BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 242542 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#95778 Aug 1, 2012
Just Sayin wrote:
<quoted text>
Yada Yada Yada
You have no rebuttal so you have to pick on my typos which I corrected in a later post.
Typical Obamanuts defense.
It had nothing to do with typos. I read your post fine typos and all. You made an assertion that was simply not true and certainly not based on any known facts.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#95779 Aug 1, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
LRS wrote:text
"How many businesses do you know of that operate with a negative cash flow?
====
Terri Tanna wrote:
"(1) Has no application to sovereign nations that NEVER have to have positive cash flow since they NEVER have to "pay off" their indebtedness.
"(2) It's not true that "businesses" must have positive cash flow or fail, because many high tech companies don't actually make money, but are sold to cash rich acquirers that can absorb the losses until the long-term payoff.
=
"BTW, show your erudition by explaining to the non-economics oriented members of the Class the difference between financial statement income and a statement of sources and uses of funds (cashflow). Please be succinct but correct. Thank you."
====
<quoted text>
Good job explaining the difference between financial statement income and a statement of sources and uses of funds (cashflow). Your ignorance is palpable.
=
Query: when Johns-Manville declared bankruptcy, how many MILLIONS do you think they had "in the bank?" The Class thinks that your financial experience is so limited that you cannot conceive that it is possible to "be broke" and "have money in the bank." You are really a rank amateur when it comes to business.
=
The Class has bet you didn't explain the difference between "financial statement income and a statement of sources and uses of funds (cashflow)" because you had never previously heard of either standard financial term and you aren't smart enough to understand the Wikipedia explanation -- if they even cover it.
====
So which of YOUR macroeconomic levers are you going to pull this afternoon to keep The Market surging upward?
Your influence didn't go as far as you thought, huh? Anytime you start thinking you're a person of influence, try telling someone else's dog what to do.

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#95780 Aug 1, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
#95,612
Terri Tanna wrote:
"IF that be the case, to whom do you look for professional expertise on macroeconomic matters (not investments or business principles, which are a completely different discipline)? Thank you."
====
<quoted text>
Is this your way of acknowledging that you have NEVER read ANYTHING about Economics?
That you know nothing about the law of supply and demand and the invisible hand of the market (Smith) or the evils of government control of the economy (Hayek and von Mises) or the role of the money supply on price levels (Friedman -- whose 100th birthday was yesterday) or the law of comparative advantage (Smith) or the interplay among factors of production on GDP (Leontieff) or why it is bad policy for a corporation to pay dividends (Miller & Modigliani) or the mathematical algorithm for equilibrium (Samuelson) or the absolute truth in securities valuation by the efficient market (Markowitz) or the universal pricing algorithm for European style options (Black-Scholes)?
=
You are saying that your own "very successful methodologies" make you knowledgeable in all of the above areas and that you could learn NOTHING by studying the above economists each whom essentially invented as pioneers each of the above sub-disciplines of Economics.
GOSH, you are one really wise fool. Implicitly, you are claiming that you are highly proficient in integral and differential calculus since each of the above areas is expressed most truly and elegantly in mathematical nomenclature.
====
LRS wrote:
We always consult with the best......[SIC] Bugs Bunny
WOW, is it possible that your punctuation is worse than amer-lassie's. What is the highest level of mathematics in which you are proficient? Remedial algebra?
====
Why can't you even pretend to make substantive replies to easy questions? The Class doesn't think you even know the meaning of the words in the questions, much less being able to respond substantively. HOW PATHETIC.
Just Sayin

Toledo, OH

#95781 Aug 1, 2012
nebka wrote:
<quoted text>
What does the Borg have to do with this?
You're the one who brought up the Star Trek Borgland.

You live in such a fantasy land you don't recognize truth when you see it.

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#95782 Aug 1, 2012
Just Sayin wrote:
<quoted text>
You have given us proof that you are blind in more ways than one Poppo.
It seems a though black mobs have currently taken over where the KKK left off.
Really JS, can you honestly say that with a straight face?
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#95783 Aug 1, 2012
TT, I had an airbrush artist paint Obama's face on the bottom of my toilets. The guy did a great job. That Obama has his stupid grin on as usual. Think I'll feed him now. LMAO

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#95784 Aug 1, 2012
Just Sayin wrote:
What makes you think I am going to listen to someone who wants to know where I got a source
This is the posters way of admitting that he LIED when he said a certain anonymous case comment was written by Obama while a second semester 3L (highly, highly unlikely given the structure of The Harvard Law Review Corp.).
These really uneducated people get themselves into deep doo-doo whenever they venture out of the world of their trailer parks.

