BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

Full story: Chicago Tribune

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...
Comments
104,261 - 104,280 of 174,975 Comments Last updated 15 min ago

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#117624
Oct 15, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Cause and Efect, Cause and Effect.
Terri Tanna wrote:
<quoted text>
More of your uneducated BS -- just making things up again. Please quote from any recognized economist or even a serious financial publication that supports your mythology. YOU CAN'T, because you have LIED again.
Tell us Tootsie, if your tire blows out and you lose control and cause a fatal accident, are you responsible? It all depends on what caused your tire to blow out!!!
Now, if the other tires on you car are seriously under-inflated, I would say it was YOUR fault for failing to maintain your vehicle but what if you just ran over a piece of metal that was lying in the roadway, maybe it was not your fault!
Do you remember the The Firestone tire problems on Ford cars in 2000? You tire blows out, you car rolls over and you and your passengers are seriously hurt or killed and then the cause was a defective tire, then Ford/Firestone are responsible...... if the tires are less than ten years old!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#117625
Oct 15, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

About thirty years ago they had several lawsuits over airplane manufacturers that resulted in mega buck$ being awarded. As a result Cessna stopped making small, single engine planes. Sure you could buy a Cessna jet or turboprop but no C-152/171/182/ etc.
Then about ten years later the feds passed a law limiting liability to the first ten years ..... on anything.
You get into an accident in you 10.1 year old car and the air bag fails to deploy and you are injured or kill,,,,, you can't sue the Ford, GM, etc.!!!

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#117626
Oct 15, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Kentucky Birfoon wrote:
Yes citizens, just not Natural born citizens eligible to be the President, otherwise the Founding Fathers would have used Hamilton's original language as he had proposed.
Explanation???
There is no record that Hamilton's language was ever the "original language".

The Committee of Detail originally proposed eligibility requirements for the Executive under a Tenth article. See William C. Rives, History of the Life and Times of James Madison, Volume 2.

"The tenth article of the plan reported by the committee of detail provided … that the executive power should be vested in a single magistrate, to be styled the President of the United States ...."

The original eligibility clause did not require a person born a citizen in the country:

Concerning this "Tenth Article" it was stated "At the end of the first section, tenth article, add,'he shall be of the age of thirty five years, and a citizen of the United States, and shall have been an inhabitant thereof for twenty one years.'" WEDNESDAY AUGUST 22. IN CONVENTION. 1787.

On September 4, 1787, the eligibility requirements were amended:
"No person except a natural born citizen or a Citizen of the U. S. at the time of the adoption of this Constitution shall be eligible to the office of President; nor shall any person be elected to that office, who shall be under the age of thirty five years, and who has not been in the whole, at least fourteen years a resident within the U. S."
LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#117627
Oct 15, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Terri Tanna wrote:
<quoted text>
Please identify the WRITTEN DOCUMENT that clarified which portions of the common law were applicable and which portions were not.
You must be a "birther," because you state things that are absurd on there face and which you cannot support by reference to any controlling written document.
That is why you have a GED, and couldn't even gain admission to junior college.
The States retained only the portions of common law applicable to their own situation. Really, can't you come up with some new slurs? These are all so old and truely boring. BOINK BOINK BOINK BOINK poor pigeon.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#117628
Oct 15, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Question for the witch doctor; what do you think would happen if the government told the people there was an imposter in the White House? LOL
LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#117629
Oct 15, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Terri Tanna wrote:
<quoted text>
Why would they. Unless you can name the economics book that you think is the best on macroeconomics,there is no point in discussing Economics with you, because you never even studied The Calculus, much less real Economics.
Please state any two GOOD reasons for a sovereign nation to be debt free.
The Class bets that you are so ignorant and uneducated you will make vile reply instead of quoting from a legitimate reference to support your ignorant statements.
That means you have no response to my question. Exactly what I thought.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#117630
Oct 15, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Hey Ms. Easy Bake, show me one valid business model based on carrying a huge debt. Dare you.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#117631
Oct 15, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Tom Brokaw turns on Obama! The Lame Stream Press is turning. They are no longer in neutral! If the LSM is going to remain relavent, they must address the hard issues.
Tom Brokaw Says President Obama Must Answer For $1.1 Trillion Deficit ‘That Happened On His Watch’ VIDEO
by Tommy Christopher | 4:03 pm, October 14th, 2012
On Sunday morning’s Meet The Press, legendary newsman Tom Brokaw joined moderator David Gregory in evening out the “specifics” narrative that has dogged Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney by demanding that President Obama give more details about his plan to control the deficit and debt. Brokaw said that in a 2008 debate, then-Senator Obama “was saying,‘Look, we’ve got a deficit of a half a trillion dollars. I’m going to get that under control.’ Well, this week that deficit is $1.1 trillion and it happened on his watch. He’s going to have to answer to that.”
By the time President Obama took office, however, he was handed a $1.017 trillion deficit by President George W. Bush.
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/tom-brokaw-says-pr ...
<quoted text>
Did you note the point "however, he was handed a $1.017 trillion deficit by President George W. Bush." which is a lie! Bush never signed the FY2009 Budget into law as Speaker San Fran Nan Pelosi never sent it to the Senate ...... until March 2009 and then OBAMA sign into law. Yep, OBAMA handed himself a $1.017 budget deficit!
Yep, just gotta blame everything on Bush, don't you!!!
I don't know. You're the one who posted it. Why'd you do it? It was GWB-originated, delayed to March and signed by Obama who had the gun to him, bankruptcies looming, huge layoffs. But remember, read the whole thing next time, and notice that Brokaw had a lot of "buts" in his discourse.
Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#117632
Oct 15, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Butthurt Loser wrote:
<quoted text>
Be a dumbazz, it is your choosing. An expert? LMAO Don't tell me we have another Prof? LOL
Barfer Girks, name calling will also get you thrown out of court.

