BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 231114 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#117722 Oct 15, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
"Please identify the WRITTEN DOCUMENT that clarified which portions of the common law were applicable and which portions were not.
"You must be a "birther," because you state things that are absurd on there face and which you cannot support by reference to any controlling written document."
====
LRS wrote:
The States retained only the portions of common law applicable to their own situation.
Notice Class the really stupid and uneducated one repeats her/his original mythology while again failing to cite any written document to support the mythology.
It is the essence of those who were too stupid to go to college that they only "say" stuff without being able to PROVE it.

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#117723 Oct 15, 2012
LRS wrote:
Hey Ms. Easy Bake, show me one valid business model based on carrying a huge debt. Dare you.
Microsoft, Apple, McDonald's any corporation that issues bonds.
NOW you tell the Class which corporations are sovereign nations that can print money.
HOW PATHETIC that you are so stupid, ignorant, and uneducated to think there is any parallel between a corporation and a sovereign nation.
In what COLLEGE COURSE did you learn something so asinine?

“Stuffs gettin better ”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#117724 Oct 15, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
Terri Tanna wrote:

====
<quoted text>
Thank you for acknowledging that you have once again been schooled by your intellectual superiors.
Easy bake.
I doubt they were superior but educated they most certainly were.
You should meet them some time.

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#117725 Oct 15, 2012
LRS wrote:
Then neither is his son. Thank you.
Your statement is contrary to ALL U.S. law: Kerchner v. Obama (cert. denied 2012).
SHEEPLE Buster

Louisville, KY

#117726 Oct 15, 2012
All Obama has left are LIES!

Obama Claims 'We Got Back Every Dime' of Bailout Money on Same Day CBO Reports $24B Loss...

I hope Romney is taking notes for tomorrow.
SHEEPLE Buster

Louisville, KY

#117727 Oct 15, 2012
For Every Person Added to Labor Force, 10 Added to Those Not in Labor Force...

SHEEPLE. it is time to change your hope!

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#117728 Oct 15, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
Then, you ask "where, what date, when, what post number"? And reply comes right back, "look for it yourself if you're so smart, I don't have time".
Excellent. That is the reason I frequently begin my response with the number of the original post.

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#117730 Oct 15, 2012
President Starky wrote:
There's this little thing on the internet called Google.
TERRIBLY LAME REPLY for a convicted LIAR. You have proven yourself repeatedly to be uneducated without any COLLEGE and intellectually dishonest. You must hate Obama.
SHEEPLE Buster

Louisville, KY

#117732 Oct 15, 2012
CementHead wrote:
It's time to ask Mitt Romney tough questions about his mental health
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/10/10/1142...
Mitt wants you to GFY!
He is not answering or showing you anything.
BTW, CementHead, Mitt says you can thank Obama for him.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#117733 Oct 15, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly the way I said it. Asked for proof, you said to look for it myself, and let me say, hard to find something that does not exist. You can't get out of this one, or all the other ones.
I already did, a long time back. Actually, you proved me to be correct. Next contestant!

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#117735 Oct 15, 2012
SHEEPLE Buster wrote:
10 Added to Those Not in Labor Force...
If they are already NOT in the labor force, how can they be "added to those not in the labor force?"
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#117736 Oct 15, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
<quoted text>
TERRIBLY LAME REPLY for a convicted LIAR. You have proven yourself repeatedly to be uneducated without any COLLEGE and intellectually dishonest. You must hate Obama.
Found that debt-based business model yet? LMAO pigeon

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#117740 Oct 15, 2012
Why can't our "birther"-tea crumpet friends respond to this simple question? They must be acknowledging it is TRUE.
Is there anyone on this thread who can provide any HARD ECONOMIC DATA to disprove the statement that in this current tax year United States citizens enjoy the LOWEST marginal federal income tax rates (across the board) than at ANY TIME since the implementation of Amendment XVI?

“Stuffs gettin better ”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#117741 Oct 15, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
<quoted text>
TERRIBLY LAME REPLY for a convicted LIAR. You have proven yourself repeatedly to be uneducated without any COLLEGE and intellectually dishonest. You must hate Obama.
Yet your IQ is so low I just step all over it every time you post.
Oops!

P.S
Its my GOD GIVEN RIGHT to hate Obama.:)

"Stuff's gettin better"
2012

“NEX UT TYRANNUS BONOBO OBAMA”

Since: Feb 12

Bowling Green KY

#117742 Oct 15, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Found that debt-based business model yet? LMAO pigeon
Obamanomics?

