Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Illinois in 2010?

[Largelanguage]

Reagan was a MENACE wrote:

<quoted text>
I'll ask yet AGAIN, moron...
1) Defense from who, moron?
2) You need to research what about an assault weapon exactly? How many children it kills in a grade school in 60 to 90 seconds, moron?
We already have those numbers available.
3) And AGAIN what "profession" gives you the NEED to have that kind of weapon if you're not a member of the military, the police or a "well regulated militia", moron?
ANSWER
THE
QUESTIONS!

1) From thugs and murdurous, and all sorts of situations.
2) We need armed guards as well as proper psychatrics, and 0 feminists causing males emotional harm making them shoot children.
3) Hunting, Target practice, Research, all sorts.

[Have a nice day]

r e p u b l I c a n s a r e c u n t s

[Largelanguage]

Reagan was a MENACE wrote:

<quoted text>
No, you obvious product of an incestual relationship!
There's plenty of people who get abused as children who DON'T take an assault rifle to the nearest grade school, point them at innocent children, pull the trigger and kill 20 of them, moron.
Jot this down ...
It was 1) Pointing an assault rifle ... 2) at children in a grade school and 3) pulling the trigger .. that caused it, moron.
Here's how simple it is to figure that out ...
Ready?
If you take away ANY of the three numbered items above? Guess what, moron?
"IT" DOESN'T HAPPEN!
And the kid ends up being another abused kid, with a whackjob mother ... who DOESN'T go on a shooting rampage at Sandy Hook Elementary School on December 14th, 2012.
Any other repuke talking points you want to use to try to spin your way out of this?
FACT: On December 13th, 2013 this kid was yet another republican hero of yours. He was a "100% NRA-supported, law abiding, flag-waving patriot who was just exercising his Constitutionally-protected right to have a gun".
Until he snapped the very next day.
Is he still an hero of you NRA wusses now?
I'll bet he is!!!
And that's why you idiots can't be trusted with those kinds of weapons!
Because you're all just "100% law abiding, flag-waving patriots who were just exercising your Constitutionally-protected right to have guns"!
Until you're not.
And you use them to kill dozens of innocent people because pus*ies like you need assault rifles to "man up" when the world throws you a beating: you get your food stamps taken away by the "nanny" government you live off of; you finally find who your daddy is and he has more melanin than Morrissey; your "mommy" forgets to cut the crusts off your PB& J; etc; etc.
Now go count your guns ... and your chromosomes!

He was emotionally troubled you pillack, HE EVEN SHOT HIMSELF!

[Reagan was a MENACE]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
He was emotionally troubled you pillack, HE EVEN SHOT HIMSELF!

I'm thinking you might need 2 hours to watch 60 Minutes now.

Nobody said he WASN'T emotionally troubled, moron.

Did you not GET how I already destroyed that bullshit the last time you posted it on here?

I'll re-post the part in question AGAIN .. just for you.

Why? Because you're obviously so stuck on stupid that you need it posted TWICE to you.

There's plenty of people who get abused as children who DON'T take an assault rifle to the nearest grade school, point it at innocent children, pull the trigger and kill 20 of them, moron.

There's plenty of people who are emotionally troubled who DON'T take an assault rifle to the nearest grade school, point it at innocent children, pull the trigger and kill 20 of them, moron.

FACT: Getting "abused as a child" or being "emotionally troubled" doesn't automatically make a 20 kids die of gunshot wounds from assault rifles at a local grade school. You need to add something else REALLY LETHAL to the equation there, moron.

It was 1) Pointing an assault rifle ... 2) at children in a grade school and 3) pulling the trigger .. that DIRECTLY caused it, moron.

AGAIN, here's how simple it is to figure that out ...

Ready?

If you take away ANY of the three numbered items above from that "abused" or "emotionally troubled" kid? Guess what, moron?

"IT" DOESN'T HAPPEN!

