BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

[Johannes]

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

I mean, Pew Research has Mitt up by ....+4%!!!
http://www.people-press.org/files/legacy-pdf/...
While Rasmussen has him up by only +2!
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_conten...

Here's the only poll that counts:

WASHINGTON (Reuters)- President Barack Obama and Republican challenger Mitt Romney are neck and neck in opinion polls, but there is one area in which the incumbent appears to have a big advantage: those who have already cast their ballots.

Obama leads Romney by 59 percent to 31 percent among early voters, according to Reuters/Ipsos polling data compiled in recent weeks.

[Jacques Ottawa]

Siouxweety wrote:

<quoted text>
Moron, in case you were not paying attention, the very first contact I had on here with Jock, he was accusing me of paying for sex.
When I am insulting to someone, it is because I am giving them back what they threw at me first.
It's always been my rule to follow just that type of protocol when posting on these threads.
Now, why don't you just stick to the crap you know, which is being hateful and angry.
I find it funny.
Obama has been in office for years and you lefties haven't even been celebrating.

Why do you do this? I never ever wrote that you paid for sex. Never even named you. You tried to prove it, re-posted that exchange, no accusation. Why defend yourself? Why the guilt? Only you can anwer that.

Tell me, have you checked on that I.D we are supposed to have? Have you checked on that 90% approval rate for our health care? Have you checked our legislation on illegal aliens? Still calling me a liar?

[Jacques Ottawa]

Baumgartner is jumping wow wo wow

[Johannes]

Jacques Ottawa wrote:

<quoted text>
Why do you do this? I never ever wrote that you paid for sex. Never even named you. You tried to prove it, re-posted that exchange, no accusation. Why defend yourself? Why the guilt? Only you can anwer that.
Tell me, have you checked on that I.D we are supposed to have? Have you checked on that 90% approval rate for our health care? Have you checked our legislation on illegal aliens? Still calling me a liar?

She's always been like that. She's unstable.

[LRS]

Johannes wrote:

<quoted text>
She's always been like that. She's unstable.

My, my, Pops is going fruitloops on us. Put the crack pipe down Pops. Senile old coot!

[LRS]

Jacques Ottawa wrote:

<quoted text>
Why do you do this? I never ever wrote that you paid for sex. Never even named you. You tried to prove it, re-posted that exchange, no accusation. Why defend yourself? Why the guilt? Only you can anwer that.
Tell me, have you checked on that I.D we are supposed to have? Have you checked on that 90% approval rate for our health care? Have you checked our legislation on illegal aliens? Still calling me a liar?

You implied it jacqazz. Can you not admit that? How small of you. LOL

[Jacques Ottawa]

Rogue Scholar wrote:

<quoted text>
I never thought Bill has Chelsea's dad. He's not a straight shooter.

No one replies to your sexually-charged sexual innuendos, so you answert them yourself.

[Jacques Ottawa]

LRS wrote:

<quoted text>
You implied it jacqazz. Can you not admit that? How small of you. LOL

Sorry, she implied it.

[LRS]

Jacques Ottawa wrote:

<quoted text>
Sorry, she implied it.

As I recall, you said "at least Frank (or whoever) didn't have to pay for it". Remember? LOL

[LRS]

Sorry azz flapper!

[LRS]

Why are you running like a scalded azz ape, jacqazz? LMAO

[Rogue Scholar 05]

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, I assumed that you were aware of Real Clear Politics' latest release! I would be very worried if I was a Dem but since you might be stoned, I can understand why you aren't.
RCP Average 10/4 - 10/13 Romney 47.3%/Obama 45.9%= Romney +1.4%
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/ ...

Johannes wrote:

<quoted text>
Seems you are pretty slow this morning. Out late pimpin' as usual?

No, I am recovering. My girlfriend is a nurse who works third shift and has Thu. and Fri. off and she went back to work last night. I've been recovering.
Even on her days off she never totally gets off third schedule hours so she usually keeps me up until two or three a.m.
Thanks for your concern though.

[Rogue Scholar 05]

Oh, next week she has three days off. She usually get only one three-day weekend off a month so we will probably fly to Biloxi and Branson for a few days.

[Rogue Scholar 05]

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
I mean, Pew Research has Mitt up by ....+4%!!!
http://www.people-press.org/files/legacy-pdf/ ...
While Rasmussen has him up by only +2!
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_conten ...

Johannes wrote:

<quoted text>
Here's the only poll that counts:
WASHINGTON (Reuters)- President Barack Obama and Republican challenger Mitt Romney are neck and neck in opinion polls, but there is one area in which the incumbent appears to have a big advantage: those who have already cast their ballots.
Obama leads Romney by 59 percent to 31 percent among early voters, according to Reuters/Ipsos polling data compiled in recent weeks.

Well, don't worry, be happy. Put the lime in da coconut, drink it all up and call me in da mornin'!

[LRS]

Grand Birther wrote:

<quoted text>
Butthurt Wannabe Troll, can you stay focused on President Barack Hussein Obama for more than one post, or are you just going to make weak attempts to troll people?

Barfer Girks! Waz up cuz? Why would anyone want to focus on Odumbo? That would be like watching a fungus grow. You've been trolling for two days now, give me a break.

[Rogue Scholar 05]

Rogue Scholar wrote:
<quoted text>
I never thought Bill has Chelsea's dad. He's not a straight shooter.

Jacques Ottawa wrote:

<quoted text>
No one replies to your sexually-charged sexual innuendos, so you answert them yourself.

Ah, you just did! You do know that you did, didn't you? Ground Control to Jacques, Ground Control to Jacques!
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

[Terri Tanna]

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

Yep, we still have 23 million unemployed Americans and you Libtrads think Obama has done a good job. Well, the people who are unemployed don't think so!!!

He hasn't done a good job with respect to employment.
Fortunately, those who are unemployed are only the really uneducated people from blue-collar backgrounds such as you and el grande birther. In a recent survey of graduates of elite Eastern universities and their professional schools, the only people not working had already retired. They were able to do so, because the U.S. equity markets are UP 121% in the past 3-3/4 years without inflation and while our great United States enjoys the highest level of creditworthiness in its 224-year history. THIS IS A GREAT TIME TO BE AN AMERICAN.

[Terri Tanna]

Wall Street President wrote:

The Stock Market went up because Bernanke printed trillions of dollars and threw it into Wall Street with Obama's blessing. Don't tell us you don't know about this, because even the Mainstream Media knew about this.

Of course, he did. ARE YOU SO COMPLETELY IGNORANT OF THE TOOLS OF MACROECONOMICS THAT YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND HOW MONETARY POLICY CAN WORK IN CONCERT WITH FISCAL POLICY? What would you have suggested the Fed do?
==
Post #116,275
Poor ol’ rouge the rube has never responded to my answer to his excellent question:“Is there a cause and effect relationship between the unprecedented creation of WEALTH in the United States since March 2009, and the policies of the current administration?”= The answer I gave is:“RESOUNDINGLY YES!!”“The G in the Keynesian macro algorithm is &#8805; [equal to or greater than]$1TRILLION,WHILE THE FIRST DERIVATIVE OF THE M FUNCTION (M1+M2+M3)IS POSITIVE. How could there be anything but enormous WEALTH CREATION with this economic program even as inflation has remained a non-issue and the United States has the highest creditworthiness in its 224-year history? Thank you for asking.”==== The Class hopes that ol’ rouge the rube will respond with an intelligent answer worthy of Econometrica.
====
What do you think it means that "THE FIRST DERIVATIVE OF THE M FUNCTION (M1+M2+M3)IS POSITIVE?"

[Terri Tanna]

Justice Dale wrote:

Although natural law is often conflated with common law

NEVER. That is the most uneducated comment I have ever seen on this thread. HOW COULD NATURAL LAW = COMMON LAW?

[Terri Tanna]

Justice Dale wrote:

Because of the intersection between natural law and natural rights, it has been cited as a component in ... the Constitution of the United States,

EXCELLENT CUT AND PASTE WITHOUT ATTRIBUTION WHILE OMITTING THE FOOTNOTES. How intellectually dishonest.
Please cite and quote any Article or Section in the United States Constitution that is based on natural law.