BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

#117756 Oct 15, 2012
Strictly defined?

Chancellor Kent, in his Commentaries, speaking
of the ‘general division of the inhabitants of
every country, under the comprehensive title of
‘Aliens' and ‘Natives,” says:‘Natives are all persons
born within the jurisdiction and allegiance of
the United States. This is the rule of the common
law, without any regard or reference to the political
condition or allegiance of their parents, with the exception
of the children of ambassadors, who are, in
theory, born within the allegiance of the foreign
power they represent.’
Id.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

#117757 Oct 15, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
The civil rights act of 1866 is all I need. Next contestant!
Says the birfoon wiping egg off his face.

The Civil Rights Act of 1866 does not help the birfoon cause, unless you believe passages from birfoon blogs are citations to authority. According to the CR Act of 1866, UR full of it.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Is that what your plagiarized birfoon blog passage says?
Got Alzheimer's? According to you there was never "ANY MENTION of the right to citizenship by birth under the United States Constitution."
Julia Lynch was RULED to be a citizen of the United States per national law:
"The right of citizenship, as distinguished from
alienage, is a national right or condition. It pertains
to the confederated sovereignty, the United States;
and not to the individual states." Lynch v. Clarke,
3 N.Y.Leg.Obs. 236 (N.Y. Ch. 1844).
"That all children, born within the dominion of
the United States, of foreign parents holding no
diplomatic office, became citizens at the time of
their birth, does not appear to have been contested
or doubted until more than 50 years after the adoption
of the constitution, when the matter was elaborately
argued in the court of chancery of New
York, and decided upon full consideration by
Vice Chancellor Sandford in favor of their citizenship.
Lynch v. Clarke (1844) 1 Sandf. Ch. 583." US v Wong Kim Ark,
169 U.S. 649, 664, 18 S.Ct. 456, 462-63 (1898).
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#117759 Oct 15, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
<quoted text>
RELEVANCE -- YES, the rube admits he is so far over his head that he cannot say anything intelligent on this subject (or any subject).
Do you have an anonymous P.O.Box? I want to send you a buttplug for x-mas. Maybe you'll shhhh then!

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#117760 Oct 15, 2012
Post #116,272
THE BIGGEST ISSUE IN THIS ELECTION
On Sunday, January 20, 2013, when Chief Justice John Roberts intones,“Congratulations, Mr. President,” will the strident and uneducated minorities on each side of the spectrum be able to accept the “Will of ‘WE THE PEOPLE’” however that turns out?
=
Why is it that the "birther"-tea crumpets on this thread refuse to assure the Class TONIGHT that they will accept the “Will of ‘WE THE PEOPLE’” however that turns out?
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#117761 Oct 15, 2012
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Says the birfoon wiping egg off his face.
The Civil Rights Act of 1866 does not help the birfoon cause, unless you believe passages from birfoon blogs are citations to authority. According to the CR Act of 1866, UR full of it.
<quoted text>
According the Civil Rights Act of 1866, I'm dead on. Your understanding of punctuations is laughable. Next contestant!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#117763 Oct 15, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
<quoted text>
Apparently, you failed to note this EARLIER post:
#117,723
<quoted text>
BTW, why do you think the course is called corporate FINANCE -- that means borrowing money and issuing debt. How sad that you couldn't make it into junior college.
C'mon now tank meat, show us all how intelligent you are by posting a simple business model "based" on carrying a huge debt. If you can't then just say so. LMAO

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#117764 Oct 15, 2012
Do any of you Libtards remember a little over a month ago a Brandon Raub who tweeted he was preparing to defend himself from a riot and they arrested him and put him in a mental evaluation center and then extended him for another month? Well these people are actually soliciting riots .... so what is Obama's secrete service going to do about them?
Oh, I know, Brandon Raub was an evil righty while the others are Obama voters!?!

Threats of elections riots if Obama loses

Despite the issue receiving national media attention, Obama supporters continue to threaten to riot if Mitt Romney wins the presidential election, raising the prospect of civil unrest if Obama fails to secure a second term.

The new threats continue to dominate Twitter and the vast majority make no reference to press coverage of the issue over the last week, illustrating the fact that they are a legitimate expression of how many Obama voters plan to respond if Romney comes out on top, and not merely a reaction to media hype.

An Infowars.com story written by Michael Snyder which was picked up by the Drudge Report over the weekend and has since gone viral documented how Twitter was flooded with messages from Obama supporters threatening to riot, a sign that "whichever side loses this election will accuse the other side of stealing the election."
http://www.presstv.ir/usdetail/266885.html
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#117765 Oct 15, 2012
Easy Bake, you did see where "women" have pushed Romney into the lead in the swing states, haven't you? Not looking good for Odumbo. Not good at all. He'll have his azz handed to him again in the next debate. I bet you don't know why either. LMAO pigeon

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#117766 Oct 15, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
Post #116,272
THE BIGGEST ISSUE IN THIS ELECTION
On Sunday, January 20, 2013, when Chief Justice John Roberts intones,“Congratulations, Mr. President,” will the strident and uneducated minorities on each side of the spectrum be able to accept the “Will of ‘WE THE PEOPLE’” however that turns out?
=
Why is it that the "birther"-tea crumpets on this thread refuse to assure the Class TONIGHT that they will accept the “Will of ‘WE THE PEOPLE’” however that turns out?
The question is, will you lefties accept it. Right now we have you lefties preparing to riot if Mitt is elected!!!

Threats of elections riots if Obama loses; Mon Oct 15, 2012
http://www.presstv.ir/usdetail/266885.html

we True Conservatives use legal means while you Commies use violence!!!

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#117767 Oct 15, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
"Apparently, you failed to note this EARLIER post:
#117,723
"BTW, why do you think the course is called corporate FINANCE -- that means borrowing money and issuing debt."
====
LRS wrote:
show us all how intelligent you are by posting a simple business model "based" on carrying a huge debt. If you can't then just say so.
The first thing that EVERY start-up corporation does after its equity infusion is to go to the capital markets for loans, issuance of bonds, or mezzanine financing. THAT IS WHY IT IS CALLED FINANCE.
Please name any corporation listed on the NYSE that does not have debt. It would be a breach of fiduciary duty for a going concern operation not to leverage itself by prudent borrowing. YOU CANNOT NAME A SINGLE EXAMPLE TO THE CONTRARY -- I have already named major corporations with substantial debt (even when they have huge cash reserves). Please name any corp. acquisition that is not facilitated by DEBT.
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

#117769 Oct 15, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Do any of you Libtards remember a little over a month ago a Brandon Raub who tweeted he was preparing to defend himself from a riot and they arrested him and put him in a mental evaluation center and then extended him for another month? Well these people are actually soliciting riots .... so what is Obama's secrete service going to do about them?
Oh, I know, Brandon Raub was an evil righty while the others are Obama voters!?!
Threats of elections riots if Obama loses
Despite the issue receiving national media attention, Obama supporters continue to threaten to riot if Mitt Romney wins the presidential election, raising the prospect of civil unrest if Obama fails to secure a second term.
The new threats continue to dominate Twitter and the vast majority make no reference to press coverage of the issue over the last week, illustrating the fact that they are a legitimate expression of how many Obama voters plan to respond if Romney comes out on top, and not merely a reaction to media hype.
An Infowars.com story written by Michael Snyder which was picked up by the Drudge Report over the weekend and has since gone viral documented how Twitter was flooded with messages from Obama supporters threatening to riot, a sign that "whichever side loses this election will accuse the other side of stealing the election."
http://www.presstv.ir/usdetail/266885.html
....and the Secret Service should do what?

Do you even know what the Secret Service is responsible for?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#117770 Oct 15, 2012
commenter2001 wrote:
It's time to ask Mitt Romney tough questions about his mental health
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/10/10/1142...
You should have seen Fox News over the weekend and they asked a shrink to analyze Joe O'Binden's performance during the debate and he politely refused. But he did lay out a diagnose of people who acted the way he did.

“Stuffs gettin better ”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#117771 Oct 15, 2012
LRS wrote:
Easy Bake, you did see where "women" have pushed Romney into the lead in the swing states, haven't you? Not looking good for Odumbo. Not good at all. He'll have his azz handed to him again in the next debate. I bet you don't know why either. LMAO pigeon
I like when they "vote like like female parts depend on it"
Abdul the camel jockey

Jacksonville, FL

#117772 Oct 15, 2012
commenter2001 wrote:
It's time to ask Mitt Romney tough questions about his mental health
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/10/10/1142...
Well, you do know he is a Mormon so he must be crazy!

“Stuffs gettin better ”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#117773 Oct 15, 2012
LRS wrote:
Easy Bake, you did see where "women" have pushed Romney into the lead in the swing states, haven't you? Not looking good for Odumbo. Not good at all. He'll have his azz handed to him again in the next debate. I bet you don't know why either. LMAO pigeon
I guess it was "VOTE LIKE YOUR LADY PARTS DEPEND ON IT"
"Flappers" is right.

An e-card many found offensive on Barack Obama’s official tumblr blog page has been removed just hours after it was first discovered and went viral in the conservative blogosphere.

The e-card featured a picture of a woman dressed like a flapper reaching out with the words “Vote like your lady parts depend on it.” However, after the image was linked on the Drudge Report, it can no longer be found.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/obama-scrubs-...
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#117774 Oct 15, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
The question is, will you lefties accept it. Right now we have you lefties preparing to riot if Mitt is elected!!!
Threats of elections riots if Obama loses; Mon Oct 15, 2012
http://www.presstv.ir/usdetail/266885.html
we True Conservatives use legal means while you Commies use violence!!!
So we could actually stay at home and let the Dims riot with themselves! I'm game. LOL
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#117775 Oct 15, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
Terri Tanna wrote:
"Apparently, you failed to note this EARLIER post:
#117,723
"BTW, why do you think the course is called corporate FINANCE -- that means borrowing money and issuing debt."
====
<quoted text>
The first thing that EVERY start-up corporation does after its equity infusion is to go to the capital markets for loans, issuance of bonds, or mezzanine financing. THAT IS WHY IT IS CALLED FINANCE.
Please name any corporation listed on the NYSE that does not have debt. It would be a breach of fiduciary duty for a going concern operation not to leverage itself by prudent borrowing. YOU CANNOT NAME A SINGLE EXAMPLE TO THE CONTRARY -- I have already named major corporations with substantial debt (even when they have huge cash reserves). Please name any corp. acquisition that is not facilitated by DEBT.
You'll have time for your questions but please post a simple business model "based" on carrying a huge debt. You can do that can't ya? Say Ms. Easy Bake, aren't you an expert in physics and related fields?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#117776 Oct 15, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't know. You're the one who posted it. Why'd you do it? It was GWB-originated, delayed to March and signed by Obama who had the gun to him, bankruptcies looming, huge layoffs. But remember, read the whole thing next time, and notice that Brokaw had a lot of "buts" in his discourse.
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Excusez-moi, when the president submits a budget request it goes to the ... Speaker of the House. If the Speaker is of the same party as the president it is usually amended very little by Speaker Pelosi is not only not in the same party as Bush, she is a radical progressive. The fact is Pelosi sat on the budget and it was not voted on at all in the House until after Bush left office. Further the deficit has grown by more than ONE TRILLION DOLLAE$. In other words, it was no longer the Bush budget. Obama owned it 100%.
FY2009 Budget Deficit
$407 billion (requested)[by Bush]
$1.413 trillion (enacted)[by Obama]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_United_Stat ...
[QUOTE who="Rogue Scholar 05"]<quoted text>
<quoted text>
And the reverse is true when the Speaker is a Republican and the President a Democrat like under Gingrich and Clinton. If it was not for Newt, those four budgets would not have been balanced!!!
Any president can only sign into law bills that are passed by both Houses of Congress!
Damn, Jacques is AWOL again. Pelosi/Obama add One Trillion Dollar$ to the deficit in FY2009 and Jacques blames .... Bush!!! And then Jacques runs over the hill!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#117777 Oct 15, 2012
I don't know how true this is but, I hear when Ms. Easy Bake is working on the weekends as a rodeo clown, that the Bull just smiles his azz off and licks his chops. He knows he can bust her azz and a nut at the same time!
Abdul the camel jockey

Jacksonville, FL

#117778 Oct 15, 2012
Keeping You Up To Date

Playboy magazine reportedly offered Sarah Palin $4,000,000 to pose nude in an upcoming issue.

Michelle Obama was offered $50 by National Geographic.

In other news... we all remember when KFC offered a "Hillary" meal, consisting of two small breasts and two large thighs.

Just keeping you up to date...

I heard the President's visit to the troops didn't go so well..

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min ObamaLogic 1,155,821
Chicago Pizza Blows 11 min Larry 4
Chicago police stop black motorists more, ACLU ... 41 min reality is a crutch 1
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 49 min RACE 98,878
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr IBdaMann 49,319
Is Vanessa Hudgens A PORN-STAR ?? (Oct '07) 1 hr moe 189
amy 12-25 1 hr RACE 2
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 12:06 am PST

Bleacher Report12:06AM
Indianapolis Colts vs. Tennessee Titans: Complete Week 17 Preview for Tennessee
NBC Sports 3:43 AM
Jay Cutler on Bears: "Everyone could get axed"
Bleacher Report 4:00 AM
Colts' Complete Week 17 Preview vs. Titans
Bleacher Report 6:00 AM
Bears vs. Vikings: What Experts Are Saying About Chicago
NBC Sports 6:03 AM
Jim Caldwell: No concerns about starting a rookie center