And the kid ends up being another abused kid, with a whackjob mother ... who DOESN'T go on a shooting rampage at Sandy Hook Elementary School on December 14th, 2012.

Did you get it that time, moron?

And if anyone had taken guns out of this household BEFORE it happened? I GUARANTEE YOU that you and your POS, gun-rights buddies would have screamed how a "100% law abiding, flag-waving patriot was victimized for just exercising his Constitutionally-protected right to have guns!"

Isn't that right, moron? Care to answer that question without lying your ass off?

I'll bet you won't!

[Reagan was a MENACE]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
1) From thugs and murdurous, and all sorts of situations.
2) We need armed guards as well as proper psychatrics, and 0 feminists causing males emotional harm making them shoot children.
3) Hunting, Target practice, Research, all sorts.

Your incorrect spelling on the most basic of words shows that you have zero education. And that's probably one of your good points!

Let's revisit the list:

1) Again, you don't need ASSAULT WEAPONS for that, moron.

You lose!

2) Again, armed guards ... in GRADE SCHOOLS ... because there's TOO MANY PEOPLE OUT THERE WITH GUNS that can shoot kids with those guns? And now you're blaming feminists for your lack of testicles and hurt feelings, moron? No wonder you're still single.

You lose!

3) You don't need ASSAULT WEAPONS for any of that. And I notice you never answered the question about WHAT KIND of research, moron.

You lose!

It's too bad someone can't go back in time and gun down your parents before they burdened everyone by having you.

Try again ...

See, every time you repeat the same previously discredited answers, I'll repeat the same response to them.

Get the pattern yet?

Still waiting on a logical reason why you NEED those ASSAULT WEAPONS if you're not in the military, a police officer, or part of a "well-regulated militia".

[Reagan was a MENACE]

ranger wrote:

poor liberal paid troll got his feeling hurt because
he didn't get paid by not getting a direct reply

Did my "direct reply" get you angry enough to post back to me and call me a "troll"?

And just think little man ... I'm just getting started with you here!

Question: If "poor liberal trolls" like me can tear you and all your pathetic excuses to shreds on here ... what does that say about you?

Got an answer?

Post it so I can rip you up again!

[Largelanguage]

Reagan was a MENACE wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm thinking you might need 2 hours to watch 60 Minutes now.
Nobody said he WASN'T emotionally troubled, moron.
Did you not GET how I already destroyed that bullshit the last time you posted it on here?
I'll re-post the part in question AGAIN .. just for you.
Why? Because you're obviously so stuck on stupid that you need it posted TWICE to you.
There's plenty of people who get abused as children who DON'T take an assault rifle to the nearest grade school, point it at innocent children, pull the trigger and kill 20 of them, moron.
There's plenty of people who are emotionally troubled who DON'T take an assault rifle to the nearest grade school, point it at innocent children, pull the trigger and kill 20 of them, moron.
FACT: Getting "abused as a child" or being "emotionally troubled" doesn't automatically make a 20 kids die of gunshot wounds from assault rifles at a local grade school. You need to add something else REALLY LETHAL to the equation there, moron.
It was 1) Pointing an assault rifle ... 2) at children in a grade school and 3) pulling the trigger .. that DIRECTLY caused it, moron.
AGAIN, here's how simple it is to figure that out ...
Ready?
If you take away ANY of the three numbered items above from that "abused" or "emotionally troubled" kid? Guess what, moron?
"IT" DOESN'T HAPPEN!
And the kid ends up being another abused kid, with a whackjob mother ... who DOESN'T go on a shooting rampage at Sandy Hook Elementary School on December 14th, 2012.
Did you get it that time, moron?
And if anyone had taken guns out of this household BEFORE it happened? I GUARANTEE YOU that you and your POS, gun-rights buddies would have screamed how a "100% law abiding, flag-waving patriot was victimized for just exercising his Constitutionally-protected right to have guns!"
Isn't that right, moron? Care to answer that question without lying your ass off?
I'll bet you won't!

Fool! If we help kids who are psychologically damaged it will prevent cases like this. And people still need guns. And why not have armed guards in schools? What is wrong with that?

[Largelanguage]

Reagan was a MENACE wrote:

<quoted text>
Your incorrect spelling on the most basic of words shows that you have zero education. And that's probably one of your good points!
Let's revisit the list:
1) Again, you don't need ASSAULT WEAPONS for that, moron.
You lose!
2) Again, armed guards ... in GRADE SCHOOLS ... because there's TOO MANY PEOPLE OUT THERE WITH GUNS that can shoot kids with those guns? And now you're blaming feminists for your lack of testicles and hurt feelings, moron? No wonder you're still single.
You lose!
3) You don't need ASSAULT WEAPONS for any of that. And I notice you never answered the question about WHAT KIND of research, moron.
You lose!
It's too bad someone can't go back in time and gun down your parents before they burdened everyone by having you.
Try again ...
See, every time you repeat the same previously discredited answers, I'll repeat the same response to them.
Get the pattern yet?
Still waiting on a logical reason why you NEED those ASSAULT WEAPONS if you're not in the military, a police officer, or part of a "well-regulated militia".

You poor child! What makes you think you're so special? You always insult people and call people less fortunate than you weak! Boys in schools are being called cocky and trying to act "all tough and top shit like" when really they are insecure inside, and feminists deny this, and when boys lack attention from the state, feminists lie and say girls do, and try to cover up and pretend the boys are just selfish pigs who don't smile for thou mother cares for them. Poor child! Is this how you deal with your emotional pains? You try to dry yourself emotionally and confuse yourself, rather than letting your emotions flow? Poor child!

[Reagan was a MENACE]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
Fool! If we help kids who are psychologically damaged it will prevent cases like this. And people still need guns. And why not have armed guards in schools? What is wrong with that?

That's not an answer to my question, moron.

I'll ask again:

If anyone had taken guns out of this kid's household BEFORE it happened I GUARANTEE YOU that you and your POS, gun-rights buddies would have screamed how a "100% law abiding, flag-waving patriot was victimized for just exercising his Constitutionally-protected right to have guns!"

Isn't that right, moron?

Care to answer that question without lying your ass off?

Again, I'll bet you won't!

[Reagan was a MENACE]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
You poor child! What makes you think you're so special? You always insult people and call people less fortunate than you weak! Boys in schools are being called cocky and trying to act "all tough and top shit like" when really they are insecure inside, and feminists deny this, and when boys lack attention from the state, feminists lie and say girls do, and try to cover up and pretend the boys are just selfish pigs who don't smile for thou mother cares for them. Poor child! Is this how you deal with your emotional pains? You try to dry yourself emotionally and confuse yourself, rather than letting your emotions flow? Poor child!

That's not an answer to my question, moron.

I'll ask again - for the 3rd time:

If anyone had taken guns out of this kid's household BEFORE it happened I GUARANTEE YOU that you and your POS, gun-rights buddies would have screamed how a "100% law abiding, flag-waving patriot was victimized for just exercising his Constitutionally-protected right to have guns!"

Isn't that right, moron?

Care to answer that question without lying your ass off?

Again, I'll bet you won't!

[Quick Draw McGraw]

Dick Cheney says we need guns to protect ourselves. If you disagree with him he'll shoot you in the face. I have proof.

[Largelanguage]

Reagan was a MENACE wrote:

<quoted text>
That's not an answer to my question, moron.
I'll ask again - for the 3rd time:
If anyone had taken guns out of this kid's household BEFORE it happened I GUARANTEE YOU that you and your POS, gun-rights buddies would have screamed how a "100% law abiding, flag-waving patriot was victimized for just exercising his Constitutionally-protected right to have guns!"
Isn't that right, moron?
Care to answer that question without lying your ass off?
Again, I'll bet you won't!

He has no right to steal.

[HEY LARGE MOUTH]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
He was emotionally troubled you pillack, HE EVEN SHOT HIMSELF!

WHAT THE HELL IS A PILLAK?? WANT TO KNOW WHAT YOUR MAMMA DID TO HER SELF LAST NIGH? CALL ME DADDY !

[Reagan was a MENACE]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
He has no right to steal.

That's not an answer to my question, moron.

What;s the matter? Afraid to answer the question because it'll expose you for what you obviously are?

I'll ask again, again, again ...

If anyone had taken guns out of this kid's household BEFORE it happened I GUARANTEE YOU that you and your POS, gun-rights buddies would have screamed how a "100% law abiding, flag-waving patriot was victimized for just exercising his Constitutionally-protected right to have guns!"

Isn't that right, moron?

Care to answer that question without lying your ass off?

Again, I'll bet you won't!

That's THREE cut-and-runs from my question there ... and counting.

[Reagan was a MENACE]

HEY LARGE MOUTH wrote:

<quoted text>WHAT THE HELL IS A PILLAK?? WANT TO KNOW WHAT YOUR MAMMA DID TO HER SELF LAST NIGH? CALL ME DADDY !

I DARE large mouth to call you "Daddy!" and smell your finger!

[HEY LARGE MOUTH]

Reagan was a MENACE wrote:

<quoted text>
I DARE large mouth to call you "Daddy!" and smell your finger!

NOW THATS SOME FUNNY SHIT ...CALL ME DADDY !!

[Largelanguage]

Reagan was a MENACE wrote:

<quoted text>
That's not an answer to my question, moron.
What;s the matter? Afraid to answer the question because it'll expose you for what you obviously are?
I'll ask again, again, again ...
If anyone had taken guns out of this kid's household BEFORE it happened I GUARANTEE YOU that you and your POS, gun-rights buddies would have screamed how a "100% law abiding, flag-waving patriot was victimized for just exercising his Constitutionally-protected right to have guns!"
Isn't that right, moron?
Care to answer that question without lying your ass off?
Again, I'll bet you won't!
That's THREE cut-and-runs from my question there ... and counting.

I don't even know what you are talking about. But yet again no one probably does lol.

[HEY LARGE MOUTH]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't even know what you are talking about. But yet again no one probably does lol.

cause your a dumb ass--CALL ME DADDY !!

[wayne easton]

to whom Reagan was a menace, you call everyone on here a moron, and uneducated, but your sociopathic style of debate proves that in fact YOU are the one without a formal education, because true ACADEMICS do not engage in the juvenile banter in which you attack others personally. Why? Because in academic circles, you would be laughed at for using so many formally recognized fallacies of logic. Your small mind betrays your lies and your claims to be "educated". It is obvious that you have no education past 12th grade,if even that. If you were to use the same strategies in a paper, you would get an "F". Your own words prove that you are the UNEDUCATED.

[wayne easton]

To the communist to whom Reagan was a menace,here is your logical reason for owning "assault" weapons. IF you had been educated in history, you would know that Stalin killed @60 MILLION, Mao killed @25 MILLION, Pol Pot killed @2 MILLION, all in the name of your beloved COMMUNISM. If you were educated, you would know that the United States is UNIQUE in the world, in that We the people, WITH FIREARMS, are the sovereign of this REPUBLIC. This nation, this land, and this Republic are OURS. It is not owned by the GOVERNMENT. We need these firearms and their necessary drums and magazines of high capacity so that sociopathic people like you, a communist, are never able to separate us from our rights, which NO MAJORITY, can do. This is a REPUBLIC, NOT A DEMOCRACY. You talk about "gunning down" the other poster's parents!!!
You prove my point every time you post. Even Democrats on here can tell that YOU ARE just as disturbed as any potential "shooter". Please go to a doctor and show them your posts, before you lose it.