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#95785 Aug 1, 2012
#95,612
Terri Tanna wrote:
"Please demonstrate to the Class how your "extremely successful" methodologies control the level of M-1, M-2, and M-3 in counterpoint to the open market operations of the Federal Reserve."
====
"The post was directed at the child who wrote a post boasting about his "extremely successful" macroeconomic policies."
====
LRS wrote:
Do you really think I would tell you anything about what has and continues to provide us with plenty.
If your MACROECONOMIC POLICIES continue to provide the United States of America and all of its citizens "with plenty," how can you say that our economy is bad.
You apparently don't even know what the simple words mean in ordinary business parlance. It is completely obvious you don't have any idea what is being discussed.

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#95786 Aug 1, 2012
LRS wrote:
Google her. Terri Tanna
You must be the world's biggest sucker if you believe what you find on the internet.
No wonder you have been duped by the "birther" fantasies. HOW PATHETIC.
Did you ever notice all of the "birthers" have unusually poor educational backgrounds?
Just Sayin

Toledo, OH

#95787 Aug 1, 2012
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
It had nothing to do with typos. I read your post fine typos and all. You made an assertion that was simply not true and certainly not based on any known facts.
You are a blind idiot who refuses to face facts.

Why would someone jeopardize their position in a libel suit by writing a book about someone that was not true?

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#95789 Aug 1, 2012
LRS wrote:text
"How many businesses do you know of that operate with a negative cash flow?
====
Terri Tanna wrote:
"(1) Has no application to sovereign nations that NEVER have to have positive cash flow since they NEVER have to "pay off" their indebtedness.
"(2) It's not true that "businesses" must have positive cash flow or fail, because many high tech companies don't actually make money, but are sold to cash rich acquirers that can absorb the losses until the long-term payoff.
=
"BTW, show your erudition by explaining to the non-economics oriented members of the Class the difference between financial statement income and a statement of sources and uses of funds (cashflow). Please be succinct but correct. Thank you."
====
Good job explaining the difference between financial statement income and a statement of sources and uses of funds (cashflow). Your ignorance is palpable.
=
Query: when Johns-Manville declared bankruptcy, how many MILLIONS do you think they had "in the bank?" The Class thinks that your financial experience is so limited that you cannot conceive that it is possible to "be broke" and "have money in the bank." You are really a rank amateur when it comes to business.
=
The Class has bet you didn't explain the difference between "financial statement income and a statement of sources and uses of funds (cashflow)" because you had never previously heard of either standard financial term and you aren't smart enough to understand the Wikipedia explanation -- if they even cover it.
====
So which of YOUR macroeconomic levers are you going to pull this afternoon to keep The Market surging upward?
====
LRS wrote:
Your influence didn't go as far as you thought, huh? Anytime you start thinking you're a person of influence, try telling someone else's dog what to do.
????
Maybe some "birther" moron understands what this guy is trying to say.
Just Sayin

Toledo, OH

#95790 Aug 1, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
<quoted text>
This is the posters way of admitting that he LIED when he said a certain anonymous case comment was written by Obama while a second semester 3L (highly, highly unlikely given the structure of The Harvard Law Review Corp.).
These really uneducated people get themselves into deep doo-doo whenever they venture out of the world of their trailer parks.
Yada Yada Yada

Use your psychology on someone else.

Are you denying that this is the "great works" that you have been crowing about for the last hundred pages?

You really need to get out of that McDonalds office more and stop eating that fast food. It's starting to take it's toll.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#95791 Aug 1, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
Terri Tanna wrote:
#95,612
Terri Tanna wrote:
"IF that be the case, to whom do you look for professional expertise on macroeconomic matters (not investments or business principles, which are a completely different discipline)? Thank you."
====
<quoted text>
Is this your way of acknowledging that you have NEVER read ANYTHING about Economics?
That you know nothing about the law of supply and demand and the invisible hand of the market (Smith) or the evils of government control of the economy (Hayek and von Mises) or the role of the money supply on price levels (Friedman -- whose 100th birthday was yesterday) or the law of comparative advantage (Smith) or the interplay among factors of production on GDP (Leontieff) or why it is bad policy for a corporation to pay dividends (Miller & Modigliani) or the mathematical algorithm for equilibrium (Samuelson) or the absolute truth in securities valuation by the efficient market (Markowitz) or the universal pricing algorithm for European style options (Black-Scholes)?
=
You are saying that your own "very successful methodologies" make you knowledgeable in all of the above areas and that you could learn NOTHING by studying the above economists each whom essentially invented as pioneers each of the above sub-disciplines of Economics.
GOSH, you are one really wise fool. Implicitly, you are claiming that you are highly proficient in integral and differential calculus since each of the above areas is expressed most truly and elegantly in mathematical nomenclature.
====
<quoted text>
WOW, is it possible that your punctuation is worse than amer-lassie's. What is the highest level of mathematics in which you are proficient? Remedial algebra?
====
Why can't you even pretend to make substantive replies to easy questions? The Class doesn't think you even know the meaning of the words in the questions, much less being able to respond substantively. HOW PATHETIC.
My suggestion for you is to contact Acme.
Just Sayin