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#117744 Oct 15, 2012
LRS wrote:
Found that debt-based business model yet?
Apparently, you failed to note this EARLIER post:
#117,723
Terri Tanna wrote:
Microsoft, Apple, McDonald's any corporation that issues bonds.
NOW you tell the Class which corporations are sovereign nations that can print money.
HOW PATHETIC that you are so stupid, ignorant, and uneducated to think there is any parallel between a corporation and a sovereign nation.
In what COLLEGE COURSE did you learn something so asinine?
BTW, why do you think the course is called corporate FINANCE -- that means borrowing money and issuing debt. How sad that you couldn't make it into junior college.
SHEEPLE Buster

Louisville, KY

#117745 Oct 15, 2012
DEMOCRATIC SKANK Terri Tanna wrote:
<quoted text>
If they are already NOT in the labor force, how can they be "added to those not in the labor force?"
You still support our man Mitt, don't ya?
Oh that is right, you're not a Republican and you won't vote for the Romney/Ryan ticket, because you LIED about being a Romney delegate and Obama is your ZERO who is about to be FIRED!
SHEEPLE Buster

Louisville, KY

#117746 Oct 15, 2012
DEMOCRATIC SKANK Terri Tanna wrote:
disprove
Obama promised the US fundamental change, and this is the change that he has delivered.

America's AAA credit rating has been downgraded not once, but TWICE!

Instead of cutting the deficit by half, which during Bush's Presidency averaged roughly 500 Billion a year over the course of 8 years, for a grand total of 4 Trillion dollars during the course of his Presidency, Obama has increased the deficit by some 6 Trillion dollars in only one term of 4 years, with nothing but increased deficits already forecast for the foreseeable future.

23 million people unemployed and can't find work.

15 million more on food stamps.

Increased costs for fuel, food, and energy.
Then we have the ubiquitous ObamaPhone.

Obama is turning this nation into a Socialist nation.
We are on a road that has been traveled many times before, and has ended badly every time it has been tried.
There are no success stories to talk about in regards to Socialist nations.

I told you SHEEPLE that Obama's election would increase the cost of living for every American, while simultaneously lowering the standard of living for every American.

That is why I have now become a Republican and will vote for Romney, because this country will not survive as a Republic after 4 more years of increased Socialism.
This is the 2nd most important election in my voting lifetime, considering that I also voted for Reagan as a Democrat to get rid of Jimmy Carter.
It seems to be a bit of Deja Vu for me.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#117748 Oct 15, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
<quoted text>
Apparently, you failed to note this EARLIER post:
#117,723
<quoted text>
BTW, why do you think the course is called corporate FINANCE -- that means borrowing money and issuing debt. How sad that you couldn't make it into junior college.
So post one or shhhhhh.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

United States

#117749 Oct 15, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
One reason for the absence of an early-defined national birthright rule is that States had decided for themselves who were its citizens by virtue of being born within the limits of the State. Prior to the 14th amendment citizens of the United States were strictly defined as citizens of the States. Hmm, a citizen of the State.
Is that what your plagiarized birfoon blog passage says?

Got Alzheimer's? According to you there was never "ANY MENTION of the right to citizenship by birth under the United States Constitution."

Julia Lynch was RULED to be a citizen of the United States per national law:

"The right of citizenship, as distinguished from
alienage, is a national right or condition. It pertains
to the confederated sovereignty, the United States;
and not to the individual states." Lynch v. Clarke,
3 N.Y.Leg.Obs. 236 (N.Y. Ch. 1844).

"That all children, born within the dominion of
the United States, of foreign parents holding no
diplomatic office, became citizens at the time of
their birth, does not appear to have been contested
or doubted until more than 50 years after the adoption
of the constitution, when the matter was elaborately
argued in the court of chancery of New
York, and decided upon full consideration by
Vice Chancellor Sandford in favor of their citizenship.
Lynch v. Clarke (1844) 1 Sandf. Ch. 583." US v Wong Kim Ark,
169 U.S. 649, 664, 18 S.Ct. 456, 462-63 (1898).
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Birfoon: "or even any mention of the right to citizenship by birth under the United States Constitution"
See Lynch v. Clarke, which, incidentally was cited favorably by several federal courts, including the USSC.
“And the constitution itself contains a direct recognition of the subsisting common law principle, in the section which defines the qualification of the President.‘No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of this constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President,’ &c. The only standard which then existed, of a natural born citizen, was the rule of the common law, and The only standard which then existed, of a natural born citizen, was the rule of the common law, and no different standard has been adopted since. Suppose a person should be elected President who was native born, but of alien parents, could there be any reasonable doubt that he was eligible under the constitution? I think not.” Lynch v. Clarke, 3 NY Leg. Obs. 236, 246 (N.Y. Ch. 1844).

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 11 min Realtime 1,459,188
Facebook is Over 36 min Truth 1
last post wins! (Dec '10) 47 min honeymylove 2,756
last post wins! (Apr '13) 49 min honeymylove 1,958
Are democrats destroyed? 2 hr the silent majority 8
Four letter word game (Dec '11) 2 hr GEORGIA 2,286
The Color of Crime in Chicago. 3 hr BLOODY-Shytcago 17
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 5 hr RACE 104,534

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages