BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 194384 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Jacques Ottawa

North York, Canada

#117631 Oct 15, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Tom Brokaw turns on Obama! The Lame Stream Press is turning. They are no longer in neutral! If the LSM is going to remain relavent, they must address the hard issues.
Tom Brokaw Says President Obama Must Answer For $1.1 Trillion Deficit ‘That Happened On His Watch’ VIDEO
by Tommy Christopher | 4:03 pm, October 14th, 2012
On Sunday morning’s Meet The Press, legendary newsman Tom Brokaw joined moderator David Gregory in evening out the “specifics” narrative that has dogged Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney by demanding that President Obama give more details about his plan to control the deficit and debt. Brokaw said that in a 2008 debate, then-Senator Obama “was saying,‘Look, we’ve got a deficit of a half a trillion dollars. I’m going to get that under control.’ Well, this week that deficit is $1.1 trillion and it happened on his watch. He’s going to have to answer to that.”
By the time President Obama took office, however, he was handed a $1.017 trillion deficit by President George W. Bush.
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/tom-brokaw-says-pr ...
<quoted text>
Did you note the point "however, he was handed a $1.017 trillion deficit by President George W. Bush." which is a lie! Bush never signed the FY2009 Budget into law as Speaker San Fran Nan Pelosi never sent it to the Senate ...... until March 2009 and then OBAMA sign into law. Yep, OBAMA handed himself a $1.017 budget deficit!
Yep, just gotta blame everything on Bush, don't you!!!
I don't know. You're the one who posted it. Why'd you do it? It was GWB-originated, delayed to March and signed by Obama who had the gun to him, bankruptcies looming, huge layoffs. But remember, read the whole thing next time, and notice that Brokaw had a lot of "buts" in his discourse.
Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

#117632 Oct 15, 2012
Butthurt Loser wrote:
<quoted text>
Be a dumbazz, it is your choosing. An expert? LMAO Don't tell me we have another Prof? LOL
Barfer Girks, name calling will also get you thrown out of court.

So far you're arguing the losing side in a case that's over 100 years old and acting like a baby.

That's exactly why you're a birfoon and why birfoons always lose.
Jacques Ottawa

North York, Canada

#117633 Oct 15, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
And Snopes says it is true too. Thank you EPA!!!
http://www.snopes.com/photos/accident/trainfi ...
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
If it is about Obama, they twist the issue. I just Googled "snopes obama college records" and this is what I got:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthers ...
Ah, what does Obama's SSN have to do with his college records?
<quoted text>
You missed the point .... again. It is about Snopes. If it has anything to do with Obama, Snopes will twist it. When I talked about the rail road fire of 2009, they covered the issue but they will run, dodge and jump every issue on Obama!
What? Was Snopes trying to hide the railroad fire in 1982 because Obama was involved? Waht was Snope gaining by hiding the railroad fire?

“Stuffs gettin better ”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#117634 Oct 15, 2012
LRS wrote:
Hey Ms. Easy Bake, show me one valid business model based on carrying a huge debt. Dare you.
She's gonna have to consult the class on that one.
May take awhile since the nearest elementary school to her is 10 miles and the short bus only runs 3 times a day.
Jacques Ottawa

North York, Canada

#117635 Oct 15, 2012
LRS wrote:
Question for the witch doctor; what do you think would happen if the government told the people there was an imposter in the White House? LOL
Why would the govt tell the people there is an impostor in the White House? They'd have to prove he is an impostor. Birthers have been trying that for more than 3 years now, to no avail. Methinks the real impostors here are the birthers, Taitz and Trump.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#117636 Oct 15, 2012
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Barfer Girks, name calling will also get you thrown out of court.
So far you're arguing the losing side in a case that's over 100 years old and acting like a baby.
That's exactly why you're a birfoon and why birfoons always lose.
More yada yada yada from Girdle Buns. Pfft! pigeon
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#117637 Oct 15, 2012
President Starky wrote:
<quoted text>
She's gonna have to consult the class on that one.
May take awhile since the nearest elementary school to her is 10 miles and the short bus only runs 3 times a day.
Couldn't help but borrow your phrase "easy bake", sorry. Cracks me up!
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

#117638 Oct 15, 2012
President Starky wrote:
<quoted text>
She's gonna have to consult the class on that one.
May take awhile since the nearest elementary school to her is 10 miles and the short bus only runs 3 times a day.
You are avoiding me.

Is that because it exposed your LIES????

Got any more bs stories for us?

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#117641 Oct 15, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Couldn't help but borrow your phrase "easy bake", sorry. Cracks me up!
Especially since her bread isn't baked.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#117642 Oct 15, 2012
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no record that Hamilton's language was ever the "original language".
The Committee of Detail originally proposed eligibility requirements for the Executive under a Tenth article. See William C. Rives, History of the Life and Times of James Madison, Volume 2.
"The tenth article of the plan reported by the committee of detail provided … that the executive power should be vested in a single magistrate, to be styled the President of the United States ...."
The original eligibility clause did not require a person born a citizen in the country:
Concerning this "Tenth Article" it was stated "At the end of the first section, tenth article, add,'he shall be of the age of thirty five years, and a citizen of the United States, and shall have been an inhabitant thereof for twenty one years.'" WEDNESDAY AUGUST 22. IN CONVENTION. 1787.
On September 4, 1787, the eligibility requirements were amended:
"No person except a natural born citizen or a Citizen of the U. S. at the time of the adoption of this Constitution shall be eligible to the office of President; nor shall any person be elected to that office, who shall be under the age of thirty five years, and who has not been in the whole, at least fourteen years a resident within the U. S."
Perhaps the first most important thing to understand about national birthright is that there was no national birthright rule until the year 1866. One will look in vain to find any national law on the subject prior to this year, or even any mention of the right to citizenship by birth under the United States Constitution.

“Stuffs gettin better ”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#117643 Oct 15, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Couldn't help but borrow your phrase "easy bake", sorry. Cracks me up!
No problem
That's her title.
Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

#117644 Oct 15, 2012
Butthurt Loser wrote:
<quoted text>
More yada yada yada from Girdle Buns. Pfft! pigeon
Barfer Girks, it looks like you cannot effectively advocate for the losing side in Ark. How does it feel to be a loser at losing?
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#117645 Oct 15, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Why would the govt tell the people there is an impostor in the White House? They'd have to prove he is an impostor. Birthers have been trying that for more than 3 years now, to no avail. Methinks the real impostors here are the birthers, Taitz and Trump.
Sorry, I was assuming you had the intellect of a dust mite and could see it was a hypothetical situation (for now).
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

#117646 Oct 15, 2012
President Starky wrote:
<quoted text>
No problem
That's her title.
Hey, what about your wacko claim that "Muslims are exempt from ObamaCare"? Remember that one? Remember I proved you wrong?

Got any more bs birther foolishness for us?

Ha Ha Ha...what a joke you birther are!!!!

“Stuffs gettin better ”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#117647 Oct 15, 2012
Johanne is slow.
Missed my post proving that muslims are exempt from Obamacare.
Go back and look.
Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

#117648 Oct 15, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Perhaps the first most important thing to understand about national birthright is that there was no national birthright rule until the year 1866. One will look in vain to find any national law on the subject prior to this year, or even any mention of the right to citizenship by birth under the United States Constitution.
Who cares? It's 2012, Barfer Girks. You're two centuries behind us on the losing side.

2012 > 1866
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

#117650 Oct 15, 2012
President Starky wrote:
Johanne is slow.
Missed my post proving that muslims are exempt from Obamacare.
Go back and look.
YOU are a LIAR.....

1) there is no proof of such
2) you never posted anything
3) you only post lies

You posted crap....I found the truth....you made yourself look like the liar and birther fool you are.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#117651 Oct 15, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
You think you can force someone to have allegiance with the U.S.? LOL
Allegiance is an obligation owed. A person born in the US (except for child of foreign ambassador, etc.) owes immediate allegiance to the US at the moment of birth.“Such allegiance and protection were mutual,-as expressed in the maxim,‘Protectio trahit subjectionem, et subjectio protectionem,’” US v. Ark, S.Ct. 456, 459, 169 U.S. 649, 656 (1898).
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
And you are not commenting on the issues. the US Supreme Court has ruled that the meaning of Natural Born Citizen comes from the common law and refers to the place of birth. And US law holds that every child born in the USA except for the children of foreign diplomats, has and in fact must have, allegiance to the USA.
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

#117652 Oct 15, 2012
Starky got caught in his lies and now is pondering what to do next.

Ah so many birther lies....
Ah, so few brains.....
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#117653 Oct 15, 2012
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Who cares? It's 2012, Barfer Girks. You're two centuries behind us on the losing side.
2012 > 1866
Girdle Buns, you really are a complete dumbazz. Still doing the shuffle huh? I'm about the fourth person or so to present the same correct information to you and you haven't seen it yet! That's what is known as stupid and we all know there is no fix for stupid. The only thing you have proven is that the DoDo bird is not extinct. You've nailed that one, I will admit. Your existence correlates perfectly with a tickfart. Hollywood should make a movie about you. You just might be the next Foster Grump! pigeon

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 8 min sonicfilter 1,262,725
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 16 min Ariel Sharon 70,141
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 1 hr Mister Tonka 100,267
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr IBdaMann 54,331
Amy 7-29-15 3 hr mrs gladys kravitz 14
News Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 3 hr Mark 52,057
abby7-29-15 3 hr mrs gladys kravitz 7
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages