TheY both lied.<quoted text>
Yep, Libtards are hypocrites. They would not impeach Bill Clinton for lying in a court (felony)(which he DID!) but they wanted to impeach G.W. Bush for allegedly lying about going to war with Saddamn Hussein.
Clinton lied to protect his reputation and his family's. He was wrong, dead wrong. But, it's what most adulterers do. Cost to his family : Very costly. Cost to nation and number of dead : ZERO and ZERO.
Bush lied to sort of avenge his daddy, and, pushed by Cheney, formerly CEO of Halliburton that was to supply billions of rations, equipment etc to the Iraq effort, and cronies Carl Rove and Rumsfeld, invaded Iraq. Cost to his family : ZERO. Cost to nation and number of dead : Appriox $1.2 trillion, 4,500 dead American military, 50,000 seriously wounded, both physically and mentally, over 200,000 Iraqi dead (Rogue says 100,000, but hey, what's 100,000 more or less, just ragheads as, again, Rogue says). detruction of infrastructure, antiquities, buildings and public services and no lowering of price of barrel and, Iraq, to show its undtying gratitude to the U.S., just wrapped up SALE OF OIL EXPLORATION TO CHINA AND,(ANNOUNCED TODAY), PURCHASE OF $4 BILLION OF ARMS FROM RUSSIA. Before invading Iraq, West had Iraq as a hostile neighbour to Iran, it was our "insulation", kept Iran busy worrying about Saddam who had invaded him before with American arms. Now Iraq is cozy with Iran. Good wor, GWB.
Now, what is the biggest consequence of both men's lies, please?