So far you're arguing the losing side in a case that's over 100 years old and acting like a baby.

That's exactly why you're a birfoon and why birfoons always lose.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#117633
Oct 15, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
And Snopes says it is true too. Thank you EPA!!!
http://www.snopes.com/photos/accident/trainfi ...
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
If it is about Obama, they twist the issue. I just Googled "snopes obama college records" and this is what I got:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthers ...
Ah, what does Obama's SSN have to do with his college records?
<quoted text>
You missed the point .... again. It is about Snopes. If it has anything to do with Obama, Snopes will twist it. When I talked about the rail road fire of 2009, they covered the issue but they will run, dodge and jump every issue on Obama!
What? Was Snopes trying to hide the railroad fire in 1982 because Obama was involved? Waht was Snope gaining by hiding the railroad fire?

“Stuffs gettin better ”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#117634
Oct 15, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

LRS wrote:
Hey Ms. Easy Bake, show me one valid business model based on carrying a huge debt. Dare you.
She's gonna have to consult the class on that one.
May take awhile since the nearest elementary school to her is 10 miles and the short bus only runs 3 times a day.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#117635
Oct 15, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

LRS wrote:
Question for the witch doctor; what do you think would happen if the government told the people there was an imposter in the White House? LOL
Why would the govt tell the people there is an impostor in the White House? They'd have to prove he is an impostor. Birthers have been trying that for more than 3 years now, to no avail. Methinks the real impostors here are the birthers, Taitz and Trump.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#117636
Oct 15, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Barfer Girks, name calling will also get you thrown out of court.
So far you're arguing the losing side in a case that's over 100 years old and acting like a baby.
That's exactly why you're a birfoon and why birfoons always lose.
More yada yada yada from Girdle Buns. Pfft! pigeon
LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#117637
Oct 15, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

President Starky wrote:
<quoted text>
She's gonna have to consult the class on that one.
May take awhile since the nearest elementary school to her is 10 miles and the short bus only runs 3 times a day.
Couldn't help but borrow your phrase "easy bake", sorry. Cracks me up!
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#117638
Oct 15, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

President Starky wrote:
<quoted text>
She's gonna have to consult the class on that one.
May take awhile since the nearest elementary school to her is 10 miles and the short bus only runs 3 times a day.
You are avoiding me.

Is that because it exposed your LIES????

Got any more bs stories for us?

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#117641
Oct 15, 2012
 

Judged:

2

1

1

LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Couldn't help but borrow your phrase "easy bake", sorry. Cracks me up!
Especially since her bread isn't baked.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#117642
Oct 15, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no record that Hamilton's language was ever the "original language".
The Committee of Detail originally proposed eligibility requirements for the Executive under a Tenth article. See William C. Rives, History of the Life and Times of James Madison, Volume 2.
"The tenth article of the plan reported by the committee of detail provided … that the executive power should be vested in a single magistrate, to be styled the President of the United States ...."
The original eligibility clause did not require a person born a citizen in the country:
Concerning this "Tenth Article" it was stated "At the end of the first section, tenth article, add,'he shall be of the age of thirty five years, and a citizen of the United States, and shall have been an inhabitant thereof for twenty one years.'" WEDNESDAY AUGUST 22. IN CONVENTION. 1787.
On September 4, 1787, the eligibility requirements were amended:
"No person except a natural born citizen or a Citizen of the U. S. at the time of the adoption of this Constitution shall be eligible to the office of President; nor shall any person be elected to that office, who shall be under the age of thirty five years, and who has not been in the whole, at least fourteen years a resident within the U. S."
Perhaps the first most important thing to understand about national birthright is that there was no national birthright rule until the year 1866. One will look in vain to find any national law on the subject prior to this year, or even any mention of the right to citizenship by birth under the United States Constitution.

“Stuffs gettin better ”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#117643
Oct 15, 2012
 

Judged:

3

2

1

LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Couldn't help but borrow your phrase "easy bake", sorry. Cracks me up!
No problem
That's her title.
Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#117644
Oct 15, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Butthurt Loser wrote:
<quoted text>
More yada yada yada from Girdle Buns. Pfft! pigeon
Barfer Girks, it looks like you cannot effectively advocate for the losing side in Ark. How does it feel to be a loser at losing?
LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#117645
Oct 15, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Why would the govt tell the people there is an impostor in the White House? They'd have to prove he is an impostor. Birthers have been trying that for more than 3 years now, to no avail. Methinks the real impostors here are the birthers, Taitz and Trump.
Sorry, I was assuming you had the intellect of a dust mite and could see it was a hypothetical situation (for now).

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

37 Users are viewing the Chicago Forum right now

Search the Chicago Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 6 min Flacks News 1,082,472
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 30 min YesWeCan 68,053
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 43 min Socialism is for Sissies 45,851
IL Who do you support for Governor in Illinois in ... (Oct '10) 1 hr Nono 3,836
Chicago the murder capital of the U.S.? Let's g... 1 hr Mr Magoo 1
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 2 hr edogxxx 97,563
Abby 7-29 2 hr edogxxx 1
•••
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••