeking to renounce U.S. citizenship submit the necessary documentation to a U.S. consular officer at a U.S. Foreign Service post abroad, the decision whether to approve the renunciation is made by the Department of State in Washington, D.C. Accordingly, unless and until a certificate of loss of nationality is approved by the U.S. Department of State, the oath of renunciation, even though signed by the individual is not/not legally effective in terminating the person's U.S. citizenship."
http://travel.state.gov/law/citizenship/citiz...
<quoted text>
Puss! Just more BS, you just don't understand, do you.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#118340 Oct 17, 2012
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, loser, but Bingham, Howard, and Trumbull adhered to the jus soli principle and they plainly stated so. They clearly did not believe that children born in this country of ordinary aliens were subject to a foreign power.
Furthermore, they are not the "highest authority" under the US Constitution, which you presumably hold dear. According to the Constitution, the Supreme Court is vested with the judicial Power of the United States, and it interprets the meaning of the Constitution.
Get used to it. And GROW UP!
<quoted text>
So, it is your claim that an Indian mother who snuck off the reservation and plopped out a child in Philadelphia would have a child who was a US Citizen?

I mean, since all those wonderful people believed in "jus soli"..

I got a bridge I can sell ya, give me a call..

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

#118343 Oct 17, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Poor little puppet. Still thinks stomping his feet, flailing his arms, and repeating himself while plugging his ears screaming "LALALALALA" wins a debate.
Grow up, loser. Bingham, Trumbull, and Howard all subscribed to the jus soli doctrine, birfoon misreading of "subject to a foreign power" notwithstanding.

They became such in virtue of national law, or rather natural law which recognizes persons born within the jurisdiction of every country as being subjects or citizens of that country. Such persons were, therefore, citizens of the United States as were born in the country or were made by naturalization.” Senator Jacob Howard, Cong. Globe 39th Cong., 1st Sess, 2765 (1866).

“A citizen of the United States is held by the courts to be a person who was born within the limits of the United States and subject to their laws.” Senator Jacob Howard, Cong. Globe 39th Cong., 1st Sess, 2765 (1866).

“Is not the child born in this country of German parents a citizen? I am afraid we have got very few citizens in some of the counties of good old Pennsylvania if the children born of German parents are not citizens.”-Senator Lyman Trumbull, Cong. Globe 39th, 1st Sess 498 (1866).

“Who are natural-born citizens but those born within the republic? Those born within the Republic, whether black or white, are citizens by birth—natural-born citizens.” John Bingham, Cong. Globe 37th Cong., 2nd Sess. 1639 (1862)

Grow up! The simple fact is THEY DIDN'T CONSIDER CHILDREN BORN IN THE US OF ORDINARY ALIENS TO BE BORN SUBJECT TO A FOREIGN POWER.

Too bad you don't understand what THEY MEANT by "subject to a foreign power", which meant children of foreign ambassadors and certain other exceptions.

GROW FECKING UP!
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, loser, but Bingham, Howard, and Trumbull adhered to the jus soli principle and they plainly stated so. They clearly did not believe that children born in this country of ordinary aliens were subject to a foreign power.
Furthermore, they are not the "highest authority" under the US Constitution, which you presumably hold dear. According to the Constitution, the Supreme Court is vested with the judicial Power of the United States, and it interprets the meaning of the Constitution.
Get used to it. And GROW UP!
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#118346 Oct 17, 2012
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Huh? You da expert on JURISDICTION!
What's your problem? Every other country is sovereign but not the US? England can invalidate US citizenship of a born US citizen?
Suppose a German man and Irish woman have a child while residing in New York? According to US law the child is a US citizen. According to German law, she is a German citizen, and according to Irish law, she is an Irish citizen. She is entitled to passports from all three countries. None of the countries may invalidate her citizenship in any other country.
Does the birfoon think that Ireland by issuing a passport recognizing her Irish citizenship "strips away" her German citizenship? Does the birfoon think that Germany similarly "strips away" her Irish citizenship? Meanwhile the birfoon believes Germany may invalidate -- "strip away" -- her US citizenship.
Cat got your tongue?
UR a birfoon!
<quoted text>
How is the water tasting, Puss!
Better yet! How does it feel to be arguing with a 6th grader?
What is education level?!!!!!
MyTwoCents

Park Ridge, IL

#118347 Oct 17, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
You better wake your azz up!
Still boring.

>

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 17 min Portlandia 1,156,130
koi meri paryshani door kar sakta ha ?? 43 min Wish 1
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr Lesser of Two Evils 49,347
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 1 hr L Morales 71,264
Double Word Game (Dec '11) 1 hr Roxie Darling 1,537
laptop online shopping singapore 1 hr Tan 1
Triple Word Game (Dec '11) 1 hr boundary painter 968
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 6:00 am PST

Bleacher Report 6:00AM
Bears vs. Vikings: What Experts Are Saying About Chicago
NBC Sports 6:03 AM
Jim Caldwell: No concerns about starting a rookie center
Bleacher Report 8:46 AM
What Are Experts Saying About Vikings?
NBC Sports11:28 AM
Bears extend Roberto Garza through 2015
NBC Sports 7:32 AM
Full-blown Bears house-cleaning could be coming