Toledo, OH

#95792 Aug 1, 2012
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
Really JS, can you honestly say that with a straight face?
Can you say BPP with a straight face?

Didn't they put a $10,000.00 hit on Zimmerman's head?
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#95793 Aug 1, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
#95,612
Terri Tanna wrote:
"Please demonstrate to the Class how your "extremely successful" methodologies control the level of M-1, M-2, and M-3 in counterpoint to the open market operations of the Federal Reserve."
====
"The post was directed at the child who wrote a post boasting about his "extremely successful" macroeconomic policies."
====
<quoted text>
If your MACROECONOMIC POLICIES continue to provide the United States of America and all of its citizens "with plenty," how can you say that our economy is bad.
You apparently don't even know what the simple words mean in ordinary business parlance. It is completely obvious you don't have any idea what is being discussed.
Yak yak yak. More meaningless drivel from the suction cup.
American Lady

Danville, KY

#95794 Aug 1, 2012
Obama's tough-guy act exposed
SOS Call to Action | by Larry Bailey | 2012-07-31
But because Obama has adopted a tough-guy act as his campaign platform – since he surely cannot stand on a record of policy success – we shouldn’t expect him to pull the curtains on it anytime soon. As a 27-year Navy SEAL officer who served as Commanding Officer of the Naval Special Warfare Center (where our proud Navy SEALS train), allow me to speak on behalf of the men and women who defend America’s freedom: I’ve seen tough guys, and Barack Obama is no tough guy, because he allows election-year politics to trump preservation of our national security. REAL tough guys get beaten, tortured and killed by the enemy because they REFUSE to give up our secrets. Read More...

'Gutsy Call' Not So Gutsy After All, New Book Reveals
Israel National News | by Rachel Hirshfeld | 2012-07-30
At the urging of senior advisor Valerie Jarrett, President Barack Obama canceled the operation to kill Osama bin Laden on three separate occasions before finally approving the May 2, 2011 Navy SEAL mission, according to a new book scheduled for release August 21, The Daily Caller (DC) reported. Read More...

http://specialoperationsspeaks.com/index.php/...
Just Sayin

Toledo, OH

#95795 Aug 1, 2012
I tired of arguing with idiots.

Got places to go and people to see.
Jacques Ottawa

Mississauga, Canada

#95797 Aug 1, 2012
Just Sayin wrote:
I tired of arguing with idiots.
Got places to go and people to see.
"I tired"? You write like that and you talk of idiots? Careful.

Places to go? Bingo? People? Are you sure?
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#95798 Aug 1, 2012
Traumatic Tats thinks it is a good business practice to shell out more than you bring in. It's obvious she has no first hand experience; a result of being too ignorant to pass kindergarten. Here is the best piece of advice you'll be given today; never believe a word she spits out. Most people who hire a nanny usually have several hidden cameras throughout their home. Now, leave those kids alone TT!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#95799 Aug 1, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
"I tired"? You write like that and you talk of idiots? Careful.
Places to go? Bingo? People? Are you sure?
Jockstain, the sentence is perfectly fine. You simply don't know how to interpret it. Most computer problems occur somewhere between the monitor and the user.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 min Incognito4Ever 1,583,399
last post wins! (Apr '13) 2 hr They cannot kill ... 2,611
Please 3 hr Kolpin lollydorm 8
OVERALL CDST of electric autos. 4 hr Bad COP No dognut 24
News Uber driver accused of locking female rider ins... 5 hr Betty 4
Jonny's Towing is Chicagoland's Most Crooked Co... (Feb '17) 11 hr Ricardo montobomb 73
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 12 hr Agents of Corruption 63,948

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages