BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#117610 Oct 15, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't recall using trailer trash and inbred, though I admit I may have. But, sigh, again you've failed, as I may have used those epitheths in retaliation for much-worst profanity-laced language at which you are an expert. However, I'll try to refrain from insulting the trailer trash and inbred by calling you that.
Oh, I dare say, I'd be proud to call myself a refugee, but not so proud to call myself trailer trash and inbred. LoL.
You see, LRS, and judging from my above paragraph, you just do not measure up. You don't know how to properly evaluate comparisons. Sigh, you and Rush are so alike. I digress. I reportedly called you trailer trash and inbred. Reportedly, I stress. Okay. You retaliate by calling me a very honourable name, to wit, refugee. Thank you for that. A true compliment. You place me in great company. Einstein, Fermi, Von Braun, Solshenitshyn, Da Vinci, Picasso, Gouzenko, Gabriel Garcia Marques, Jorge Luis Borges, Pùblo Neruda etc, were all at one time refugees. Not one of those names shows up in the trailer trash or inbred list. Sorry. Do try to be choosier next time, eh boy.
You never recall shat, jacqazz. pigeon

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#117611 Oct 15, 2012
LRS wrote:
Ludicrous.
What a very strong and well-thought out answer.

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#117612 Oct 15, 2012
SHEEPLE Buster wrote:
Ark was a citizen, not Natural born, IDIOT!
Natural born citizen was never used specifically in regards to Wong Kim Ark's own status as a citizen.
The decision did not confirm that Ark was a Natural born citizen, only a citizen.
Irrelevant.
Please analyze and explain why the Court's action in Kerchner v. Obama (cert. denied 2010) does not control. Thank you.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#117613 Oct 15, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
<quoted text>
VERY SIMPLE. By its action in Kerchner v. Obama (cert. denied 2010), the Supreme Court upheld President Obama's eligibility against all of the "birther" babblings.
HOW IGNORANT OF YOU THAT YOU CANNOT DEAL WITH THE KERCHNER CASE. Because it dealt specifically with the eligibility of Barack HUSSEIN Obama and his false and fraudulent state-issued birth documents and his false and fraudulent social security number it is CONTROLLING WITH LEGAL FINALITY.
How obsessively ignorant and uneducated of you to persist with your strained and debunked misreadings of The Law.
Then the court's opinion is out of line with the law. How ignorant of you not being able to understand plain English. Don't tell me, you think anyone born on U.S. soil is automatically a U.S. citizen? LMAO dumbazz

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#117614 Oct 15, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
People who were raised under communism know what it is and they do not want to go back.
Tell that to St. Peter and the other of the Lord's Apostles. Luke describes the communism of Jesus of Nazareth in great detail in his second major writing.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#117615 Oct 15, 2012
Flappers get dumber with each passing day.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#117616 Oct 15, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Tom Brokaw turns on Obama! The Lame Stream Press is turning. They are no longer in neutral! If the LSM is going to remain relavent, they must address the hard issues.
Tom Brokaw Says President Obama Must Answer For $1.1 Trillion Deficit ‘That Happened On His Watch’ VIDEO
by Tommy Christopher | 4:03 pm, October 14th, 2012
On Sunday morning’s Meet The Press, legendary newsman Tom Brokaw joined moderator David Gregory in evening out the “specifics” narrative that has dogged Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney by demanding that President Obama give more details about his plan to control the deficit and debt. Brokaw said that in a 2008 debate, then-Senator Obama “was saying,‘Look, we’ve got a deficit of a half a trillion dollars. I’m going to get that under control.’ Well, this week that deficit is $1.1 trillion and it happened on his watch. He’s going to have to answer to that.”
By the time President Obama took office, however, he was handed a $1.017 trillion deficit by President George W. Bush.
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/tom-brokaw-says-pr ...
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
have you read it in its entirety or did you just read a headline that you can't resist? Or don't you understand it at all?
BTW, yes, Chuck Todd said that. Is that the same Chuck Todd who worked on democratic campaigns in Florida at one time and authored a book on Obama? Goes to show, eh Rogue, how those lame press lefties can be unbiased in their reporting. When was the last time Foxnews.com , WND.com , americanthinker.com , newyorkpost.com do that?
Did you note the point "however, he was handed a $1.017 trillion deficit by President George W. Bush." which is a lie! Bush never signed the FY2009 Budget into law as Speaker San Fran Nan Pelosi never sent it to the Senate ...... until March 2009 and then OBAMA sign into law. Yep, OBAMA handed himself a $1.017 budget deficit!
Yep, just gotta blame everything on Bush, don't you!!!

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#117617 Oct 15, 2012
LurkerLooky wrote:
PAUL RYAN'S VISION OF AMERICA - FREEDOM AND PROSPERITY
Will Mr. Ryan try to balance the U.S. operating account and introduce a balanced budget amendment?
Will he try to lower the personal income tax rate of 15%(the lowest it has ever been for working-class people)?

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

#117618 Oct 15, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
How many times do you have to see the words in front of your face before you finally go....oh, I get it now? Your argument fails and you know it. I guess keep telling yourself this over and over, maybe someday even you'll believe it. Now, the case is closed. You lose!
The case has been closed for over 100 years, despite that you keep mumbling the same tripe over and over.

Ark was born in the US under the complete jurisdiction of the UN and not subject to any foreign power. The US is a sovereign nation and foreign law has no force or effect within US jurisdiction.

Long settled law. Get used to it.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Either you can effectively rebut the statement or UR impotent.
Case closed.

“Stuffs gettin better ”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#117619 Oct 15, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
<quoted text>
Please identify the WRITTEN DOCUMENT that clarified which portions of the common law were applicable and which portions were not.
You must be a "birther," because you state things that are absurd on there face and which you cannot support by reference to any controlling written document.
That is why you have a GED, and couldn't even gain admission to junior college.
The only degree you've come close to achieving is a google degree.
Oh, and a minor in easy bake oven.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#117620 Oct 15, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
And Snopes says it is true too. Thank you EPA!!!
http://www.snopes.com/photos/accident/trainfi ...

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
If it is about Obama, they twist the issue. I just Googled "snopes obama college records" and this is what I got:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthers ...
Ah, what does Obama's SSN have to do with his college records?
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Who knows? And where do Ohama's college records have to do with ... Obama? That is highly personal information. Why should we have access to that? It's why you got the phoney SSN reply, as that is all the poor computer can find. And at the same time, totally debunks the false Obama SSN number affair. And, btw, it used to be, I believe, a Penn number, now it's a Hawaii one. Go figure.
Oh, how about Romney's college records and his last 10 yrs income tax records? What's he afraid of? Certified copies, like Obama's long and short form records, will suffice thank you. True, he does not have to produce those records, but then Obama didn't have to produce his BC either and he did anyhow. What say you?
You missed the point .... again. It is about Snopes. If it has anything to do with Obama, Snopes will twist it. When I talked about the rail road fire of 2009, they covered the issue but they will run, dodge and jump every issue on Obama!

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#117621 Oct 15, 2012
LRS wrote:
Why would any Nation or person NOT want to be debt free? I'm debt free and can tell you that it makes all the difference in the world to an individual.
Why would they. Unless you can name the economics book that you think is the best on macroeconomics,there is no point in discussing Economics with you, because you never even studied The Calculus, much less real Economics.
Please state any two GOOD reasons for a sovereign nation to be debt free.
The Class bets that you are so ignorant and uneducated you will make vile reply instead of quoting from a legitimate reference to support your ignorant statements.
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

#117622 Oct 15, 2012
President Starky wrote:
<quoted text>
The only degree you've come close to achieving is a google degree.
Oh, and a minor in easy bake oven.
Hey, how's that 'Muslims exempt from ObamaCare' thing going for you? Have any more fables for us?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#117624 Oct 15, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Cause and Efect, Cause and Effect.
Terri Tanna wrote:
<quoted text>
More of your uneducated BS -- just making things up again. Please quote from any recognized economist or even a serious financial publication that supports your mythology. YOU CAN'T, because you have LIED again.
Tell us Tootsie, if your tire blows out and you lose control and cause a fatal accident, are you responsible? It all depends on what caused your tire to blow out!!!
Now, if the other tires on you car are seriously under-inflated, I would say it was YOUR fault for failing to maintain your vehicle but what if you just ran over a piece of metal that was lying in the roadway, maybe it was not your fault!
Do you remember the The Firestone tire problems on Ford cars in 2000? You tire blows out, you car rolls over and you and your passengers are seriously hurt or killed and then the cause was a defective tire, then Ford/Firestone are responsible...... if the tires are less than ten years old!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#117625 Oct 15, 2012
About thirty years ago they had several lawsuits over airplane manufacturers that resulted in mega buck$ being awarded. As a result Cessna stopped making small, single engine planes. Sure you could buy a Cessna jet or turboprop but no C-152/171/182/ etc.
Then about ten years later the feds passed a law limiting liability to the first ten years ..... on anything.
You get into an accident in you 10.1 year old car and the air bag fails to deploy and you are injured or kill,,,,, you can't sue the Ford, GM, etc.!!!

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

#117626 Oct 15, 2012
Kentucky Birfoon wrote:
Yes citizens, just not Natural born citizens eligible to be the President, otherwise the Founding Fathers would have used Hamilton's original language as he had proposed.
Explanation???
There is no record that Hamilton's language was ever the "original language".

The Committee of Detail originally proposed eligibility requirements for the Executive under a Tenth article. See William C. Rives, History of the Life and Times of James Madison, Volume 2.

"The tenth article of the plan reported by the committee of detail provided … that the executive power should be vested in a single magistrate, to be styled the President of the United States ...."

The original eligibility clause did not require a person born a citizen in the country:

Concerning this "Tenth Article" it was stated "At the end of the first section, tenth article, add,'he shall be of the age of thirty five years, and a citizen of the United States, and shall have been an inhabitant thereof for twenty one years.'" WEDNESDAY AUGUST 22. IN CONVENTION. 1787.

On September 4, 1787, the eligibility requirements were amended:
"No person except a natural born citizen or a Citizen of the U. S. at the time of the adoption of this Constitution shall be eligible to the office of President; nor shall any person be elected to that office, who shall be under the age of thirty five years, and who has not been in the whole, at least fourteen years a resident within the U. S."
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#117627 Oct 15, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
<quoted text>
Please identify the WRITTEN DOCUMENT that clarified which portions of the common law were applicable and which portions were not.
You must be a "birther," because you state things that are absurd on there face and which you cannot support by reference to any controlling written document.
That is why you have a GED, and couldn't even gain admission to junior college.
The States retained only the portions of common law applicable to their own situation. Really, can't you come up with some new slurs? These are all so old and truely boring. BOINK BOINK BOINK BOINK poor pigeon.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#117628 Oct 15, 2012
Question for the witch doctor; what do you think would happen if the government told the people there was an imposter in the White House? LOL
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#117629 Oct 15, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
<quoted text>
Why would they. Unless you can name the economics book that you think is the best on macroeconomics,there is no point in discussing Economics with you, because you never even studied The Calculus, much less real Economics.
Please state any two GOOD reasons for a sovereign nation to be debt free.
The Class bets that you are so ignorant and uneducated you will make vile reply instead of quoting from a legitimate reference to support your ignorant statements.
That means you have no response to my question. Exactly what I thought.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#117630 Oct 15, 2012
Hey Ms. Easy Bake, show me one valid business model based on carrying a huge debt. Dare you.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 4 min TRD 68,875
Deat Abby 12-16 9 min cheluzal 48
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 13 min RealDave 1,152,952
sexting on whatsapp 58 min cute_bwoy 1
14-Year-Old Boy Shot In Head On Far South Side 1 hr Taint Shield 4
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 2 hr kal 49,174
best joke (Oct '09) 3 hr Always Smile 526
Chicago Dating
Find my Match

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 11:41 am PST

NFL11:41AM
Trestman: There's accountability in Bears' building
NBC Sports12:41 PM
Bears' Trestman aware of speculation about future - NBC Sports
Yahoo! Sports 1:20 PM
Chicago sportscaster apologizes for tasteless joke in Cutler pun
NFL 1:47 PM
One Preview: Passing and rushing yardage leaders meet in Big D
NBC Sports 1:57 PM
Marc Trestman: It's evident I haven't gotten best from Jay Cutler