BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#118069 Oct 16, 2012
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Boy howdy, Barfer Girks, that's a really interesting reply.
It's missing something though. Where is the case law to support your silly, uneducated interpretation of jurisdiction?
I'll wait.
Girdle Buns, do you not know what you're reading? LMAO
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#118070 Oct 16, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry Ellen, but the people who's opinions actually matter say you are an idiot:
Senator Jacob Howard (Aided in drafting the 14th Amendment)
"The first amendment is to section one, declaring that all "persons born in the United States and Subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the States wherein they reside. I do not propose to say anything on that subject except that the question of citizenship has been fully discussed in this body as not to need any further elucidation, in my opinion. This amendment which I have offered is simply declaratory of what I regard as the law of the land already, that every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great desideratum in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country."
Senator Lymann Trumbull (chairman judiciary committee)replies:
"[T]he provision is, that 'all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.' That means 'subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof.' What do we mean by 'complete jurisdiction thereof?' Not owing allegiance to anybody else. That is what it means."
Senator Jacob Howard concurs:
" I concur entirely with the honorable Senator from Illinois [Trumbull], in holding that the word "jurisdiction," as here employed, ought to be construed so as to imply a full and complete jurisdiction on the part of the United States, whether exercised by Congress, by the executive, or by the judicial department; that is to say, the same jurisdiction in extent and quality as applies to every citizen of the United States now."
Rep. John Bingham (Considered the father of the 14th Amendment) States:
"[I] find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill], which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen"
Yep! Why the flappers can't grasp what it is they read is beyond any logical explanation.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#118071 Oct 16, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Or the Chicago Mercantile Exchange?
<quoted text>
Where did I claim CME was a "stock" exchange? My point being there was no United States Stock Exchange as you implied existed!
I saw her response and just went, oh brother! You reckon' she trips over her tongue numerous times daily?
Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

#118072 Oct 16, 2012
Butthurt Loser wrote:
<quoted text>
Girdle Buns, do you not know what you're reading? LMAO
Barfer Girks, you could very easily end this by posting some case law that supports your uneducated interpretation of jurisdiction.

It's that easy.

Do you even know where to look? Do you know how?
SHEEPLE Buster

Louisville, KY

#118073 Oct 16, 2012
I think Romney won the debate.
Obama appeared to be rattled many times, while only regurgitating his asinine rhetoric and failed policies.
Say la vie to Obama.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#118074 Oct 16, 2012
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Barfer Girks, you could very easily end this by posting some case law that supports your uneducated interpretation of jurisdiction.
It's that easy.
Do you even know where to look? Do you know how?
Suffice it to say, I've done my reading and understand what determines whether a child is a citizen or not. Apparently, with all your great knowledge (lmao) you still don't understand it. Your puppetmaster's hands are growing weary of your constant dancing. Did you even read what AK (I think) posted just a few minutes ago? There it is, spelled out for you. What else do you need? Fly now little pigeon, you're becoming a mere pest.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#118075 Oct 16, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.canadafreepress.com/ eh? Does LRS know that http://www.canadafreepress.com/ is commenting on the US and therefore none of its business?
You goofball, that sentence doesn't even make sense. pigeon I tell ya.
SHEEPLE Buster

Louisville, KY

#118076 Oct 16, 2012
NEW YORK OBSERVER: Romney For President...
SHEEPLE, it is time to change your hope.
SHEEPLE Buster

Louisville, KY

#118077 Oct 16, 2012
Record High Enrollment for Food Stamps: 46,681,833...
SHEEPLE Buster

Louisville, KY

#118078 Oct 16, 2012
Ross Perot endorses Romney...
Jacques Ottawa

North York, Canada

#118079 Oct 16, 2012
LRS wrote:
Let's rank the Flappers according to stupidity.
1 Barfer Girks
2 jacqazz
3 Ms Easy Bake
4 Ellen
5 Dun Learnt Meseff To Reed
6 Mobarf
Any attempt to reproduce this ranking system is indicative of the biggest loser. LMAO pigeons
Let's rank the birthers according to stupidity, along with coarse behaviour, profanity and weird sexual outbursts, mostly anal :

1. LRS
2. LRS
3. LRS
4. LRS
5. LRS
6. LRS
7 and so forth, take your pick,they are all of the above and more.

“Stuffs gettin better ”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#118080 Oct 16, 2012
Romney wins another debate!

"Stuff's gettin better"
2012
Jacques Ottawa

North York, Canada

#118081 Oct 16, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
No vote! LMAO!!!!!!!!
No vote?

Does that mean that a bright and knowledgeable 17-yr-old American who is not yet eligible to vote cannot have an opinion on American politics, politicians, the economy, justice, foreign affairs etc? You saidit, "no vote" .
Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

#118082 Oct 16, 2012
Busted Birfoon wrote:
Say la vie to Obama.
Kentucky Klown, when you write stuff like the above, I just can't help but laugh hysterically.
Jacques Ottawa

North York, Canada

#118083 Oct 16, 2012
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, Barfer Girks, but you have to read above a fourth grade level to understand.
You assume that he has a fourth grade reading level. Why oh why do you overestimate these people all the time?
Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

#118084 Oct 16, 2012
Butthurt Loser wrote:
<quoted text>
Suffice it to say, I've done my reading and understand what determines whether a child is a citizen or not. Apparently, with all your great knowledge (lmao) you still don't understand it. Your puppetmaster's hands are growing weary of your constant dancing. Did you even read what AK (I think) posted just a few minutes ago? There it is, spelled out for you. What else do you need? Fly now little pigeon, you're becoming a mere pest.
TRANSLATION: Barfer Girks-- "No I can't explain my uneducated opinion, and no I don't have any case law to back it up. PLEASE LEAVE ME ALONE!"

Barfer Girks, you can easily put an end to this by posting case law that supports your silly, uneducated interpretation of jurisdiction.

It's really simple.

Maybe next time you leave the bunker you can stop by a law library? The librarians will be more than happy to help a layperson find the resources s/he needs to write a cogent reply.

Jacques Ottawa

North York, Canada

#118085 Oct 16, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
How is Canada's economy going?
Not as well as we'd like. These are hard times. But we are number 1 economy-wise among the G-8 nations and, I believe, number 3 in the 34-member OECD. But that is small consolation, as I said, these are hard times for the whole world except for a few sheikdoms.
Jacques Ottawa

North York, Canada

#118086 Oct 16, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
How is Canada's economy going?
And the wife said Qatar is filthy rich. However, and apart from stunningly beautiful skyscrapers and luxury cars, and except for shopping, if onelikesdoing just that, it's desert, in both manners of speaking. Which is why most of the ruling class spend their time in Europe and the U.S.

She said the people are quite welcoming, and she had no problem with the dress code, so long as it's modest and not flashy. Food is varied and excellent, and their hotels make our 4 stars look like hovels. No economic problems for them!
Jacques Ottawa

North York, Canada

#118087 Oct 16, 2012
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Rogue Moron, I know exactly how Canada's economy is doing.
You too can analyze the data by going here: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-...
When you're able to analyze anything, something, at least one thing, on that page, come back and ask your silly birfoon questions.
Until then, you have yet to explain why EXACTLY a person from our closest ally and a largest trading partner cannot have an interest in US politics.
Do please try to keep up.
Thanks for that, GB. Actually, Rogue is more interested in what's happening over the border and elsewhere than his birther ilk and has some knowledge of it. He also understands why many nations are affected by what goes on in the world's biggest economy and super power. But his pals don't, they are convinced they live on an island, even though their land area is about 7% of the globe's and the population, hmmm, about 5%.

Most "sheeples",as they call you and other brighter types, know not just about Canada, but can converse on pretty much any nation on this planet.
Jacques Ottawa

North York, Canada

#118089 Oct 16, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
You goofball, that sentence doesn't even make sense. pigeon I tell ya.
It makes perfect sense, but being illiterate, you cannot read too well. Did I not suggest remedial reading AND then writing classes? How's that going?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Do you find smoking attractive? (No posts about... 3 min Girly girl 7
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 19 min JOEL 69,974
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 54 min KiMare 50,588
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 hr sonicfilter 1,124,815
Chicago a model city 5 hr Just me 6
Father Of Hans Peterson Speaks Out (Oct '07) 6 hr Getagrip 44
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 6 hr casting director 98,497
Chicago Dating
Find my Match

Chicago Jobs

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]